Oceans of Conflict: Pathways to an Ocean Sustainability PACT

References

• Alexander, K. (2019) Conflicts over Marine and Coastal Common Resources: Causes, Governance and Prevention, (London: Routledge). doi:10.4324/9781315206424.
   Google Scholar
• Allison, E. (2011) Aquaculture, fisheries, poverty and food security, Working Paper 2011-65, Malysia: The WorldFish Center.
   Google Scholar
• Avruch, K., & Mitchell, C. (eds) (2013) Conflict Resolution and Human Needs: Linking Theory and Practice (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Bäcklund, P., & Mäntysalo, R. (2010) Agonism and institutional ambiguity: Ideas on democracy and the role of participation in the development of planning theory and practice - the case of Finland, Planning Theory, 9(4), pp. 333–350. doi:10.1177/1473095210373684.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, N., Govan, H., & Satterfield, T. (2015) Ocean grabbing, Marine Policy, 57, pp. 61–68. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2015.03.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chuenpagdee, R., & Jentoft, S. (2018) Transforming the governance of small-scale fisheries, Maritime Studies, 12, pp. 101–115. doi:10.1007/s40152-018-0087-7.
   Google Scholar
• Cicin-Sain, B. (1992) Multiple use conflicts and their resolution: Toward a comparative research agenda, in: P. Fabbri (Ed) Ocean Management in Global Change, pp. 280–307 (London: Elsevier Applied Science).
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, J., & Flannery, W. (2020) The post-political nature of marine spatial planning and modalities for its re-politicization, JEPP, 22(2), pp. 170–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Del Bene, D., Scheidel, A., & Temper, L. (2018) More dams, more violence? Analysing global resistances and repression around conflictive dams through co-produced knowledge, Sustainability Science, 13, pp. 617–633. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0558-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewulf, A., Klenk, N., Wyborn, C., & Lemos, M. (2020) Usable environmental knowledge from the perspective of decision-making: The logics of consequentiality, appropriateness, and meaningfulness, Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 42, pp. 1–6. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2019.10.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douvere, F. (2008) The importance of marine spatial planning in advancing ecosystem-based sea use management, Marine Policy, 32, pp. 762–771. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2008.03.021.
   Google Scholar
• Engel, A., & Korf, B. (2005) Negotiation and Mediation Techniques for Natural Resource Management (Rome: FAO).
   Google Scholar
• Ertör, I., & Ortega-Cerdà, M. (2015) Political lessons from early warnings: Marine finfish aquaculture conflicts in Europe, Marine Policy, 54, pp. 202–210. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2014.07.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Facer, K. (2020) Foreword, in: G. Gallardo, F. Saunders, & T. Sokolovo (Eds) Co-creating Actionable Science, pp. vii–viii (Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing).
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. (2004) Phronetic planning research: Theoretical and methodological reflections, Planning Theory & Practice, 5(3), pp. 283–306. doi:10.1080/1464935042000250195.
   Google Scholar
• Forester, J. (1989) Planning in the Face of Power (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press).
   Google Scholar
• Forester, J. (2013) On the theory and practice of critical pragmatism: Deliberative practice and creative negotiations, Planning Theory, 12(1), pp. 5–22. doi:10.1177/1473095212448750.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galaz, V., Biermann, F., Crona, B., Loorbach, D., Folke, C., Olsson, P., Nilsson, M. (2012) ‘Planetary boundaries’ – Exploring the challenges for global environmental governance, Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 4(1), pp. 80–87. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2012.01.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallardo, G., & Saunders, F. (2018) “Before we asked for permission, now we only give Notice”. New gender relations in fisheries: Women’s entrance into small-scale artisanal fisheries in Chile, Maritime Studies, 17, pp. 177–188. doi:10.1007/s40152-018-0110-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gee, K., & Siedschlag, D. (2019) A place-based perspective on marine and coastal space, Europa XXI, 36, pp. 61–75.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (1993) Planning through debate: The communicative turn in planning theory, in: F. Fischer & J. Forester (Eds) The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning, pp. 233–253 (Durham and London: Duke University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Higgs, S. (2007) The potential for mediation to resolve environmental and natural resources disputes, American Journal of Mediation, 1, pp. 1–32.
   Google Scholar
• Jentoft, S., & Knol, M. (2014) Marine spatial planning: Risk or opportunity for fisheries in the North Sea? Maritime Studies, 13(1), pp. 1–16. doi:10.1186/2212-9790-13-1.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, C., Ellis, G., & Flannery, W. (2019) Unravelling persistent problems to transformative marine governance, Frontiers in Marine Science, pp. 1–15. doi:10.3389/fmars.2019.00213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lederach, J. (2003) The Little Book of Conflict Transformation: Clear Articulation of the Guiding Principles by a Pioneer in the Field (New York: Good Books).
   Google Scholar
• Lembke, M., Lalander, R., & Fernando, G. (2020) Objectives and trust in ethnographic research on and with Latin American Indigenous peoples, in: G. Garllardo, F. Saunders, & T. Sokolova (Eds) Cocreating Actionable Science: Reflections from the Global North and South, pp. 13–34 (UK: Cambridge Scholar Publishing).
   Google Scholar
• Lowndes, V., & Paxton, M. (2018) Can agonism be institutionalized? Can institutions be agonized? Prospects for democratic design, The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 20(3), pp. 693–710. doi:10.1177/1369148118784756.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madden, F., & McQuinn, B. (2014) Conservation’s blind spot: The case for conflict transformation in wildlife conservation, Biological Conservation, 178, pp. 97–106. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2014.07.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, E. (2016) Introduction: Learning through conflict, working with transformation, in: E. Marshall (Ed) Conflict Transformation and Religion, pp. 1–12 (New York: Palgrave Macmillan). doi:10.1057/978-1-137-56840-3_1).
   Google Scholar
• Mitlin, D. (2008) With and beyond the state - Co-production as a route to political influence, power and transformation for grassroots organizations, Environment and Urbanization, 20(2), pp. 339–360. doi:10.1177/0956247808096117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C. (2005) On the Political (London & New York: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Murray, W., & Storey, D. (2003) Political conflict in postcolonial Oceania, Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 44(3), pp. 213–224. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8373.2003.00211.x.
   Google Scholar
• Nadasdy, P. (2011) Application of environmental knowledge: The politics of constructing society/nature, in: M. Goldman, P. Nadasdy, & M. Turner (Eds) Knowing Nature: Conversations at the Intersection of Political Ecology and Science Studies, pp. 129–133 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
   Google Scholar
• Norström, A., Cvitanovic, C., Löf, M., West, S., Wyborn, C., Balvanera, P., Bednarek, A. T., Bennett, E. M., Biggs, R., de Bremond, A., Campbell, B. M., Canadell, J. G., Carpenter, S. R., Folke, C., Fulton, E. A., Gaffney, O, Gelcich, S., Jouffray, J., Leach, M., Le Tissier, M., Martín-López, B., Louder, E., Loutre, M., Meadow, A. M., Nagendra, H., Payne, D., Peterson, G. D., Reyers, B., Scholes, R., Speranza, C I, Spierenburg, M, Stafford-Smith, M, Tengö, M, van der Hel, S, van Putten, I, Österblom, H (2020) Principles for knowledge co-production in sustainability research, Nature Sustainability, 3(3), pp. 182–190. doi:10.1038/s41893-019-0448-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oppenheimer, M., Glavovic, B. C., Hinkel, J., Van Del Wal, R., Magan, A. K., Abd-Elgawad, A., Cai, R., Cifuentes-Jara, M., Deconto, R.M., Ghosh, T. and Hay, J. (2019) Sea level rise and implications for low lying islands, coasts and communities, in: H. Pörtner et al. (Eds) IPCC Special Report on the Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate, pp. 321–411 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Pinkerton, E., & Davis, R. (2015) Neolibralism and the politics of enclosure in North American small-scale fisheries, Marine Policy, 61, pp. 303–312. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2015.03.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quimby, B., & Levine, A. (2018) Participation, power, and equity: Examining three key social dimensions of fisheries comanagement, Sustainability, 10(9), pp. 3324. doi:10.3390/su10093324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rochette, J., Billé, R., Molenaar, E. J., Drankier, P., & Chabason, L. (2015) Regional oceans governance mechanisms: A review, Marine Policy, 60, pp. 9–19. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2015.05.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russo, E., Monti, M., Mangano, C., Raffaetà, A., Sarà, G., Silvestri, C., & Pranovi, F. (2020) Temporal and spatial patterns of trawls fishing activities in the Adriatic Sea (Central Mediterranean Sea, GSA17), Ocean & Coastal Management, 192. doi:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2020.105231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders, F., Gilek, M., Ikauniece, A., Tafon, R., Gee, K., & Zaucha, J. (2020) Theorizing social sustainability and justice in marine spatial planning: Democracy, diversity, and equity, Sustainability, 12(6), pp. 1–18. doi:10.3390/su12062560.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scoones, I., Stirling, A., Abrol, D., Atela, J., Charli-Joseph, L., Eakin, H., Ely, A., Olsson, P., Pereira, L., Priya, R., Van Zwanenberg, P., & Yang, L. (2019) Transformations to sustainability: Combining structural, systemic and enabling approaches, Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 42, pp. 65–75. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2019.12.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, H. D. (2000) The industrialization of the world ocean, Ocean & Coastal Management, 43, pp. 11–28. doi:10.1016/S0964-5691(00)00028-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spijkers, J., Morrison, T., Blasiak, R., Osborne, M., Watson, J., & Österblom, H. (2018) marine fisheries and future ocean conflict, Fish & Fisheries, 19, pp. 798–806. doi:10.1111/faf.12291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinberg, P.,& Peters, K. (2015) Wet ontologies, fluid spaces: Giving depth to volume through oceanic thinking, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 33(2), pp. 247–264. doi:10.1068/d14148p.
   Google Scholar
• Susskind, L., Mckearnan, S., & Thomas-Larmer, J. (Eds) (1999) The Consensus Building Handbook: A Comprehensive Guide to Reaching Agreement (California: SAGE).
   Google Scholar
• Tafon, R., Howarth, D., & Griggs, S. (2019a) The politics of Estonia’s offshore wind energy programme: Discourse, power and marine spatial planning, Environment & Planning C: Politics & Spcae, 37(1), pp. 157–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tafon, R., Saunders, F., & Gilek, M. (2019b) Re-reading marine spatial planning through Foucault, Haugaard and others: An analysis of domination, empowerment and freedom, JEPP, 21(6), pp. 754–768.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tafon, R. V. (2018) Taking power to sea: Towards a post-structuralist discourse theoretical critique of marine spatial planning, Environment & Planning C: Politics & Space, 36(2), pp. 258–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tafon, R. V. (2019) Small-scale fishers as allies or opponents? Unlocking looming tensions and potential exclusions in Poland’s marine spatial planning, JEPP, 21(6), pp. 637–648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tambakaki, P. (2011) Agonism and the reconception of European citizenship, BJPIR, 13, pp. 567–585.
   Google Scholar
• Temper, L., Demaria, F., Scheidel, A., Del Bene, D., & Martinez-Alier, J. (2018) The global environmental justice atlas (EJAtlas): Ecological distribution conflicts as forces for sustainability, Sustainability Science, 13(3), pp. 573–584. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0563-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turnhout, E. (2018) The politics of environmental knowledge, Conservation & Society, 16(3), pp. 363–371. doi:10.4103/cs.cs_17_35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turnhout, E., Metze, T., Wyborn, C., Klenk, N., & Louder, E. (2020) The politics of co-production: Participation, power, and transformation, Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 42, pp. 15–21. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2019.11.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UK In A Changing World (2020) What would no deal mean? Available at https://ukandeu.ac.uk/research-papers/what-would-no-deal-mean/
   Google Scholar
• Vallega, A. (1999) Fundamentals of Integrated Coastal Management (Dordrecht: Kluwer).
   Google Scholar
• Visbeck, M. (2018) Ocean science research is key for a sustainable future, Nature Communications, 9(1). doi:10.1038/s41467-018-03158-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, S., Kerkhoff, L., & Wagenaar, H. (2019) Beyond “linking knowledge and action”: Towards a practice-based approach to transdisciplinary sustainability interventions, Policy Studies, 40(5), pp. 534–555. doi:10.1080/01442872.2019.1618810.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, E. O. (2012) Transforming capitalism through real utopias, American Sociological Review, 78(1), pp. 1–25. doi:10.1177/0003122412468882.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wüstenhagen, R., Wolsink, M., & Burer, M. (2007) Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation: An introduction to the concept, Energy Policy, 35(5), pp. 2683–2691. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar