‘Holding Properties Vacant Is Resource Stupidity’: Towards a Typology of Roles in the (Inter)mediation of Urban ‘Temporary Use’

References

• Andres, L. (2013) Differential spaces, power hierarchy and collaborative planning: A critique of the role of temporary uses in shaping and making places, Urban Studies, 50(March), pp. 759–775. doi:10.1177/0042098012455719.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andres, L., & Kraftl, P. (2021) New directions in the theorisation of temporary urbanisms: Adaptability, activation and trajectory, Progress in Human Geography, 45, pp. 1237–1253. preprint. (accessed 26 October 2021). doi:10.1177/0309132520985321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baum, J. A. C., Calabrese, T., & Silverman, B. S. (2000) Don’t go it alone: Alliance network composition and startups’ performance in Canadian biotechnology, Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), pp. 267–294. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200003)21:3<267::AID-SMJ89>3.0.CO;2-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkes, F., Colding, J., & Folke, C. (Eds) (2002) Navigating Social-Ecological Systems (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Berwyn, E. (2012) The meanwhile plinth, in: M. Glaser, M. van’t Hoff, H. Karssenberg, J. Laven, & J. van Teeffelen (Eds) The City at Eye Level: Lessons for Street Plinths, pp. 143–147 (Delft: Eburon).
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, P., & Williams, L. (2012) The Temporary City (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Bosák, V., Slach, O., Nováček, A., & Krtička, L. (2020) Temporary use and brownfield regeneration in post-socialist context: From bottom-up governance to artists exploitation, European Planning Studies, 28(3), pp. 604–626. doi:10.1080/09654313.2019.1642853.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buijs, A. E., Mattijssen, T. J., Van der Jagt, A. P., Ambrose-Oji, B., Andersson, E., Elands, B. H., & Steen Møller, M. (2016) Active citizenship for urban green infrastructure: Fostering the diversity and dynamics of citizen contributions through mosaic governance, Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 22, pp. 1–6. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2017.01.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulkeley, H., Broto, V. C., Hodson, M., & Marvin, S. (2011) Cities and Low Carbon Transitions (New York: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Christmann, G. B., Ibert, O., Jessen, J., & Walther, U. J. (2020) Innovations in spatial planning as a social process – Phases, actors, conflicts, European Planning Studies, 28(3), pp. 496–520. doi:10.1080/09654313.2019.1639399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collier, P., & Callero, P. (2005) Role theory and social cognition: Learning to think like a recycler, Self and Identity, 4(1), pp. 45–58. doi:10.1080/13576500444000164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colomb, C. (2012) Pushing the urban frontier: Temporary uses of space, city marketing, and the creative city discourse in 2000s Berlin, Journal of Urban Affairs, 34(2), pp. 131–152. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9906.2012.00607.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Fejter, A. (2017) Building bridges to cross-over: Neighbourhood managers playing a brokerage role between stakeholders involved in temporary use, in: F. Jégou & M. Bonneau (Eds) Brokering between Stakeholders Involved in Temporary Use Refill Magazine #2, pp. 12–15 (Ghent: Refill).
   Google Scholar
• de Roo, G., & Boelens, L. (Eds) (2016) Spatial Planning in a Complex Unpredictable World of Change (Groningen: Coöperatie in Planning UA).
   Google Scholar
• Dotson, T. (2016) Trial-and-error urbanism: Addressing obduracy, uncertainty and complexity in urban planning and design, Journal of Urbanism, 9(2), pp. 148–165.
   Google Scholar
• Filion, P. (2010) Reorienting urban development? Structural obstruction to new urban forms, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 34(1), pp. 1–19. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2427.2009.00896.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, J., & Guy, S. (2009) Re-interpreting regulations: Architects as intermediaries for low-carbon buildings, Urban Studies, 46(12), pp. 2577–2594. doi:10.1177/0042098009344228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frantzeskaki, N., Castán Broto, V., Coenen, L., & Loorbach, D. (Eds) (2017) Urban Sustainability Transitions (New York and Oxon: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Frantzeskaki, N., Dumitru, A., Anguelovski, I., Avelino, F., Bach, M., Best, B., Binder, C., Barnes, J., Carrus, G., Egermann, M., Haxeltine, A., Moore, M. L., Mira, R. G., Loorbach, D., Uzzell, D., Omman, I., Olsson, P., Silvestri, G., Stedman, R., Wittmayer, J., Durrant, R., & Rauschmayer, F. (2016) Elucidating the changing roles of civil society in urban sustainability transitions, Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 22, pp. 41–50. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2017.04.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuenfschilling, L., & Truffer, B. (2014) The structuration of socio-technical regimes - Conceptual foundations from institutional theory, Research Policy, 43(4), pp. 772–791. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.10.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galdini, R. (2020) Temporary uses in contemporary spaces. A European project in Rome, Cities, 96, pp. 1–8. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2019.102445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gebhardt, M. F. (2017) Planning, property rights and the tragedy of the anticommons: Temporary uses in Portland and Detroit, in: J. Henneberry (Ed) Transience and Permanence in Urban Development, pp. 171–184 (Oxford: Wiley).
   Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W. (2002) Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: A multi-level perspective and a case-study, Research Policy, 31(8–9), pp. 1257–1274. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W. (2004) From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory, Research Policy, 33(6–7), pp. 897–920. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2004.01.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W., Kern, F., Fuchs, G., Hinderer, N., Kungl, G., Mylan, J., Neukirch, M., & Wassermann, S. (2016). The enactment of socio-technical transition pathways: A reformulated typology and a comparative multi-level analysis of the German and UK low-carbon electricity transitions (1990-2014), Research Policy, 45, 869–913.
   Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W., & Schot, J. (2010) The dynamics of transitions: A socio-technical perspective, in: J. Grin, J. Rotmans, & J. Schot (Eds) Transitions to Sustainable Development: New Directions in the Study of Long Term Transformative Change, pp. 11–102 (New York and London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W. (2011) The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: Responses to seven criticisms, Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 1(1), pp. 24–40. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2011.02.002.
   Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W. (2012) A socio-technical analysis of low-carbon transitions: Introducing the multi-level perspective into transport studies, Journal of Transport Geography, 24, pp. 471–482. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.01.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W., & Deuten, J. J. (2006) Local and global dynamics in technological development: A socio-cognitive perspective on knowledge flows and lessons from reinforced concrete, Science and Public Policy, 33(4), pp. 265–275. doi:10.3152/147154306781778984.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, C., & Malins, J. (2004) Visualising Research: A Guide to the Research Process in Art and Design (London and New York: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Groth, J., & Corijn, E. (2005) Reclaiming urbanity: Indeterminate spaces, informal actors and urban agenda setting, Urban Studies, 42(3), pp. 503–526. doi:10.1080/00420980500035436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (2007) Ethnography: Principles in Practice, 3rd ed. (London and New York: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. (1988) Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective, Feminist Studies, 14(3), pp. 575. doi:10.2307/3178066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harding, S. (Ed) (2011) The Postcolonial Science and Technology Studies Reader (Durham and London: Duke University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, T., Hielscher, S., Seyfang, G., & Smith, A. (2013) Grassroots innovations in community energy: The role of intermediaries in niche development, Global Environmental Change, 23, pp. 868–880. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.02.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasemann, O., Schnier, D., Angenendt, A., Oßwald, S., & Bremen, Z. (Eds) (2017) Building Platforms (Berlin: Jovis Verlag).
   Google Scholar
• Haydn, F., & Temel, R. (2006) Temporary Urban Spaces: Concepts for the Use of City Spaces (Basel: Birkhäuser).
   Google Scholar
• Henneberry, J. (Ed) (2017) Transience and Permanence in Urban Development Transience and Permanence in Urban Development (Oxford: Wiley).
   Google Scholar
• Hernberg, H. (2014) Tyhjät Tilat: Näkökulmia ja keinoja olemassa olevan rakennuskannan uusiokäyttöön [Vacant Spaces: Perspectives to Reusing Existing Built Environment] (Helsinki: Ministry of the Environment).
   Google Scholar
• Hernberg, H. (2020) Mediating ‘Temporary use’ of urban space: Accounts of selected practitioners, in: M. Chudoba, A. Hynynen, M. Rönn, & A. E. Toft (Eds) Built Environment and Architecture as a Resource, Proceedings Series 2020-1, pp. 211–239 (Sweden: Nordic Academic Press of Architectural Research).
   Google Scholar
• Hernberg, H., & Mazé, R. (2017) Architect/designer as ‘Urban agent’ – A case of mediating temporary use in cities, in: Proceedings of NORDES Nordic Design Research Conference 2017 Design + Power, June 15–17, Oslo, Norway.
   Google Scholar
• Hodson, M., & Marvin, S. (2009) Cities mediating technological transitions: Understanding visions, intermediation and consequences, Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 21(4), pp. 515–534. doi:10.1080/09537320902819213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodson, M., Marvin, S., & Bulkeley, H. (2013) The intermediary organisation of low carbon cities: A comparative analysis of transitions in Greater London and Greater Manchester, Urban Studies, 50(7), pp. 1403–1422. doi:10.1177/0042098013480967.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honeck, T. (2017) From squatters to creatives. An innovation perspective on temporary use in planning, Planning Theory and Practice, 18(2), pp. 268–287. doi:10.1080/14649357.2017.1303536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howells, J. (2006) Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation, Research Policy, 35(5), pp. 715–728. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2006.03.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyysalo, S., Juntunen, J. K., & Martiskainen, M. (2018) Energy Internet forums as acceleration phase transition intermediaries, Research Policy, 47(5), pp. 872–885. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2018.02.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jegou, F., & Bonneau, M. (Eds) (2017) Brokering between Stakeholders Involved in Temporary Use Refill Magazine #2 (Ghent: Refill).
   Google Scholar
• Jégou, F., Bonneau, M., & Tytgadt, E. (Eds) (2018) A Journey Through Temporary Use (Ghent: Refill).
   Google Scholar
• Kivimaa, P. (2014) Government-affiliated intermediary organisations as actors in system-level transitions, Research Policy, 43(8), pp. 1370–1380. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2014.02.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kivimaa, P., Boon, W., Hyysalo, S., & Klerkx, L. (2019a) Towards a typology of intermediaries in sustainability transitions: A systematic review and a research agenda, Research Policy, 48, pp. 1062–1075. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kivimaa, P., Hyysalo, S., Boon, W., Klerkx, L., Martiskainen, M., & Schot, J. (2019b) Passing the baton: How intermediaries advance sustainability transitions in different phases, Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 31, pp. 110–125. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2019.01.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009) Interviews, Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing, 2nd ed. (London: SAGE).
   Google Scholar
• Lehtovuori, P., & Ruoppila, S. (2012) Temporary uses as means of experimental urban planning, Serbian Architecture Journal, 4(1), pp. 29–54. doi:10.5937/SAJ1201029L.
   Google Scholar
• Loorbach, D., Frantzeskaki, N., & Avelino, F. (2017) Sustainability transitions research: Transforming science and practice for societal change, Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 42(1), pp. 599–626. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-102014-021340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madanipour, A. (2018) Temporary use of space: Urban processes between flexibility, opportunity and precarity, Urban Studies, 55(5), pp. 1093–1110. doi:10.1177/0042098017705546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matoga, A. (2019) Governance of temporary use, Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Urban Design and Planning, 172(4), pp. 159–168.
   Google Scholar
• Matschoss, K., & Heiskanen, E. (2017) Making it experimental in several ways: The work of intermediaries in raising the ambition level in local climate initiatives, Journal of Cleaner Production, 169, pp. 85–93. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matschoss, K., & Heiskanen, E. (2018) Innovation intermediary challenging the energy incumbent: Enactment of local socio-technical transition pathways by destabilisation of regime rules, Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 30(12), pp. 1455–1469. doi:10.1080/09537325.2018.1473853.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mignon, I., & Kanda, W. (2018) A typology of intermediary organizations and their impact on sustainability transition policies, Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 29, pp. 100–113. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2018.07.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moss, T. (2009) Intermediaries and the governance of sociotechnical networks in transition, Environment and Planning A, 41(6), pp. 1480–1495. doi:10.1068/a4116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Németh, J., & Langhorst, J. (2014) Rethinking urban transformation: Temporary uses for vacant land, Cities, 40, pp. 143–150. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2013.04.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orstavik, F. (2014) Innovation as re-institutionalization: A case study of technological change in housebuilding in Norway, Construction Management and Economics, 32(9), pp. 857–873. doi:10.1080/01446193.2014.895848.
   Google Scholar
• Oswalt, P., Overmeyer, K., & Misselwitz, P. (2013) Urban Catalyst - the Power of Temporary Use (Berlin: DOM Publishers).
   Google Scholar
• Parag, Y., & Janda, K. B. (2014) More than filler: Middle actors and socio-technical change in the energy system from the ‘middle-out’, Energy Research and Social Science, 3, pp. 102–112. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2014.07.011.
   Google Scholar
• Patti, D., & Polyak, L. (2017) Frameworks for temporary use: Experiments of urban regeneration in Bremen, Rome and Budapest, in: J. Henneberry (Ed) Transience and Permanence in Urban Development, pp. 231–248 (Oxford: Wiley).
   Google Scholar
• Patti, D., & Polyak, L. (2015) From practice to policy: Frameworks for temporary use, Urban Research & Practice, 8(1), pp. 122–134. doi:10.1080/17535069.2015.1011422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raven, R., Van Den Bosch, S., & Weterings, R. (2010) Transitions and strategic niche management: Towards a competence kit for practitioners, International Journal of Technology Management, 51(1), pp. 57–74. doi:10.1504/IJTM.2010.033128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubenis, M. (2017) ‘Free Riga’: Space offer -driven brokering between owners and initiatives, in: F. Jégou & M. Bonneau (Eds) Brokering between Stakeholders Involved in Temporary Use Refill Magazine #2, pp. 23–27 (Ghent: Refill).
   Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J. (2009) The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers (London: SAGE Publications).
   Google Scholar
• Schot, J., & Geels, F. W. (2008) Strategic niche management and sustainable innovation journeys: Theory, findings, research agenda, and policy, Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 20(5), pp. 537–554. doi:10.1080/09537320802292651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seyfang, G., Hielscher, S., Hargreaves, T., Martiskainen, M., & Smith, A. (2014) A grassroots sustainable energy niche? Reflections on community energy in the UK, Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 13(2014), pp. 21–44. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2014.04.004.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, B., & Carroll, B. (2008) Re-viewing ‘role’ in processes of identity construction, Organization, 15(1), pp. 29–50. doi:10.1177/1350508407084484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A., Fressoli, M., & Thomas, H. (2014) Grassroots innovation movements: Challenges and contributions, Journal of Cleaner Production, 63, pp. 114–124. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.12.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A., Hargreaves, T., Hielscher, S., Martiskainen, M., & Seyfang, G. (2016) Making the most of community energies: Three perspectives on grassroots innovation, Environment and Planning A, 48(2), pp. 407–432. doi:10.1177/0308518X15597908.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A., & Raven, R. (2012) What is protective space? Reconsidering niches in transitions to sustainability, Research Policy, 41(6), pp. 1025–1036. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.12.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A., Voß, J. P., & Grin, J. (2010) Innovation studies and sustainability transitions: The allure of the multi-level perspective and its challenges, Research Policy, 39(4), pp. 435–448. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens, Q., & Dovey, K. (2019) ‘Pop‐ups’ and public interests: Agile public space in the Neoliberal city, in: M. Arefi & C. Kickert (Eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Bottom-Up Urbanism, pp. 323–337 (New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan).
   Google Scholar
• Tonkiss, F. (2013) Austerity urbanism and the makeshift city, City, 17(3), pp. 312–324. doi:10.1080/13604813.2013.795332.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, R. H. (1990) Role change, Annual Review of Sociology, 16, pp. 87–110. doi:10.1146/annurev.so.16.080190.000511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valderrama Pineda, A. F., Braagaard Harders, A. K., & Morten, E. (2017) Mediators acting in urban transition processes: Carlsberg city district and cycle superhighways, in: N. Frantzeskaki, V. Castán Broto, L. Coenen, & D. Loorbach (Eds) Urban Sustainability Transitions, pp. 300–310 (New York and Oxon: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• van der Laak, W. W. M., Raven, R. P. J. M., & Verbong, G. P. J. (2007) Strategic niche management for biofuels: Analysing past experiments for developing new biofuel policies, Energy Policy, 35(6), pp. 3213–3225. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2006.11.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughan, L. (2017) Practice-based Design Research (London and New York: Bloomsbury).
   Google Scholar
• Warbroek, B., Hoppe, T., Coenen, F., & Bressers, H. (2018) The role of intermediaries in supporting local low-carbon energy initiatives, Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(7), pp. 1–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, R., & Stirling, A. (2013) Sustaining trajectories towards sustainability: Dynamics and diversity in UK communal growing activities, Global Environmental Change, 23, pp. 838–846. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.06.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittmayer, J. M., Avelino, F., van Steenbergen, F., & Loorbach, D. (2017) Actor roles in transition: Insights from sociological perspectives, Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 24, pp. 45–56. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2016.10.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfram, M., Frantzeskaki, N., & Maschmeyer, S. (2016) Cities, systems and sustainability: Status and perspectives of research on urban transformations, Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 22, pp. 18–25. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2017.01.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar