Reflection-In-Action in Land Use Planning: Can We Do Better?

References

• Arefi, M. (2011) Design for resilient cities: Reflections from a studio, in: T. Banerjee & A. Loukaitou-Sideris (Eds) Companion to Urban Design, pp. 674–685 (New York: Routledge)
   Google Scholar
• Bayer, M., Frank, N., & Valerius, J. (2011) Becoming an Urban Planner: A Guide to Careers in Planning & Urban Design, (New Jersey: Wiley & Sons).
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, H. (2012) Planning to change the world: Between knowledge and action lies synthesis, Journal of Planning Education & Research, 32(2), pp. 135–146. doi:10.1177/0739456X11436347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, W., Eastman, C., Johnson, N., & Kortanek, K. (1971) Systems approaches to urban planning: Mixed, conditional, adaptive and other alternatives, Policy Sciences, 2(4), pp. 397–405. doi:10.1007/BF01406140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton, L. (1986) Why the rational paradigm persists-the resistance of professional education and practice to alternative forms of planning, Journal of Planning Education & Research, 5(3), pp. 147–153. doi:10.1177/0739456X8600500302
   Google Scholar
• Dalton, L. (2001) Weaving the fabric of planning as education, Journal of Planning Education & Research, 20(4), pp. 423–436. doi:10.1177/0739456X0102000404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fagin, H. (1965) Planning for future urban growth, Law & Contemporary Problems, 30(1), pp. 9–25. doi:10.2307/1190682
   Google Scholar
• Fainstein, S. (2000) New directions in planning theory, Urban Affairs Review, 35(4), pp. 451–478. doi:10.1177/107808740003500401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, M. (1994) Perloff revisited: Reassessing planning education in postmodern times, Journal of Planning Education & Research, 13(2), pp. 89–103. doi:10.1177/0739456X9401300202
   Google Scholar
• Forester, J. (2015) Editorial: What kind of research might help us become better planners? Planning Theory & Practice, 16(2), pp. 145–148. doi:10.1080/14649357.2015.1028711
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster, J. (2005) From simplistic to complex systems in economics, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 29(6), pp. 873–892. doi:10.1093/cje/bei083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedmann, J. (1971) The future of comprehensive urban planning: A critique, Public Administration Review, 31(3), pp. 315–326. doi:10.2307/974890
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuller, I., Rawlinson, S., & Bevan, R. (2000) Evaluation of student learning experiences in physical geography fieldwork: Paddling or pedagogy? Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 24(2), pp. 199–215. doi:10.1080/713677388
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant Long, J. (2012) State of the studio: Revisiting the potential of studio pedagogy in U.S.-based planning programs, Journal of Planning Education & Research, 32(4), pp. 431–448. doi:10.1177/0739456X12457685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (1992) A planner’s day: Knowledge and action in communicative practice, Journal of the American Planning Association, 58(1), pp. 9–20. doi:10.1080/01944369208975531
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (2006) Urban Complexity & Spatial Strategies: Towards a Relational Planning for Our Times, (New York: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, M., Aitken-Rose, E., & Dixon, J. (2009) The pedagogy of the planning studio: A view from down under, Journal for Education in the Built Environment, 4(1), pp. 8–30. doi:10.11120/jebe.2009.04010008
   Google Scholar
• https:www.FIXR.com
   Google Scholar
• Jerke, D., Porter, D., & Lassar, T. (2008) Urban Design & the Bottom Line: Optimizing the Return on Perception, (Washington D.C: The Urban Land Institute).
   Google Scholar
• Kitchen, T. (2006) Skills for Planning Practice, (New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan).
   Google Scholar
• Kolb, D. (1984) Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning & Development, (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall).
   Google Scholar
• Kotval, Z. (2003) Teaching experiential learning in the urban planning curriculum, Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 27(3), pp. 297–308. doi:10.1080/0309826032000145061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livingston, D., & Lynch, K. (2000) Group project work & student-centered active learning: Two different experiences, Studies in Higher Education, 25(3), pp. 325–345. doi:10.1080/713696161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, S. (2009) Cities Design & Evolution, (New York: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Myers, D., & Banerjee, T. (2005) Toward greater heights for planning, Journal of the American Planning Association, 71(2), pp. 121–129. doi:10.1080/01944360508976687
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nemeth, J., & Grant Long, J. (2012) Assessing learning outcomes in U.S. planning studio courses, Journal of Planning Education & Research, 32(4), pp. 476–490. doi:10.1177/0739456X12453740
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG). (2018) https://www.nctcog.org/ ( accessed 4 May).
   Google Scholar
• North Richland Hills. (2018) https://www.nrhtx.com/
   Google Scholar
• Sandercock, L. (2003) Out of the closet: The importance of stories and storytelling in planning practice, Planning Theory & Practice, 4(1), pp. 11–28. doi:10.1080/1464935032000057209
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D. (1983) The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action, (New York: Basic Books).
   Google Scholar
• Teitz, M. (1988) Planning education as a vocation, Journal of Planning Education & Research, 7(2), pp. 79–83. doi:10.1177/0739456X8800700207
   Google Scholar
• Throgmorton, J. (2003) Planning as persuasive storytelling in a global-scale web of relationships, Planning Theory, 2(2), pp. 125–151. doi:10.1177/14730952030022003
   Google Scholar
• van Hulst, M. (2012) Storytelling, a model of and a model for planning, Planning Theory, 11(3), pp. 299–318. doi:10.1177/1473095212440425
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wildavsky, A. (1973) If planning is everything, maybe it’s nothing, Policy Sciences, 4, pp. 127–153. doi:10.1007/BF01405729
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf-Powers, L. (2013) Teaching planners to deal: The pedagogical value of a simulated economic development negotiation, Journal of Planning Education & Research, 33(3), pp. 348–362. doi:10.1177/0739456X13482979
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar