1,710
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Digitally Supported Co-creation within Public Open Space Development Process: Experiences from the C3Places Project and Potential for Future Urban Practice

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Andersen, L. B., Danholt, P., Halskov, K., Hansen, N. B., & Lauritsen, P. (2015) Participation as a matter of concern in participatory design, CoDesign, 11(3–4), pp. 250–261. doi:10.1080/15710882.2015.1081246
  • Arnstein, S. R. (1969) A ladder of citizen participation, Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), pp. 216–224. doi:10.1080/01944366908977225
  • Brown, G., & Chin, S. Y. W. (2013) Assessing the effectiveness of public participation in neighbourhood planning, Planning Practice and Research, 28(5), pp. 563–588. doi:10.1080/02697459.2013.820037
  • C3Places – using ICT for co-creation of inclusive public places (n.d.) Available at https://c3places.eu/
  • CITI-SENSE (2012) CITI-SENSE. Available at www.citi-sense.eu
  • de Gramont, D. (2013) Rethinking participatory development: From critique to better practice. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Available at https://carnegieendowment.org/2013/08/21/rethinking-participatory-developmentfrom-critique-to-better-practice-pub–52860
  • Dewaele, A., Vandael, K., Buysse, A., & Westerduin, S. (2018) Guide to Co-Creation, (Ghent, Belgium: Department of Experimental clinical and health psychology, Universiteit Gent).
  • Dodgson, M., & Gann, D. (2011) Technological innovation and complex systems in cities, Journal of Urban Technology, 18(3), pp. 101–113. doi:10.1080/10630732.2011.615570
  • Drazkiewicz, A., Challies, E., & Newig, J. (2015) Public participation and local environmental planning: Testing factors influencing decision quality and implementation in four case studies from Germany, Land Use Policy, 46, pp. 211–222. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.02.010
  • Eggertsen Teder, M. (2019) Placemaking as co-creation–professional roles and attitudes in practice, CoDesign, 15(4), pp. 289–307. doi:10.1080/15710882.2018.1472284
  • European Citizen Science Association (ECSA) (2020) European citizen science association (ECSA). Available at https://ecsa.citizen-science.net
  • Evans-Cowley, J., & Hollander, J. (2010) The new generation of public participation: Internet-based participation tools, Planning Practice & Research, 25(3), pp. 397–408. doi:10.1080/02697459.2010.503432
  • Falco, E., & Kleinhans, R. (2018) Digital Participatory Platforms for Co-Production in Urban Development: A Systematic Review. International Journal of E-Planning Research (IJEPR), 7(3), pp. 52-79. doi:10.4018/IJEPR.2018070105.
  • Fors, H., Molin, J. F., Murphy, M. A., & van den Bosch, C. K. (2015) User participation in urban green spaces–For the people or the parks? Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 14(3), pp. 722–734. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2015.05.007
  • Goličnik Marušić, B., & Šuklje Erjavec, I. (in press) Understanding co-creation within urban open space development process, in: C. Smaniotto Costa, M. Mačiulienė, M. Menezes, & B. Goličnik Marušić. (Eds) Co-Creation of Public Open Places. Practice—Reflection—Learning.C3Places Project Lisbon: Lusófona University Press. ISBN 978-989-757-125-1.
  • Gordon, E., Schirra, S., & Hollander, J. (2011) Immersive planning: A conceptual model for designing public participation with new technologies, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 38(3), pp. 505–519. doi:10.1068/b37013
  • Graham, S., & Marvin, S. (2002) Telecommunications and the City: Electronic Spaces, Urban Places, (London, England: Routledge).
  • Hanzl, M. (2007) Information technology as a tool for public participation in urban planning: A review of experiments and potentials, Design Studies, 28(3), pp. 289–307. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2007.02.003
  • Hasler, S., Chenal, J., & Soutter, M. (2017) Digital tools as a means to foster inclusive, data-informed urban planning, Civil Engineering and Architecture, 5(6), pp. 230–239. doi:10.13189/cea.2017.050605
  • Houghton, K. (2010) Augmenting public urban spaces: The impact of the digital future on the design of public urban spaces, Queensland Planner, 50(4), pp. 19–23.
  • Houghton, K., Miller, E., & Foth, M. (2014) Integrating ICT into the planning process: Impacts, opportunities and challenges, Australian Planner, 51(1), pp. 24–33. doi:10.1080/07293682.2013.770771
  • IAP2 (2018) IAP2 spectrum of public participation. Available at https://cdn.ymaws.com/www.iap2.org/resource/resmgr/pillars/Spectrum_8.5x11_Print.pdf
  • Kleinhans, R., Van Ham, M., & Evans-Cowley, J. (2015) Using social media and mobile technologies to foster engagement and self-organization in participatory urban planning and neighbourhood governance, Planning Practice & Research, 30(3), pp. 237–247. doi:10.1080/02697459.2015.1051320
  • Manzini, E. (2015) Design, When Everybody Designs: An Introduction to Design for Social Innovation, (Cambridge, MA: MIT press).
  • Münster, S., Georgi, C., Heijne, K., Klamert, K., Noennig, J. R., Pump, M., Stelzle, B., & van der Meer, H. (2017) How to involve inhabitants in urban design planning by using digital tools? An overview on a state of the art, key challenges and promising approaches, Procedia Computer Science, 112, pp. 2391–2405. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2017.08.102
  • Neef, A. (2003) Participatory approaches under scrutiny: Will they have a future? Quarterly Journal of International Agriculture, 42(4), pp. 493–502.
  • Oksman, V., Väätänen, A., & Ylikauppila, M. (2014) Co-creation of sustainable smart cities. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Mobile Ubiquitous Computing, Systems, Services and Technologies, pp. 189–195. Rome, Italy.
  • Participatory Research Methods (n.d.) (Participate). Available at https://participatesdgs.org/methods/
  • Pew Research Center (2019) Social media fact sheet. Available at https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/fact-sheet/social-media/
  • Sanders, E. B.-N., & Stappers, P. J. (2008) Co-creation and the new landscapes of design, Co-Design, 4(1), pp. 5–18.
  • Smaniotto Costa, C., Solipa Batista, J., Almeida, I., & Menezes, M. (2020) Exploring teenagers’ spatial practices and needs in light of new communication technologies, Cities, 98, pp. 102574. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2019.102574
  • Sorensen, A., & Sagaris, L. (2010) From participation to the right to the city: Democratic place management at the neighbourhood scale in comparative perspective, Planning Practice & Research, 25(3), pp. 297–316. doi:10.1080/02697459.2010.503424
  • Steen, M., Manschot, M., & De Koning, N. (2011) Benefits of co-design in service design projects, International Journal of Design, 5(2).
  • Šuklje Erjavec, I., & Ruchinskaya, T. (2019) A spotlight of co-creation and inclusiveness of public open spaces, in: C. Smaniotto Costa, I. Šuklje Erjavec, T. Kenna, M. de Lange, K. Ioannidis, G. Maksymiuk, & M. de Waal (Eds) CyberParks–The Interface between People, Places and Technology, pp. pp. 209–223 (Cham, Switzerland: Springer).
  • Šuklje Erjavec, I., & Žlender, V. (in press) Categorization of digital tools for co-creation quality of public open space: Key aspects and possibilities, in: C. Smaniotto Costa, M. Mačiulienė, M. Menezes, & B. Goličnik Marušić (Eds) Co-Creation of Public Open Places. Practice—Reflection—Learning. C3Places Project Lisbon: Lusófona University Press. ISBN 978-989-757-125-1.
  • The European Citizens Crowdsourcing (EUCROWD) (2016) The European Citizens Crowdsourcing (EUCROWD). Available at http://www.inepa.si/eucrowd/
  • Van Renterghem, T., Vanhecke, K., Filipan, K., Sun, K., De Pessemier, T., De Coensel, B., Joseph, W., & Botteldooren, D. (2020) Interactive soundscape augmentation by natural sounds in a noise polluted urban park, Landscape and Urban Planning, 194, pp. 103705. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.103705