Collaboration with Caveats: Research–Practice Exchange in Planning

References

• Balducci, A. & Bertolini, L. (2007) Reflecting on practice or reflecting with practice? Planning Theory & Practice, 8(4), pp. 532–555.
   Google Scholar
• Barrett, M. & Brunton-Smith, I. (2014) Political and civic engagement and participation: Towards an integrative perspective, Journal of Civil Society, 10(1), pp. 5–28.10.1080/17448689.2013.871911
   Google Scholar
• Bergold, J. & Thomas, S. (2012) Participatory research methods: A methodological approach in motion, Historical Social Research/Historische Sozialforschung, 37(4), pp. 191–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryman, A. (2015) Social Research Methods, 5th ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, H. J., & Vanderhoven, D. (2016) Knowledge That Matters: Realising the Potential of Co-Production, (Manchester: N8 Research Partnership).
   Google Scholar
• Caplan, N. (1979) The two-communities theory and knowledge utilization, American Behavioral Scientist, 22(3), pp. 459–470.10.1177/000276427902200308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chevalier, J. M., & Buckles, D. (2013) Participatory Action Research: Theory and Methods for Engaged Inquiry (London; New York: Routledge)).
   Google Scholar
• Clavisi, O., Bragge, P., Tavender, E., Turner, T. & Gruen, R. L. (2013) Effective stakeholder participation in setting research priorities using a global evidence mapping approach, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 66(5), pp. 496–502.e2.10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.04.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davoudi, S. (2006) Evidence-based planning: rhetoric and reality, DisP - the Planning Review, 42(165), pp. 14–24.10.1080/02513625.2006.10556951
   Google Scholar
• Dodson, J. (2011) Strengthening policy and research, Urban Policy and Research, 29(1), pp. 1–3.10.1080/08111146.2011.547158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodson, J. (2015) Putting Australia’s latest national urban policy shift in its place, Planning News, 41(10), pp. 20–21.
   Google Scholar
• Durning, B. (2004) Planning academics and planning practitioners: Two tribes or a community of practice?, Planning Practice & Research, 19(4), pp. 435–446.10.1080/0269745052000343262
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. (2012) Why mass media matter to planning research the case of megaprojects, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 32(2), pp. 169–181.10.1177/0739456X12441950
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forsyth, A. (2016) Investigating research, Planning Theory & Practice, 17(3), pp. 447–473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foxon, T., Pearson, P., Arapostathis, S., Carlsson-Hyslop, A. & Thornton, J. (2013) Branching points for transition pathways: How actors respond to stresses and challenges, Energy Policy, 52, pp. 146–158.10.1016/j.enpol.2012.04.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwood, D. J. & Levin, M. (2007) Introduction to action research, 2nd ed. (London: Sage Publications).10.4135/9781412984614
   Google Scholar
• Gurran, N. & Phibbs, P. (2014) Evidence-free zone?, Examining Claims about Planning Performance and Reform in New South Wales, Australian Planner, 51(3), pp. 232–242.
   Google Scholar
• Head, B. (2014) Public administration and the promise of evidence-based policy: Experience in and beyond Australia, Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 36(1), pp. 48–59.10.1080/23276665.2014.892273
   Google Scholar
• Head, B. W. (2015) Relationships between policy academics and public servants: Learning at a distance?, Australian Journal of Public Administration, 74(1), pp. 5–12.10.1111/aupa.2015.74.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Head, B. (2016) Toward more ‘evidence-informed’ policy making?, Public Administration Review, 76(3), pp. 472–484.10.1111/puar.12475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Head, B. W., Ferguson, M., Cherney, A. & Boreham, P. (2014) Are policy-makers interested in social research? Exploring the sources and uses of valued information among public servants in Australia, Policy & Society, 33(2), pp. 89–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellmich, M. & Lange, L. (2016) Bridging research and practice through collaboration: Lessons from a joint working group, Planning Theory & Practice, 17(3), pp. 447–473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt, G. (2016) Long-Term Planning and Cities for the Next Century, Available at https://www.greghunt.com.au/Home/LatestNews/tabid/133/ID/3623/Long-term-planning-and-cities-for-the-next-century–Sydney-Business-Chamber.aspx (accessed 5 June 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Hurley, J. & Taylor, E. J. (2016) Australian early career planning researchers and the barriers to research–practice exchange, Australian Planner, 53(1), pp. 5–14.10.1080/07293682.2015.1135813
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurley, J., Lamker, C. W., Taylor, E. J., Stead, D., Hellmich, M., Lange, L., Rowe, H., Beeck, S., Phibbs, P. & Forsyth, A. (2016) Exchange between researchers and practitioners in urban planning: Achievable objective or a bridge too far?: Interface, Planning Theory & Practice, 17(3), pp. 447–473.10.1080/14649357.2016.1190491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Innes, J. & Booher, D. (2004) Reframing public participation: Strategies for the 21st century, Planning Theory & Practice, 5(4), pp. 419–436.10.1080/1464935042000293170
   Google Scholar
• Krizek, K., Forysth, A. & Slotterback, C. S. (2009) Is there a role for evidence-based practice in urban planning and policy?, Planning Theory & Practice, 10(4), pp. 459–478.10.1080/14649350903417241
   Google Scholar
• Kuzdas, C., Wiek, A., Warner, B., Vignola, R. & Morataya, R. (2014) Sustainability appraisal of water governance regimes: The case of guanacaste, Costa Rica, Environmental Management, 54(2), pp. 205–222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacArthur, J. (2016) Challenging public engagement: Participation, deliberation and power in renewable energy policy, Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 6(3), pp. 631–640.10.1007/s13412-015-0328-7
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald, K., Sanyal, B., Silver, M., Ng, M. K., Head, P., Williams, K. & Campbell, H. (2014) Challenging theory: Changing practice: Critical perspectives on the past and potential of professional planning: Interface, Planning Theory & Practice, 15(1), pp. 95–122.10.1080/14649357.2014.886801
   Google Scholar
• McCann, E. J. (2001) Collaborative visioning or urban planning as therapy?, The Politics of Public-Private Policy Making, the Professional Geographer, 53(2), pp. 207–218.
   Google Scholar
• Moore-Cherry, N. & Mccarthy, L. (2016) Debating temporary uses for vacant urban sites: Insights for practice from a stakeholder workshop, Planning Practice & Research, 31(3), pp. 347–357.10.1080/02697459.2016.1158075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, J. (2014) Revisiting the ‘two communities’ metaphor of research utilisation, International Journal of Public Sector Management, 27(7), pp. 614–627.10.1108/IJPSM-04-2014-0056
   Google Scholar
• Newman, J., Cherney, A. & Head, B. W. (2016) Do policy makers use academic research? Reexamining the ‘two communities’ theory of research utilization, Public Administration Review, 76(1), pp. 24–32.10.1111/puar.12464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phibbs, P. (2016) Collaboration between researchers and practitioners: Political and bureaucratic issues, Planning Theory & Practice, 17(3), pp. 464–467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schön, D. (1983) The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. (New York: Basic Books).
   Google Scholar
• Stead, D. (2016) The use of academic research in planning practice: Who, what, where, when and how?, Planning Theory & Practice, 17(3), pp. 453–457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, E. J. & Hurley, J. (2016) ‘Not a lot of people read the stuff’: Australian urban research in planning practice, Urban Policy and Research, 34(2), pp. 116–131.10.1080/08111146.2014.994741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tingle, L. (2015) Political amnesia—How we forgot to govern, Quarterly Essay, 60, pp. 1–86.
   Google Scholar
• Wolman, H. & Page, E. (2002) Policy transfer among local governments: An information-theory approach. Governance, 15(4), pp. 477–501.10.1111/gove.2002.15.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar