Decentralized Implementation of Flood Resilience Measures – A Blessing or a Curse? Lessons from the Thames Estuary 2100 Plan and the Royal Docks Regeneration

References

• Aldridge, H., Born, T. B., Tinson, A., & MacInnes, T. (2015) London’s Poverty Profile 2015, Report (100 pages), London, Trust for London and New Policy Institute. Available at http://www.npi.org.uk/files/5714/4533/2889/LPP_2015_report.pdf (accessed 15 August 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Armitage, D. (2008) Governance and the commons in a multi-level world, International Journal of the Commons, 2(1), pp. 7–32. doi:10.18352/ijc.28
   Google Scholar
• Begg, C., Luther, J., Kuhlicke, C., & Steinführer, A. (2011) Participation in Central European Flood Risk Management: Social Capacity Building in Practice. CapHaz-Net WP9 Report, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research – UFZ, Leipzig, Germany. Available at: http://caphaznet.org/outcomesresults/CapHaz-Net_WP9_RHW-River-Floods.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Begg, C., Walker, G., & Kuhlicke, C. (2015) Localism and flood risk management in England: The creation of new inequalities? Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 33(4), pp. 685–702. doi:10.1068/c12216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, H., Ellis, H., Henneberry, J., & Gladwell, C. (2000) Planning obligations, planning practice, and land-use outcomes, Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 27(5), pp. 759–775. doi:10.1068/b2683
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, J. R. L. (2015) Learning from practice - enhancing the resilience of cities through urban design and planning, Doctoral dissertation, University of Warwick, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, N., & Cochrane, A. (2013) Geographies and politics of localism: The localism of the United Kingdom’s coalition government, Political Geography, 34, pp. 10–23. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2013.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cullingworth, B., Nadin, V., Hart, T., Davoudi, S., Pendlebury, J., Vigar, G., … Townshend, T. (2014) Town and Country Planning in the UK, (London: Taylor & Francis).
   Google Scholar
• Davoudi, S. (2016) Resilience and governmentality of unknowns, in: M. Bevir (Ed) Governmentality after Neoliberalism, pp. 152–171 (New York: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Davoudi, S., & Madanipour, A. (2015) Reconsidering Localism, (London: Taylor & Francis).
   Google Scholar
• Driessen, P. P. J., Hegger, D. L. T., Bakker, M. H. N., van Rijswick, H. F. M. W., & Kundzewicz, Z. W. (2016) Toward more resilient flood risk governance, Ecology and Society, 21, pp. 4. doi:10.5751/ES-08921-210453
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EA. (2014) Letter from EA to London Borough of Newham, Concerning Finished Floor Levels in Minoco Wharf Development (Dated 3 September 2014), Approval of details pursuant condition C35 (details of proposed finished floor levels) attached to planning permission 11/00856/OUT dated 30th March 2012 (London: Environment Agency).
   Google Scholar
• EA & DEFRA. (2011) Understanding the risks, empowering communities, building resilience: The national flood and coastal erosion risk management strategy for England. London. Available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/228898/9780108510366.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Eagle, R., Jones, A., & Greig, A. (2017) Localism and the environment: A critical review of UK Government localism strategy 2010–2015, Local Economy, 32(1), pp. 55–72. doi:10.1177/0269094216687710
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giosan, L., Syvitski, J., Constantinescu, S., & Day, J. (2014) Protect the world’s deltas, Nature, 516(7529), pp. 31–33. doi:10.1038/516031a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handmer, J. (2008) Risk creation, bearing and sharing on Australian floodplains, International Journal of Water Resources Development, 24(4), pp. 527–540. doi:10.1080/07900620801921439
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haughton, G., Bankoff, G., & Coulthard, T. J. (2015) In search of “lost” knowledge and outsourced expertise in flood risk management, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 40, pp. 375–386. doi:10.1111/tran.12082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hegger, D. L. T., Driessen, P. P. J., Wiering, M., Van Rijswick, H. F. M. W., Kundzewicz, Z. W., Matczak, P., … Ek, K. (2016) Toward more flood resilience: Is a diversification of flood risk management strategies the way forward? Ecology and Society, 21, pp. 4. doi:10.5751/ES-08854-210452
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooijer, A., Klijn, F., Pedroli, G. B. M., & Van Os, A. G. (2004) Towards sustainable flood risk management in the Rhine and Meuse river basins: Synopsis of the findings of IRMA-SPONGE, River Research and Applications, 20(3), pp. 343–357. doi:10.1002/rra.781
