Ecological Assessment for Spatial Planning: The Case of Southern Tuscany, Italy

References

• Amadio Guidi, V. (2003) Analisi di sistemi e progetti di paesaggio (Milano: Franco Angeli).
   Google Scholar
• Amadio Guidi, V. (2007) The map of Italian Nature: The detection of hotspots of ecological attention. Proceedings International Workshop on Digital Governance and Hotspot GeoInformatics, 7th Annual Digital Government Research, San Diego, CA, May.
   Google Scholar
• Amadio Guidi, V., Amadei, M., Bagnaia, R., Di Bucci, D., Laureti, L., Lisi, A., Lugeri, F. R., & Lugeri, N. (2002) The role of geomorphology in landscape ecology: The “Landscape Unit Map of Italy” at the scale 1:250.000 (“Carta della Natura” Project), in: Applied Geomorphology: Theory and Practice (London: John Wiley & Sons), pp. 265–282.
   Google Scholar
• Amadio Guidi, V., & Lugeri, F. R. (May 2016) The peri-urban natural areas: Methodological proposals for the study area and the environmental assessment, in: SIEP – IALE 2016 Challenges of Anthropocene and the Role of Landscape Ecology (Asti, Italy), pp. 149–153.
   Google Scholar
• Ambalagan, R. (1992). Terrain evaluation and zonation mapping in mountainous terrain, Engineering Geology, 32, pp. 269–277. doi:10.1016/0013-7952(92)90053-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boitani, L., Corsi, F., Falcucci, A., Maiorano, L., Masi, M., Montemaggiori, A., Ottavini, D., Reggiani, G., & Rondinini, C. (2002) Rete Ecologica Nazionale. Un approccio alla conservazione dei vertebrati italiani (Rome, Italy: Ministero dell’Ambiente, Direzione per la Conservazione della Natura).
   Google Scholar
• Burgan, F. E. (1998) Fuel models and fire potential from satellite and surface observations, International Journal of Wildland Fire, 8(3), pp. 159–170. doi:10.1071/WF9980159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C.E.C., Commission of European Community. (1991) CORINE Biotopes Manual, Habitats of the European Community. A Method to Identify and Describe Consistently Sites of Major Importance for Nature Conservation (EUR 12587/3). Bruxelles.
   Google Scholar
• Crist, E. P., & Cicone, R. C. (1984) A physically-based transformation of thematic mapper data, The TM Tasseled Cap. IEEE T, Geoscience Remote, GE-22(3), pp. 256–263. doi:10.1109/TGRS.1984.350619.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Csuti, B., Polasky, S., Williams, P. H., Pressey, R. L., Camm, J. D., Kershaw, M., Kiester, A. R., Downs, B., Hamilton, R., Huso, M., & Sahr, K. (1997). A comparison of reserve selection algorithms using data on terrestrial vertebrates in Oregon, Biological Conservation, 80, pp. 83–97. doi:10.1016/S0006-3207(96)00068-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Groot, R. S., Van der Perk, J., Chiesura, N., & van Vliet, A. (2004). Importance and threat as determining factors for criticality of natural capital, Ecological Economics, 44, pp. 187–204. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00273-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eiswerth, M. E., & Haney, J. C. (2001). Maximizing conserved biodiversity: Why ecosystem indicators and thresholds matter, Ecological Economics, 38, pp. 259–274. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(01)00166-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrarini, A. (2005) Analisi e valutazioni spazio-temporali mediante GIS e Telerilevamento del grado di Pressione antropica attuale e potenziale gravante sul mosaico di habitat di alcune aree italiane, Ipotesi di pianificazione, PhD Thesis, Universita` di Parma.
   Google Scholar
• Forman, R. T. T. (1995) Land Mosaics. The Ecology of Landscapes and Regions (Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Forman, R. T. T., & Godron, M. (1986) Landscape Ecology (New York: John Wiley and Sons).
   Google Scholar
• Gaston, K. J., Giupponi, C., Ramanzin, M., & Sturaro, E. (1994) Rarity (London: Chapman and Hall).
   Google Scholar
• IUCN. 2000. Red list of threatened species, Available at http://www.iucn.org.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, K., & Pauleit, S. (2007). Landscape character, biodiversity and land use planning: The case of Kwangju City Region, South Korea Land Use Policy, 24, pp. 264–274. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2005.12.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J. T., & Thompson, S. (2005). Targeting sites for habitat creation: An investigation into alternative scenarios, Landscape and Urban Planning, 71, pp. 17–28. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2004.01.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J. T., Woddy, S. J., & Thompson, S. (2001). Targeting sites for conservation: Using a patch-based ranking scheme to assess conservation potential, Journal of Environmental Management, 61, pp. 367–380. doi:10.1006/jema.2001.0419.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legendre, P., & Legendre, L. (1998) Numerical ecology, Environmental Modelling, 20, pp. 37–38.
   Google Scholar
• Margules, C., & Usher, M. B. (1981). Criteria used in assessing wildlife conservation potential: A review, Biological Conservation, 21, pp. 79–109. doi:10.1016/0006-3207(81)90073-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milligan, G. W., & Cooper, M. C. (1998). A study of standardization of variables in cluster analysis, Journal of Classification, 5, pp. 181–204. doi:10.1007/BF01897163.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, D. D., & Wilcox, B. A. (1986). On island biogeography and conservation, Oikos, 47, pp. 385–387. doi:10.2307/3565453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, W. L., Patil, G. P., & Cai, Y. (2006) Exploring patterns of habitat diversity across landscapes using partial ordering, in: R. Bruggemann & L. Carlsen (Eds) Partial Order in Environmental Sciences and Chemistry, pp. 309–325 (Berlin: Springer).
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson, C. N., & Grelsson, G. (1995). The fragility of ecosystems: A review, The Journal of Applied Ecology, 32, pp. 677–692. doi:10.2307/2404808.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patil, G. P., & Taillie, C. (2004). Multiple indicators, partially ordered sets and linear extensions: Multi-criterion ranking and prioritization, Environmental Ecological Statistics, 11, pp. 199–228. doi:10.1023/B:EEST.0000027209.93218.d9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petraitis, P. S., Latham, R. E., & Niesenbaum, R. A. (1989). The maintenance of species diversity by disturbance, Quarterly Review of Biology, 64, pp. 393–418. doi:10.1086/416457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierce, S. M., Cowling, R. M., Knight, A. T., Lombard, A. T., Rouget, M., & Wolf, T. (2005) Systematic conservation planning products for land-use planning: Interpretation for implementation, Biological Conservation, 125(4), pp. 441–458. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2005.04.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poiani, K. A., Baumgartner, J. V., Buttrick, S. C., Green, S. L., Hopkins, E., Ivey, G. D., Seaton, K. P., & Sutter, R. D. (1998) A scale-independent, site conservation planning framework in the nature conservancy, Landscape and Urban Planning, 43(1–3), pp. 143–156. doi:10.1016/S0169-2046(97)00086-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pressey, R. L., Hager, T. C., Ryan, K. M., Schwarz, K. M., Wall, S., Ferrier, S., & Creaser, P. M. (2000). Using abiotic data for conservation assessments over extensive regions: Quantitative methods applied across New South Wales, Australian Biological Conservation, 96, pp. 55–82. doi:10.1016/S0006-3207(00)00050-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratcliffe, D. A. (1977) A Nature Conservation Review I (Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Restrepo, C., & Vitousek, P. (2001) Landslides, alien species, and the diversity of a Hawaiian Montane Mesic ecosystem, Biotropica, 33(3), pp. 409–420. doi:10.1111/j.1744-7429.2001.tb00195.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rookwood, P. (1995). Landscape planning for biodiversity, Landscape and Urban Planning, 31, pp. 379–385. doi:10.1016/0169-2046(94)01064-F.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenzweig, M. L. (1995) Species Diversity in Space and Time (Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Rossi, P. (2005) Stima e Valutazione del grado di Sensibilità, Fragilità e Valore ecologico del mosaico ambientale di alcune aree italiane mediante dati a terra e immagini telerilevate, PhD Thesis, Universita` di Parma.
   Google Scholar
• Rouse, J. J. W., Haas, R. H., Schell, J. A., & Deering, D. W. (1973) Monitoring vegetation systems in the Great Plains with ERTS. in: S. C. Freden, E. P. Mercanti, & M. Becker (Eds.), Third Earth Resources Technology Satellite-1 Symposium, A(I), pp. 309–317, Washington DC, National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Roy, P. S., & Tomar, S. (2000) Biodiversity characterization at landscape level using geospatial modelling technique, Biological Conservation, 95(1), pp. 95–109. doi:10.1016/S0006-3207(99)00151-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tansley, A. G. (1935). The use and abuse of vegetational concepts and terms, Ecology, 16, pp. 284–307. doi:10.2307/1930070.
   Google Scholar
• Theobald, D. M., Hobbs, N. T., Bearly, T., Zack, J. A., Shenk, T., & Riesame, W. E. (2000). Incorporating biological information in local land-use decision-making: Designing a system for conservation planning, Landscape Ecology, 15, pp. 35–45. doi:10.1023/A:1008165311026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vila, M., Lloret, F., Ogheri, E., & Terradas, J. (2001). Positive fire-grass feedback in Mediterranean basin shrub lands, Forest Ecology and Management, 147, pp. 3–14. doi:10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00435-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldhardt, R. (2003) Biodiversity and landscape summary, conclusions and perspectives, Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 98(1–3), pp. 305–309. doi:10.1016/S0167-8809(03)00090-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zurlini, G., Amadio Guidi, V., & Rossi, O. (1999) A landscape approach to biodiversity and biological health planning: The Map of Italian Nature, Ecosystem Health, 5(4), pp. 294–311.
   Google Scholar