Private Sector-led Urban Development Projects: Comparative Insights from Planning Practices in the Netherlands and the UK

References

• Adams, D., & Tiesdell, S. (2010) Planners as market actors: Rethinking state–market relations in land and property, Planning Theory & Practice, 11(2), pp. 187–207.
   Google Scholar
• Adams, D., & Tiesdell, S. (2013) Shaping Places: Urban Planning, Design and Development (London: Routledge)
   Google Scholar
• Adams, D., Watkins, C., & White, M. (2005) Planning, Public Policy & Property Markets (Oxford: Blackwell)
   Google Scholar
• Agranoff, R., & McGuire, M. (2001) Big questions in public network management research, Journal of Public Administration and Theory, 11(3), pp. 295–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander, E. R. (2001) Why planning vs. markets is an oxymoron: Asking the right question, Planning and Markets, 4(1). Available at http://www-pam.usc.edu/volume4/v4i1a2s1.html (accessed 13 June 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Alter, C., & Hage, J. (1993) Organizations Working Together (Newbury Park, CA: Sage)
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, N., Barker, A., & MacDonald, K. (1995) Partnership Agencies in British Urban Policy (London: UCL Press)
   Google Scholar
• Ball, M., & Maginn, P. J. (2005) Urban change and conflict: Evaluating the role of partnerships in urban regeneration in the UK, Housing Studies, 20(1), pp. 9–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boelens, L. (2010a) Planologie extended: Naar een nieuwe toekomst van ruimtelijk openbaar bestuur [Planning extended: Towards a new future of spatial public administration], in: H.Dijstelbloem, P.den Hoed, J. W.Holtslag & S.Schouten (Eds) Het gezicht van de publieke zaak: Openbaar bestuur onder ogen [The Face of the Public Good], pp. 185–204 (Den Haag/Amsterdam: WRR/Amsterdam University Press)
   Google Scholar
• Boelens, L. (2010b) Theorizing practice and practising theory: Outlines for an actor-relational-approach in planning, Planning Theory, 9(1), pp. 28–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booth, P. (2003) Planning by Consent: The Origins and Nature of British Development Control (London: Routledge)
   Google Scholar
• Bruijn, J. A., & ten Heuvelhof, E. F. (1999) Management in Netwerken (Utrecht: Lemma)
   Google Scholar
• Bruil, A. W. (2011) Management Thoughts and Practices (Delft: Delft University of Technology)
   Google Scholar
• Buitelaar, E. (2007) The Costs of Land Use Decisions: Applying Transaction Cost Economics to Planning and Development (Oxford: Blackwell)
   Google Scholar
• Buitelaar, E. (2010) Cracks in the myth: Challenges to land policy in the Netherlands, TESG, 101(3), pp. 49–356.
   Google Scholar
• Bult-Spiering, M., & DeWulf, G. (2006) Strategic Issues in Public–Private Partnerships: An International Perspective (Oxford: Blackwell)
   Google Scholar
• Burie, J. B. (ed.) (1978) Handboek Bouwen en Wonen [Handbook Construction and Housing] (Deventer: Van Loghum Slaterus)
   Google Scholar
• Carley, M., Chapman, M., Hastings, A., Kirk, K., & Young, R. (2000) Urban Regeneration Through Partnership: A Study in Nine Regions in England, Scotland and Wales (Bristol: The Policy Press)
   Google Scholar
• Coulson, A., & Wright, G. (2013) Brindleyplace, Birmingham: Creating an inner city mixed-use development in times of recession, Planning Practice & Research, 28(2), pp. 256–274.
   Google Scholar
• Cullingworth, B., & Nadin, V. (2006) Town and Country Planning in the UK, 14th ed. (London: Routledge)
   Google Scholar
• Daamen, T. (2010) Strategy as Force: Towards Effective Strategies for Urban Development Projects—The Case of Rotterdam City Ports (Amsterdam: IOS Press)
   Google Scholar
• de Jonge, H. (2012) The entrepreneurial city, Archis (English Edition), 34(4), pp. 115–117.
   Google Scholar
• de Leeuw, A. C. J. (2002) Bedrijfskundig Management: Primair Proces, Strategie en Organisatie [Business and Administrative Management: Primary Process, Strategy and Organisation] (Assen: Koninklijke van Gorcum)
   Google Scholar
• de Zeeuw, W. C. T. F., & Hobma, F. A. M. (2008) Leren van de Engelse praktijk van gebiedsontwikkeling [Learning from the English urban development practice], Building Business, 4, pp. 16–19.
