Innovation dynamics in regional policies for urban regeneration: experiences from Italy

References

• Albanese, G., Ciani, E., & de Blasio, G. (2019) Anything new in town? The local effects of urban regeneration policies in Italy Working papers Banca d’Italia, April, p. 1214.
   Google Scholar
• Allulli, M., & Tortorella, W. (2013) Cities in search of policy. The urban issue in the Italian National Political Agenda, Métropoles, 12, pp. 1–18. (accessed 5 may 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Apulia Region. (2008) The Housing Observatory (Osservatorio regionale della condizione abitativa – Orca), 2nd Report, Department of Architecture and Urban Planning, Polytechnic University of Bari.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, R. (2014) The Urban Dimension in Cohesion Policy: Past developments and future prospects, Paper presented at RSA workshop on ‘The New Cycle of the Cohesion Policy in 2014-2020ʹ. Institute for European Studies, Vrije Universiteit Brussels, March 24.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, R. (2008) European Urban Policies and the Neighbourhood: An overview, Urban Design and Planning, 161, pp. 115–122. doi:10.1680/udap.2008.161.3.115.
   Google Scholar
• Barbanente, A., & Grassini, L. (2019) Transitions towards landscape- and heritage-centred local development strategies: A multi-level perspective, in: AESOP 2019 Conference - Book of Papers ‘Planning for Transition’, July 9–13, Venice, IUAV.
   Google Scholar
• Barbanente, A., & Grassini, L. (2020) Fostering innovation in area-based initiatives for deprived neighbourhoods: A multi-level approach, International Planning Studies, 25(2), pp. 206–221. doi:10.1080/13563475.2019.1578200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkeley, N., Bailey, D., Jones, A., & Jarvis, D. (2018) Assessing the transition towards battery electric vehicles: A multi-level perspective on drivers of, and barriers to, take up, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 106, pp. 320–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonora, P. (2017) Rendita e riconversione, la rigenerazione urbana core business del nuovo ciclo edilizio, in: I. Agostini (Ed) Consumo di luogo. Neoliberismo nel disegno di legge urbanistica dell’Emilia-Romagna, pp. 43-46 (Bologna: Pendragon).
   Google Scholar
• Cabodi, C., Davico, L., Mela, S., Russo, G., & Staricco, L. (2014) Semi di fiducia. Quindicesimo Rapporto ‘Giorgio Rota’ su Torino (Turin: Centro di ricerca Luigi Einaudi).
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, J. (2006) Addressing Europe’s urban challenges: Lessons from the EU URBAN community initiative, Urban Studies, 43(12), pp. 2145–2162. doi:10.1080/00420980600990456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CEC. (1994) Community Initiative Concerning Urban Areas (URBAN). Explanatory Memorandum (Brussels: COM(94) 61 final).
   Google Scholar
• CEC. (1997) The EU Compendium of Spatial Planning Systems and Policies, Regional Development Studies No. 28 (Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities).
   Google Scholar
• CEC. (2000) Communication from the European Commission to the Member States Laying down Guidelines for a Community Initiative Concerning Economic and Social Regeneration of Cities and of Neighborhoods in Crisis in order to Promote Sustainable Urban Development (URBAN II) (Brussels: COM(2000)1100).
   Google Scholar
• CEC. (2001) A Sustainable Europe for A Better World: A European Union Strategy for Sustainable Development (Brussels: COM(2001)264 final).
   Google Scholar
• CEC. (2002) The Programming of the Structural Funds 2000-2006, an Initial Assessment of the Urban Initiative (Brussels: CEC).
   Google Scholar
• CEC. (2004) Ex-post Evaluation of URBAN Community Initiative (Brussels: CEC).
   Google Scholar
• CEC. (2010) Ex-Post Evaluation of Cohesion Policy Programmes 2000-06: The URBAN Community Initiative (Brussels: CEC).
   Google Scholar
• Cellamare, C. (2020) La rigenerazione senza abitanti, in: G. Storto (Ed) Territorio senza governo tra Stato e regioni: A cinquant’anni dall’istituzione delle regioni, pp. 203–226 (Roma: DeriveApprodi).
   Google Scholar
• Cherp, A., Vinichenko, V., Jewell, J., Suzuki, M., & Antal, M. (2017) Comparing electricity transitions: A historical analysis of nuclear, wind and solar power in Germany and Japan, Energy Policy, 101, pp. 612–628. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2016.10.044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Città di Torino. (2005) Periferie 1997-2005 (Torino: Città di Torino). Available at http://www.comune.torino.it/rigenerazioneurbana/documentazione/periferie9705.pdf (accessed 6 December 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Coaffee, J., & Healey, P. (2003) ‘My Voice: My Place’: Tracking transformations in urban governance, Urban Studies, 40(10), pp. 1979–1999. doi:10.1080/0042098032000116077.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Codecasa, G., & Ponzini, D. (2011) Public–private partnership: A delusion for urban regeneration? Evidence from Italy, European Planning Studies, 19(4), pp. 647–667. doi:10.1080/09654313.2011.548471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coenen, L., & Truffer, B. (2012) Places and spaces of sustainability transitions: Geographical contributions to an emerging research and policy field, European Planning Studies, 20(3), pp. 367–374. doi:10.1080/09654313.2012.651802.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colantonio, A., & Dixon, T. (2010) Urban Regeneration and Social Sustainability: Best Practice from European Cities (Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell).
   Google Scholar
• Cotella, G., & Janin Rivolin, U. (2011) Europeanization of spatial planning through discourse and practice in Italy, disP, 186(3), pp. 42–53.
   Google Scholar
• Couch, C., Sykes, O., & Börstinghaus, W. (2011) Thirty years of urban regeneration in Britain, Germany and France: The importance of context and path dependency, Progress in Planning, 75, pp. 1–52. doi:10.1016/j.progress.2010.12.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Onofrio, R., & Talia, M., (Eds). (2015) La rigenerazione urbana alla prova (Milano: FrancoAngeli).
   Google Scholar
• Di Lascio, F., & Giglioni, F., (Eds). (2017) La rigenerazione di beni e spazi urbani (Bologna: Il Mulino).
   Google Scholar
• ECOTEC. (2010) Ex-post of cohesion policy programmes 2000-06: The URBAN community initiatives. Available at https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/evaluation/pdf/expost2006/urbanii/final_report.pdf (accessed 6 December 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Edmondson, D. L., Kern, F., & Rogge, K. (2019) The co-evolution of policy mixes and socio-technical systems: Towards a conceptual framework of policy mix feedback in sustainability transitions, Research Policy, 48(10), pp. 1–14. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2018.03.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fontanari, E., & Piperata, G., (Eds). (2017) Agenda Re-Cycle. Proposte per Reinventare La Città (Bologna: Il Mulino).
   Google Scholar
• Frank, S., Holm, A., Kreinsen, H., & Birkholz, T. (2006) The European URBAN Experience - Seen from the Academic Perspective, Study Project Funded by the URBACT Programme (Berlin: Humboldt Study Team).
   Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W., Kern, F., Fuchs, G., Hinderer, N., Kungl, G., Mylana, J., Neukirch, M., & Wassermann, S. (2016) The enactment of socio-technical transition pathways: A reformulated typology and a comparative multi-level analysis of the German and UK low-carbon electricity transitions (1990-2014), Research Policy, 45, pp. 896–913. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2016.01.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W., & Schot, J. (2007) Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways, Research Policy, 36, pp. 399–417. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W. (2002) Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: A multi level perspective and a case study, Research Policy, 31, pp. 1257–1274. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W. (2005) Co-evolution of technology and society: The transition in water supply and personal hygiene in the Netherlands (1850-1930) – A case study in multi-level perspective, Technology in Society, 27, pp. 363–397. doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2005.04.008.
   Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W. (2011) The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: Responses to seven criticisms, Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 1, pp. 24–40. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2011.02.002.
   Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W. (2012) A socio-technical analysis of low-carbon transitions: Introducing the multi-level perspective into transport studies, Journal of Transport Geography, 24, pp. 471–482. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.01.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W. (2019) Socio-technical transitions to sustainability: A review of criticisms and elaborations of the Multi-Level Perspective, Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, pp. 187–201. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2019.06.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W. (2020) Micro-foundations of the multi-level perspective on socio-technical transitions: Developing a multi-dimensional model of agency through crossovers between social constructivism, evolutionary economics and neo-institutional theory, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 152, pp. 119894. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119894.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GHK. (2003) Ex-post evaluation urban community initiative (1994-2000). Final report. Available at https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/evaluation/urban/urban_expost_evaluation_9499_en.pdf (accessed 6 December 2021).
   Google Scholar
• González, S., & Healey, P. (2005) A sociological institutionalist approach to the study of innovation in governance capacity, Urban Studies, 42(11), pp. 2055–2069. doi:10.1080/00420980500279778.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Governa, F., Rossignolo, C., & Saccomani, S. (2009) Turin: Urban regeneration in a post-industrial City, Journal of Urban Regeneration & Renewal, 3(1), pp. 20–30.
   Google Scholar
• Governa, F., & Saccomani, S. (2004) From urban renewal to local development. New conceptions and governance practices in the Italian peripheries, Planning Theory & Practice, 5(3), pp. 327–348. doi:10.1080/1464935042000250212.
   Google Scholar
• Governa, F., & Salone, C. (2005) Italy and European spatial policies: Polycentrism, urban networks and local innovation practices, European Planning Studies, 13(2), pp. 265–283. doi:10.1080/0965431042000321820.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Governa, F. (2004) Scegliere, decidere, apprendere. Approcci e criteri nella valutazione dei programmi complessi, in: R. Piemonte (Ed) Valutare i programmi complessi, pp. 39–49 (Savigliano: L’Artistica Editrice).
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, T., & Coenen, L. (2015) The geography of sustainability transitions: Review, synthesis and reflections on an emergent research field, Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 17, pp. 92–109. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2014.11.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (1997) Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies (London: Macmillan).
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (2006) Transforming governance: Challenges of institutional adaptation and a new politics of space, European Planning Studies, 14(3), pp. 299–320. doi:10.1080/09654310500420792.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (2007) The new institutionalism and the transformative goals of planning, in: N. Verma (Ed) Institutions and Planning: Current Research in Urban and Regional Studies, pp. 61–87 (Oxford: Elsevier).
   Google Scholar
• Hodson, M., & Marvin, S. (2010) Can cities shape socio-technical transitions and how would we know if they were? Research Policy, 39(4), pp. 477–485. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodson, M., & Marvin, S. (2012) Mediating low-carbon urban transitions? Forms of organization, knowledge and action, European Planning Studies, 20(3), pp. 421–439. doi:10.1080/09654313.2012.651804.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, C. (1986) The Tools of Government (Chatham: Chatham House Publishers).
   Google Scholar
• Howlett, M., Kim, J., & Weaver, P. (2006) Assessing instrument mixes through program- and agency-level data: Methodological issues in contemporary implementation research, Review of Policy Research, 23(1), pp. 129–151. doi:10.1111/j.1541-1338.2006.00189.x.
   Google Scholar
• IRES Piemonte. (2013) Le Politiche per lo Sviluppo Locale della Regione Piemonte (1994-2006). Inquadramento Generale e Studi di Caso (Analisi e Studi), Research Report. Available at http://www.ires.piemonte.it/pdf/Le-Politiche-per-lo-Sviluppo-Locale_web.pdf (accessed 6 December 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Kern, F., & Rogge, K. S. (2016) The pace of governed energy transitions: Agency, international dynamics and the global paris agreement accelerating decarbonisation processes? Energy Research & Social Science, 22, pp. 13–17. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2016.08.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kivimaa, P., & Kern, F. (2016) Creative destruction or mere niche support? Innovation policy mixes for sustainability transitions, Research Policy, 45, pp. 205–217. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2015.09.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Rosa, D., Privitera, R., Barbarossa, L., & La Greca, P. (2017) Assessing spatial benefits of urban regeneration programs in a highly vulnerable urban context: A case study in Catania, Italy, Landscape and Urban Planning, 157, pp. 180–192. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.05.031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaPo Corep. (2004) Programmi di recupero urbano: processi di attuazione e capitale sociale. Sintesi della Ricerca (Turin: Regione Piemonte. Available at http://www.sistemapiemonte.it/eXoRisorse/dwd/servizi/Urban/sintesi_ricerca.pdf (accessed 6 December 2021).
   Google Scholar
• LaPo Corep. (2010) I programmi territoriali integrati in Piemonte. Coalizioni, progetti e governance dell’attuazione (Turin: Regione Piemonte. Available at https://www.regione.piemonte.it/web/sites/default/files/media/documenti/2019-03/materiale_sem_21012011.pdf (accessed 6 December 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Larbi, M., Kellett, J., Palazzo, E., & Mehdipour, A. (2021) Urban sustainability transitions in two frontrunner cities: Insights from the multi-level perspective, Planning Practice & Research, 36(5), pp. 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maassen, A. (2012) Heterogeneity of lock-in and the role of strategic technological interventions in urban infrastructural transformations, European Planning Studies, 20(3), pp. 441–460. doi:10.1080/09654313.2012.651807.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markard, J., Raven, R., & Truffer, B. (2012) Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects, Research Policy, Special Section on Sustainability Transitions, 41, pp. 955–967.
   Google Scholar
• Mazur, C., Contestabile, M., Offer, G. J., & Brandon, N. P. (2015) Assessing and comparing German and UK transition policies for electric mobility, Environmental Innovation and Social Transitions, 14, pp. 84–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moradi, A., & Vagoni, E. (2018) A multi-level perspective analysis of urban mobility system dynamics: What are the future transition pathways?, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 126, pp. 231–243. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2017.09.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olagnero, M., Ortona, G., & Saccomani, S. (2004) I PRU della Regione Piemonte, Final evaluation report, Turin.
   Google Scholar
• Ombuen, S., Calvaresi, C., Fioretti, C., & De Leo, D. (2017) Oltre le periferie: Verso una strategia nazionale per la rigenerazione urbana, in: Urban@it, Secondo rapporto sulle città. Le agende urbane delle città italiane, pp. 213–227 (Bologna: Il Mulino).
   Google Scholar
• Ostanel, E. (2018) Spazi fuori dal comune Rigenerare, includere, innovare (Milano: FrancoAngeli).
   Google Scholar
• Palermo, P. C. (2002) Prove di innovazione. Nuove forme ed esperienze di governo del territorio in Italia (Milano: FrancoAngeli).
   Google Scholar
• Pasqui, G. (2011) Un ciclo politico al tramonto: Perché l’innovazione delle politiche urbane in Italia non ha funzionato, Territorio, 57, pp. 147–156. doi:10.3280/TR2011-057019.
   Google Scholar
• Rabbiosi, C. (2016) Urban regeneration ‘from the bottom up’, City, 20(6), pp. 832–844. doi:10.1080/13604813.2016.1242240.
   Google Scholar
• Rip, A., & Kemp, R. (1998) Technological Change, in: S. Rayner & E. L. Malone (Eds) Human Choice and Climate Change. Resources and Technology, pp. 327–399 (Columbus, OH: Battelle Press).
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, C., Geels, F. W., Lockwood, M., Newell, P., Schmitz, H., Turnheim, B., & Jordan, A. (2018) The politics of accelerating low-carbon transitions: Towards a new research agenda, Energy Research and Social Science, 44, pp. 304–311. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2018.06.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, C., & Geels, F. W. (2019) Conditions and intervention strategies for the deliberate acceleration of socio-technical transitions: Lessons from a comparative multi-level analysis of two historical case studies in Dutch and Danish heating, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 31(9), pp. 1081–1103. doi:10.1080/09537325.2019.1584286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, C. (2017) Discursive destabilisation of socio-technical regimes: Negative storylines and the discursive vulnerability of historical american railroads, Energy Research & Social Science, 31, pp. 86–99. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2017.05.031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogge, K. S., & Reichardt, K. (2016) Policy mixes for sustainability transitions: An extended concept and framework for analysis, Research Policy, 45, pp. 1620–1635. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2016.04.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saccomani, S. (2016) Urban Regeneration and Crisis, Paper presented at the EURA Conference ‘City lights Cities and citizens within/beyond/notwithstanding the crisis’, pp. 1–13, Turin. Available at https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Silvia_Saccomani/publication/304140071_Urban_regeneration_and_crisis/links/5767cb4508aedbc345f771ff/Urban-regeneration-and-crisis.pdf (accessed 6 December 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Saccomani, S. (2019) Rigenerazione Urbana e Periferie, Guardando Torino. Contraddittorietà e Frammentazione, Archivio di Studi Urbani e Regionali, 125, pp. 26–46. doi:10.3280/ASUR2019-125002.
   Google Scholar
• Savino, M. (2015) If regeneration is everything, perhaps is nothing, in: R. D’Onofrio & M. Talia (Eds) La rigenerazione urbana alla prova, pp. 261–271 (Milano: Franco Angeli).
   Google Scholar
• Schot, J. W. (1998) The usefulness of evolutionary models for explaining innovation. The case of the Netherlands in the nineteenth century, History and Technology, 14(3), pp. 173–200. doi:10.1080/07341519808581928.
   Google Scholar
• Serra, S. (2021) Urban planning and the market of development rights in Italy: Learning from Milan, City, Territory and Architecture, 8(1), pp. 1–17. doi:10.1186/s40410-021-00133-2.
   Google Scholar
• Tedesco, C. (2009) Italia. Senso, strumenti ed esiti dell’area-based approach ai problemi urbani, in: P. Briata, M. Bricocoli, & C. Tedesco (Eds) Città in periferia. Politiche urbane e progetti locali in Franciam, Gran Bretagna e Italia, pp. 101–133 (Milano: Carocci).
   Google Scholar
• Torino Internazionale. (2006) Il Secondo Piano Strategico dell’Area Metropolitana di Torino. Available at http://www.torinostrategica.it/pubblicazioni/il-secondo-piano-strategico-dellarea-metropolitana-di-torino/ (accessed 6 December 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Tosics, I. (2015) Integrated Regeneration of Deprived Areas and the New Cohesion Policy Approach. An URBACT contribution to the European Urban Agenda. URBACT, August. Available at http://urbact.eu/sites/default/files/20150909_urbact_deprived-areas_gb_md_1.pdf (accessed 5 May 2021).
   Google Scholar
• URBACT. (2015) Sustainable regeneration in urban areas, URBACT II capitalisation. URBACT, April. Available at https://urbact.eu/sites/default/files/04_sustreg-web.pdf (accessed 5 May 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Urban@it. (2016) Rapporto sulle città. Metropoli attraverso la crisi (Bologna: il Mulino).
   Google Scholar
• van den Berg, L., Braun, E., & van den Meer, J., (Eds). (1998) National Urban Policies in the European Union: Responses to Urban Issues in the Fifteen Member States (Aldershot: Ashgate).
   Google Scholar
• Verbong, G., & Geels, F. W. (2007) The ongoing energy transition: Lessons from a socio-technical, multi-level analysis of the Dutch electricity system (1960–2004), Energy Policy, 35(2), pp. 1025–1037. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2006.02.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinci, I. (2021) How the EU regional policy can shape urban change in Southern Europe: Learning from different planning processes in Palermo, Urban Research & Practice, 14(4), pp. 445–470. .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolman, H., & Page, E. (2002) Policy transfer among local governments: An information-theory approach, Governance, 15(4), pp. 477–501. doi:10.1111/1468-0491.00198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar