Planners' Technical Expertise: Changing Paradigms and Practices in the Italian Experience

REFERENCES

• Alexander, E. R. (2000) Rationality revisited: Planning paradigms in a post-modernist perspective, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 19(3), pp. 242–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander, E. R. (2002) The public interest in planning: From legitimation to substantive plan evaluation, Planning Theory, 1(3), pp. 226–249.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, E. R. (2008) The role of knowledge in planning, Planning Theory, 7(2), pp. 207–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander, E. R. (2010) Introduction: Does planning theory affects practice, and if so, how?Planning Theory, 9(2), pp. 99–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allmendinger, P. (2009) Planning Theory, 2nd ed. (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan)
   Google Scholar
• Amin, A. & Thrift, N. (1995) Globalisation, institutional ‘thickness’ and the local economy, in: P.Healey, S.Cameron & S.Davoudi (Eds) Managing Cities: The New Urban Context, pp. 91–108 (Chichester, UK: Wiley)
   Google Scholar
• Balducci, A. (2011) Planning the changing city, in: A.Balducci, V.Fedeli & G.Pasqui (Eds) Strategic Planning for Contemporary Urban Regions. City of Cities: A Project for Milan, pp. 27–36 (Farnham: Ashgate)
   Google Scholar
• Balducci, A., Fedeli, V. & Pasqui, G. (Eds) (2011) Strategic Planning for Contemporary Urban Regions. City of Cities: A Project for Milan (Farnham and Burlington, VT: Ashgate)
   Google Scholar
• Bobbio, L. & Dansero, E. (2008) The TAV and the valle di Susa: Competing Geographies (Torino: Allemandi)
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, H. (2010) The idea of planning: Alive or dead—who cares?Planning Theory & Practice, 11(4), pp. 471–475.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, H. (2012a) ‘Planning ethics’ and rediscovering the idea of planning, Planning Theory, 11(4), pp. 379–399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, H. (2012b) Planning to change the world: Between knowledge and action lies synthesis, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 32(2), pp. 135–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, H. & Marshall, R. (1998) Acting on principle: Dilemmas in planning practice, Planning Practice and Research, 13(2), pp. 117–128.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, H. & Marshall, R. (2000a) Moral obligations, planning, and the public interest: A commentary on current British practice, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 27(2), pp. 297–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, H. & Marshall, R. (2000b) Public involvement and planning: Looking beyond the one and the many, International Planning Studies, 5(3), pp. 321–344.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, H. & Marshall, R. (2002) Justification for planning utilitarianism's bad breath? A re-evaluation of the public interest, Planning Theory, 1(2), pp. 163–187.
   Google Scholar
• CEC (Commission of the European Communities) (1997) The EU Compendium of Spatial Planning Systems and Policies, Regional Development Studies 28, European Commission, Luxembourg.
   Google Scholar
• Centro Studi Consiglio Nazionale Ingegneri (2011) 1° Rapporto sugli ingegneri in Italia, 17 febbraio 2011, Teatro Caprinica, Roma. Available at www.centrostudicni.it/index.php/aree-tematiche/mercato-del-lavoro/item/1008-1%C2%B0-rapporto-sugli-ingegneri-in-italia (accessed 1 October 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Crosta, P. L. (Ed.) (1973) L'urbanista di parte: ruolo sociale del tecnico e partizione popolare nei processi di pianificazione urbana (Milano: F. Angeli)
   Google Scholar
• Crosta, P. L. (1996) Istituzionalizzare l'interazione sociale in pratiche professionali? [To institutionalize social interaction in professional practices?], Urbanistica, 106, pp. 111–115. English summary, pp. 216–217.
   Google Scholar
• Colavitti, A. M., Usai, N. & Bonfiglioli, S. (2013) Urban planning in Italy: The future of urban general plan and governance, European Planning Studies, 21(2), pp. 167–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, J. S. (1988) Social capital in the creation of human capital, The American Journal of Sociology, 94, pp. S95–S120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CSAPPC (Centro Studi Architetti, Pianificatori, Paesaggisti, Conservatori)-Cresme Ricerche (2013) Rapporto 2013 sulla professione di Architetto. Available at www.awn.it/AWN/Engine/RAServeFile.php/f/Documenti%20CNAPPC/Rapporto_annuale_2013_1.pdf (accessed 1 October 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Davoudi, S. (2010, July) Planning and interdisciplinarity: in: A.Geppert & G.Cotella (Eds) Quality Issues in a Consolidating European Higher Education Area, Planning Education, No. 2, pp. 33–35 (Reims: AESOP)
   Google Scholar
• Davoudi, S. & Ellison, P. (2006) Bologna Survey 2006: Implications of the Bologna Process for Planning Education in Europe: Results of the 2006 Survey, Produced by Oxford Brookes University, Department of Planning on Behalf of AESOP (UK: AESOP/The Association of European Schools of Planning)
   Google Scholar
• ECTP-CEU (2003) The New Charter of Athens 2003: The European Council of Town Planners' Vision for Cities in the 21st Century. Available at www.ceu-ectp.eu/index.php?option = com_content&view = article&id = 85&Itemid = 118 (accessed 1 October 2013).
   Google Scholar
• ESPON (2007) Project 2.3.2, Governance of Territorial and Urban Policies from EU to Local Level, ESPON Final Report, Luxembourg. Available at http://www.espon.eu/export/sites/default/Documents/Projects/ESPON2006Projects/PolicyImpactProjects/Governance/fr-2.3.2_final_feb2007.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Fabbro, S. & Mesolella, A. (2010) Multilevel spatial visions and territorial cohesion: Italian regional planning between the TEN-T corridors, ESDP polycentrism and governmental ‘strategic platforms’, Planning Practice and Research, 25(1), pp. 25–48.
   Google Scholar
• Fainstein, S. S. (2000) New directions in planning theory, Urban Affairs Review, 35(4), pp. 451–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faludi, A. (1973) Planning Theory (Oxford: Pergamon Press)
   Google Scholar
• Fürst, D. (2009) Planning cultures en route to a better comprehension of ‘planning processes’?, in: J.Knieling & F.Othengrafen (Eds) Planning Cultures in Europe: Decoding Cultural Phenomena in Urban and Regional Planning, pp. 23–38 (Farnham and Burlington, VT: Ashgate)
   Google Scholar
• Gelli, F. (2001) Planning systems in Italy within the context of new processes of ‘regionalization’, International Planning Studies, 6(2), pp. 183–197.
   Google Scholar
• Geppert, A. (2008) EU regulation on the recognition of professional qualifications: State of the art, issues at stake, in: A.Geppert & R.Verhage (Eds) Towards a European Recognition for the Planning Profession, Planning Education, No. 1, pp. 13–18 (Reims: AESOP)
   Google Scholar
• Geppert, A. (2010, July) Making use of the Dublin descriptors of academic quality, in: A.Geppert & G.Cotella (Eds) Quality Issues in a Changing European Higher Education Area, Planning Education, No. 2, pp. 69–74 (Reims: AESOP)
   Google Scholar
• Geppert, A. & Cotella, G. (2010, July) Quality Issues in a Changing European Higher Education Area, Planning Education, No. 2 (Reims: AESOP)
   Google Scholar
• Geppert, A. & Verhage, R. (Eds) (2008) Towards a European Recognition for the Planning Profession, Planning Education, No. 1 (Reims: AESOP)
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, H. A. & Carmin, J. A. (2006) Compact, diffuse, or would-be discipline?: Assessing cohesion in planning scholarship, 1963–2002, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 26(1), pp. 66–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Governa, F. & Saccomani, S. (2004) From urban renewal to local development: New conceptions and governance practices in the Italian peripheries, Planning Theory & Practice, 5(3), pp. 327–348.
   Google Scholar
• Governa, F. & Salone, C. (2004) Territories in action, territories for action: The territorial dimension of Italian local development policies, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 28(4), pp. 796–818.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Governa, F. & Salone, C. (2005) Italy and European spatial policies: Polycentrism, urban networks and local innovation practices, European Planning Studies, 13(2), pp. 265–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S. (2001) The city as sociotechnical process: Networked mobilities and urban inequalities, City, 5(3), pp. 339–349.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (1997) Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies (Hampshire: Macmillan)
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (1998) Building capacity through collaborative approaches to urban planning, Environment and Planning A, 30(9), pp. 1531–1546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janin Rivolin, U. (2010) Spatial units for EU territorial governance: Findings from a study on north-western Italy, European Planning Studies, 18(2), pp. 299–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayo, J. M. & Johnson, B. J. (n.d.) A Role Dynamic Theory of Planning. Available at http://www.sadp.ku.edu/sites/default/files/A%20Role%20Dynamics%20Theory%20of%20Planning.pdf (accessed 1 October 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Mazza, L. (2002) Technical knowledge and planning actions, Planning Theory, 1(1), pp. 11–26.
   Google Scholar
• Mazza, L. (2009) Milano, in: E.Piroddi & A.Cappuccitti (Eds) Il nuovo manuale di urbanistica, Vol. III, Lo stato della pianificazione urbana in Italia. 20 città a confronto, pp. 24–45 (Roma: Gruppo Mancosu Editore)
   Google Scholar
• Micelli, E. (2002) Development rights markets to manage urban plans in Italy, Urban Studies, 39(1), pp. 141–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pasqui, G. (2011) The changing urban agenda, in: A.Balducci, V.Fedeli & G.Pasqui (Eds) Strategic Planning for Contemporary Urban Regions. City of Cities: A Project for Milan, pp. 56–65 (Farnham and Burlington, VT: Ashgate)
   Google Scholar
• Piccinato, G. (2010) A brief history of Italian town planning after 1945, Town Planning Review, 81(3), pp. 237–259.
   Google Scholar
• Ponzini, D. (2008, December) New Italian perspectives on urban planning: A policy tool approach, Planum. Available at www.planum.net/new-italian-perspectives-on-urban-planning-a-policy-tool-approach (accessed 1 October 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. D. (2000) Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community (New York: Simon & Schuster)
   Google Scholar
• Rydin, Y. (2007) Re-examining the role of knowledge within planning theory, Planning Theory, 6(1), pp. 52–60.
   Google Scholar
• Salet, W. & Finka, M. (2010, July) Towards a system of quality assurance for planning schools: The policy of AESOP, in: A.Geppert & G.Cotella (Eds) Quality Issues in a Changing European Higher Education Area, Planning Education, No. 2, pp. 49–54 (Reims: AESOP)
   Google Scholar
• Salone, C. (2010) Institutional arrangements and political mobilization in the new Italian regionalism: The role of spatial policies in the piedmont region, European Planning Studies, 18(8), pp. 1207–1226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scattoni, P. & Falco, E. (2011) Why Italian planning is worth studying, IJPP - Italian Journal of Planning Practice, 1(1), pp. 4–32.
   Google Scholar
• Scattoni, P. & Falco, E. (2012) The hidden factor in planning and local politics in Italy: The case of Tuscany, Town Planning Review, 83(1), pp. 47–67.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D. A. (1983) The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action (New York: Basic Books)
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D. A. (1987) Educating the Reflective Practitioner (San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass)
   Google Scholar
• Servillo, A. L. (2011) Urban policy and the objective of territorial cohesion in Europe: Contemporary strategies and future challenges from an Italian perspective, in: R.Atkinson & C.Rossignolo (Eds) The Re-creation of the European City: Governance, Territory & Policentricity, pp. 39–64 (Amsterdam: Techne)
   Google Scholar
• Siemiatycki, M. (2012) The role of the planning scholar: Research, conflict and social change, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 32(2), pp. 147–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tira, M., van der Krabben, E. & Zanon, B. (Eds) (2011) Land Management for Urban Dynamics: Innovative Methods and Practices in a Changing Europe, Cost Action TU0602 (Rimini: Maggioli Editore)
   Google Scholar
• Tira, M. & Zanon, B. (2011) Land regimes and planning systems for urban containment in Italy, in: M.Tira, E.van der Krabben & B.Zanon (Eds) Land Management for Urban Dynamics. Innovative Methods and Practices in a Changing Europe, Cost Action TU0602, pp. 137–152 (Rimini: Maggioli Editore)
   Google Scholar
• Trigilia, C. (2001) Social capital and local development, European Journal of Social Theory, 4(4), pp. 427–442.
   Google Scholar
• van der Kamp, H. & Ó Ceallaigh, D. (2013) Towards mutual recognition: Planning practices and education in Europe. Paper presented at AESOP-ACSP Joint Congress, Dublin, 15–19 July.
   Google Scholar
• Vettoretto, L. (2009) Planning cultures in Italy – Reformism, laissez-faire and contemporary trends, in: J.Knieling & F.Othengrafen (Eds) Planning Cultures in Europe: Decoding Cultural Phenomena in Urban and Regional Planning, pp. 189–203 (Farnham and Burlington, VT: Ashgate)
   Google Scholar
• Vigar, G. (2012) Planning and professionalism: Knowledge, judgment and expertise in English planning, Planning Theory, 11(4), pp. 361–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogelij, J. (2008) ECTP perspective: A common platform of professional standards in 2010? in: A.Geppert & R.Verhage (Eds) Towards a European Recognition for the Planning Profession, Planning Education, No. 1, pp. 5–6 (Reims: AESOP)
   Google Scholar
• Watson, V. (2002) Do we learn from planning practice? The contribution of the practice movement to planning theory, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 22(2), pp. 178–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zanon, B. (2011) Infrastructure network development, re-territorialization processes and multilevel territorial governance: A case study in northern Italy, Planning Practice and Research, 26(3), pp. 325–347.
   Google Scholar