Non-Negotiable Developer Obligations in the Spanish Land Readjustment: An Effective Passive Governance Approach that ‘de facto’ Taxes Development Value?

References

• Alexander, E. R. (2001) Governance and transaction costs in planning systems: a conceptual framework for institutional analysis of land-use planning and development control—The case of Israel. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 28, pp. 755–776.10.1068/b2759
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
  (a) (2014) Land-property markets and planning: a special case. Land Use Policy, 41, pp. 533–540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alterman, R. (2007) Much more than land assembly land readjustment for the supply of urban public services. in: Y. Hong & B. Needham (Eds), pp. 57–85.
   Google Scholar
  (a) (2009) Can the ‘unearned increment’ in land values be harnessed to supply affordable housing? Paper in Conference ‘Financing affordable housing and infrastructure in cities: towards innovative land and property taxation system’, UN Habitat GLTN, Warsaw, 15 and 16 October.
   Google Scholar
  (b) (2012) Land-use regulations and property values. The ‘windfalls capture’ idea revisited, in: N. Brooks, K. Donangy & G. J. Knapp (Eds) The Oxford Handbook on Urban Economics and Planning, pp. 755–786 (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Baño León, J. M. (2009) Derecho urbanístico común, p. 39 (Iustel: Valencia).
   Google Scholar
• Burón Cuadrado, J. (2006) Land reserves for subsidized housing: lessons learned from Vitoria-Gasteiz, in: Architecture, City and Environment, 1(2), pp. 1–20 (Universitat Politécnica de Catalunya).
   Google Scholar
• Burriel de Orueta, E. (2008) La “Década prodigiosa” del Urbanismo Español (1997–2006). Paper in X Coloquio Internacional de Geocrítica, Barcelona, 26–30 de mayo de 2008 Universidad de Barcelona. Available at http://www.ub.es/geocrit/-xcol/383.htm#_edn28
   Google Scholar
• Christman, J. (1994) The Myth of Property: Toward an Egalitarian Theory of Ownership. p. 219 (New York, NY: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Clusa, J. & Mur, S. (2007) “La experiencia británica 1973–2006 de JGB y el pago de una deuda pendiente.” in: ACE Architecture, City and Environment, 3 February, pp. 122–149 Barcelona.
   Google Scholar
• Crook, T. (2016) Planning obligations policy in England: de facto taxation of development value, in: Croot et al., (Ed) pp. 63–114.
   Google Scholar
• García-Bellido García de Diego, J. (1975) Gran Bretaña: Community Land Act 1975. ¿Hacia una socialización del suelo. in: Ciudad y Territorio, 4/75, pp. 81–94 (Madrid).
   Google Scholar
  (a) (1991) A (r)evolutionary framework for Spanish town planning, European viewpoint. Town Planning Review, 62(4), pp. v–vii.
   Google Scholar
• George, H. (1879) Progress and Poverty, 2006 edited and abridged edition, p. 210 (New York, NY: Robert Schalkenbach Foundation).
   Google Scholar
• Gozalvo Zamorano, M. J. (2015a) Marco general de la gestión urbanística [Overall framework of urban management]. in: J. Hervás Más (Ed) Nuevo Régimen Urbanístico de la Comunidad Valenciana. Ley de Ordenación del Territorio, Urbanismo y Paisaje. LOTUP, pp. 238–245 (Valencia: Tirant lo Blanch).
   Google Scholar
  (a) (2015b) Las zonas verdes como problema de gestión. Aportación desde el estudio de las zonas verdes estructurales en la provincia de Valencia: Especial consideración a los municipios de la comarca de La Safor, [Green zones as a problem of urban management. Contribution from the study of structural green areas in the province of Valencia. Special consideration to the municipalities of the La Safor region], Doctoral thesis, Universidad Politécnica de Valencia, p. 643. Available at http://hdl.handle.net/10251/59469
   Google Scholar
• Hartmann, T. & Spit, T. (2015) Dilemmas of involvement in land management—Comparing an active (Dutch) and passive (German) approach. Land Use Policy, 42, pp. 729–737.10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Home, R. (2007) Land readjustment as a method of development land assembly: a comparative overview. The Town Planning Review, 78(4), pp. 459–483.10.3828/tpr.78.4.4
   Google Scholar
• Hong, Y. H. (2007) Assembling land for urban development: issues and opportunities. in: Hong & Needham, (Eds) pp. 3–34.
   Google Scholar
• Hong and Brain. (2012) Land readjustment for urban development and post-disaster reconstruction. in: Land Lines, (Lincoln Institute of Land Policy), January.
   Google Scholar
• Hong, Y. H. & Brubaker, D. (2010) Integrating the proposed property tax with the public leasehold system. China’s local public finance in transition, in: J. Y. Man & Y. H. Hong (Eds) China’s Local Public Finance in Transition, pp. 285 (Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy).
   Google Scholar
• Hong, Y. H. & Needham, B. (Eds) (2007) Analyzing Land Readjustment Economics, Law, and Collective Action. p. 203 (The Lincoln Institute of Land Policy).
   Google Scholar
• Korthals Altes, W. K. (2013) The europeanization of development planning in Valencia. European Planning Studies, pp. 1–19. doi:10.1080/09654313.2012.757585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueckeberg, D. A. (1995) The difficult character of property: to whom do things belong? Journal of the American Planning Association, 61(3), pp. 301–309.10.1080/01944369508975644
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levante, D. (2013, December 28) Piles destinará el 25% de su presupuesto a pagar una sentencia por una expropiación. http://www.levante-emv.com/comarcas/2013/12/28/piles-destinara-25—presupuesto/1063812.html
   Google Scholar
• López Rodríguez, B. (2007) Influencia de los estándares urbanísticos en los nuevos desarrollos residenciales. Boletín DF+S, 52/53, pp. 109–178.
   Google Scholar
• MacIntyre, A. (1984) After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory, 1st ed 1981, 2nd ed 1984, (Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press).
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis, (Sage Publications).
   Google Scholar
• Moore, V. (2005) A Practical Approach to Planning Law, 9th ed. (Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Muñoz, G. D. (2010) Capturing Value Increase in Urban Redevelopment, p. 478 (Leiden: Sidestone Press).
   Google Scholar
  (a) (2014 first published online in 2012) Urban governance, property rights, land readjustment and public value capturing. European Urban and Regional Studies, 21(1), pp. 60–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
  (b) (2016) Proposal of land readjustment for the Netherlands: analysing its effectiveness from an international perspective. Cities, 53, pp. 78–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muñoz Gielen, D. & Korthals, A. (2007) Lessons from Valencia. Separating infrastructure provision from land ownership. Town Planning Review, 78(1), pp. 61–80.10.3828/tpr.78.1.5
   Google Scholar
• Muñoz Gielen, D., Maguregui Salas, I. & Burón Cuadrado, J. (2017) International comparison of the changing dynamics of governance approaches to land development and their results for public value capture. Cities, 71, pp. 123–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oxley, M. (2006) The gain from the planning-gain supplement: a consideration of the proposal for a new tax to boost housing supply in the UK. European Journal of Housing Policy, 6(1), pp. 101–113. April.10.1080/14616710600585757
   Google Scholar
• Prest, A. R. (1981) The taxation of urban land, p. 190 (Maschester: Manchester University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Priemus, H. & Louw, E. (2003) Changes in dutch land policy: from monopoly towards competition in the building market. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 30, pp. 369–378.10.1068/b12982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riera, P., Munt, I. & Keyes, J. (1991) The practice of land use planning in Spain. Planning Practice & Research, 6(2), pp. 11–18. doi:10.1080/02697459108722808.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Bachiller, A., Thomas, M. & Walker, S. (1992) The English planning lottery. The Town Planning Review, 63(4), pp. 387–402.10.3828/tpr.63.4.w03mu042w170km56
   Google Scholar
• Smolka, M. O. (2013) Implementing Value Capture in Latin America: Policies and Tools for Urban Development, p. 72 (Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy).
   Google Scholar
• Sorensen, A. (2007) Consensus, Persuation, and Opposition Organizing Land Readjustment in Japan. in: Hong & Needham (Eds) pp. 89–114.
   Google Scholar
• Spaans, M., Golland, A. & Carter, N. (1996) Land supply and housing development: a comparative analysis of Britain and The Netherlands 1970–1995. International Planning Studies, 1(3), pp. 291–310.10.1080/13563479608721659
   Google Scholar
• Turk, S. S. (2008) An examination for efficient applicability of the land readjustment method at the international context. Journal of Planning Literature, 22, pp. 229–242.10.1177/0885412207310283
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UN-HABITAT. (2012) Handling Land. Innovative Tools for Land Governance and Secure Tenue, (Nairobi: UNON, Publishing Services Section).
   Google Scholar
• Van der Krabben, E. & Jacobs, H. M. (2013) Public land development as a strategic tool for redevelopment: reflections on the Dutch experience. Land Use Policy, 30, pp. 774–783.10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Krabben, E. & Needham, B. (2008) Land readjustment for value capturing. A new planning tool for urban redevelopment. Town Planning Review, 79(6), pp. 651–672.10.3828/tpr.79.6.4
   Google Scholar
• Worldbank. (2014) Land value capture in urban DRM programs. Working Paper Series No. 26, 80583. Available at http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2013/08/23/000356161_20130823130137/Rendered/PDF/805830Brief0260Box0379807B00PUBLIC0.pdf
   Google Scholar