How accessibility and transportation options affect neighborhood livability: evidence from the 2017 oregon livability survey

References

• AARP. (2020, March 12). Livability index: Great neighborhoods for all ages. Available at https://livabilityindex.aarp.org/
   Google Scholar
• Appleyard, B., Ferrell, C. E., Carroll, M. A., & Taecker, M. (2014 January 1) Toward livability ethics: A framework to guide planning, design, and engineering decisions, Transportation Research Record, 2403(1), pp. 62–71. doi:10.3141/2403-08
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arundel, R., & Ronald, R. (2017 January 1) The role of urban form in sustainability of community: The case of Amsterdam, Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 44(1), pp. 33–53. doi:10.1177/0265813515608640
   Google Scholar
• Aslıgül Göçmen, Z. (2009 September) Relationships between residential development and the environment: Examining resident perspectives, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 29(1), pp. 54–66. doi:10.1177/0739456X09339065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baqutayan, S. M. S., Ariffin, A. S. B., & Raji, F. (2015) Describing the need for affordable livable sustainable housing based on Maslow’s theory of need, Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6, pp. 353. doi:10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n3s2p353
   Google Scholar
• Best Places | Livability. Available at https://livability.com/best-places (accessed 11 August 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Binette, J., & Vasold, K. (2018 August) Home and Community Preferences: A National Survey of Adults Ages 18-Plus (AARP). Available at https://www.aarp.org/research/topics/community/info-2018/2018-home-community-preference.html
   Google Scholar
• Brookfield, K. (2017 January 2) Residents’ preferences for Walkable neighbourhoods, Journal of Urban Design, 22(1), pp. 44–58. doi:10.1080/13574809.2016.1234335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buys, L., & Miller, E. (2012 April 1) Residential satisfaction in inner urban higher-density Brisbane, Australia: Role of dwelling design, neighbourhood and neighbours, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 55(3), pp. 319–338. doi:10.1080/09640568.2011.597592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, J., & Wu, X. (2019 January 28) Exploring the importance of transportation infrastructure and accessibility to satisfaction with urban and suburban neighborhoods: An application of gradient boosting decision trees, Transport Findings. doi:10.32866/7209
   Google Scholar
• Cao, X., (Jason). (2015 January 1) Residential preference and choice of movers in light rail neighborhoods in Minneapolis, Minnesota, Transportation Research Record, 2494(1), pp. 1–10. doi:10.3141/2494-01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, X., (Jason). (2016 September 1) How does neighborhood design affect life satisfaction? Evidence from Twin Cities, Travel Behaviour and Society, Planning for Quality of Life, 5(Supplement C), pp. 68–76. doi:10.1016/j.tbs.2015.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Land Conservation and Development, State of Oregon. Place types tool. Available at https://www.oregon.gov/lcd/CL/Pages/Place-Types.aspx. (accessed 2021 November 22).
   Google Scholar
• Eizenberg, E., Jabareen, Y., & Zilberman, O. (2020 June 3) Planning by scale: The role of perceived scale in determining residential satisfaction, Journal of Planning Education and Research, pp. 0739456X20921431. doi:10.1177/0739456X20921431
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fabish, L., & Haas, P. (2011 January 1) Measuring the performance of livability programs, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2242(1), pp. 45–54. doi:10.3141/2242-06
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florida, R. (2008) Who’s Your City? How the Creative Economy Is Making Where to Live the Most Important Decision of Your Life (New York, NY: Basic Books).
   Google Scholar
• Gruber, K. J., & Shelton, G. G., (1987) Assessment of neighborhood satisfaction by residents of three housing types, Social Indicators Research, 19(3), pp. 303–315. doi:10.1007/BF00300363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haarhoff, E., Beattie, L., & Dupuis, A. (2016 December 31) Does higher density housing enhance liveability? Case studies of housing intensification in Auckland, Edited by Ben Derudder Cogent Social Sciences, 2(1), pp. 1243289. doi:10.1080/23311886.2016.1243289
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrell, R., Lynott, J., Guzman, S., & Lampkin, C. (2014 April) What Is Livable? Community Preferences of Older Adults (AARP Public Policy Institute). Available at https://www.aarp.org/ppi/issues/livable-communities/info-2015/what-is-livable-AARP-ppi-liv-com.html
   Google Scholar
• Herrman, T., & Lewis, R. (2017) What Is Livability? (University of Oregon Sustainable Cities Research Initiative 2015-2017). Available at https://sci.uoregon.edu/sites/sci1.uoregon.edu/files/sub_1_-_what_is_livability_lit_review.pdf (accessed 4 January 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Hur, M., & Morrow-Jones, H. (2008 September) Factors that influence residents’ satisfaction with neighborhoods, Environment and Behavior, 40(5), pp. 619–635. doi:10.1177/0013916507307483
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hur, M., Nasar, J. L., & Chun, B. (2010 March 1) Neighborhood satisfaction, physical and perceived naturalness and openness, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(1), pp. 52–59. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IBM (2020). Raking or rim weighting in SPSS statistics, CT741, April 16. Available at https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/raking-or-rim-weighting-spss-statistics (accessed 4 January 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Kearney, A. R. (2006 January 1) Residential development patterns and neighborhood satisfaction: Impacts of density and nearby nature, Environment and Behavior, 38(1), pp. 112–139. doi:10.1177/0013916505277607
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S. M., Conway, T. L., Frank, L. D., Saelens, B. E., Cain, K. L., & Sallis, J. F. (2017 February 1) The relation of perceived and objective environment attributes to neighborhood satisfaction, Environment and Behavior, 49(2), pp. 136–160. doi:10.1177/0013916515623823
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mouratidis, K. (2017 October 25) Is compact city livable? The impact of compact versus sprawled neighbourhoods on neighbourhood satisfaction, Urban Studies, pp. 0042098017729109. doi:10.1177/0042098017729109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, D., & Gearin, E., (2001) Current preferences and future demand for denser residential environments, Housing Policy Debate, 12(4), pp. 633–659. doi:10.1080/10511482.2001.9521422
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkes, A., Kearns, A., & Atkinson, R. (2002 December 1) What makes people dissatisfied with their neighbourhoods? Urban Studies, 39(13), pp. 2413–2438. doi:10.1080/0042098022000027031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rebecca, L., & Parker, R. G. (2018) The Contribution of Transportation and Land Use to Citizen Perceptions of Livability in Oregon MPOs (Portland, OR: Transportation Research and Education Center (TREC)).
   Google Scholar
• Ruth, M., & Franklin, R. S. (2014) Livability for all? Conceptual limits and practical implications, Applied Geography, 49, pp. 18–23. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.09.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walk Score. (n.d.). List of Cities in Oregon on Walk Score. Walk Score. Available at https://www.walkscore.com/OR/ (accessed 4 January 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Yang, Y., & O’Neill, K. (2014 January 2) Understanding factors affecting people’s attitudes toward living in compact and mixed-use environments: A case study of a new urbanist project in Eugene, Oregon, USA, Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, 7(1), pp. 1–22. doi:10.1080/17549175.2013.827585
   Google Scholar
• Yang, Y. (2008) A tale of two cities: Physical form and neighborhood satisfaction in metropolitan Portland and Charlotte, Journal of the American Planning Association, 74(3), pp. 307–323. Available at https://trid.trb.org/view/875527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar