Setting the Standard for Green Infrastructure: The Need for, and Features of, a Benchmark in England

References

• Albert, C., & Von Haaren, C. (2014) Implications of applying the green infrastructure concept in landscape planning for ecosystem services in peri-urban areas: An expert survey and case study, Planning Practice & Research. doi:10.1080/02697459.2014.973683.
   Google Scholar
• Ameen, R. F. M., Mourshed, M., & Li, M. (2015) A critical review of environmental assessment tools for sustainable urban design, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 55, pp. 110–125. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2015.07.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benedict, M. A., & McMahon, E. T. (2006) Green Infrastructure: Linking Landscapes and Communities, (Washington, DC: Island Press).
   Google Scholar
• Berlin Senate Department for Urban Development and the Environment [BSDUDE]. (2016) A green city center - BAF - biotope area factor. Available at http://www.stadtentwicklung.berlin.de/umwelt/landschaftsplanung/bff/index_en.shtml (accessed 28 September 2018).
   Google Scholar
• BRE. (2016) Strategic ecology framework. Available at http://www.breeam.com/strategic-ecology-framework (accessed 15 July 2016).
   Google Scholar
• BRE. (2018) BREEAM UK new construction. Non-domestic buildings (United Kingdom). Technical Manual. BRE. Available at http://www.breeam.com/NC2018/content/resources/output/10_pdf/a4_pdf/print/nc_uk_a4_print_mono/nc_uk_a4_print_mono.pdf (accessed 28 September 2018).
   Google Scholar
• BRE [Building Research Establishment]. (2012) BREEAM communities. Technical manual. BRE. Available at https://www.breeam.com/communitiesmanual/#resources/otherformats/output/10_pdf/20_a4_pdf_screen/sd202_breeam_communities_1.2_screen.pdf (accessed 28 September 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Building for Life Partnership. (2016) Building for life 12. 2016 edition. Nottingham Trent University: CADBE for the Building for Life Partnership. Available at http://www.udg.org.uk/publications/other-publication/building-life-12-2016-edition (accessed 28 September 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Burgess, S. (2015) Multifunctional green infrastructure: A typology, in: D. Sinnett, N. Smith, & S. Burgess (Eds) Handbook on Green Infrastructure: Planning, Design and Implementation, pp. 227–241 (Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar).
   Google Scholar
• Chen, B., Adimo, O., & Bao, Z. (2009) Assessment of aesthetic quality and multiple functions of urban green space from the users’ perspective: the case of Hangzhou flower garden, China, Landscape and & Urban Planning, 93, pp. 76–82. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.06.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole, R. J. (2005) Building environmental assessment methods: Redefining intentions and roles, Building Research & Information, 33(5), pp. 455–467. doi:10.1080/09613210500219063.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, C., & Lafortezza, R. (2017) Urban green infrastructure in Europe: Is greenspace planning and policy compliant? Land Use Policy, 69, pp. 93–101. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.08.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demuzere, M., Orru, K., Heidrich, O., Olazabal, E., Geneletti, D., Orru, H., Bhave, A. G., Mittal, N., Feliu, E., & Faehnle, M. (2014) Mitigating and adapting to climate change: Multi-functional and multi-scale assessment of green urban infrastructure, Journal of Environmental Management, 146, pp. 107–115. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.07.025.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding, G. (2008) Sustainable construction – The role of environmental assessment tools, Journal of Environmental Management, 86, pp. 451–464. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.12.025.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, J. B. (2013) Sustainable surface water management and green infrastructure in UK urban catchment planning, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 56(1), pp. 24–41. doi:10.1080/09640568.2011.648752.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2013) Green Infrastructure (GI) – Enhancing Europe’s natural capital. Available at http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52013DC0249 (accessed 20 July 2016).
   Google Scholar
• GBCA [Green Building Council of Australia]. (2016). Green star communities scorecard v.1.1. Available at https://new.gbca.org.au/green-star/rating-system/communities/(accessed 28 September 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Gidlow, C., Ellis, N., & Bostock, S. (2012) Development of the Neighbourhood Green Space Tool (NGST), Landscape & Urban Planning, 106(4), pp. 347–358. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.04.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GORD [Gulf Organisation for Research and Development. (2017) GSAS technical guide 2017. GORD. Available at http://www.gord.qa/admin/Content/Link2120183544.pdf (accessed 28 September 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Green Building Index. (2013) How GBI works? Available at http://www.greenbuildingindex.org/how-GBI-works.html (accessed 16 July 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Green Flag Award. (2016) Green flag award. Available at http://www.greenflagaward.org.uk/ (accessed 20 July 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Haapio, A., & Viitaniemi, P. (2008) A critical review of building environmental assessment tools, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 28(7), pp. 469–482. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2008.01.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heritage Lottery Fund. (2016) The State of UK public parks 2016. Available at https://www.hlf.org.uk/state-uk-public-parks-2016 (accessed 6 July 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Hunter, R., Christian, H., Veitch, J., Astell-Burt, T., Hipp, J., & Schipperijn, J. (2015) The impact of interventions to promote physical activity in urban green space: A systematic review and recommendations for future research, Social Science & Medicine, 124, pp. 246–256. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.11.051.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Institute for Sustainable Infrastructure (2015) Envision rating system for sustainable infrastructure. Available at https://research.gsd.harvard.edu/zofnass/files/2015/06/Envision-Manual_2015_red.pdf (accessed 28 September 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Jerome, G., Mell, I., & Shaw, D. (2017) Re-defining the characteristics of environmental volunteering: Creating a typology of community-scale green infrastructure, Environmental Research, 158, pp. 399–408. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2017.05.037.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kambites, C., & Owen, S. (2006) Renewed prospects for green infrastructure planning in the UK, Planning Practice & Research, 21(4), pp. 483–496. doi:10.1080/02697450601173413.
   Google Scholar
• Khoshkar, S., Balfors, B., & Wärnbäck, A. (2018) Planning for green qualities in the densification of suburban Stockholm – Opportunities and challenges, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management. doi:10.1080/09640568.2017.1406342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lafortezza, R., Davies, C., Sanesi, G., & Konijnendijk, C. C. C. (2013) Green infrastructure as a tool to support spatial planning in European urban regions, iForest: Biogeosciences & Forestry, 6, pp. 102–108. doi:10.3832/ifor0723-006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mell, I., Allin, S., Reimer, M., & Wilker, J. (2017) Strategic green infrastructure planning in Germany and the UK: A transnational evaluation of the evolution of urban greening policy and practice, International Planning Studies, 22, pp. 333–349. doi:10.1080/13563475.2017.1291334.
   Google Scholar
• MHCLG [Ministry of Housing and Local Government]. (2018) National planning policy framework. Available at https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/740441/National_Planning_Policy_Framework_web_accessible_version.pdf (accessed 28 September 2018).
   Google Scholar
• O’Neil, J. A., & Gallagher, C. E. (2014) Determining what is important in terms of the quality of an urban green network: A study of urban planning in England and Scotland, Planning Practice & Research, 29(2), pp. 202–216. doi:10.1080/02697459.2014.896154.
   Google Scholar
• Retzlaff, R. (2009) Green buildings and building assessment systems, Journal of Planning Literature, 24(1), pp. 3–21. doi:10.1177/0885412209349589.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roe, M., & Mell, I. (2013) Negotiating value and priorities: Evaluating the demands of green infrastructure development, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 56(5), pp. 650–673. doi:10.1080/09640568.2012.693454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmond, J. A., Tadaki, M., Vardoulakis, S., Arbuthnott, K., Coutts, A., Demuzere, M., Dirks, K. N., Heaviside, C., Lim, S., Macintyre, H., McInnes, R. N., & Wheeler, B. W. (2016) Health and climate related ecosystem services provided by street trees in the urban environment, Environmental Health, 15(Suppl 1), pp. 36. doi:10.1186/s12940-016-0138-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, A., Hölzinger, O., & Sadler, J. (2017) Making Plans for Green Infrastructure in England: Review of National Planning and Environmental Policies and Project Partners’ Plans. Northumbria University & University of Birmingham. Available at https://www.ecosystemsknowledge.net/sites/default/files/wp-content/uploads/Making%20Plans%20for%20Green%20Infrastructure%20in%20England%202017.pdf (accessed 28 September 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Sinnett, D. (2015) Green infrastructure and biodiversity in the city: Principles and design, in: D. Sinnett, N. Smith, & S. Burgess (Eds) Handbook on Green Infrastructure: Planning, Design and Implementation, pp. 87–101 (Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar).
   Google Scholar
• Sinnett, D., Calvert, T., Smith, N., Burgess, S., & King, L. (2018) The translation and use of green infrastructure evidence, Proceedings of the ICE - Water Management, 171(2), pp. 99–109.
   Google Scholar
• SSI [Sustainable Sites Initiative]. (2014) SITES v2 rating system for sustainable land design and development. Available at https://www.usgbc.org/resources/sites-rating-system-and-scorecard (accessed 28 September 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Swanwick, C. (2009) Society’s attitudes to and preferences for land and landscape, Land Use Policy, 26S, pp. S62–S75. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.08.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Wildlife Trusts. (2016) Biodiversity benchmark for a living landscape. Available at http://www.wildlifetrusts.org/biodiversitybenchmark (accessed 20 July 2016).
   Google Scholar
• USGBC [United States Green Building Council]. (2018a) LEED v4 for Homes Design and Construction. USGBC. Available at https://www.usgbc.org/sites/default/files/LEED%20v4%20ballot%20version%20(Homes)%20-%2013%2011%2013.pdf (accessed 28 September 2018).
   Google Scholar
• USGBC [United States Green Building Council]. (2018b). LEED v4 for Building Design and Construction. USGBC. Available at http://greenguard.org/uploads/images/LEEDv4forBuildingDesignandConstructionBallotVersion.pdf (accessed 28 September 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Van Herzele, A., & Wiedemann, T. (2003) A monitoring tool for the provision of accessible and attractive urban green spaces, Landscape & Urban Planning, 63(2), pp. 109–126. doi:10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00192-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VGBC [Vietnam Green Building Council]. (2015) LOTUS non-residential rating tool. Version 2.0. Technical manual. VGBC. Available at http://vgbc.vn/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/LOTUS-Non-Residential-V2.0-Technical-Manual.pdf accessed 25 April 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Wildlife Trusts. (2018) About us. Available at https://www.wildlifetrusts.org/about-us (Accessed, 25 September, 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Wilker, J., Rusche, K., & Rymsa-Fitschen, C. (2016) Improving participation in green infrastructure planning, Planning Practice & Research, 31(3), pp. 229–249. doi:10.1080/02697459.2016.1158065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar