Dissolution rather than consolidation - questioning the existence of the comprehensive-integrative planning model

References

• Albrechts, L. (2004) Strategic (spatial) planning re-examined, Environment and Planning. B, Planning & Design, 31(5), pp.743–758. doi:10.1068/b3065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrechts, L. (2010) More of the same is not enough! How could strategic spatial planning be instrumental in dealing with the challenges ahead? Environment and Planning. B, Planning & Design, 37(6), pp.1115–1127. doi:10.1068/b36068.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alden, J. (2006) Regional planning: An idea whose time has come? International Planning Studies, 11(3–4), pp. 209–223.
   Google Scholar
• CEC (Commission of the European Communities). (1997) The EU Compendium of Spatial Planning Systems and Policies (Regional Development Studies) (Luxemburg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities).
   Google Scholar
• CEC (Commission of the European Communities). (1999) European Spatial Development Perspective: Towards Balanced and Sustainable Development of the Territory of the EU (Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities).
   Google Scholar
• CEMAT (Conference Europeenne des Ministres responsables de l’aménagement du territoire). (1983) European regional/spatial planning Charter: Torremolinos Charter. Adopted at the Conference of European Ministers responsible for Regional Planning on 20th May 1983 at Torremolinos, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Dühr, S., Colomb, C., & Nadin, V. (2010) European Spatial Planning and Territorial Cooperation (Milton Park, Abingdon: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• ESPON. (2007) Governance of Territorial and Urban Policies from EU to Local Level. ESPON Project 2.3.2, Final Report, Luxembourg: ESPON Coordination Unit.
   Google Scholar
• ESPON. (2018a) COMPASS – Comparative Analysis of Territorial Governance and Spatial Planning Systems in Europe. Final Report, Luxembourg: ESPON Coordination Unit.
   Google Scholar
• ESPON. (2018b) COMPASS – Comparative Analysis of Territorial Governance and Spatial Planning Systems in Europe. Final Report - Additional Volume 2 – Methodology, Luxembourg: ESPON Coordination Unit.
   Google Scholar
• ESPON. (2018c) COMPASS – Comparative Analysis of Territorial Governance and Spatial Planning Systems in Europe. Final Report - Additional Volume 7 – Europeanisation, Luxembourg: ESPON Coordination Unit.
   Google Scholar
• Evers, D., & Tennekes, J. (2016) Europe exposed: Mapping the impacts of EU policies on spatial planning in the Netherlands, European Planning Studies, 24(10), pp.1747–1765. doi:10.1080/09654313.2016.1183593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faludi, A. (2010) Cohesion, Coherence, Co-operation: European Spatial Planning Coming of Age? (Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon, New York: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Fürst, C., Luque, S., & Geneletti, D. (2017) Nexus thinking – How ecosystem services can contribute to enhancing the cross-scale and cross-sectoral coherence between land use, spatial planning and policy-making, International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management, 13(1), pp.412–421. doi:10.1080/21513732.2017.1396257.
   Google Scholar
• Galland, D. (2012) Understanding the reorientations and roles of spatial planning: The case of national planning policy in Denmark, European Planning Studies, 20(8), pp.1359–1392. doi:10.1080/09654313.2012.680584.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Getimis, P. (2012) Comparing spatial planning systems and planning cultures in Europe. The Need for a multi-scalar approach, Planning Practice and Research, 27(1), pp.25–40. doi:10.1080/02697459.2012.659520.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, N., & Hooper, A. (2004) Rediscovering the ‘Spatial’ in public policy and planning: An examination of the spatial content of sectoral policy documents, Planning Theory & Practice, 5(2), pp.147–169. doi:10.1080/14649350410001691736.
   Google Scholar
• Hrelja, R. (2015) Integrating transport and land-use planning? How steering cultures in local authorities affect implementation of integrated public transport and land-use planning, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 74, pp. 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingold, K., Driessen, P. P. J., Runhaar, H. A. C., & Widmer, A. (2019) On the necessity of connectivity: Linking key characteristics of environmental problems with governance modes, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 62(11), pp.1821–1844. doi:10.1080/09640568.2018.1486700.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, A., & Lenschow, A. (2010) Environmental policy integration: A state of the art review, Environmental Policy and Governance, 20(3), pp. 147–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knieling, J., & Othengrafen, F. (2015) Planning culture—A concept to explain the evolution of planning policies and processes in Europe? European Planning Studies, 23(11), pp.2133–2147. doi:10.1080/09654313.2015.1018404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunzmann, K. R., & Koll-Schretzenmayr, M. (2015) A planning journey across Europe in the year 2015, disP - the Planning Review, 51(1), pp.86–90. doi:10.1080/02513625.2015.1038081.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liljenfeldt, J. (2015) Legitimacy and efficiency in planning processes—(How) does wind power change the situation? European Planning Studies, 23(4), pp.811–827. doi:10.1080/09654313.2014.979766.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madanipour, A. (2010) Connectivity and contingency in planning, Planning Theory, 9(4), pp.351–368. doi:10.1177/1473095210371162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministers responsible for Spatial Planning and Territorial Development. (2011) Territorial Agenda of the European Union 2020: Towards an Inclusive, Smart and Sustainable Europe of Diverse Regions. Available at http://www.nweurope.eu/media/1216/territorial_agenda_2020.pdf (accessed 11 November 2019)
   Google Scholar
• Nadin, V., & Stead, D. (2013) Opening up the Compendium: An Evaluation of International Comparative Planning Research Methodologies, European Planning Studies, 21(10), pp.1542–1561. doi:10.1080/09654313.2012.722958.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuman, M., & Zonneveld, W. (2018) The resurgence of regional design, European Planning Studies, 26(7), pp.1297–1311. doi:10.1080/09654313.2018.1464127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olesen, K., & Carter, H. (2018) Planning as a barrier for growth: Analysing storylines on the reform of the Danish Planning Act, Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 36(4), pp. 689–707.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Othengrafen, F. (2012) Uncovering the Unconscious Dimensions of Planning. Using Culture as a Tool to Analyse Spatial Planning Practices, 1st ed. (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Pasquinelli, C., & Vuignier, R. (2020) Place marketing, policy integration and governance complexity: An analytical framework for FDI promotion, European Planning Studies, 28(7), pp.1413–1430. doi:10.1080/09654313.2019.1701295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priemus, H. (1999) Four ministries, four spatial planning perspectives? Dutch evidence on the persistent problem of horizontal coordination, European Planning Studies, 7(5), pp.563–585. doi:10.1080/09654319908720539.
   Google Scholar
• Ran, J., & Nedovic-Budic, Z. (2016) Integrating spatial planning and flood risk management: A new conceptual framework for the spatially integrated policy infrastructure, Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 57, pp. 68–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reimer, M., & Blotevogel, H. H. (2012) Comparing spatial planning practice in europe: A plea for cultural sensitization, Planning Practice and Research, 27(1), pp.7–24. doi:10.1080/02697459.2012.659517.
   Google Scholar
• Reimer, M., Getimēs, P., & Blotevogel, H. H., (Eds.) (2014) Spatial Planning Systems and Practices in Europe: A Comparative Perspective on Continuity and Changes, 1st ed. (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Rode, P. (2019) Urban planning and transport policy integration: The role of governance hierarchies and networks in London and Berlin, Journal of Urban Affairs, 41(1), pp.39–63. doi:10.1080/07352166.2016.1271663.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runhaar, H., Driessen, P. P. J., & Soer, L. (2009) Sustainable urban development and the challenge of policy integration: An assessment of planning tools for integrating spatial and environmental planning in the Netherlands, Environment and Planning. B, Planning & Design, 36(3), pp. 417–431.
   Google Scholar
• Sandström, C., Lindkvist, A., Öhman, K., & Nordström, E.-M. (2011) Governing competing demands for forest resources in Sweden, Forests, 2(1), pp. 218–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, P., & Van Well, L. (2017) Tracing the place-based coordinative frameworks of EU Territorial Cohesion Policy: From European Spatial Planning towards European Territorial Governance, in: E. Medeiros (Ed) Uncovering the Territorial Dimension of European Union Cohesion Policy, pp. 97–113 (London and New York: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, P., & Wiechmann, T. (2018) Unpacking spatial planning as the governance of place: Extracting potentials for future advancements in planning research, disP - the Planning Review, 54(4), pp.21–33. doi:10.1080/02513625.2018.1562795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Servillo, L. A., & Van Den Broeck, P. (2012) The social construction of planning systems: A strategic-relational institutionalist approach, Planning Practice and Research, 27(1), pp.41–61. doi:10.1080/02697459.2012.661179.
   Google Scholar
• Stead, D., & Meijers, E. (2009) Spatial planning and policy integration: Concepts, facilitators and inhibitors, Planning Theory & Practice, 10(3), pp.317–332. doi:10.1080/14649350903229752.
   Google Scholar
• Van Assche, K., Beunen, R., & Duineveld, M. (2014) Formal/informal dialectics and the self-transformation of spatial planning systems: An exploration, Administration & Society, 46(6), pp.654–683. doi:10.1177/0095399712469194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Assche, K., Beunen, R., & Oliveira, E. (2020) Spatial planning and place branding: Rethinking relations and synergies, European Planning Studies, 28(7), pp.1274–1290. doi:10.1080/09654313.2019.1701289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vigar, G. (2009) Towards an integrated spatial planning? European Planning Studies, 17(11), pp.1571–1590. doi:10.1080/09654310903226499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, M. (1949) The Methodology of the Social Sciences (E. Shils & H. A. Finch, Trans) (New York: Free Press).
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M., & Driessen, P. P. J. (2010) Environmental policy integration: The role of policy windows in the integration of noise and spatial planning, Environment and Planning. C, Government & Policy, 28(6), pp.1120–1134. doi:10.1068/c0997.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolsink, M. (2010) Near-shore wind power—Protected seascapes, environmentalists’ attitudes, and the technocratic planning perspective, Land Use Policy, 27(2), pp.195–203. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.04.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaucha, J., Komornicki, T., Böhme, K., Świątek, D., & Żuber, P. (2014) Territorial keys for bringing closer the territorial Agenda of the EU and Europe 2020, European Planning Studies, 22(2), pp.246–267. doi:10.1080/09654313.2012.722976.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar