Unpacking the Ecuadorian spatial planning law: policy mobilities in Latin America between transnational agency and path-dependent logics

References

• Becker, M. (2011) Correa, indigenous movements, and the writing of a new constitution in Ecuador. Latin American Perspectives, 38(1), pp. 47–62. doi: 10.1177/0094582X10384209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benabent Fernández de Córdoba, M., & Vivanco Cruz, L. (2017) El ordenamiento territorial y el urbanismo en el Ecuador y su articulación competencial. Ciudad Y Territorio: Estudios Territoriales, 194, pp. 713–726.
   Google Scholar
• Benabent Fernández de Córdoba, M., & Vivanco Cruz, L. (2019) The experience of the municipal spatial planning in Ecuador. Estoa, 8(15), pp. 133–144. doi: 10.18537/est.v008.n015.a11.
   Google Scholar
• Berisha, E., Cotella, G., Janin Rivolin, U., & Solly, A. (2021) Spatial governance and planning systems and the public control of spatial development: A European typology. European Planning Studies, 29(1), 181–200. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2020.1726295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanc, F., & Cotella, G. (forthcoming) The business of National Urban Policies in Latin America and the pitfalls of ‘fast-track institutionalization’. Insights from Bolivia and Ecuador. In review.
   Google Scholar
• Caldeira, T. P. R. (2017) Peripheral urbanization: Autoconstruction, transversal logics, and politics in cities of the global south. Environment and Planning. D, Society & Space, 35(1), pp. 3–20. doi: 10.1177/0263775816658479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Congreso de Colombia. (1997) Ley 388 de 1997. Diario Oficial No. 43.091, de 24 de julio de 1997. (Bogotá: Congreso de Colombia).
   Google Scholar
• Dąbrowski, M., & Lingua, V. (2018) Introduction: Historical institutionalist perspectives on European spatial planning. Planning Perspectives, 33(4), pp. 499–505. doi: 10.1080/02665433.2018.1513374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dąbrowski, M., & Piskorek, K. (2018) The development of strategic spatial planning in Central and Eastern Europe: Between path dependence, European influence, and domestic politics. Planning Perspectives, 33(4), pp. 571–589. doi: 10.1080/02665433.2018.1513373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delgadillo, V. (2014) Urbanismo a la carta: Teorías, políticas, programas y otras recetas urbanas para ciudades latinoamericanas. Cadernos Metrópole, 16(31), pp. 89–111. doi: 10.1590/2236-9996.2014-3104.
   Google Scholar
• Dolowitz, D. P., & Marsh, D. (2000) Learning from abroad: The role of policy transfer in contemporary policy-making. Governance, 13(1), pp. 5–23. doi: 10.1111/0952-1895.00121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolowitz, D. P., & Marsh, D. (2012) The future of policy transfer research. Political Studies Review, 10(3), pp. 339–345. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-9302.2012.00274.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estados Unidos Mexicanos. (2016) Ley General de Asentamientos Humanos, Ordenamiento Territorial Y Desarrollo Urbano. (CDMX: Secretaría de Desarrollo Agrario, Territorial y Urbano).
   Google Scholar
• Evans, M. (2009) Policy transfer in critical perspective. Policy Studies, 30(3), pp. 243–268. doi: 10.1080/01442870902863828.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandes, E. (2011) Implementing the Urban reform agenda in Brazil: Possibilities, challenges, and lessons. Urban Forum, 22(3), pp. 299–314. doi: 10.1007/s12132-011-9124-y.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandes, E. (2019) Urban planning at a crossroads. A critical assessment of Brazil’s City Statute, 15 years later. in: G. Bhan, S. Srinivas, and V. Watson (Eds) The Routledge Companion to Planning in the Global South, pp. 48-58 (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Friendly, A., & Stiphany, K. (2019) Paradigm or paradox? The ‘cumbersome impasse’ of the participatory turn in Brazilian urban planning. Urban Studies, 56(2), pp. 271–287. doi: 10.1177/0042098018768748.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerard, A. (2001) Institutions, path dependence, and democratic consolidation. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 13(3), pp. 249–269. doi: 10.1177/095169280101300302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilardi, F., & Wasserfallen, F. (2019) The politics of policy diffusion. European Journal of Political Research, pp. 1–12. doi: 10.1111/1475-6765.12326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horn, P. (2018) Indigenous peoples, the city and inclusive urban development policies in Latin America: Lessons from Bolivia and Ecuador. Development Policy Review, 36(4), pp. 483–501. doi: 10.1111/dpr.12234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horn, P. (2019) . Indigenous rights to the city. Ethnicity and urban planning in Bolivia and Ecuador, pp. 48-58 Routledge Studies in Urbanism and the City. (London: Routledge). ISBN: 978-1-138-57358-1.
   Google Scholar
• Jajamovich, G. (2013) Miradas sobre intercambios internacionales y circulación internacional de ideas y modelos urbanos. Andamios, 10(22), pp. 91–111. doi: 10.29092/uacm.v10i22.268.
   Google Scholar
• Jajamovich, G., & Delgadillo, V. (2020) La circulación de conocimientos, saberes y políticas urbanas en América Latina. Introducción. Iberoamericana, 10(74), pp. 7–11. doi: 10.18441/ibam.20.2020.74.7-11.
   Google Scholar
• Janin Rivolin, U. (2012). Planning systems as institutional technologies: A proposed conceptualization and the implications for comparison. Planning Practice and Research, 27(1), pp. 63–85. doi: 10.1080/02697459.2012.661181.
   Google Scholar
• Jefatura del Estado (1956) Ley de 12 de mayo de 1956 sobre régimen del suelo y ordenación Urbana. In: Boletín Oficial del Estado núm. 135, de 14 de mayo de 1956, pp. 3106–3134.
   Google Scholar
• Lapdat, J. C. (2017) Ethics in autoethnography and collaborative autoethnography. Qualitative Inquiry, 23(8), pp. 589–603. doi: 10.1177/1077800417704462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larrea Maldonado, A. M. (2011) El Buen Vivir como contrahegemonía en la Constitución Ecuatoriana. Utopía Y Praxis Latinoamericana, 16(53), pp. 59–70.
   Google Scholar
• Leite, C., Acosta, C., Militelli, F., Jajamovich, G., Wilderom, M., Bonduki, N., Somekh, N., & Herling, T. (2020) Social Urbanism in Latin America. (Berlin: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-16012-8_1.
   Google Scholar
• López Sandoval, M. F. (2015) El sistema de planificación y el ordenamiento territorial para Buen Vivir en el Ecuador. Geousp - Espaço E Tempo (Online), 19(2), pp. 297–312. doi: 10.11606/.2179-0892.
   Google Scholar
• Lozano Castro, A. (2013). Ordenamiento Territorial y Buen Vivir - Sumak Kawsay. Retos del Estado Plurinacional Ecuatoriano. . Revista Electronica Digital Runa Yachachiy I semestre. pp. 1–35. http://www.alberdi.de/OrdTerLozI13.pdf, (accessed 04 May 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Mahoney, J. (2000) Path dependence in historical sociology. Theory and Society, 29(4), pp. 507–548. doi: 10.1023/A:1007113830879.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maricato, E. (2011) O Impasse Da Política Urbana No Brasil. (Petrópolis, Brasil: Vozes.
   Google Scholar
• Máximo, R., & Royer, L. (2021) La reforma Urbana en brasil y su semántica. Eure, 47(140), pp. 143–158. doi: 10.7764/eure.47.140.07.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann, E. (2011) Urban policy mobilities and global circuits of knowledge: Toward a research agenda. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 101(1), pp. 107–130. doi: 10.1080/00045608.2010.520219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann, E., & Ward, K. (2012) Policy assemblages, mobilities and mutations: Toward a multidisciplinary conversation. Political Studies Review, 10(3), pp. 325–332. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-9302.2012.00276.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann, E., & Ward, K. (2013) A multi-disciplinary approach to policy transfer research: Geographies, assemblages, mobilities and mutations. Policy Studies, 34(1), pp. 2–18. doi: 10.1080/01442872.2012.748563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montero, S. (2020) Leveraging Bogotá: Sustainable development, global philanthropy and the rise of urban solutionism. Urban Studies, 57(11), pp. 2263–2281. doi: 10.1177/0042098018798555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadin, V., & Stead, D. (2008) European spatial planning systems, social models and learning. DisP - the Planning Review, 44(172), pp. 35–47. doi: 10.1080/02513625.2008.10557001.
   Google Scholar
• Pauta Calle, F. (2019) ¿Son técnicamente viables los planes de uso y gestión de suelo previstos por la ley ecuatoriana de ordenamiento territorial? Eídos, 13(1), pp. 39–54 .
   Google Scholar
• Peck, J., & Theodore, N. (2010) Mobilizing policy: Models, methods, and mutations. Geoforum, 41(2), pp. 169–174. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2010.01.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peck, J., & Theodore, N. (2015) Fast Policy: Experimental Statecraft at the Thresholds of Neo-liberalism, pp. 300 (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press) . https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5749/j.ctt155jmqz
   Google Scholar
• Pierson, P. (2000) Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. American Political Science Review, 94(2), pp. 251–267. doi: 10.2307/2586011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pojani, D., & Stead, D. (2015) Going Dutch? The export of sustainable land-use and transport planning concepts from the Netherlands. Urban Studies, 52(9), pp. 1558–1576. doi: 10.1177/0042098014562326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porto de Oliveira, O. (2019) Policy ambassadors: Human agency in the transnationalization of Brazilian social policies. Policy and Society, 39(1), pp. 53–69. doi: 10.1080/14494035.2019.1643646.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porto de Oliveira, O., Osorio Gonnet, C., Montero, S., & Leite Kerches Da Silva, K. (2019) . Latin America and policy diffusion: From import to export pp. 224. Routledge Studies in Latin American Politics. (London: Routledge) . doi: 10.4324/9780429446139.
   Google Scholar
• Porto de Oliveira, O., & Pal, L. A. (2018) New frontiers and directions in policy transfer, diffusion and circulation research: Agents, spaces, resistance, and translations. Revista de Administração Pública. Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública., 52(2), pp. 199–220. doi: 10.1590/0034-761220180078.
   Google Scholar
• Provincia de Buenos Aires (2012) Ley de Acceso Justo Al Hábitat. (Buenos Aires: Senado y Cámara de Diputados.
   Google Scholar
• Radcliffe, S. A. (2012) Development for a postneoliberal era? Sumak kawsay, living well and the limits to decolonisation in Ecuador. Geoforum, 43(2), pp. 240–249. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.09.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• República del Ecuador (2008) Constitución de La República Del Ecuador. (Quito: Asamblea Nacional.
   Google Scholar
• República del Ecuador (2016a) Ley Orgánica de Ordenamiento Territorial, Uso Y Gestión Del Suelo. (Quito: Asamblea Nacional).
   Google Scholar
• República del Ecuador (2016b) Ley Orgánica de Tierras Rurales Y Territorios Ancestrales. (Quito: Asamblea Nacional.
   Google Scholar
• Rolnik, R. (2011) Democracy on the edge: Limits and possibilities in the implementation of an Urban Reform Agenda in Brazil. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 35(2), pp. 239–255. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2010.01036.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossbach, A., & Montandon, D. (Eds) (2017) An Overview of National Urban Laws in Latin America and the Caribbean: Case Studies from Brazil, Colombia and Ecuador. (San Pablo: Cities Alliance).
   Google Scholar
• Senado Federal, Secretaria Especial de Editoração e Publicações Subsecretaria de Edições Técnicas. (2001) Estatuto Da Cidade. (Brasilia: Senado Federal)
   Google Scholar
• Shipan, C. R., & Volden, C. (2008) The mechanisms of policy diffusion. American Journal of Political Science, 52(4), pp. 840–857. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00346.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorensen, A. (2010) Land, property rights, and planning in Japan: Institutional design and institutional change in land management. Planning Perspectives, 25(3), pp. 279–302. doi: 10.1080/02665433.2010.481178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorensen, A. (2015) Taking path dependence seriously: An historical institutionalist research agenda in planning history. Planning Perspectives, 30(1), pp. 17–38. doi: 10.1080/02665433.2013.874299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorensen, A. (2018) Multiscalar governance and institutional change: Critical junctures in European spatial planning. Planning Perspectives, 33(4), pp. 615–632. doi: 10.1080/02665433.2018.1512894.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorensen, A. (2020). Urbanization and developmental pathways: Critical junctures of urban transition. in: D. Labbé, and A. Sorensen (Eds), International Handbook on Megacities and Megacity-regions, pp. 47-64 (Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar). doi:10.4337/9781788972703 .
   Google Scholar
• Stead, D. (2012) Best practices and policy transfer in spatial planning. Planning Practice and Research, 27(1), pp. 103–116. doi: 10.1080/02697459.2011.644084.
   Google Scholar
• Stead, D. (2021) Conceptualizing the policy tools of spatial planning. Journal of Planning Literature, 36(6), pp. 297–311. doi: 10.1177/0885412221992283.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, D. (2012). Transfer and translation of policy. Policy Studies, 33(6), pp. 483–499. doi: 10.1080/01442872.2012.695933.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, D. (2017) Understanding the transfer of policy failure: Bricolage, experimentalism and translation. Policy and Politics, 45(1), pp. 55–70. doi: 10.1332/030557316X14748914098041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, D., Porto de Oliveira, O., & Pal, L. (2019) Transnational policy transfer: The circulation of ideas, power and development models. Policy and Society, 39(1), pp. 1–18. doi: 10.1080/14494035.2019.1619325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Temenos, C., & McCann, E. (2013) Geographies of policy mobilities. Geography Compass, 7(5), pp. 344–357. doi: 10.1111/gec3.12063.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, R., Pojani, D., Lenferink, S., Bertolini, L., Stead, D., & van der Krabben, E. (2018) Is transit-oriented development (TOD) an internationally transferable policy concept? Regional Studies, 52(9), pp. 1201–1213. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2018.1428740.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UN-Habitat. (2014) I Foro Urbano Nacional. Memorias. Ciudades sostenibles, ciudades para la vida. (Quito, Ecuador) Available at https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B3cpVUih7nyoRjdGRXdranFPM3c/edit accessed 10 September 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Vivanco Cruz, L., & Cordero, F. (2019) Descentralización de la planificación del ordenamiento territorial en Ecuador. Ecuador Debate, 108, pp. 73–100.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, C. (2010) Development as Buen Vivir: Institutional arrangements and (de) colonial entanglements. Development, 53(1), pp. 15–21. doi: 10.1057/dev.2009.93.
   Google Scholar
• Whitney, R. A. (2020) Trendy urbanists, innovation laboratories and best practices: In pursuit of ‘progressive’ urban planning in Mexico City. Town Planning Review, pp. 1–21. doi: 10.3828/tpr.2021.12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitney, R. A., & López-García, D. (2020) Fast-track institutionalization and the collision between global urban politics and local governance in Mexico City’s Best Practice Agencies. Manuscript submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar