Participatory Action Research in Affordable Housing Partnerships: Collaborative Rationality, or Sleeping with the Growth Machine?

References

• Albrechts, L. (2010) More of the same is not enough! How could strategic spatial planning be instrumental in dealing with the challenges ahead?, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 37, pp. 1115–1127.10.1068/b36068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allmendinger, P. & Haughton, G. (2012) Post-political spatial planning in England: A crisis of consensus? Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 37(1), pp. 89–103.10.1111/tran.2011.37.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budge, T. (2009) Educating planners. Educating for Planning or Planning Education: The Never-Ending Story, Australian Planner, 46(1), pp. 8–13.
   Google Scholar
• Childers, D., Pickett, S., Grove, J., Ogden, L. & Whitmer, A. (2014) Advancing urban sustainability theory and action: Challenges and opportunities. Landscape and Urban Planning, 125, pp. 320–328.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.01.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cockburn, J., Rouget, M., Slotow, R., Roberts, D., Boon, R., Douwes, E., O'Donoghue, S., et al. (2016) How to build science-action partnerships for local land-use planning and management: lessons from Durban, South Africa. Ecology and Society, 21(1), article 28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, B. & Kothari, U. (Eds) (2001) Participation: The New Tyranny?. (London: Zed Books).
   Google Scholar
• Finkel, A. (2014) Perspective: Powering up citations. Nature, 511, p. S77.10.1038/511S77a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B., Bruzelius, N. & Rothengatter, W. (2003) Megaprojects and Risk. (Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press).10.1017/CBO9781107050891
   Google Scholar
• Forester, J. (1999) The Deliberative Practitioner: Encouraging Participatory Planning Processes. (Cambridge: MIT Press).
   Google Scholar
• Giles-Corti, B., Sallis, J., Sugiyama, T., Lowe, M., Frank, L. & Owen, N. (2015) Translating active living research into policy and practice: One important pathway to chronic disease prevention. Journal of Public Health Policy, 36(2), pp. 231–243.10.1057/jphp.2014.53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Global Planners Network. (2006) Reinventing Planning: A New Governance Paradigm for Managing Human Settlements. (Vancouver: Global Planners Network). Available at http://www.globalplannersnetwork.org/pdf/reinventingplanningenglish.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gurran, N., Norman, B. & Gleeson, B. (2008) Foundations for the Future: Planning Education Discussion Paper. (Canberra: Planning Institute of Australia). Available at http://www.planning.org.au/documents/item/67
   Google Scholar
• Hart, A. & Wolff, D. (2006) Developing local ‘communities of practice’ through local community – university partnerships. Planning, Practice and Research, 21(1), pp. 121–138.10.1080/02697450600901616
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (1997) Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies. (Houndmills: Palgrave).10.1007/978-1-349-25538-2
   Google Scholar
• Holden, M. (2017) Getting to Groundbreaking, but not Build Out: From formation to failure in a regional housing indicators collaborative, in: M. Holden, R. Phillips & C. Stevens (Eds) Community Quality-of-Life Indicators: Best Cases VII, pp. 87–110 (Cham: Springer International Publishing).10.1007/978-3-319-54618-6
   Google Scholar
• Holden, M. & Sidhu, T. (2014) Getting to Groundbreaking: Residential Building Approval Processes in Metro Vancouver – Year 1: Focus on Townhouses. (Vancouver: Real Estate Foundation of British Columbia). Available at http://www.refbc.com/sites/default/files/G2G_Report2014_FINAL.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Howard, Z. & Somerville, M. (2014) A comparative study of two design charettes: Implications for co-design and participatory action research. Co-Design, 10(1), pp. 46–62.
   Google Scholar
• Innes, J. & Booher, D. (2010) Planning with Complexity: An Introduction to Collaborative Rationality for Public Policy. (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Kallus, R. (2016) Citizenship in action: participatory urban visualization in contested urban space. Journal of Urban Design, 21(5), pp. 616–637.10.1080/13574809.2016.1186490
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kindon, S., Pain, R. & Kesby, M. (2007) Participatory Action Research Approaches and Methods: Connecting People, Participation and Place. (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Kothari, U. (2001) Power, knowledge and social control in participatory development, in: B. Cooke, & U. Kothari (Eds) Participation: The New Tyranny?, pp. 139–152 (London: Zed Books).
   Google Scholar
• Legacy, C. (2012) Achieving legitimacy through deliberative plan-making processes—Lessons for metropolitan strategic planning. Urban Policy and Research, 13(1), pp. 71–87.
   Google Scholar
• MacLeod, G. (2011) Urban politics reconsidered: Growth machine to post-politics city. Urban Studies, 48(12), pp. 2629–2660.10.1177/0042098011415715
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martel, A., Whitzman, C., Fincher, R., Lawther, P., Woodcock, I. (2013) Getting to Yes: Can international ideas on family-friendly affordable housing in central cities be applied to Melbourne?, 6th State of Australian Cities Conference, Sydney, November 27–29, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Molotch, H. (1976) The city as a growth machine: Towards a political economy of place. American Journal of Sociology, 82(2), pp. 309–332.10.1086/226311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nevens, F., Frantzeskaki, N., Gorissen, L. & Loorbach, D. (2013) Urban transition labs: Co-creating transformative action for sustainable cities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 50, pp. 111–122.10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randolph, B. (2013) Wither urban research? Yes, you read it right the first time, Urban Policy and Research, 31(2), pp. 130–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rydin, Y. (2007) Re-examining the role of knowledge within planning theory. Planning Theory, 6(1), pp. 52–68.10.1177/1473095207075161
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, K. (2013) Public housing estate redevelopments in Australian inner cities and the role of social mix, in: K. Ruming, B. Randolph & N. Gurran (Eds) Proceedings of the 6th State of Australian Cities conference, Sydney. Available at http://www.soacconference.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/Shaw-Governance.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Straatemeier, T., Bertolini, L. & Boemelstroet, M. (2010) An experiential approach to research in planning. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 37, pp. 578–591.10.1068/b35122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suopajarvi, T. (2016) Knowledge-making on ‘ageing in a smart city’ as socio-material power dynamics of participatory action research. Action Research, doi:10.1177/1476750316655385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, E. & Hurley, J. (2016) ‘Not a lot of people read this stuff’: Australian urban research in planning practice. Urban Policy and Research, 34(2), pp. 116–131.10.1080/08111146.2014.994741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Troy, P. (2013) Australian urban research and planning. Urban Policy and Research, 31(2), pp. 134–149.10.1080/08111146.2013.793260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vainio, T. (2016) Motivations, results and the role of technology in participatory design research during 2000’s—A review in the field of architecture and urban planning. Architecture and Urban Planning, 11(1), pp. 14–18.
   Google Scholar
• Whitzman, C. (2009) Reinventing planning education. Australian Planner, 46(1), pp. 14–21.10.1080/07293682.2009.9995284
   Google Scholar
• Whitzman, C. (2015) Partnerships for disability-inclusive road development in Papua New Guinea: Unusual suspects and equivocal gains. Planning Theory and Practice, 16(1), pp. 28–44.10.1080/14649357.2014.998702
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitzman, C., Andrew, C. & Viswanath, K. (2014) Partnerships for women’s safety in the city: “Four legs for a good table”. Environment and Urbanization, 26(2), pp. 443–456.10.1177/0956247814537580
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, I. M. (1990) Justice and the Politics of Difference (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
   Google Scholar