The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) in Rural Land-use Planning in Poland: A Case Study of Zawidz Commune

References

• Afshari, M., & Mafi, E. (2014) Land capability assessment for regional planning using AHP and GIS at Shandiz Urban Region, Northeast Iran, Environment and Urbanization ASIA, 5(1), pp. 105–118. doi:10.1177/0975425314521537.
   Google Scholar
• Akay, A. E., & Yılmaz, B. (2017) Using GIS and AHP for planning primer transportation of forest products, ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, IV-4-W4, pp. 19–24. doi:10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-4-W4-19-2017.
   Google Scholar
• Akinci, H., Özalp, A. Y., & Turgut, B. (2013) Agricultural land use suitability analysis using GIS and AHP technique, Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 97, pp. 71–82. doi:10.1016/j.compag.2013.07.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benítez, J., Delgado-Galván, X., Izquierdo, J., & Pérez-García, R. (2012) Improving consistency in AHP decision-making processes, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 219(5), pp. 2432–2441. doi:10.1016/j.amc.2012.08.079.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhushan, N., & Rai, K. (2004) Strategic Decision Making Applying the Analytic Hierarchy Process (London, UK: Springer-Verlag).
   Google Scholar
• Chabuk, A., Al-Ansari, N., Hussain, H. M., Knutsson, S., & Pusch, R. (2016) Landfill siting using GIS and AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process): A case study Al-Qasim Qadhaa, Babylon, Iraq, Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture, 10(5), pp. 530–543.
   Google Scholar
• Feltynowski, M. (2018) Planowanie przestrzenne gmin wiejskich. Zastosowanie koncepcji polityki opartej na dowodach (Lodz, PL: Lodz University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Feltynowski, M., Kronenberg, J., Bergier, T., Kabisch, N., Łaszkiewicz, E., & Strohbach, M. W. (2018) Challenges of urban green space management in the face of using inadequate data, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 31, pp. 56–66. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2017.12.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Figueira, J., Greco, S., & Ehrgott, M. (eds.) (2005) Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys (Berlin, DE: Springer Science).
   Google Scholar
• Jarek, S. (2016) Removing inconsistency in pairwise comparisons matrix in the AHP, Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM), 11, pp. 63–76. doi:10.22367/mcdm.2016.11.05.
   Google Scholar
• Jovanovic, J., Shah, H., Vujovic, A., & Krivokapic, Z. (2014) Application of MCDM methods in evaluation of environmental impacts, International Journal for Quality Research, 8(4), pp. 517–532.
   Google Scholar
• Kabisch, N., Strohbach, M., Haase, D., & Kronenberg, J. (2016) Urban green space availability in European cities, Ecological Indicators, 70, pp. 586–596. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.02.029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobryn, A. (2014) Wielokryterialne wspomaganie decyzji w gospodarowaniu przestrzenia (Warszawa, PL: Difin).
   Google Scholar
• Köksalan, M., Wallenius, J., & Zionts, S. (2011) Multiple Criteria Decision Making: From Early History to the 21st Century (Singapore, SG: World Scientific Publishing).
   Google Scholar
• Lewczuk, J., & Ustinovichius, L. (2015) The concept of multi-functional development of cross-border regions: Poland case, Procedia Engineering, 122, pp. 65–70. doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2015.10.008.
   Google Scholar
• Malczewski, J., & Rinner, C. (2015) Multicriteria Decision Analysis in Geographic Information Science (New York, NY: Springer).
   Google Scholar
• Malinowski, M., & Religa, A. (2016) Method of setting locations for municipal solid waste collection points in protected areas, Infrastructure and Ecology of Rural Areas, 2016/IV, pp. 1603–1614.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, G. A. (1994) The magical number seven, plus or minus two. Some limits on our capacity for processing information, Psychological Review, 101(2), pp. 343–352. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.101.2.343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosadeghi, R., Warnken, J., Tomlinson, R., & Mirfenderesk, H. (2015) Comparison of Fuzzy-AHP and AHP in a spatial multi-criteria decision-making model for urban land-use planning, Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 49, pp. 54–65. doi:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2014.10.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulliner, E., Malys, N., & Maliene, V. (2016) Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for the assessment of sustainable housing affordability, Omega, 59, pp. 146–156. doi:10.1016/j.omega.2015.05.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L. (2007a) Multi-decisions decision-making: In addition to wheeling and dealing, our national political bodies need a formal approach for prioritization, Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 46(7–8), pp. 1001–1016. doi:10.1016/j.mcm.2007.03.023.
   Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L. (2007b) Time dependent decision-making; dynamic priorities in the AHP/ANP: Generalizing from points to functions and from real to complex variables, Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 46(7–8), pp. 860–891. doi:10.1016/j.mcm.2007.03.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L. (2008) Decision making with the Analytic Hierarchy Process, International Journal of Services Sciences, 1(1), pp. 83–98. doi:10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590.
   Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L., & Kearns, K. P. (1985) Analytical Planning. The Organization of System (Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press).
   Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L., & Sagir, M. (2015) Choosing the best city of the future, Journal of Urban Management, 4(1), pp. 3–23. doi:10.1016/j.jum.2015.06.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L., & Vargas, L. G. (2012) Models, Methods, Concepts & Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (New York, NY: Springer).
   Google Scholar
• Sugumaran, R., & DeGroote, J. (2011) Spatial Decision Support Systems. Principles and Practices (Boca Raton, US: CRC Press).
   Google Scholar
• Tavana, M., Arteaga, F., Mohammadi, S., & Alimohammadi, M. (2017) A fuzzy multi-criteria spatial decision support system for solar farm location planning, Energy Strategy Reviews, 18, pp. 93–105. doi:10.1016/j.esr.2017.09.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar