2,076
Views
32
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Agenda

Plan Evaluation: Challenges and Directions for Future Research

&

References

  • Alexander, E. R. (2006) Evolution and status: Where is planning-evaluation today and how did it get here? in: E. R. Alexander (Ed) Evaluation in Planning: Evolution and Prospects, pp. 3–16 (Burlington, VT: Ashgate).
  • Alexander, E. R. (2011) Evaluating planning: What is successful planning and (how) can we measure it? in: A. Hull, E. R. Alexander, A. Khakee & J. Woltjer (Eds) Evaluation for Participation and Sustainability in Planning, pp. 32–46 (New York: Routledge).
  • Alexander, E. R., & Faludi, A. (1989) Planning and plan implementation: Notes on evaluation criteria, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 16, pp. 127–140.10.1068/b160127
  • Alkin, M. C. (2013) Evaluation Roots: A Wider Perspective of Theorists’ Views and Influences, 2nd ed. (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage).
  • Altes, W. K. R. (2006) Stagnation in housing production: Another success in the Dutch ‘planner’s paradise’? Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 33(1), pp. 97–114.10.1068/b31192
  • Baer, W. C. (1997) General plan evaluation criteria: An approach to making better plans, Journal of the American Planning Association, 63(3), pp. 329–344.10.1080/01944369708975926
  • Balsas, C. (2012) What about plan evaluation? Integrating Evaluation in Urban Planning Studios’ Pedagogy, Planning Practice & Research, 27(4), pp. 475–494.
  • Bell, J. (2004) Managing evaluation projects, in: J. Wholey, H. Hatry & K. Newcomer (Eds) Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation, 2nd ed. pp. 571–603 (San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass).
  • Berke, P., & Conroy, M. (2000) Are we planning for sustainable development? An evaluation of 30 comprehensive plans, Journal of the American Planning Association, 66(1), pp. 21–33.10.1080/01944360008976081
  • Berke, P., & Godschalk, D. (2009) Searching for the good plan: A meta-analysis of plan quality studies, Journal of Planning Literature, 23(3), pp. 227–240.10.1177/0885412208327014
  • Berke, P., Backhurst, M., Day, M., Ericksen, N., Laurian, I., Crawford, J., & Dixon, J. (2006) What makes plan implementation successful? An Evaluation of Local Plans and Implementation Practices in New Zealand, Environment and Planning B: Planning & Design, 33(4), pp. 581–600.
  • Berke, P. R., Godschalk, D. R., & Kaiser, E. J. (2006) Urban Land Use Planning, 5th ed. (Chicago, IL: UIC).
  • Berke, P., Smith, G., & Lyles, W. (2012) Planning for resiliency: Evaluation of state hazard mitigation plans under the disaster mitigation act, Natural Hazards Review, 13(2), pp. 139–149.10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000063
  • Berke, P., Spurlock, D., Hess, G., & Band, L. (2013) Local comprehensive plan quality and regional ecosystem protection: The case of the Jordan Lake watershed, North Carolina, USA, Land Use Policy, 31, pp. 450–459.10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.08.009
  • Bernstein, D. J. (2001) Local government measurement use to focus on performance and results, Evaluation and Program Planning, 24, pp. 95–101.10.1016/S0149-7189(00)00050-1
  • Blalock, A. B. (1999) Evaluation research and the performance management movement: From estrangement to useful integration? Evaluation, 5, pp. 117–149.10.1177/13563899922208887
  • Brody, S., & Highfield, W. (2005) Does planning work? Testing the implementation of local environmental planning in Florida, Journal of the American Planning Association, 71(2), pp. 159–175.
  • Brody, S. D., Godschalk, D. R., & Burby, R. J. (2003) Mandating citizen participation in plan making: Six strategic planning choices, Journal of the American Planning Association, 69(3), pp. 245–264.10.1080/01944360308978018
  • Brody, S., Highfield, W. E., & Thornton, S. (2006) Planning at the urban fringe: An examination of the factors influencing nonconforming development patterns in southern Florida, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 33, pp. 75–96.10.1068/b31093
  • Brousselle, A., & Champagne, F. (2011) Program theory evaluation: Logic analysis, Evaluation and Program Planning, 34(1), pp. 69–78.10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2010.04.001
  • Burby, R. J. (2003) Making plans that matter: Citizen involvement and government action, Journal of the American Planning Association, 69(1), pp. 33–49.10.1080/01944360308976292
  • Carmona, M., & Sieh, L. (2004) Measuring Quality in Planning: Managing the Performance Process (London: Spoon).
  • Carmona, M., & Sieh, L. (2005) Performance measurement innovation in English planning authorities, Planning Theory & Practice, 6(3), pp. 303–333.
  • Carmona, M., & Sieh, L. (2008) Performance measurement in planning – Towards a holistic view, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 26(2), pp. 428–454.10.1068/c62m
  • Caudle, S. (2004) Qualitative data analysis, in: J. Wholey, H. Hatry & K. Newcomer (Eds) Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation, pp. 417–438 (San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass).
  • Chouinard, J. A. (2013) The case for participatory evaluation in an era of accountability, American Journal of Evaluation, 34(2), pp. 237–253.10.1177/1098214013478142
  • Christensen, K. S. (2015) Both process and outcome are essential to planning, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 35(2), pp. 188–198.10.1177/0739456X14566277
  • Conroy, M. M., & Berke, P. R. (2004) What makes a good sustainable development plan? An analysis of factors that influence principles of sustainable development, Environment & Planning A, 36(8), pp. 1381–1396.
  • Cousins, J. B., Goh, S. C., Elliott, C., Aubry, T., & Gilbert, N. (2014) Government and voluntary sector differences in organizational capacity to do and use evaluation, Evaluation and Program Planning, 44(Complete), pp. 1–13.10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2013.12.001
  • Davidson, J. E. (2005) Evaluation Methodology Basics: The Nuts and Bolts of Sound Evaluation (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage).
  • Faludi, A. (2000) The performance of spatial planning, Planning Practice and Research, 15(4), pp. 299–318.10.1080/713691907
  • Faludi, A. (2006) Evaluating plans: The application of the European spatial development perspective, in: E. R. Alexander (Ed) Evaluation in Planning: Evolution and Prospects, pp. 119–143 (Burlington, VT: Ashgate).
  • Grob, G. (2004) Writing for impact, in: J. Wholey, H. Hatry, & K. Newcomer (Eds) Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation, pp. 604–627 (San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass).
  • Hoch, C. (2002) Evaluating plans pragmatically, Planning Theory, 1(1), pp. 53–75.10.1177/147309520200100104
  • Hoch, C. (2009) Planning craft: How planners compose plans, Planning Theory, 8(3), pp. 219–241.10.1177/1473095209105528
  • Hoch, C., Dalton, L., & So, F. (2000) The Practice of Local Government Planning, 3rd ed. (Washington, DC: ICMA).
  • Khakee, A. (2000) Reading plans as an exercise in evaluation, Evaluation, 6(2), pp. 119–136.10.1177/13563890022209172
  • Khakee, A. (2003) The emerging gap between evaluation research and practice, Evaluation, 9(3), pp. 340–352.10.1177/13563890030093007
  • Khakee, A., Hull, A., Miller, D., & Woltjer, J. (2008) Introduction: New principles in planning evaluation, in: A. Khakee, A. Hull, D. Miller, & J. Woltjer (Eds) New Principles in Planning Evaluation, pp. 1–13 (Burlington, VT: Ashgate).
  • Krizek, K., Forysth, A., & Slotterback, C. S. (2009) Is there a role for evidence-based practice in urban planning and policy? Planning Theory & Practice, 10(4), pp. 459–478.
  • Laurian, L., & Shaw, M. (2008) Evaluation of public participation: The practices of certified planners, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 28(3), pp. 293–309.10.1177/0739456X08326532
  • Laurian, L., Day, M., Berke, P., Ericksen, N., Backhurst, M., Crawford, J., & Dixon, J. (2004) Evaluating plan implementation: A conformance-based methodology, Journal of the American Planning Association, 70(4), pp. 471–480.10.1080/01944360408976395
  • Laurian, L., Crawford, J., Day, M., Kouwenhoven, P., Mason, G., Ericksen, N., & Beattie, L. (2010) Evaluating the outcomes of plans: Theory, practice, and methodology, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 37(4), pp. 740–757.10.1068/b35051
  • Leeuw, F. L., & Furubo, J. E. (2008) Evaluation systems: What are they and why study them? Evaluation, 14(2), pp. 157–169.10.1177/1356389007087537
  • Lichfield, N. (2000) Where do we go from here? Evaluation, 6(3), pp. 351–359.10.1177/13563890022209334
  • Lichfield, N. (2001) Where do we go from here? in: H. Voogd (Ed) Recent Developments in Evaluation, pp. 7–15 (Groningen: Geopress).
  • Lyles, W., & Stevens, M. (2014) Plan quality evaluation 1994–2012: Growth and contributions, limitations, and new directions, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 34(4), pp. 433–450.10.1177/0739456X14549752
  • McDavid, J. C., & Hawthorn, L. R. L. (2006) Performance Evaluation & Performance Measurement: An Introduction to Practice, 1st ed. (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage).
  • Mertens, D. (1998) Research Methods in Education and Psychology (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage).
  • Millard-Ball, A. (2012) The limits of planning: Casual impacts of city climate action plans, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 33(1), pp. 5–19.
  • Mueller, G. P., & Hersperger, A. M. (2015) Implementing comprehensive plans: Indicators for a task-sheet based performance evaluation process, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 58(11), pp. 2056–81.10.1080/09640568.2014.973482
  • Newcomer, K., & Triplett, T. (2004) Using surveys, in: J. Wholey, H. Hatry, & K. Newcomer (Eds) Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation, pp. 257–291 (San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass).
  • Newcomer, K., Hatry, H., & Wholey, J. (2004) Meeting the need for practical evaluation approaches: An introduction, in: J. Wholey, H. Hatry, & K. Newcomer (Eds) Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation, pp. xxxiii–xliv (San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass).
  • Oliveira, V., & Pinho, P. (2009) Evaluating plans, processes and results, Planning Theory & Practice, 10(1), pp. 35–63.
  • Oliveira, V., & Pinho, P. (2010a) Evaluation in urban planning: Advances and prospects, Journal of Planning Literature, 24(4), pp. 343–361.10.1177/0885412210364589
  • Oliveira, V., & Pinho, P. (2010b) Measuring success in planning: Developing and testing a methodology for planning evaluation, Town Planning Review, 81(3), pp. 307–332.10.3828/tpr.2010.7
  • Oliveira, V., & Pinho, P. (2011) Bridging the gap between planning evaluation and programme evaluation: The contribution of the PPR methodology, Evaluation, 17(3), pp. 293–307.10.1177/1356389011411686
  • Patton, C. V. (1986) Policy analysis with implementation in mind, in: B. Checkoway (Ed) Strategic Perspectives on Planning Practice, pp. 105–19 (Toronto: Lexington Books).
  • Patton, M. Q. (2008) Utilization-Focused Evaluation, 4th ed. (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage).
  • Posavac, E. J., & Carey, R. G. (2007) Program Evaluation: Methods and Case Studies, 7th ed. (Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson).
  • Prato, T. (2007) Evaluating land use plans under uncertainty, Land Use Policy, 24(1), pp. 165–174.10.1016/j.landusepol.2006.02.003
  • Roberts, P. (2006) Evaluating regional sustainable development: Approaches, methods and the politics of analysis, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 49(4), pp. 515–532.10.1080/09640560600747786
  • Rodríguez, D. O., Galera, A. N., & López Hernández, A. M. (2006) Consensus among public managers as strategy for standardization of performance indicators, International Public Management Journal, 9(4), pp. 371–398.10.1080/10967490601077129
  • Rossi, P. H., Freeman, H., & Lipsey, M. (Eds) (1999) Evaluation: A Systematic Approach, 6th ed. (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage).
  • Seasons, M. (2003) Monitoring and evaluation in municipal planning: Considering the realities, Journal of the American Planning Association, 69(4), pp. 430–440.10.1080/01944360308976329
  • Soria, J. A., & Valenzuela, L. M. (2013) A method for the evaluation of metropolitan planning: Application to the context in Spain, European Planning Studies, 21(6), pp. 944–966.10.1080/09654313.2012.722935
  • Stevens, M. (2013) Evaluating the quality of official community plans in Southern British Columbia, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 33(4), pp. 471–490.10.1177/0739456X13505649
  • Tang, Z., & Brody, S. D. (2009) Linking planning theories with factors influencing local environmental-plan quality, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 36, pp. 522–537.10.1068/b34076
  • Vedung, E. (1997) Public Policy and Program Evaluation (New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers).
  • Waldner, L. S. (2004) Planning to perform: Evaluation models for city planners, Berkley Planning Journal, 17, pp. 1–28.
  • Weiss, C. (1998) Evaluation, 2nd ed. (Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall).
  • Weiss, C., Murphy-Graham, E., Petrosino, A., & Gandhi, A. (2008) The fairy godmother – and her warts: Making the dream of evidence-based policy come true, American Journal of Evaluation, 29(1), pp. 29–47.10.1177/1098214007313742
  • Wholey, J. S. (2003) Improving performance and accountability: Responding to emerging management challenges, in: S. Donaldson & M. Scriven (Eds) Evaluating Social Programs and Problems, pp. 41–57 (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum).
  • Winberg, A. (1986) A phased approach for conducting program evaluation, Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 1(2), pp. 1–11.
  • Zhong, T., Mitchell, B., & Huang, X. (2014) Success or failure: Evaluating the implementation of China’s National General Land Use Plan (1997–2010), Habitat International, 44, pp. 93–101.10.1016/j.habitatint.2014.05.003

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.