   Google Scholar
• Deloitte (2008) Alleen ga je sneller samen kom je verder: De toekomst van publiek–private samenwerking bij gebiedsontwikkeling [You go faster alone but together you go further: The future of public–private partnerships in urban development] (Rotterdam: Veenman Drukkers)
   Google Scholar
• Deloitte (2010) Financiële effecten crisis bij gemeentelijke grondbedrijven [Financial effects of the crisis on public land development companies] (Utrecht: Deloitte Real Estate Advisory)
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2004) Green Paper, Article 60: 20 (Brussels: European Commission)
   Google Scholar
• Franzen, A., Hobma, F. A. M., De Jonge, H., & Wigmans, G. (2011) Management of Urban Development Processes in the Netherlands: Governance, Design, Feasibility (Amsterdam: Techne Press)
   Google Scholar
• Gijzen, M. H. M. (2009) Zonder loslaten geen concessie: Inzicht in de recente toepassing van deze publiek–private samenwerkingsvorm in de Nederlandse gebiedsontwikkelingspraktijk met ‘evidence-based’ verbetervoorstellen [No concession with management control: Insight in recent applications of public–private concession partnerships in the Dutch urban development practice with evidence-based proposals for improvement], Thesis, Erasmus University Rotterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Hackworth, J. (2007) The Neoliberal City: Governance, Ideology and Development in American Urbanism (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press)
   Google Scholar
• Hanf, K. I. & Scharpf, F. W. (Eds) (1978) Interorganizational Policy Making: Limits to Coordination and Central Control (London: Sage)
   Google Scholar
• Harms, E. (2008) We zijn steeds bezig met het ontwerpen van een maatpak: Veranderende rollen bij gebiedsontwikkeling [We are constantly designing a custom-made suit: Changing roles in urban development], Real Estate Magazine, MCD Special, pp. 10–14.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (2006) Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies (Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan)
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, S. (2010) Developer collaboration in urban land development: Partnership working in Paddington, London, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 28(1), pp. 165–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heurkens, E. W. T. M. (2008) The Anglo-Saxon western wind: Repositioning the management of urban area development in the Netherlands, BOSS Magazine, 34, pp. 54–58.
   Google Scholar
• Heurkens, E. W. T. M. (2009) Changing public and private roles in urban area development in the Netherlands, in: J.Rosemann, L.Qu & D.Sepúlveda (Eds) The NEW Urban Question: Urbanism Beyond Neo-Liberalism, pp. 344–355 (Rotterdam: International Forum on Urbanism)
   Google Scholar
• Heurkens, E. W. T. M. (2010) Private sector-led urban development, Real Estate Research Quarterly, 9(2), pp. 29–34.
   Google Scholar
• Heurkens, E. W. T. M. (2012) Private Sector-led Urban Development Projects: Management, Partnerships & Effects in the Netherlands and the UK (Delft: A+BE)
   Google Scholar
• Heurkens, E. W. T. M. (2013) Een nieuwe rolverdeling: Privaat ‘in the lead’, publiek faciliteert, VHV Bulletin, July, pp. 14–15.
   Google Scholar
• Heurkens, E. W. T. M., Hobma, F. A. M., & de Zeeuw, W. C. T. F. (2008) Gebiedsconcessie: Een omstreden nieuwkomer [Urban development concessions: A controversial newcomer], Ruimtelijke Ontwikkeling Magazine, 10, pp. 12–15.
   Google Scholar
• Hillier, J. (2002) Shadows of Power: An Allegory of Prudence in Land use Planning (London: Routledge)
   Google Scholar
• Hobma, F. A. M. (2011) Successful urban area development, in: A.Franzen, F. A. M.Hobma, H.de Jonge & G.Wigmans (Eds) Management of Urban Development Processes in the Netherlands, pp. 219–235 (Amsterdam: TechnePress)
   Google Scholar
• Hobma, F. A. M., Louw, E., Spaans, M., & van der Veen, M. (2008) Leren van de Engelse gebiedsontwikkelingspraktijk [Learning from the English urban development practice] (Delft: Faculteit Bouwkunde/Onderzoeksinstituut OTB)
   Google Scholar
• Hodge, G., & Greve, C. (2005) The Challenge of Public Private Partnerships: Learning from International Experience (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar)
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C. (1991) A public management for all reasons, Public Administration, 69, pp. 3–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Interdepartementale Commissie Europees Recht (ICER) (2008) ICER rapport Auroux: De gevolgen van het arrest Auroux voor de gebiedsontwikkeling in Nederland [ICER Report Aroux: The consequences of the Aroux judgment for urban development in the Netherlands], October. (The Hague: ICER).
   Google Scholar
• Janssen-Jansen, L., & Woltjer, J. (2010) British discretion in Dutch planning: Establishing a comparative perspective for regional planning and local development in the Netherlands and the United Kingdom, Land Use Policy, 27, pp. 906–916.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kantor, P., & Savitch, H. V. (2005) How to study comparative urban development politics: A research note, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 29(1), pp. 135–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klijn, E. H., & Teisman, G. R. (2003) Institutional and strategic barriers to public–private partnership: An analysis of Dutch cases, Public Money & Management, 23(3), pp. 137–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kort, M. B. (2011) Perspectief op herstructurering: Een onderzoek naar het belang van organisatie en management van de wijkontwikkelingsmaatschappij [Perspective on Regeneration: A study on the importance of organization and management of the Urban Regeneration Company] (Boom: Den Haag)
   Google Scholar
• Mandell, M. P. (Ed.) (2001) Getting Results Through Collaboration: Networks and Network Structures for Public Policy and Management (Westport, CT: Quorum Books)
   Google Scholar
• Meier, K. J., & O'Toole, L. J. (2001) Managerial strategies and behaviour in networks: A model with evidence from U.S. public education, Journal of Public Administration and Theory, 11(3), pp. 271–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mekkes, P., Van der Valk, A., & Korthals Altes, W. (2012) The Netherlands spatial planning doctrine in disarray in the 21st century, Environment and Planning A, 44, pp. 377–395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muñoz Gielen, D. (2010) Capturing Value Increase in Urban Redevelopment: A Study of How the Economic Values Increase in Urban Redevelopment Can Be Used to Finance the Necessary Public Infrastructure and Other Facilities (Leiden: Sidestone Press)
   Google Scholar
• Nadin, V. (2011) International Comparison of Spatial Development and Planning: Four Models (Rotterdam: Presentation Master City Developer). November 9.
   Google Scholar
• Nadin, V., Short, M., Smith, N., & Askew, J. (2008) Development and Planning Processes in England. General paper for learning from English practices of area development, February 25 (Delft/Bristol: Delft University of Technology & University of the West of England)
   Google Scholar
• Needham, B. (2007) Dutch Land Use Planning: Planning and Managing Land Use in the Netherlands, the Principles and the Practice (Den Haag: Sdu Uitgevers)
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1992) Re-inventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector (Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley)
   Google Scholar
• Pollit, C., Talbot, C., Caulfield, J., & Smullen, D. (2004) Agencies: How Governments do Things Through Semi-autonomous Organizations (Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan)
   Google Scholar
• Spaans, M. (2005) Een nieuwe jas voor het Engelse planningsstelsel [A new coat for the English planning system], Nova Terra, 5(2), pp. 32–37.
   Google Scholar
• Squires, G., & Moate, J. (2012) Socially responsible property investment in urban regeneration: Priorities and behaviours of institutional investors in practice, Journal of Urban Regeneration and Renewal, 5(2), pp. 152–163.
   Google Scholar
• Teisman, G. R. (2001) Besluitvorming en Ruimtelijk Proces management [Decision-making and Spatial Process Management] (Delft: Eburon)
   Google Scholar
• Teisman, G. R., & Klijn, E. H. (2002) Partnership arrangements: Governmental rhetoric or governmental schemes?Public Administration, 62(2), pp. 189–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Krabben, E. (2011) Gebiedsontwikkeling in zorgelijke tijden: Kan de Nederlandse ruimtelijke ordening zichzelf nog wel bedruipen? [Urban development in worrisome times: Can Dutch spatial planning still survive?] (Nijmegen: Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen)
   Google Scholar
• van der Krabben, E., & Jacobs, H. M. (2013) Public land development as a strategic tool for redevelopment: Reflections on the Dutch experience, Land Use Policy, 20(1), pp. 774–783.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dijk, M. P. (2006) Managing Cities in Developing Countries: The Theory and Practice of Urban Management (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.)
   Google Scholar
• van Loon, P. P. J., Heurkens, E. W. T. M., & Bronkhorst, S. (2008) The Urban Decision Room: An Urban Management Instrument (Amsterdam: IOS Press)
   Google Scholar
• van Remmen, Y. (2012) Dutch planning and Asian business thinking: A new synergy?Archis (English Edition), 34(4), pp. 118–120.
   Google Scholar
• van Thiel, S. (2001) Quango's: Trends, Causes and Consequences (Ashgate: Aldershot)
   Google Scholar
• Wijnen, G., Renes, W., & Storm, P. (2004) Projectmatig Werken [Project-oriented Working] (Utrecht: Het Spectrum)
   Google Scholar