Improving Participation in Green Infrastructure Planning

References

• Albrechts, L. (2004) Strategic (spatial) planning reexamined, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 31(5), pp. 743–758.10.1068/b3065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrechts, L. (2013) Reframing strategic spatial planning by using a coproduction perspective, Planning Theory, 12(1), pp. 46–63.10.1177/1473095212452722
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrechts, L. & Balducci, A. (2013) Practicing strategic planning: In search of critical features to explain the strategic character of plans, disP – The Planning Review, 49(3), pp. 16–27.10.1080/02513625.2013.859001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnstein, S. R. (1969) A ladder of citizen participation, Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), pp. 216–224.10.1080/01944366908977225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, K. & Grossardt, T. (2010) Toward structured public involvement: Justice, geography and collaborative geospatial/geovisual decision support systems, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 100(1), pp. 57–86.10.1080/00045600903364259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benedict, M. A. & McMahon, E. T. (2002) Green Infrastructure: Smart Conservation for the 21st Century (Washington, DC: Sprawl Watch Clearinghouse).
   Google Scholar
• Bizjak, I. (2012) Improving public participation in spatial planning with Web 2.0 tools, Urbani Izziv, 23(1), pp. 112–124.10.5379/urbani-izziv-en-2012-23-01-004
   Google Scholar
• Brown, G. (2012) Public participation GIS (PPGIS) for regional and environmental planning: Reflections on a decade of empirical research, URISA Journal, 25(2), pp. 7–18.
   Google Scholar
• Cerar, A. (2014) From reaction to initiative: Potentials of contributive participation, Urbani Izziv, 25(1), pp. 93–106.10.5379/urbani-izziv-en-2014-25-01-002
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2013) Green Infrastructure – Enhancing Europe’s Natural Capital (Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions). Available at http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52013DC0249&from=EN (accessed 22 January 2015).
   Google Scholar
• European Institute for Public Participation (EIPP) (2009) Public Participation in Europe: An International Perspective. Available at http://www.partizipation.at/fileadmin/media_data/Downloads/Zukunftsdiskurse-Studien/pp_in_e_report_03_06.pdf (accessed 25 June 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Faehnle, M., Bäcklund, P., Tyrväinen, L., Niemelä, J. & Yli-Pelkonen, V. (2014) How can residents’ experiences inform planning of urban green infrastructure? Landscape and Urban Planning, 130, pp. 171–183.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.07.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanley, N. & Barbier, E. B. (2013) Pricing Nature. Cost-benefit Analysis Environmental Policy (Cheltenham: Elgar).
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (1992) Planning through debate: The communicative turn in planning theory, The Town Planning Review, 63(2), pp. 143–162.10.3828/tpr.63.2.422x602303814821
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (2008) In search of the ‘strategic’ in spatial strategy making, Planning Theory & Practice, 10(4), pp. 439–457.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P., Khakee, A., Motte, A. & Needham, B. (1997) Making Strategic Spatial Plans: Innovation in Europe (London: UCL Press).10.4324/9780203451502
   Google Scholar
• Kabisch, N. (2015) Ecosystem service implementation and governance challenges in urban green space planning – the case of Berlin, Germany, Land Use Policy, 42, pp. 557–567.10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunzmann, K. R. (2000) Strategic spatial development through information and communication, in: W. Salet & A. Faludi (Eds) The Revival of Strategic Spatial Planning, pp. 259–266 (Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences).
   Google Scholar
• Kunzmann, K. R. (2013) Strategic planning: A chance for spatial innovation and creativity, disP – The Planning Review, 49(3), pp. 28–31.10.1080/02513625.2013.859003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Llausàs, A. & Roe, M. (2012) Green infrastructure planning: Cross-national analysis between the north east of England (UK) and Catalonia (Spain), European Planning Studies, 20(4), pp. 641–663.10.1080/09654313.2012.665032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luyet, V., Schlaepfer, R., Parlange, M. B. & Buttler, A. (2012) A framework to implement Stakeholder participation in environmental projects, Journal of Environmental Management, 111, pp. 213–219.10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.06.026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackrodt, U. & Helbrecht, I. (2013) Performative Bürgerbeteiligung als neue Form kooperativer Freiraumplanung [Performative participation – a new cooperative planning instrument for urban public spaces], disP – The Planning Review, 49(4), pp. 14–24.10.1080/02513625.2013.892782
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maier, C., Lindner, T. & Winkel, G. (2014) Stakeholders’ perceptions of participation in forest policy: A case study from Baden–Württemberg, Land Use Policy, 39, pp. 166–176.10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.02.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manchester City Council (2009) Manchester: A certain Future. Available at http://www.manchester.gov.uk/egov_downloads/ClimateChange.pdf (accessed 25 June 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Morphet, J. & Clifford, B. (2014) Policy convergence, divergence and communities: The case of spatial planning in post-devolution Britain and Ireland, Planning, Practice & Research, 29(5), pp. 508–524.
   Google Scholar
• Newig, J. & Fritsch, O. (2009) Environmental governance: Participatory, multi-level – and effective? Environmental Policy and Governance, 19(3), pp. 197–214.10.1002/eet.v19:3
   Google Scholar
• Roe, M. & Mell, I. (2013) Negotiating value and priorities: Evaluating the demands of green infrastructure development, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 56(5), pp. 650–673.10.1080/09640568.2012.693454
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouse, D. C. & Bunster-Ossa, I. F. (2013) Green Infrastructure: A Landscape Approach (Chicago, IL: American Planning Association).
   Google Scholar
• Rowe, G. & Frewer, L. J. (2000) Public participation methods: A framework for evaluation, Science, Technology & Human Values, 25(1), pp. 3–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rydin, Y. & Pennington, M. (2000) Public participation and local environmental planning: The collective action problem and the potential of social capital, Local Environment, 5(2), pp. 153–169.10.1080/13549830050009328
   Google Scholar
• Rymsa-Fitschen, C., Rusche, K. & Wilker, J. (2014) The need for participation in green infrastructure planning – Evidence from north–west Europe, in: M. M. Keitsch (Ed) Proceedings of the 20th Annual International Sustainable Development Research Conference, pp. 664–672. (Trondheim: International Sustainable Development Research Society (ISDRS)/ Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Department of Product Design).
   Google Scholar
• Scott, A. (2011) Focussing in on focus groups: Effective participative tools or cheap fixes for land use policy? Land Use Policy, 28(4), pp. 684–694.10.1016/j.landusepol.2010.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• South Yorkshire Forest Partnership (2011) Creating & improving our green network, The South Yorkshire Green Infrastructure Strategy. Available at http://www.syforest.co.uk/projects.php?p=273 (accessed 25 June 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Southern, A., Lovett, A., O’Riordan, T. & Watkinson, A. (2011) Sustainable landscape governance: Lessons from a catchment based study in whole landscape design, Landscape and Urban Planning, 101(2), pp. 179–189.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB) (2010) The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity for Local and Regional Policy Makers (Malta: Progress Press).
   Google Scholar
• Turnhout, E., Van Bommel, S. & Aarts, N. (2010) How participation creates citizens: Participatory governance as performative practice, Ecology and Society, 15(4). Article ID: 26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilker, J., Rusche, K. & Rymsa-Fitschen, C. (2015) Stakeholder participation in north–west Europe: Lessons learnt from green infrastructure case studies, in: M. Schrenk, V. V. Popovich, P. Zeile, P. Elisei & C. Beyer (Eds) REAL CORP 2015. Plan together – Right now – Overall. From Vision to Reality for Vibrant Cities and Regions. Proceedings of 20th International Conference on Urban Planning, Regional Development and Information Society, pp. 883–888 (Vienna: CORP – Competence Center of Urban and Regional Planning).
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, W. & Parolin, B. (2013) Web 2.0 and social media growth in planning practice: A longitudinal study, Planning Practice and Research, 28(5), pp. 544–562.10.1080/02697459.2013.840996
   Google Scholar
• World Bank (1996) The World Bank Participation Sourcebook (Washington, DC: The World Bank).
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2009) Case Study Research. Design and Methods. Applied Social Research Methods Series, Vol. 5 (Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications).
   Google Scholar
• Young, R. F. & McPherson, E. G. (2013) Governing metropolitan green infrastructure in the United States, Landscape and Urban Planning, 109(1), pp. 67–75.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar