https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3888-9138
References
- Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an Ecology of Mind: Collected Essays in Anthropology, Psychiatry, Evolution, and Epistemology, p. 533. (Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson Inc.)
- Bertolini, L., Frank, A., Grin, J., Bell, S., Scholl, B., Mattila, H., Mynttinen, E., & Mäntysalo, R. (2012). Planning education: Time to think, time to act, Planning Theory & Practice, 13(3), pp. 465–490. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2012.704712
- Besselink, T. (2018). Kennis mozaik Tussenruimte. Presentation at interactive reflective meeting: “Tussenruimte Compost”. Aan de slag met de Omgevingswet. Utrecht, February 15. Available at https://aandeslagmetdeomgevingswet.nl/publish/pages/154083/essay_kennismozaik_over_de_tussenruimte.pdf
- Beunen, R., Assche, K., & Duineveld, M., (2016). Making planning great again: How to become more reflexive in planning and design education. Working paper. doi:https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.20911.74408
- Boyd, D., Buizer, M., Schibeci, R., & Baudains, C. (2015). Prompting transdisciplinary research: Promising futures for using the performance metaphor in research, Futures, 65, pp. 175–184. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2014.10.014
- Chang, H., & Huang, W. 2022. Stakeholder workshops as a pedagogical method for experiential learning in collaborative planning education, Planning Practice & Research, pp. 1–19. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2021.2019523
- Chen, D. J., Huang, W. J., Wang, Y. K., & Chang, Y. (2022). Training for interdisciplinary collaboration in environmental planning: The shore-land project, Taiwan, Planning Practice & Research, pp. 1–20. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2021.2023987
- Davoudi, S., & Pendlebury, J. (2010). The evolution of planning as an academic discipline, The Town Planning Review, 81(6), pp. 613–645. doi:https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2010.24
- Frank, A. I., & Silver, C. (2018). Chapter 22 conclusions, in: A. I. Frank & C. Silver (Eds) Urban Planning Education; Beginnings, Global Movement and Future Prospects. the Urban Book Series, pp. 337–345(Springer).
- Gissi, E., & Suarez de Vivero, J. L. (2016). Exploring marine spatial planning education: Challenges in structuring transdisciplinarity, Marine Policy, 74, pp. 43–57. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2016.09.016
- Humer, A. (2020). Conceptual freedom in planning education and students’ methodological learning, Planning Practice & Research, pp. 1–15. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2020.1758429
- Reed, M. S., Vella, S., Challies, E., de Vente, J., Frewer, L., Hohenwallner-Ries, D., Huber, T., Neumann, R. K., Oughton, E. A., Sidoli Del Ceno, J., & van Delden, H. (2018). A theory of participation: What makes stakeholder and public engagement in environmental management work?, Restoration Ecology, 26(S1), pp. S7–S17. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.12541
- Rooij, R., & Frank, A. I. (2016). Educating spatial planners for the age of co-creation: The need to risk community, science and practice involvement in planning programmes and curricula, Planning Practice & Research, 31(5), pp. 473–485. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2016.1222120
- Tasan-Kok, T., Bertolini, L., Oliveira E Costa, S., Lothan, H., Carvalho, H., Desmet, M., De Blust, S., Devos, T., Kimyon, D., Zoete, J. A., & Ahmad, P. (2016). Float like a butterfly, sting like a bee”: Giving voice to planning practitioners, Planning Theory & Practice, 17(4), pp. 621–651. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2016.1225711
- van Karnenbeek, L., Janssen-Jansen, L., & Peel, D. (2020). Conceptualising co-creative planning pedagogies: The Community knowledge triangle, Planning Practice & Research, pp. 1–18. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2020.1856501
- Wilson, B., & Beatley, T. (2018). Chapter 20 educating code-switchers in a post-sustainability world, in: A. I. Frank & C. Silver (Eds) Urban Planning Education; Beginnings, Global Movement and Future prospects. the Urban Book Series, pp. 307–322 (Springer).