How Senior Glaswegian Planners are Adjusting to the Scottish Government’s Modernization Agenda

References

• Allmendinger, P. (2001) The head and the heart, national identity and urban planning in Scotland, International Planning Studies, 6(1), pp. 33–54. doi:10.1080/13563470120026523
   Google Scholar
• Allmendinger, P. (2016) Neoliberal Spatial Governance (Abingdon: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Allmendinger, P., & Haughton, G. (2010) Spatial planning, devolution and new planning spaces, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 28(5), pp. 803–818. doi:10.1068/c09163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allmendinger, P., & Haughton, G. (2013) The evolution and trajectories of English spatial governance: ‘neoliberal episodes in planning, Planning Practice and Research, 28(1), pp. 6–26. doi:10.1080/02697459.2012.699223
   Google Scholar
• Baum, H. (2015) Planning with half a mind: Why planners resist emotion, Planning Theory and Practice, 16(4), pp. 498–516. doi:10.1080/14649357.2015.1071870
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyce, M., Rice, G., & McWilliamson, C. (2008) The spatialities of actually existing neoliberalism in Glasgow 1977 to present, Geografiska Annaler B, 90(4), pp. 313–325. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0467.2008.00296.x
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, N., Peck, J., & Theodore, N. (2010) Variegated neoliberalization geographies, modalities, pathways, Global Networks, 10(2), pp. 182–222. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0374.2009.00277.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan, N., & Theodore, N. (2002a) Cities and the geographies of ‘Actually Existing Neoliberalism’, Antipode, 34(3), pp. 349–379. doi:10.1111/1467-8330.00246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briggs, A. (1968) Victorian Cities (Harmondsworth: Penguin).
   Google Scholar
• Buxton, M., Goodman, R., & Budge, T. (2005) Planning and deregulation: the failure of the new Victorian Planning System, Australian Planner, 42(2), pp. 52–58. doi:10.1080/07293682.2005.9982418
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, E. (2014) A new era for a historic place, Scottish Planner, 159, pp. 10–11.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, H. (2012) ‘Planning ethics’ and rediscovering the idea of planning, Planning Theory, 11(4), pp. 379–399. doi:10.1177/1473095212442159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, H., & Marshall, R. (2000) Moral obligations, planning and the public interest: acommentary on current British practice, Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and CityScience, 27(2), pp. 297–312. doi:10.1068/b2509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, H., Tait, M., & Watkins, C. (2014) Is there space for better planning in a neoliberal world? Implications for planning practice, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 34(1), pp. 45–59. doi:10.1177/0739456X13514614
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz, C. (2006) Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis (London: Sage).
   Google Scholar
• Checkland, S. (1981) The Upas Tree. Glasgow 1875–1975, and after 1975–1980 (Glasgow: University ofGlasgow Press).
   Google Scholar
• Clifford, B. (2016) ‘Clock-watching and box-ticking”: British local authority planners, professionalism and performance targets, Planning Practice and Research, 31(4), pp. 383–401. doi:10.1080/02697459.2016.1178038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clifford, B., & Tewdwr-Jones, M. (2013) The Collaborative Planner? Practitioners in the Neoliberal Age (Bristol: Policy Press).
   Google Scholar
• Davies, J., & Bianco, I. (2017) Austerity urbanism: Patterns of neoliberalisation and resistance in six cities of Spain and the UK, Environment and Planning A, 49(7), pp. 1517–1536. doi:10.1177/0308518X17701729
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson, C. (2007) A Practical Guide to Research Methods: A User-Friendly Manual for Mastering research Techniques and Projects, 3rd ed. (Oxford: How to Books).
   Google Scholar
• Docherty, I., Turok, I., & Bailey, N. (1999) Edinburgh and Glasgow: Contrasts in Competitiveness and Cohesion (Glasgow: Department of Urban Studies, University of Glasgow).
   Google Scholar
• Forester, J. (2012a) on theory and practice of critical pragmatism: deliberative practice and creative negotiations, Planning Theory, 12(1), pp. 5–22. doi:10.1177/1473095212448750
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forester, J. (2012b) Learning to Improve practice: lessons from practice stories and own discourse analysis, Planning Theory and Practice, 13(1), pp. 11–26. doi:10.1080/14649357.2012.649905
   Google Scholar
• Forester, J. (2015) What kind of research might help us become better planners? Planning Theory andPractice, 16(2), pp. 145–148. doi:10.1080/14649357.2015.1028711
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedmann, J. (1987) Planning in the Public Domain: From Knowledge to Action (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Given, L. M. (Ed.) (2008) The Sage Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods (Los Angeles: Sage).
   Google Scholar
• Grange, K. (2012) Shaping acting space: in search of a new political awareness among local authority planners, Planning Theory, 12(3), pp. 225–243. doi:10.1177/1473095212459740
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grange, K. (2017) Planners – A silenced profession? The politicisation of planning and the need for fearless speech, Planning Theory, 16(3), pp. 275–295. doi:10.1177/1473095215626465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunn, S., & Vigar, G. (2012) Reform processes and discretionary acting space in English planningpractice, Town Planning Review, 83(5), pp. 533–551. doi:10.3828/tpr.2012.33
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. (1989) From managerialism to entrepreneurialism: the formation of urban governance inlate capitalism, Geografiska Annaler B, 71(1), pp. 3–17. doi:10.1080/04353684.1989.11879583
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (1992) A planner’s day: knowledge and action in communicative practice, Journal of the American Planning Association, 58(1), pp. 9–20. doi:10.1080/01944369208975531
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (2009) The pragmatic tradition in planning thought, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 28(3), pp. 277–299. doi:10.1177/0739456X08325175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, H. (2017) Towards an ethnographic sensibility in urban research, Australian Planner, 53(1), pp. 28–36. doi:10.1080/07293682.2015.1135817
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howe, E. (1994) Acting on Ethics in City Planning (New Brunswick, New Jersey: Centre for Urban Policy Research).
   Google Scholar
• Inch, A. (2013) Changing the Culture of Scottish Planning: interpreting New Regulations, Shaping New practices, Relationships and Identities, Report for the Royal Institute of Chartered Surveyors, London.
   Google Scholar
• Inch, A. (2017) ‘Opening for business?’ Neoliberalism and the cultural politics of modernising planning in Scotland, Urban Studies, 55(5), pp. 1076–1092. doi:10.1177/0042098016684731
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, J. (2009) Neo-liberal or third way? What planners from Glasgow, Melbourne and Toronto say, Urban Policy and Research, 27(4), pp. 397–417. doi:10.1080/08111140903318437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, J. (2018) Neoliberalism and urban planners in Toronto: how seasoned planners adjust to their changing circumstances, International Planning Studies, 23(2), pp. 144–162. doi:10.1080/13563475.2017.1358606
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kneiling, J., & Othengrafen, F. (2015) Planning culture – A concept to explain the evolution of planning policies and processes in Europe? European Planning Studies, 23(11), pp. 2133–2147. doi:10.1080/09654313.2015.1018404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krumholz, N., & Forester, J. (1990) Making Equity Planning Work: Leadership in the Public Sector (Philadelphia: Temple University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Laws, D., & Forester, J. (2015) Conflict, Improvisation, Governance: Street Level Practice for Urban Democracy (Abingdon: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Lennon, M. (2018) How the planning (Scotland) bill is shaking up Holyrood, The Planner, 11(October), pp. 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M. (1980) Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services (New York: Russell Sage Foundation).
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, G., & Peel, D. (2012) The Edinburgh Concordat: contractual, collaborative positive planning? Public Performance and Management Review, 36(2), pp. 275–289. doi:10.2753/PMR1530-9576360206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovering, J. (2010) Will the recession prove to be a turning point in planning and urban development thinking? International Planning Studies, 15(3), pp. 227–243. doi:10.1080/13563475.2010.509476
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, M. (2013) First-world urban activism: beyond austerity urbanism in creative city politics, City, 17(1), pp. 5–19. doi:10.1080/13604813.2013.757417
   Google Scholar
• McClymont, K. (2014) Stuck in the process, facilitating nothing? Justice, capabilities and planning for value-led outcomes, Planning Practice and Research, 29(4), pp. 187–201. doi:10.1080/02697459.2013.872899
   Google Scholar
• Needleham, M., & Needleham, C. (1974) Guerillas in the Bureaucracy: The Community Planning Experiment in the United States (New York: Wiley).
   Google Scholar
• Paton, K. (2014) Gentrification: A Working-Class Perspective (Farnham: Ashgate).
   Google Scholar
• Porter, L. (2015) By any means necessary: urban regeneration and the ‘state of exception’ in Glasgow’s Commonwealth Games, Antipode, 47(2), pp. 380–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanyal, B. (ed.) (2005) Comparative Planning Cultures (Abingdon: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Sorensen, A. (2018) Institutions and urban space: Land, infrastructure and governance in the production of urban property, Planning Theory and Practice, 19(1), pp. 21–38. doi:10.1080/14649357.2017.1408136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stead, D., De Vries, J., & Tasan-Kok, T. (2015) Planning cultures and histories: influences on the evolution of planning systems and spatial development patterns, European Planning Studies, 23(11), pp. 2127–2132. doi:10.1080/09654313.2015.1016402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tasan-Kok, T., & Oranje, M. (Eds.) (2018) From Student to Urban Planner: Young Practitioners’ Reflections on Contemporary Ethical Challenges (Abingdon: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Tewdwr-Jones, M. (2001) Grasping the thistle: the search for distinctiveness in the devolved Scottish planning system, International Planning Studies, 6(2), pp. 199–213. doi:10.1080/13563470123500
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, H., & Healey, P. (eds.) (1991) Dilemmas of Planning Practice: Ethics, Legitimacy and The validation of Knowledge (Aldershot: Avebury).
   Google Scholar
• Tonkiss, F. (2013) Austerity urbanism and the makeshift city, City, 17(3), pp. 312–324. doi:10.1080/13604813.2013.795332
   Google Scholar
• Underwood, J. 1980 Town planners in search of a role: A participant observation study of local planners in a London borough, School of Advanced Urban Studies, Occasional Paper number 6, University of Bristol.
   Google Scholar
• Valler, D., & Phelps, N. (2018) Framing the future: on local planning cultures and legacies, Planning Theory and Practice, 19, pp. 698–716. doi:10.1080/14649357.2018.1537448. published online 1.11.18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wannop, U. (1990) The Glasgow Eastern Area Renewal (GEAR) project: a perspective on the management of urban regeneration, The Town Planning Review, 61(4), pp. 455–474. doi:10.3828/tpr.61.4.23737624w2705246
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. (2011) Qualitative Research from Start to Finish (New York: Guilford).
   Google Scholar