Teaching Land Use–Transport Interactions in Italy: Towards an Interdisciplinary Pedagogy?

References

• Alizadeh, T., Tomerini, D., & Colbran, S. (2017) Teaching planning studios: An online assessment task to enhance the first year experience, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 37(2), pp. 234–245. doi: 10.1177/0739456X16647162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balassiano, K. (2011) Tackling “wicked problems” in planning studio courses, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 31(4), pp. 449–460. doi: 10.1177/0739456X11415282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldwin, C., & Rosier, J. (2017) Growing future planners: A framework for integrating experiential learning into tertiary planning programs, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 37(1), pp. 43–55. doi: 10.1177/0739456X16634864.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balsas, C. (2012) What about plan evaluation? Integrating evaluation in urban planning studio’s pedagogy, Planning Practice and Research, 27(4), pp. 475–494. doi: 10.1080/02697459.2012.680274.
   Google Scholar
• Congiu, T. (2014) L’insegnamento del progetto del Sistema dei trasporti nella scuola di Architettura di Algero, E. Cicalò (Ed) Progetto, ricerca, didattica. L’esperienza decennale di una nuova scuola di Architettura, pp. 185–193, (Milano: FrancoAngeli).
   Google Scholar
• Crane, R. (2000) The influence of urban form on travel: An interpretive review, Journal of Planning Literature, 15(3), pp. 3–23. doi: 10.1177/08854120022092890.
   Google Scholar
• Davoudi, S. (2010) Planning and interdisciplinarity, Geppert & G. Cotella (Eds) Quality Issues in a Consolidating European Higher Education Area, Planning Education No. 2, pp. 1–76, (Leuven: AESOP).
   Google Scholar
• Davoudi, S., & Ellison, P. (2006) Implications of the Bologna Process for Planning Education in Europe: Results of the 2006 Survey, (Leuven: AESOP).
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (1997) The EU compendium of spatial planning systems and policies. Available at http://commin.org/upload/Glossaries/European_Glossary/EU_compendium_No_28_of_1997.pdf (accessed 26 July 2017)
   Google Scholar
• Frank, A. I. (2006) Three decades of thought on planning education, Journal of Planning Literature, 21(1), pp. 15–67. doi: 10.1177/0885412206288904.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank, A. I. (2010) Making a case for complementarity of student learning from year-long work-based placements in town planning, Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 4(2), pp. 21–45.
   Google Scholar
• Fubini, A. (2008) Il difficile rapporto tra pianificazione urbanistica e della mobilità, P. Riganti (Ed) Città, attività, spostamenti. La pianificazione della mobilità urbana, pp. 9–23, (Roma: Carocci).
   Google Scholar
• Handy, S., Weston, L., Song, J., & Lane, M. D. (2002) Education of transport planning professionals, Transport Research Record, 1812, pp. 151–160. doi: 10.3141/1812-19.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, M., Aitken-Rose, E., & Dixon, J. (2009) The pedagogy of the planning studio: A view from down under, Journal for Education in the Built Environment, 4(1), pp. 8–30. doi: 10.11120/jebe.2009.04010008.
   Google Scholar
• Janin Rivolin, U. (2017) Global crisis and the systems of spatial governance and planning: A European comparison, European Planning Studies, 25(6), pp. 994–1012. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2017.1296110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, D., Krizek, K., & Levinson, D. (2008) Designing and assessing a teaching laboratory for an integrated land use and transport course, Transport Research Record, 2046, pp. 85–93. doi: 10.3141/2046-11.
   Google Scholar
• Kotval, Z. (2003) Teaching experiential learning in the urban planning curriculum, Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 27(3), pp. 297–308. doi: 10.1080/0309826032000145061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krizek, K., & Levinson, D. (2005) Teaching integrated land use-transport planning: Topics, readings, and strategies, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 24(3), pp. 304–316. doi: 10.1177/0739456X04267731.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanzani, A., & Longo, A. (2016) In search of an integrated mobility project, P. Pucci & M. Colleoni (Eds) In Understanding Mobilities for Designing Contemporary Cities, pp. 87–108, (Heidelberg: Springer). doi : 10.1007/9783319225784.
   Google Scholar
• Levinson, D., & Krizek, K. (2008) Planning for Place and Plexus. Metropolitan Land Use and Transport, (New York: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Long, J. G. (2012) State of the studio: Revisiting the potential of studio pedagogy in US-based planning programs, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 32(4), pp. 431–448. doi: 10.1177/0739456X12457685.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maat, K., van Wee, B., & Stead, D. (2005) Land use and travel behaviour: Expected effects from the perspective of utility theory and activity-based theories, Environment and Planning B, 32(1), pp. 33–46. doi: 10.1068/b31106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mateo-Babiano, I., & Burke, M. I. (2013) Transport planning education in urban planning schools in Australia, in: Australasian Transport Research Forum 2013 Proceedings, Brisbane, October 2–4.
   Google Scholar
• Mironowicz, I. (2010) Interdisciplinarity and planning, interdisciplinarity in planning: Advantages and disadvantages, Planning Education, 2, pp. 39–42.
   Google Scholar
• Nadin, V., & Stead, D. (2008) European spatial planning systems, social models and learning, disP-The Planning Review, 44(172), pp. 35–47. doi: 10.1080/02513625.2008.10557001
   Google Scholar
• Næss, P. (2006) Urban Structure Matters, The RTPI Library Series, (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Németh, J., & Long, J. G. (2012) Assessing learning outcomes in US planning studio courses, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 32(4), pp. 476–490. doi: 10.1177/0739456X12453740.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oonk, C., Gulikers, J., & Mulder, M. (2016) Educating collaborative planners: Strengthening evidence for the learning potential of multi-stakeholder regional learning environments, Planning Practice & Research, 31(5), pp. 533–551. doi: 10.1080/02697459.2016.1222108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinson, D. (2004) Urban planning: An ‘undisciplined’ discipline? Futures, 36, pp. 503–513. doi: 10.1016/j.futures.2003.10.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pojani, D., Johnson, L., Darchen, S., & Yang, K. (2016) Learning by doing: Employer expectations of planning studio education, Urban Policy and Research, pp. 1–9. doi: 10.1080/08111146.2016.1221814.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riganti, P. (2008) Città, attività, spostamenti. La pianificazione della mobilità urbana, (Roma: Carocci).
   Google Scholar
• Rooij, R., & Frank, A. I. (2016) Educating spatial planners for the age of co-creation: The need to risk community, science and practice involvement in planning programmes and curricula, Planning Practice & Research, 31(5), pp. 473–485. doi: 10.1080/02697459.2016.1222120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosier, J., Slade, C., Perkins, T., Baldwin, C., Coiacetto, E., Budge, T., & Harwood, A. (2016) The benefits of embedding experiential learning in the education of planners, Planning Practice & Research, 31(5), pp. 486–499. doi: 10.1080/02697459.2016.1229899.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senbel, M. (2012) Experiential learning and the co-creation of design artifacts: A hybrid urban design studio for planners, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 32(4), pp. 449–464. doi: 10.1177/0739456X12455065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staricco, L., & Vitale Brovarone, E. (2018) Promoting TOD through regional planning. A comparative analysis of two European approaches, Journal of Transport Geography, 66, pp. 45–52. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2017.11.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stead, D., & Marshall, S. (2001) The relationship between urban form and travel patterns. An international review and evaluation, European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, 1(2), pp. 113–141.
   Google Scholar
• Te Brömmelstroet, M., & Bertolini, L. (2010) Integrating land use and transport knowledge in strategy-making, Transportation, 37(1), pp. 85–104. doi: 10.1007/s11116-009-9221-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viswanathan, L., Whitelaw, G. S., & Meligrana, J. (2012) Evaluating the role of the project course in professional planning education and its influence on planning policy and practice, Planning Practice and Research, 27(3), pp. 387–403. doi: 10.1080/02697459.2012.673329.
   Google Scholar
• Wight, I., Kellett, J., & Pieters, J. (2016) Practice ~ reflection ~ learning: Work experience in planner education, Planning Practice & Research, 31(5), pp. 500–512. doi: 10.1080/02697459.2016.1222109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zanon, B. (2014) Planners’ technical expertise: Changing paradigms and practices in the Italian experience, Planning Practice and Research, 29(1), pp. 75–95. doi: 10.1080/02697459.2013.872907.
   Google Scholar