Stuck in the Process, Facilitating Nothing? Justice, Capabilities and Planning for Value-Led Outcomes

REFERENCES

• Ambrose, P. (1986) Whatever Happened to Planning? (London: Methuen)
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, H. (2006) Just planning: The art of situated ethical judgement, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 26(1), pp. 92–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, H. & Marshall, R. (2005) Professionalism and planning in Britain, Town Planning Review, 76(2), pp. 191–214.
   Google Scholar
• Casey, R. & Allen, C. (2004) Social housing managers and the performance ethos: Towards a ‘professional project of the self’, Work, Employment and Society, 18(3), pp. 395–412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Causer, G. & Exworthy, M. (1999) Professionals as managers across the public sector, in: M.Exworthy & S.Halford (Eds) Professionals and the New Managerialism in the Public Sector, 2002 Edition, pp. 83–101 (Buckingham: Open University Press)
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, J. & Newman, J. (1997) The Managerial State (London: Sage)
   Google Scholar
• Conservatives (2010) Open Source Planning Green Paper, Policy Paper 14. Available at http://www.conservatives.com/NNSnZ/∼/media/Files/Green%20Papers/planning-green-paper.ashx (last accessed 20th December 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Dent, M. & Whitehead, S. (2003) Managing Professional Identities: Knowledge, Performativities and the ‘New’ Professional (London: Routledge)
   Google Scholar
• Durkheim, E. (1957) Professional Ethics and Civic Morals[translated (from the French) by Cornelia Brookfield] (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul)
   Google Scholar
• Evans, B. (1993) Why we no longer need a planning profession, Planning Practice and Research, 8(1), pp. 9–15.
   Google Scholar
• Fainstein, S. (2005) Planning theory and the city, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 25, pp. 121–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fainstein, S. (2010) The Just City (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press)
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. (2001) Making Social Science Matter: Why Social Inquiry Fails and How It Can Succeed Again (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. (2006) Five misunderstandings about case study research, Qualitative Inquiry, 12, pp. 219–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fogelsong, R. (1986) Planning the Capitalist City (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press)
   Google Scholar
• Furbey, R., Reid, B. & Cole, I. (2001) Housing professionalism in the United Kingdom: The final curtain or a new age?Housing Theory and Society, 18, pp. 36–49.
   Google Scholar
• Halford, S. & Exworthy, M. (1999) Professionals and managers in a changing public sector: Conflict compromise and change, in: M.Exworthy & S.Halford (Eds) Professionals and the New Managerialism in the Public Sector, 2002 Edition,pp. 1–16 (Buckingham: Open University Press)
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (1997) Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan)
   Google Scholar
• Huxley, M. & Yiftachel, O. (2000) New paradigm or old myopia? Unsettling the communicative turn in planning theory, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 19, pp. 333–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inch, A. (2009) Planning at the crossroads again: Re-evaluating street-level regulation of the contradictions in new labour's planning reforms, Planning Practice and Research, 24(1), pp. 83–101.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J. (1961) The Death and Life of Great American Cities (London: Penguin)
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, T. (1972) Professions and Power (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan)
   Google Scholar
• Kirkpatrick, I., Ackroyd, S. & Walker, R. (2005) The New Managerialism and Public Service Professions (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan)
   Google Scholar
• Larson, M. (1977) The Rise of Professionalism: A Sociological Analysis (Berkeley: University of California Press)
   Google Scholar
• Macdonald, K. (1995) The Sociology of the Professions (London: Sage)
   Google Scholar
• Mckay, S., Murray, M. & Macintyre, S. (2012) Justice as fairness in planning policy-making, International Planning Studies, 17(2), pp. 147–162.
   Google Scholar
• Millerson, G. (1964) The Qualifying Associations: A Study in Professionalisation (London: Routledge)
   Google Scholar
• Newman, J. (2001) Modernising Governance: New Labour, Policy and Society (London: Sage)
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M. (2001) Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
   Google Scholar
• Olsen, E. & Sayer, A. (2009) Radical geography and its critical standpoints: Embracing the normative, Antipode, 41(1), pp. 180–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsons, T. (1954) Essays in Sociological Theory (New York: Free Press)
   Google Scholar
• Purcell, M. (2009) Resisting neoliberalization: Communicative planning or counter-hegemonic movements?Planning Theory, 8(2), pp. 140–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reade, E. (1997) Planning in the future or planning for the future? in: A.Blowers & B.Evans (Eds) Town Planning into the Twenty-First Century, pp. 71–103 (London: Routledge)
   Google Scholar
• Sager, T. (2009) Planners' role: Torn between dialogical ideals and neo-liberal realities, European Planning Studies, 17(1), pp. 65–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandercock, L. (1998) Towards Cosmopolis (Chichester: Wiley)
   Google Scholar
• Sandercock, L. (2003) Cosmopolis II- Mongrel Cities in the Twenty-first Century (London: Continuum)
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, N. (1998) Urban Planning Theory Since 1945 (London: Sage)
   Google Scholar
• Tewdwr-Jones, M. & Allmendinger, P. (1998) Deconstructing communicative rationality: A critique of Habermasian collaborative planning, Environment and Planning A, 30(11), pp. 1975–1989.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Upton, R. (2002) Planning praxis-ethics, value and theory, Town Planning Review, 73(3), pp. 253–269.
   Google Scholar