Mobile Participation in Urban Planning; Exploring a Typology of Engagement

References

• Adenskog, M. et al. (2017) Balancing potential and risk: The Living Lab approach in mobile participation research, in: Electronic participation; 9th IFIP WG 8.5 International Conference, ePart 2017. pp. 12–23. Available at http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-642-33250-0.
   Google Scholar
• Arnstein, S. R. (1969) A ladder of citizen participation, Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), pp. 216–224. doi:10.1080/01944366908977225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bäcklund, P., Kallio, K. P., & Jouni, H. (2014) Residents, customers or citizens? Tracing the idea of youthful participation in the context of administrative reforms in Finnish public administration, Planning Theory & Practice, 15(3), pp. 311–327. doi:10.1080/14649357.2014.929726.
   Google Scholar
• Barros, S. A. R., & Sampaio, R. C. (2016) Do citizens trust electronic participatory budgeting? Public expression in online forums as an evaluation method in Belo Horizonte, Policy and Internet, 8(3), pp. 292–312. doi:10.1002/poi3.125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boonstra, B., Boelens, L. (2011) Self-Organization in urban development: Towards a new perspective on spatial planning. Urban Research & Practice, 4(2), pp. 99–122. doi:10.1080/17535069.2011.579767
   Google Scholar
• Brabham, D. C. (2009a) Crowdsourcing the public participation process for planning projects, Planning Theory, 8(3), pp. 242–262. doi:10.1177/1473095209104824
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brabham, D. C. (2009b) Crowdsourcing the public participation process for planning projects, Planning Theory, 8(3), pp. 242–262. doi:10.1177/1473095209104824
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brownill, S., & Parker, G. (2010) Why bother with good works? The relevance of public participation(s) in planning in a post-collaborative era, Planning Practice and Research, 25(3), pp. 275–282. doi:10.1080/02697459.2010.503407
   Google Scholar
• Bugs, G., Granell, C., Fonts, O., Huerta, J., & Painho, M. (2010) An assessment of public participation GIS and Web 2.0 technologies in urban planning practice in Canela, Brazil, Cities, 27(3), pp. 172–181. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2009.11.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burby, R. J. (2003) Making plans that matter: Citizen involvement and government action, Journal of the American Planning Association, 69(1), pp. 33–49. doi:10.1080/01944360308976292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corburn, J. (2003) Bringing local knowledge into environmental decision making, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 22, pp. 420–433. doi:10.1177/0739456X03022004008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2003) Research Design; Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications).
   Google Scholar
• D’Hondt, E., Stevens, M., & An, J. (2013) Participatory noise mapping works! An evaluation of participatory sensing as an alternative to standard techniques for environmental monitoring, Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 9(5), pp. 681–694. doi:10.1016/j.pmcj.2012.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Waal, M. (2011) The ideas and ideals in urban media, in: M. Foth, L. Forlando, & C. Satchell (Eds) From Social Butterfly to Engaged Citizen, pp. 5–21 (London: MIT Press).
   Google Scholar
• DiCindio, F., & Peraboni, C. (2011) Building digital participation hives: Towards a local public sphere, in: M. Foth, L. Forlano, C. Satchell, & M. Gibbs (Eds) From Social Butterfly to Engaged Citizen: Urban Informatics, Social Media, Ubiquitous Computing, and Mobile Technology to Support Citizen Engagement, pp. 93–114 (London, England: The MIT Press/Cambridge Massachusetts).
   Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J. S. 2002. Deliberative democracy and beyond. Oxford Scholarship Online. Available at http://www.oxfordscholarship.com.libraryproxy.griffith.edu.au/view/10.1093/019925043X.001.0001/acprof-9780199250431 ( accessed March 2015). pp. 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Ertiö, T. 2015. Participatory apps for urban planning—Space for improvement. Planning Practice & Research Available at http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02697459.2015.1052942 ( accessed 30 October). pp.303–321.
   Google Scholar
• Ertiö, T. P., Ruoppila, S., & Thiel, S.-K. 2016. Motivations to use a mobile participation application. in Electronic Participation; 8th International Conference on Electronic Participation ePart, 2016, Vol. 8. Available at http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-642-33250-0 pp. 138–150
   Google Scholar
• Ertiö, T.-P., & Ruoppila, S. 2014. Supporting ‘ Participation ’ in mobile participation. Electronic Government and Electronic Participation 21(Innovation and the Public Sector):3–12 (Dublin, Ireland).
   Google Scholar
• Estellés-Arolas, E., & González-Ladrón-de-Guevara, F. (2012) Towards an integrated crowdsourcing definition, Journal of Information Science, 38(2), pp. 189–200. doi:10.1177/0165551512437638
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, F. (2000) Citizens, Experts, and the Environment: The Politics of Local Knowledge, (Durham, London: Duke University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, E., Schirra, S., & Hollander, J. (2011) Immersive planning: A conceptual model for designing public participation with new technologies, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 38(3), pp. 505–519. doi:10.1068/b37013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, E. A., Henderson, S., & Schloss, A. (2011) Using mobile phones to engage citizen scientists in research, Eos, 92(38), pp. 313–315. doi:10.1029/2011EO380002
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (1992) Planning through debate: The communicative turn in planning theory, The Town Planning Review, 63, pp. 143–162. doi:10.3828/tpr.63.2.422x602303814821
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (1997) Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies, (Vancouver: UBC Press).
   Google Scholar
• Horelli, L. (2002) A methodology of participatory planning, in: Robert B. Bechtel, & Arza Churchman (Eds) Handbook of Environmental Psychology, pp. 607–628 (New York: Wiley).
   Google Scholar
• Horelli, L. (2013) New Approaches to Urban Planning, (Helsinki, Finland: Aalto University)
   Google Scholar
• Horelli, L., Saad-Sulonen, J., Wallin, S., & Botero, A. (2015) When self-organization intersects with urban planning: Two cases from Helsinki, Planning Practice & Research, 30(3), pp. 286–302. doi:10.1080/02697459.2015.1052941
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howe, J. (2006) The rise of crowdsourcing, Wired Magazine, 14(6), pp. 1–5. Available at http://www.clickadvisor.com/downloads/Howe_The_Rise_of_Crowdsourcing.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Irvin, R. A., & Stansbury, J. (2004) Citizen participation in decision making: Is it worth the effort? Public Administration Review, 64(1), pp. 55–65. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00346.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, P., Layard, A., Speed, C., & Lorne, C. (2015a) MapLocal: Use of smartphones for crowdsourced planning, Planning Practice & Research, 7459(July 2015), pp. 1–15. doi:10.1080/02697459.2015.1052940
   Google Scholar
• Jones, P., Layard, A., Speed, C., & Lorne, C. (2015b) MapLocal: Use of smartphones for crowdsourced planning, Planning Practice & Research, 7459(July 2015), pp. 1–15. doi:10.1080/02697459.2015.1052940
   Google Scholar
• Kahila-Tani, M. (2015) Reshaping the Planning Process Using Local Experiences: Utilising PPGIS in Participatory Urban, (Helsinki, Finland: Aalto University).
   Google Scholar
• Kahila-Tani, M., Broberg, A., Kyttä, M., & Tyger, T. (2016) Let the citizens map—Public participation GIS as a planning support system in the Helsinki master plan process, Planning Practice & Research, 31(2), pp. 195–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, C., & Cruickshank, M. (2012) Building capacity to engage: Community engagement or government engagement? Community Development Journal, 47(1), pp. 5–28. doi:10.1093/cdj/bsq018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleinhans, R., Van Ham, M., & Evans-Cowley, J. (2015) Using social media and mobile technologies to foster engagement and self-organization in participatory urban planning and neighbourhood governance, Planning Practice & Research, 30(3), pp. 237–247. doi:10.1080/02697459.2015.1051320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korn, M. (2013) Situating Engagement - Ubiquitous Infrastructures for In-Situ Civic Engagement, (Denmark: Aarhus University).
   Google Scholar
• Landemore, H. 2012. Collective wisdom. Old and new. Collective Wisdom: Principles and Mechanisms. Available at http://books.google.com/books?hl=en‎&id=5vQgAwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA1&dq=Collective+Wisdom+Old+and+New&ots=tV6yS_2Eun&sig=Epfws_Q1GuQF0vxGDsGOYf1ByGg
   Google Scholar
• Lee, D. T., Goel, A., & Landemore, H. (2014) Crowdsourcing for participatory democracies : Efficient elicitation of social choice functions, in: Proceedings of the Second AAAI Conference on Human Computation and Crowdsourcing (HCOMP 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Lindner, R., & Riehm, U. (2011) Broadening participation through e-petitions? An empirical study of petitions to the German parliament, Policy & Internet, 3(1), pp. 63–85. doi:10.2202/1944-2866.1083
   Google Scholar
• Magro, M. J. (2012) A review of social media use in e-government, Administrative Sciences, 2(4), pp. 148–161. doi:10.3390/admsci2020148
   Google Scholar
• Nuojua, J. (2010) WebMapMedia: A map-based web application for facilitating participation in spatial planning, Multimedia Systems, 16(1), pp. 3–21. doi:10.1007/s00530-009-0175-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ochara, N. M., & Mawela, T. (2013) Enabling social sustainability of e-participation through mobile technology, Information Technology for Development, (April 2015), pp. 1–24. doi:10.1080/02681102.2013.833888
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Partanen, J. 2015. Indicators for self-organization potential in urban context. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design doi:10.1068/b140064p
   Google Scholar
• Pearce, K. E., & Rice, R. E. (2013) Digital divides from access to activities: Comparing mobile and personal computer internet users, Journal of Communication, 63, pp. 721–744. doi:10.1111/jcom.12045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porwol, L., Ojo, A., & Breslin, J. G. (2014) An ontology for next generation E-Participation initiatives, Government Information Quarterly, pp. 1–12. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2016.01.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rantanen, H., & Kahila, M. (2009) The softGIS approach to local knowledge, Journal of Environmental Management, 90(6), pp. 1981–1990. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.08.025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe, G., & Frewer, L. (2005) A typology of public engagement mechanisms, Science, Technology & Human Values, 30(2), pp. 251–290. doi:10.1177/0162243904271724
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saad-Sulonen, J. (2014) Combining Participations, (Helsinki: Aalto Arts books).
   Google Scholar
• Seltzer, E., & Mahmoudi, D. (2013) Citizen participation, open innovation, and crowdsourcing: Challenges and opportunities for planning, Journal of Planning Literature, 28(1), pp. 3–18. doi:10.1177/0885412212469112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva, C. N. (2013) Open source urban governance: Crowdsourcing, neogeography, VGI, and citizen science, in: Citizen E-Participation in Urban Governance: Crowdsourcing and Collaborative Creativity, pp. 1–18. Available at http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84938957237&partnerID=40&md5=37e18938ba3eb1fccc5adc052eae2d09
   Google Scholar
• Staffans, A. (2004) Vaikuttavat Asukkaat: Vuorovaikutus Ja Paikallinen Tieto Kaupunkisuunnittelun Haasteena, (Espoo: Yliopistopaino Oy).
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Finland. (2015) Use of information and communications technology by individuals, (Helsinki: Statistics Finland). Available at http://www.stat.fi/til/sutivi/2017/13/sutivi_2017_13_2017-11-22_tie_001_en.html (accessed 12 October2018).
   Google Scholar
• Streich, B., & Stefan, H. (2011) Engaging the mobile citizens – How mobile devices offer new ways of civil engagement, Real Corp 2011: Change for Stability, 6(May), pp. 269–274.
   Google Scholar
• Surowiecki, J. (2004) The wisdom of crowds: Why the Many are Smarter than the Few and How Collective Wisdom Shapes Business, Econo- mies, Societies, and Nations, (New York: Doubleday).
   Google Scholar
• Surowiecki, J. (2005). The Wisdom of Crowds. Available at http://www.amazon.com/dp/0385721706
   Google Scholar
• Townsend, A. M. (2000) Life in the real-time city: Mobile telephones and urban metabolism, Journal of Urban Technology, 7(2), pp. 85–104. doi:10.1080/713684114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turnhout, E., Van Bommel, S., & Aarts, N. (2010) How participation creates citizens: Participatory governance as performative practice, Ecology and Society, 15, pp. 4. doi:10.5751/ES-03701-150426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Herzele, A. (2004) Local knowledge in action: Valuing nonprofessional reasoning in the planning process, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 24(2), pp. 197–212. doi:10.1177/0739456X04267723
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar