The Bounded and Pragmatic Consultant: Fiscal Impact Analysts as Rational Actors

References

• Albrechts, L. (2003) Planning and power: Towards an emancipatory planning approach, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 21(6), pp. 905–924. doi:10.1068/c29m
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunnell, G. (1997) Fiscal impact studies as advocacy and storytelling, Journal of Planning Literature, 12(2), pp. 136–151. doi:10.1177/088541229701200202
   Google Scholar
• Bunnell, G. (1998) Analyzing the fiscal impacts of development: Lessons for building successful communities, Community Development, 29(1), pp. 38–57. doi:10.1080/15575339809489772
   Google Scholar
• Burchell, R. W., & Listokin, D. (1978) The Fiscal Impacts Handbook: Projecting the Local Costs and Revenues Related to Growth, (New Brunswick, NJ: Center for Urban Policy Research).
   Google Scholar
• Burchell, R. W., & Listokin, D. (2012) The Fiscal Impact Handbook: Estimating Local Costs and Revenues of Land Development, (New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers).
   Google Scholar
• Carruthers, J. I., & Ulfarsson, G. F. (2003) Urban sprawl and the cost of public services, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 30, pp. 503–522. doi:10.1068/b12847
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carruthers, J. I., & Ulfarsson, G. F. (2008) Does ‘smart growth’ matter to public finance? Urban Studies, 45(9), pp. 1791–1823. doi:10.1177/0042098008093379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, T., & Laegreid, P. (2001) New public management: The effects of contractualism and devolution on political control, Public Management Review, 3(1), pp. 73–94. doi:10.1080/14616670010009469
   Google Scholar
• Clapp, C. M., Freeland, J., Ihlanfeldt, K., & Willardsen, K. (2018) The fiscal impact of alternative land uses: An empirical investigation of cost of community service studies, Public Finance Review, 46(5), pp. 850–878. doi:10.1177/1091142116687842
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleave, E., Arku, G., & Chatwin, M. (2017) Are they surgeons? Or are they plumbers? Assessing the role of private sctor consultants in place branding and other place-based economic development strategies, Public Organization Review, doi:10.1007/s11115-017-0396-0
   Google Scholar
• Da Cruz, N. F., Tavares, A. F., Marques, R. C., Jorge, S., & de Sousa, L. (2016) Measuring local government transparency, Public Management Review, 18(6), pp. 866–893. doi:10.1080/14719037.2015.1051572
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dekel, G. P. (1995) Housing density: A neglected dimension of fiscal impact analysis, Urban Studies, 32(6), pp. 935–951. doi:10.1080/00420989550012726
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deller, S. C. (2005) Urban growth, rural land conversion and the fiscal well-being of local municipalities, in: S. J. Goetz, J. S. Shortle, & J. C. Bergstrom (Eds) Land Use Problems and Conflicts, pp. 94–119, (New York, NY: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Diefenback, T. (2009) New public management in public sector organizations: The dark sides of managerialistic ‘enlightenment’, Public Administration, 87(4), pp. 892–909. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2009.01766.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixit, A. K., & Skeath, S. (2015) Games of strategy, fourth international student edition. WW Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, M. M., & Xiao, Y. (2009) Annexation, local government spending, and the complicating role of density, Urban Affairs Review, 45(2), pp. 147–165. doi:10.1177/1078087409341036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, M.M., & Huddleston, J.R. (2009). Prospects and perils of fiscal impact analysis, Journal of the American Planning Association, 76(10), pp. 25–41. doi:10.1080/01944360903310477
   Google Scholar
• Estill, J., & Means, T. (2018). “Does land development pay for itself? A critique of cost-of-community-service studies.” Mercatus Working Paper, Mercatus Center at George Mason University, Arlington, VA.
   Google Scholar
• Forester, J. (1982) Planning in the face of power, Journal of the American Planning Association, 48(1), pp. 67–80. doi:10.1080/01944368208976167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forester, J. (1993) Critical Theory, Public Policy, and Planning Practice, (Albany, NY: SUNY Press).
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, J. (1987) Planning in the Public Domain: From Knowledge to Action, (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Garrett, T., & Leatherman, J. (2000) An introduction to state and local public finance, in: S. Loveridge (Ed) Introduction to Regional Science, (Regional Research Institute Web Book, West Virginia University). Available at http://www.rri.wvu.edu/WebBook/Garrett/ chaptersix.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Geertman, S., & Stillwell, J. (Eds.) (2012) Planning Support Systems in Practice, (Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media).
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, A., & Gerhard, P. (2015) Fiscal Impact Analysis: What You Need to Know to Plan for Your Community’s Future and Save Taxpayer Money, (Portland, OR: 1000 Friends of Oregon).
   Google Scholar
• Hefetz, A., & Warner, M. E. (2004) Privatization and its reverse: Explaining the dynamics of the government contracting process, Journal of Public Administration, Research and Theory, 14(2), pp. 171–190. doi:10.1093/jopart/muh012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, C., & Jackson, M. (1991) Administrative Argument, (Aldershot, UK: Dartmouth).
   Google Scholar
• Innes, J. E., & Booher, D. E. (2004) Reframing public participation: Strategies for the 21st century, Planning Theory & Practice, 5(4), pp. 419–436. doi:10.1080/1464935042000293170
   Google Scholar
• Kalkuhl, M., Milan, B. F., Schwerhoff, G., Jakob, M., Hahnen, M., & Creutzig, F. (2018) Can land taxes foster sustainable development? An assessment of fiscal, distributional and implementation issues, Land Use Policy, 78, pp. 338–352. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.07.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kipfer, S., & Keil, R. (2002) Toronto Inc? Planning the competitive city in the new Toronto, Antipode, 34(2), pp. 227–264. doi:10.1111/anti.2002.34.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotval, Z., & Mullin, J. (2006) Fiscal Impact Analysis: Methods, Cases, and Intellectual Debate, (Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy).
   Google Scholar
• Lamie, R. D., Campbell, W., & Molnar, W. (2012) The fiscal-geographic nexus: An overview of fiscal impact assessment in local policy development, Applied Geography, 32(1), pp. 54–60. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2010.07.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lieske, S. N. (2015) Cost of sprawl in the metropolitan west: Census block group evaluation of public service expenditures, Western Economics Forum, 14(1) pp. 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Lieske, S. N., McLeod, D. M., Coupal, R. H., & Srivastava, S. K. (2012) Determining the relationship between urban form and the costs of public services, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 39(1), pp. 155–173. doi:10.1068/b37099
   Google Scholar
• Linovski, O. (2016) Politics of expertise: Constructing professional design knowledge in the public and private sectors, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 36(4), pp. 451–464. doi:10.1177/0739456X15620656
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linovski, O. (2018) Shifting agendas: Private consultants and public planning policy, Urban Affairs Review, doi:10.1177/1078087417752475
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linovski, O. (2019) Shareholder as client: Firms, markets, and the new business of planning, Journal of Urban Affairs, pp. 1–19. doi:10.1080/07352166.2018.1562303
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loh, C. G., & Arroyo, R. L. (2017) Special ethical considerations for planners in private practice, Journal of the American Planning Association, 83(2), pp. 168–179. doi:10.1080/01944363.2017.1286945
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loh, C. G., & Norton, R. K. (2013) Planning consultants and local planning, Journal of the American Planning Association, 79(2), pp. 138–147. doi:10.1080/01944363.2013.883251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loh, C. G., & Norton, R. K. (2015) Planning consultants’ influence on local comprehensive plans, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 35(2), pp. 199–208. doi:10.1177/0739456X14566868
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milward, H. B., & Provan, K. G. (2000) Governing the hollow state, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(2), pp. 359–379. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024273
   Google Scholar
• Momani, B. (2013) Management consultants and the United States’ public sector, Business and Politics, 15(3), pp. 381–399. doi:10.1515/bap-2013-0001
   Google Scholar
• Momani, B., & Khirfan, L. (2013) Explaining the use of planning consultants in Ontario cities, Canadian Public Administration, 56(3), pp. 391–413. doi:10.1111/capa.2013.56.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nalbandian, J. (1999) Facilitating community, enabling democracy: New roles for local government managers, Public Administration Review, 59(3), pp. 187–197. doi:10.2307/3109948
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Looney, J. (1998) Outsourcing State and Local Government Services: Decision-Making Strategies and Management Methods, (Westport, CT: Quorum Books).
   Google Scholar
• Paulsen, K. (2014) The effect of land development on municipal finance, Journal of Planning Literature, 29(1), pp. 20–40. doi:10.1177/0885412213497982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perl, A., & White, D. J. (2002) The changing role of consultants in Canadian policy analysis, Policy, Organisation and Society, 21(1), pp. 49–73. doi:10.1016/S1449-4035(02)70003-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raco, M. (2014) Delivering flagship projects in the era of regulatory capitalism: State-led privatization and the London Olympics 2012, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38(1), pp. 176–197. doi:10.1111/1468-2427.12025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raja, S., & Verma, N. (2010) Got perspective? A theoretical view of fiscal impact analysis, Planning Theory, 9(2), pp. 126–136. doi:10.1177/1473095209357866
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Read, D. C., & Leland, S. M. (2011) Does sector matter? An analysis of planners’ attitudes regarding politics and competing interests in the planning process, The American Review of Public Administration, 41(6), pp. 639–653. doi:10.1177/0275074010390031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reese, L. A. (1997) The use of planning methodologies in local economic development decisionmaking, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 15(3), pp. 285–303. doi:10.1068/c150285
   Google Scholar
• Reese, L. A. (2006) The planning-policy connection in US and Canadian economic development, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 24(4), pp. 553–573. doi:10.1068/c1g
   Google Scholar
• Sager, T. (1999) The rationality issue in land-use planning, Journal of Management History, 5(2), pp. 87–107. doi:10.1108/13552529910249869
   Google Scholar
• Saint‐Martin, D. (1998) The new managerialism and the policy influence of consultants in government: An historical–Institutionalist analysis of Britain, Canada and France, Governance, 11(3), pp. 319–356. doi:10.1111/gove.1998.11.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. (1990) Reason in Human Affairs, (Standford, CA: Stanford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Warner, M. E. (2012) Privatization and urban governance: The continuing challenges of efficiency, voice and integration, Cities, 29(2), pp. S38–S43. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2012.06.007
   Google Scholar
• Warner, M. E., & Hefetz, A. (2012) Insourcing and outsourcing: The dynamics of privatization among U.S. municipalities 2002–2007, Journal of the American Planning Association, 78(3), pp. 313–327. doi:10.1080/01944363.2012.715552
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weisbrod, G., & Duncan, C. (2016) Integrating multiple economic analysis methods for more effective decision making, Transportation Research Record, 2597, pp. 99–107. doi:10.3141/2597-13
   Google Scholar
• Whittemore, A. H. (2015) Practitioners theorize, too: Reaffirming planning theory in a survey of practitioners’ theories, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 35(1), pp. 76–85. doi:10.1177/0739456X14563144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, O. E. (1999) Public and private bureaucracies: A transaction cost economics perspective, Journal of Law, Economics, & Organizations, 15, pp. 306–342. doi:10.1093/jleo/15.1.306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ylönen, M., & Kuusela, H. (2018) Consultocracy and its discontents: A critical typology and a call for a research agenda, Governance, doi:10.1111/gove.12369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar