Dealing with Conflict in Local Planning: Reflections from Australian Planners

References

• ABS (Australian Bureau of Statistics). (2015) ‘Population clock’, 3235.0, Available at http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/[email protected]/0/1647509ef7e25faaca2568a900154b63?Open Document (accessed 11 July 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin C. & Rosier, J. (2016) Growing future planners: A framework for integrating experiential learning into tertiary planning programs, Journal of Planning Education and Research, pp. 1–13 doi: 10.1177/0739456X16634864.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boulle, L. (2011) Mediation: Principles, Process, Practice, 3rd ed. (Chatswood, NSW: Butterworths).
   Google Scholar
• Claydon, J. & Chick, M. (2005) Teaching Negotiations. Planning Practice and Research, 20(2), pp. 221–234. doi:10.1080/02697450500414710.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, P. T., Kugler, K. G., Bui-Wrzosinska, L., Nowak, A. & Vallacher, R. (2012) Getting down to basics: A situated model of conflict in social relations. Negotiation Journal, 28, pp. 7–43. doi:10.1111/j.1571-9979.2011.00324.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, N., Taylor, E., Hurley, J. & Colic-Peisker, V. (2012) Resident third party objections and appeals against planning applications: implications for higher density and social housing, AHURI Final Report No. 197, Melbourne: Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute Limited, Available at http://www.ahuri.edu.au/research/final-reports/197 (accessed 23 July 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Coppens, T. (2014) How to turn a planning conflict into a planning success? Conditions for constructive conflict management in the case of Ruggeveld-Boterlaar-Silsburg in Antwerp Belguim. Planning Practice and Research, 29(1), pp. 96–111.10.1080/02697459.2013.872912
   Google Scholar
• DTPLI (Department of Transport, Planning and Local Infrastructure) (2014) Plan Melbourne Metropolitan Planning Strategy. (Melbourne: Victorian Government).
   Google Scholar
• Deutsch, M. (2002) Social psychology’s contributions to the study of conflict resolution. Negotiation Journal, 18, pp. 307–320. doi:10.1111/j.1571-9979.2002.tb00263.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DIRD (Department of Infrastructure and Regional Development) (2015) State of Australian Cities 2014–15, Progress in Australia’s Regions. (Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia).
   Google Scholar
• DoI (Department of Infrastructure) (2002) Melbourne 2030 - Planning for sustainable growth. (Melbourne: DoI).
   Google Scholar
• Eccles, D. & Bryant, T. (2011) Statutory Planning in Victoria, 4th ed. (Annandale, NSW: Federation Press).
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, M. (2007) Public finance in planning education and practice. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 27, pp. 217–227.10.1177/0739456X07305796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forester, J. (2006) Making participation work when interests conflict: Moving from facilitating dialogue and moderating debate to mediating negotiations. Journal of the American Planning Association, 72(4), pp. 447–456. doi:10.1080/01944360608976765.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman, R., Burton, P. & Freestone R. (2016) Planning practice and academic research—views from the parallel worlds. Paper presented to the Urban Planning and Environment 12 Symposium, 30 May–3 June, Lisbon, IUPEA—International Urban Planning and Environment Association.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, J. (1994) On some public uses of planning ‘theory’: Rhetoric and expertise in community planning disputes. The Town Planning Review, 65(1), pp. 59–76.10.3828/tpr.65.1.jmkp718159396n55
   Google Scholar
• Greenlee, A., Edwards, M. & Anthony, Jerry (2015) Planning skills: An examination of supply and local government demand. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 35(2), pp. 161–173.10.1177/0739456X15570321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurran, N., Norman, B. & Gleeson, B. (2008) Planning Education Discussion Paper. (Kingston, ACT: Planning Institute of Australia).
   Google Scholar
• Guzzetta, J. D. & Bollens, S. A. (2003) Urban planners’ skills and competencies: Are we different from other professions? Does context matter? Do we evolve? Journal of Planning Education and Research, 23, pp. 96–106.10.1177/0739456X03255426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrington, A., & Herrington, J. (Eds) (2006) Authentic learning environments in higher education. (Hershey, PA: Information Science Publications).
   Google Scholar
• Herrington, J., Reeves, T. & Oliver, R. (2010) A Guide to Authentic e-learning. (New York: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Jones, T. S. & Bodtker, A. (2001) Mediating with heart in mind: Addressing emotion in mediation practice. Negotiation Journal, 17(3), pp. 207–244.10.1111/nejo.2001.17.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent, J. L. & Thompson, S. M. (2015) Healthy Planning in Australia, in: H. Barton, S. Thompson, S. Burgess & M. Grant (Eds) The Routledge Handbook of Planning for Health and Well-Being: Shaping a sustainable and healthy future, Chapter 31, pp. 443–454, (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Lung-Amam, W., Harwood, S. A., Sandoval, G. F. & Sen, S. (2015) Teaching equity and advocacy planning in a multicultural “post-racial” world. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 35(3), pp. 337–342.10.1177/0739456X15580025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March, A. & Low, N. (2004) Knowing and steering: Mediatization, planning and democracy in Victoria, Australia. Planning Theory, 3(1), pp. 41–69.10.1177/1473095204042317
   Google Scholar
• Myers, D. (2015) Mutual benefits and equity amid racial diversity: A generational strategy for growing a broader base of support for social equity. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 35(3), pp. 369–375.10.1177/0739456X15596579
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PAB (Planning Accreditation Board, USA) (2012) Accreditation standards and criteria, approved April 14, 2012. Available at http://www.planningaccreditationboard.org/ (accessed 28 March 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Phibbs, P., Gurran, N. & Mead, M. (2002) Reconnecting theory and practice in planning education: Surveys of planning graduates and their employers. Australia New Zealand Association of Planning Schools (ANZAPS) Conference, Melbourne, pp. 58–66.
   Google Scholar
• PIA (Planning Institute of Australia) (2010) Accreditation Policy for Recognition of Australian Planning Qualifications. (Kingston, ACT: PIA).
   Google Scholar
• PSB (Professional Standards Board, Canada) (2015) Accreditation standards, new planning degrees program. Available at http://www.psb-planningcanada.ca/UNIVERSTYACCREDITATION/index.php (accessed 28 March 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Reeves, D. (2016) Management Skills for Effective Planners. (London: Palgrave).10.1007/978-1-137-27701-5
   Google Scholar
• Rollinson D, (2008) Alternative dispute resolution in local government planning in NSW: Understanding the gap between rhetoric and practice, PhD Thesis, University of NSW.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, I. (2009) A centre of excellence in ADR. Law Institute Journal, 83(9), pp. 34–36.
   Google Scholar
• RTPI (Royal Town Planning Institute, Great Britain) (2012) Policy Statement on Initial Planning Education. (London).
   Google Scholar
• Ruming, K. & Goodman, R. (2016) Planning system reform and economic development: Unpacking policy rhetoric and trajectories in Victoria and New South Wales. Built Environment, 42, pp. 72–89.10.2148/benv.42.1.72
   Google Scholar
• Schon, D. (1987) Educating the Reflective Practitioner: Toward a New Design for Teaching and Learning in the Professions. (San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass).
   Google Scholar
• Susskind and Osawa (1984) Mediating negotiations in the public sector: The planner as mediator. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 4, pp. 5–15.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, E. Cook, N. & Hurley, J. (2016) Do objections count? Estimating the influence of residents on housing development assessment in Melbourne, Urban Policy and Research, 34(3), pp. 269–283, Routledge, Australia. ISSN: 0811-1146.
   Google Scholar
• Tow, D. & Stubbs, M. (1997) The effectiveness of alternative dispute resolution methods in planning disputes. Australian Dispute Resolution Journal, 8, pp. 267–281.
   Google Scholar
• Vigar, G. (2012) Planning and professionalism: Knowledge, Judgement and Expertise in English Planning. Planning Theory, 11(4), pp. 361–378.10.1177/1473095212439993
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willey, S. (2006) Planning appeals: Are third party rights legitimate? The Case Study of Victoria, Australia, Urban Policy and Research, 24(3), pp. 369–389.10.1080/08111140600877032
   Google Scholar
• Zapata, M. & Bates, L. (2015) Equity planning revisited. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 35(3), pp. 245–248.10.1177/0739456X15589967
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar