309
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Never Read the Comments: Planning System Reform Discourse from the Bottom of the Web

ORCID Icon

References

  • Allmendinger, P., & Haughton, G. (2013) The evolution and trajectories of English neoliberal spatial governance: ‘neoliberal’ episodes in planning, Planning Practice and Research, 28(1), pp. 6–26. doi:10.1080/02697459.2012.699223.
  • Anderson, A., Brossard, D., Scheufele, D., Xenos, M., & Ladwig, P. (2014) The “nasty effect” Online incivility and risk perceptions of emerging technologies, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(3), pp. 373–387. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12009.
  • Boyd, M. (2018) Critical discourse analysis and the editorial 2.0: News reception and user-generated comments in discourse about (Im)migration, Altre Modernità, ottobre 1–22. doi:10.13130/2035-7680/10748.
  • Chouliaraki, L., & Fairclough, N. (1999) Discourses in Late Modernity: Rethinking Critical Discourse Analysis (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press).
  • Clifford, B. (2006) Only a town planner would run a toxic-waste pipe through a recreational area: Planning and planners in the British press, Town Planning Review, 77(4), pp. 423–454. doi:10.3828/tpr.77.4.4.
  • Dahlberg, L. (2001) Computer-mediated communication and the public sphere: A critical analysis, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 7(1), pp. JCMC714.
  • Dovey, K., & Sandercock, L. (2002) Hype and hope: Imagining Melbourne’s docklands, City, 6(1), pp. 83–101. doi:10.1080/13604810220142853.
  • Duque Francoa, I., & Ortiz, C. (2020) Medellín in the headlines: The role of the media in the dissemination of urban models, Cities, 96, pp. 102431. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2019.102431.
  • Fairclough, N. (1989) Language and Power (London: Longman).
  • Fairclough, N. (1992) Discourse and Social Change (Cambridge: Polity Press).
  • Fairclough, N. (1995) Critical Discourse Analysis (London: Longman).
  • Fairclough, N. (2003) Analyzing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research (London: Routledge).
  • Flyvbjerg, B. (2012) Why mass media matter to planning research: The case of megaprojects, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 32(2), pp. 169–181. doi:10.1177/0739456X12441950.
  • Gibson, W., & Roca-Cuberes, C. (2019) Constructing blame for school exclusion in an online comments forum: Membership categorisation analysis and endogenous category work, Discourse, Context & Media, 32, pp. 100331. doi:10.1016/j.dcm.2019.100331.
  • Gilbert, C., & Gurran, N. (2021) Can ceding planning controls for major projects support metropolitan housing supply and diversity? The case of Sydney, Australia, Land Use Policy, 102, pp. 105278. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105278.
  • Goodman, R., Maginn, P., Gurran, N., & Ruming, K. (2013) Simpler, faster, cheaper? Australia’s urban aspirations and the planning reform agendas. Paper presented at State of Australian Cities National Conference, Sydney, November 26–29.
  • Graham, T. (2012) Talking back, but is anyone listening? Journalism and comment fields, in: C. Peters & M. Broersma (Eds) Rethinking Journalism: Trust and Participation in a Transformed Media Landscape, pp. 114–127 (London: Routledge).
  • Green, M. (2018) No comment! Why more news sites are dumping their comment sections. KQED Inc. Available at https://www.kqed.org/lowdown/29720/no-comment-why-a-growing-number-of-news-sites-are-dumping-their-comment-sections (accessed 20 August 2021).
  • Gunn, S., & Hillier, J. (2014) When uncertainty is interpreted as risk: An analysis of tensions relating to spatial planning reform in England, Planning Practice and Research, 29(1), pp. 56–74. doi:10.1080/02697459.2013.848530.
  • Gurran, N., & Phibbs, P. (2013) Evidence-free zone? Examining claims about planning performance and reform in New South Wales, Australian Planner, 51(3), pp. 232–242. doi:10.1080/07293682.2013.833121.
  • Gurran, N., & Ruming, K. (2016) Less planning, more development? Housing and urban reform discourses in Australia, Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 19(3), pp. 262–280. doi:10.1080/17487870.2015.1065184.
  • Inch, A. (2018) ‘Opening for business’? Neoliberalism and the cultural politics of modernising planning in Scotland, Urban Studies, 55(5), pp. 1076–1092. doi:10.1177/0042098016684731.
  • Innes, J. (1998) Information in communicative planning, Journal of the American Planning Association, 64(1), pp. 52–63. doi:10.1080/01944369808975956.
  • Ipsos MediaCT (2020) Monthly readership & audience demographic. Available at https://www.nineforbrands.com.au/brand/the-sydney-morning-herald/ (accessed 20 August 2021).
  • Jacobs, K. (2004) Waterfront redevelopment: A critical discourse analysis of the policymaking process within the Chatham maritime project, Urban Studies, 41(4), pp. 817–832. doi:10.1080/0042098042000194124.
  • Kovacs, K. (2020) Comment sections aren’t dead (yet). Digital Context Next. Available at https://digitalcontentnext.org/blog/2020/03/05/comment-sections-arent-dead-yet/ (accessed 20 August 2021).
  • Lee, E. (2012) That’s not the way it is: How user-generated comments on the news affect perceived media bias, Journal of Computer-mediated Communication, 18(1), pp. 32–45. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01597.x.
  • Lees, L. (2004) Urban geography: Discourse analysis and urban research, Progress in Human Geography, 28(1), pp. 101–107. doi:10.1191/0309132504ph473pr.
  • Liu, Q., Zhou, M., & Zhao, X. (2015) Understanding news 2.0: A framework for explaining the number of comments from readers on online news, Information and Management, 52(7), pp. 764–776. doi:10.1016/j.im.2015.01.002.
  • Lord, A., & Tewdwr-Jones, M. (2018) Getting the planners off our backs: Questioning the post-political nature of English planning policy, Planning Practice & Research, 33(3), pp. 229–243.
  • Mitchelstein, E. (2011) Catharsis and community: Divergent motivations for audience participation in online newspapers and blogs, International Journal of Communication, 5(11), pp. 2014–2034.
  • Munro, M. (2018) House price inflation in the news: A critical discourse analysis of newspaper coverage in the UK, Housing Studies, 33(7), pp. 1085–1105. doi:10.1080/02673037.2017.1421911.
  • Osborne, N. (2019) For still possible cities: A politics of failure for the politically depressed, Australian Geographer, 50(2), pp. 145–154. doi:10.1080/00049182.2018.1530717.
  • Pinto-Coelho, Z., Carvalho, A., & Castro Seixas, E. (2019) News discourse and readers’ comments: Expanding the range of citizenship positions? Journalism, 20(6), pp. 733–751. doi:10.1177/1464884917707595.
  • Piracha, A. (2010) The NSW (Australia) planning reforms and their implications for planning education and natural and built environment, Local Economy, 25(3), pp. 240–250. doi:10.1080/02690941003784291.
  • Raynor, K., Matthews, T., & Mayere, S. (2016) Shaping urban consolidation debates: Social representations in Brisbane newspaper media, Urban Studies, 54(6), pp. 1519–1536. doi:10.1177/0042098015624385.
  • Reagle, J. (2015) Reading the Comments: Likers, Haters and Manipulators at the Bottom of the Web (Cambridge: MIT Press).
  • Ruiz, C., Domingo, D., Mico, J., Diaz-Noci, J., Meso, K., & Masip, P. (2011) Public sphere 2.0? The democratic qualities of citizen debates in online newspapers, The International Journal of Press/Politics, 16(4), pp. 463–487. doi:10.1177/1940161211415849.
  • Ruming, K., & Goodman, R. (2016) Planning system reform and economic development: Unpacking policy rhetoric and trajectories in Victoria and New South Wales, Built Environment, 42(1), pp. 72–89. doi:10.2148/benv.42.1.72.
  • Ruming, K., & Gurran, N. (2014) Australian planning system reform, Australian Planner, 51(2), pp. 102–107. doi:10.1080/07293682.2014.896065.
  • Sandercock, L. (2010) From the campfire to the computer: An epistemology of multiplicity and the story turn in planning, in: L. Sandercock & G. Attili (Eds) Multimedia Explorations in Urban Policy and Planning, pp. 17–37 (Dordrecht: Springer).
  • Schweitzer, L., & Stephenson, M. (2016) Planning, development and media: A case study of the Woodrow Wilson Bridge, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 36(2), pp. 239–254. doi:10.1177/0739456X15620280.
  • Smith, A. (2019) Berejiklian to overhaul planning laws with push for 30-minute cities, Sydney Morning Herald, November 27.
  • Snow, D., Gorrey, M., & Chung, L. (2019) ‘No effective oversight’: Why the opal and Mascot towers cases may be the tip of a very large iceberg, Sydney Morning Herald, June 22.
  • Spence, P., Lachlan, K., Sellnow, T., Rice, R., & Seeger, H. (2017) That is so gross and I have to post about it: Exemplification effects and user comments on a news story, Southern Communication Journal, 82(1), pp. 27–37. doi:10.1080/1041794X.2016.1265578.
  • Springer, N., Engelmann, I., & Pfaffinger, C. (2015) User comments: Motives and inhibitors to write and read, Information, Communication & Society, 18(7), pp. 798–815. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2014.997268.
  • Suler, J. (2004) The online disinhibition effect, CyberPsychology & Behaviour, 7(3), pp. 321–326. doi:10.1089/1094931041291295.
  • Troy, L., Randolph, B., Pinnegar, S., Crommelin, L., & Easthope, H. (2020) Vertical sprawl in the Australian City: Sydney’s high-rise residential development boom, Urban Policy and Research, 38(1), pp. 18–36. doi:10.1080/08111146.2019.1709168.
  • Williamson, W., & Ruming, K. (2019) Urban renewal and public participation in Sydney: Unpacking social media strategies and use for contesting consensus, Urban Policy and Research, 37(3), pp. 350–366. doi:10.1080/08111146.2019.1585340.
  • Ziegele, M., Weber, M., Quiring, O., & Breiner, T. (2017) The dynamics of online news discussions: Effects of news articles and reader comments on users’ involvement, willingness to participate, and the civility of their contributions, Information, Communication & Society, 21(10), pp. 1419–1435. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2017.1324505.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.