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• House of Commons. (2015) Living with water – Report from the commission of inquiry into flood resilience of the future Report by the All Party Group for Excellence in the Built Environment (40 pages), Available at http://cic.org.uk/admin/resources/appg-report.-1.pdf (accessed 15 August 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Hupe, P. L., & Hill, M. J. (2016) “And the rest is implementation.” Comparing approaches to what happens in policy processes beyond great expectations, Public Policy and Administration, 31(2), pp. 103–121. doi:10.1177/0952076715598828
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutter, G., & Kuhlicke, C. (2013) Resilience, talk and action: Exploring the meanings of resilience in the context of planning and institutions, Planning Practice & Research, 28(3), pp. 294–306. doi:10.1080/02697459.2013.787706
   Google Scholar
• Janssen-Jansen, L. B., & Woltjer, J. (2010) British discretion in Dutch planning: Establishing a comparative perspective for regional planning and local development in the Netherlands and the United Kingdom, Land Use Policy, 27(3), pp. 906–916. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeuken, A., & Reeder, T. (2011) Short-term decision making and long-term strategies : How to adapt to uncertain climate change - examples from the Thames Estuary and the Dutch Rhine-Meuse Delta, Water Governance, 1, pp. 29–35.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, C. L., & Priest, S. J. (2008) Flood risk management in England: A changing landscape of risk responsibility? International Journal of Water Resources Development, 24(4), pp. 513–525. doi:10.1080/07900620801923146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhlicke, C., & Steinführer, A. (2010) Social capacity building for natural hazards: A conceptual frame, CapHaz-net WP 1 report, Leipzig, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research – UFZ. Available at http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.476.7009&rep=rep1&type=pdf (accessed 15 August 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Lavery, S., & Donovan, B. (2005) Flood risk management in the Thames Estuary looking ahead 100 years, Philosophical Transactions, Series A, Mathematical, Physical, and Engineering Sciences, 363(1831), pp. 1455–1474. doi:10.1098/rsta.2005.1579
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao, K. H. (2014) From flood control to flood adaptation: A case study on the Lower Green River Valley and the city of Kent in King County, Washington, Natural Hazards, 71, pp. 723–750. doi:10.1007/s11069-013-0923-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• London’s Poverty Profile. (2014) Reduction in borough budgets (dated 28 March 2014). Available at http://www.londonspovertyprofile.org.uk/indicators/topics/11-services/reduction-in-borough-budgets/(accessed 15 August 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Loucks, D. P., Stedinger, J. R., Davis, D. W., & Stakhiv, E. Z. (2008) Private and public responses to flood risks, International Journal of Water Resources Development, 24(4), pp. 541–553. doi:10.1080/07900620801923286
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mees, H., Tempels, B., Crabbé, A., & Boelens, L. (2016) Shifting public-private responsibilities in Flemish flood risk management - Towards a co-evolutionary approach, Land Use Policy, 57, pp. 23–33. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.05.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mees, H. L. P., Driessen, P. P. J., & Runhaar, H. A. C. (2012) Exploring the scope of public and private responsibilities for climate adaptation, Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 14(3), pp. 305–330. doi:10.1080/1523908X.2012.707407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijerink, S., & Dicke, W. (2008) Shifts in the public–private divide in flood management, International Journal of Water Resources Development, 24(4), pp. 499–512. doi:10.1080/07900620801921363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsen, P., Stahl, C., Roback, K., Cairney, P., & Ståhl, C. (2013) Never the twain shall meet? - A comparison of implementation science and policy implementation research, Implementation Science, 8(63), pp. 1–12. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-8-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nye, M., Tapsell, S., & Twigger-Ross, C. (2011) New social directions in UK flood risk management: Moving towards flood risk citizenship? Journal of Flood Risk Management, 4(4), pp. 288–297. doi:10.1111/j.1753-318X.2011.01114.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pahl-Wostl, C. (2009) A conceptual framework for analysing adaptive capacity and multi-level learning processes in resource governance regimes, Global Environmental Change, 19(3), pp. 354–365. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penning-Rowsell, E. C., Haigh, N., Lavery, S., & McFadden, L. (2013) A threatened world city: The benefits of protecting London from the sea, Natural Hazards, 66, pp. 1383–1404. doi:10.1007/s11069-011-0075-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plate, E. J. (Ed.) (2001) Naturkatastrophen: Ursachen, Auswirkungen, Vorsorge, (Stuttgart: Schweizerbart).
   Google Scholar
• Pressman, J. L., & Wildavsky, A. B. (1973) Implementation: How Great Expectations in Washington are Dashed in Oakland: Or, Why It’s Amazing that Federal Programs Work at All, This Being a Saga of the Economic Development Administration as Told by Two Sympathetic Observers Who Seek to Build Morals, (Berkeley: University of California Press).
   Google Scholar
• Quod and Shelter. (2016) When Brownfield isn’t enough - strategic options for London’s growth. Available at http://www.quod.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/When-brownfield-isnt-enough.pdf (accessed 15 August 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Restemeyer, B., Woltjer, J., & van den Brink, M. (2015) A strategy-based framework for assessing the flood resilience of cities - A Hamburg case study, Planning Theory and Practice, 16(1), pp. 45–62. doi:10.1080/14649357.2014.1000950
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tempels, B., & Hartmann, T. (2014) A co-evolving frontier between land and water: Dilemmas of flexibility versus robustness in flood risk management, Water International, 39(6), pp. 872–883. doi:10.1080/02508060.2014.958797
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Guardian. (2015) London’s poorest boroughs once again prepare to make the biggest cuts (dated 23 February 2015). Available at https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/davehillblog/2015/feb/23/londons-poorest-boroughs-once-again-prepare-to-make-the-biggest-cuts (accessed 15 August 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Tunstall, S. M., Johnson, C. L., & Penning-Rowsell, E. C. (2004) Flood hazard management in England and Wales: From land drainage to flood risk management, in: Proceedings World Congress on Natural Disaster Mitigation, February 19-21, New Delhi, Vol. 2, pp. 447–454.
   Google Scholar
• van den Hurk, M., Mastenbroek, E., & Meijerink, S. (2014) Water safety and spatial development: An institutional comparison between the United Kingdom and the Netherlands, Land Use Policy, 36, pp. 416–426. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.09.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vis, M., Klijn, F., de Bruijn, K. M., & van Buuren, M. (2003) Resilience strategies for flood risk management in the Netherlands, International Journal River Basin Management, 1(1), pp. 33–40. doi:10.1080/15715124.2003.9635190
   Google Scholar
• Wachinger, G., Renn, O., Begg, C., & Kuhlicke, C. (2013) The risk perception paradox - implications for governance and communication of natural hazards, Risk Analysis, 33(6), pp. 1049–1065. doi:10.1111/risa.2013.33.issue-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, G., Whittle, R., Medd, W., & Watson, N. (2010) Risk Governance and Natural Hazards, CapHaz-Net WP2 Report, Lancaster, Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University. Available at https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Gordon_Walker/publication/228680238_Risk_governance_and_natural_hazards/links/00b7d525d4e53efa7d000000/Risk-governance-and-natural-hazards.pdf (accessed 15 August 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Wesselink, A. J., Bijker, W. E., de Vriend, H. J., & Krol, M. S. (2007) Dutch dealings with the Delta, Nature and Culture, 2(2), pp. 188–209. doi:10.3167/nc.2007.020206
   Google Scholar
• White, I. (2010) Water and the City: Risk, Resilience and Planning for a Sustainable Future, (London: Taylor & Francis).
   Google Scholar
• White, I., & O’Hare, P. (2014) From rhetoric to reality: Which resilience, why resilience, and whose resilience in spatial planning? Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 32(5), pp. 934–950. doi:10.1068/c12117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiering, M., Green, C., Rijswick, H. F. M. W., Van, Priest, S. J., & Keessen, A. (2015) The rationales of resilience in English and Dutch flood risk policies, Journal of Water and Climate, 6(1), pp. 38–54. doi:10.2166/wcc.2014.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuidema, C. (2017) Decentralization in Environmental Governance: A Post-Contingency Approach, (Abingdon: Routledge).
   Google Scholar