Financing cleaner transportation: understanding changing trends in capturing developer contributions towards sustainable transport infrastructure

References

• Baker, M., & Hincks. S. (2009) Infrastructure delivery and spatial planning, Town planning review, 80(2), pp. 173–199.
   Google Scholar
• Banister, D. (2001) Transport Planning, 2nd ed. (London: SPON).
   Google Scholar
• Banister, D. (2005) Unsustainable Transport. (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Booth, P. (2012) The unearned increment: Property and the capture of betterment value in Britain and France, In: G. K. Ingram & Y.-H. Hong (Eds) Value Capture and Land Policies, pp. 74–93 (Cambridge: Lincoln Institute for Land Policy).
   Google Scholar
• Buck, M. (2021) Considering the role of negotiated developer contributions in financing ecological mitigation and protection programs in England: A cultural perspective, Local Economy, 36(5), pp. 356–373. doi:10.1177/02690942211053592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgess, G., & Monk, S. (2016) Chapter 8 Delivering planning obligations – are agreements successfully delivered?, In: A. D. H. Crook, J. Henneberry, & C. Whitehead (Eds) Planning Gain, pp. 201–226 (Chichester: Wiley Blackwell).
   Google Scholar
• Cairney, P. (2022) The myth of ‘evidence-based policymaking’ in a decentred state, Public Policy and Administration, 37(1), pp. 46–66. doi:10.1177/0952076720905016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CIHT (Charted Institution of Highways and Transportation) (2019) Better Planning, Better Transport, Better Places (London: CIHT).
   Google Scholar
• Clifford, B., & Tewdwr-Jones, M. (2014) The Collaborating Planner? Practitioners in the Neoliberal Age. (Bristol: Policy Press).
   Google Scholar
• Crook, A. D. H. (2016) Chapter 4 Planning obligations policy in England: undefined facto taxation of development value, In: A. D. H. Crook, J. Henneberry, & C. Whitehead (Eds) Planning Gain, pp. 63–114 (Chichester: Wiley Blackwell).
   Google Scholar
• Crook, A. D. H., Henneberry, J., & Whitehead, C. (2016) Summary and conclusions, In: A. Crook, J. Henneberry, & C. Whitehead (Eds) Planning Gain, pp. 269–290 (Chichester: Wiley Blackwell).
   Google Scholar
• Crook, A. D. H., Henneberry, J., & Whitehead, C. (2021) Funding affordable homes and new infrastructure – improving Section 106 or moving to an infrastructure levy?, Town & Country Planning, 90(3/4), pp. 88–94.
   Google Scholar
• Crook, A. D. H., & Whitehead, C. (2019) Capturing development value, principles and practice: Why is it so difficult?, The Town Planning Review, 90(4), pp. 359–381. doi:10.3828/tpr.2019.25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cullingworth, B., & Nadin, V. (2006) Town and Country Planning in the UK, 14th ed. (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Davoudi, S. (2006) Evidence-based planning; rhetoric and reality, disP, 165(42), pp. 14–24. doi:10.1080/02513625.2006.10556951.
   Google Scholar
• DCLG (Department of Communities and Local Government) 2012 National Planning Policy Framework (London: DCLG).
   Google Scholar
• DoE (Department of the Environment) 1995 The Use of Conditions in Planning Permissions, Circular 11/95 (London: DoE).
   Google Scholar
• Dunning, R., & Lord, A. (2020) Viewpoint: Preparing for the climate crisis: What role should land value capture play?, Land Use Policy, 99(99), p. 104867. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104867.
   Google Scholar
• Dunning, R., Lord, A., Keskin, B., & Buck, M. (2019) Is there a relationship between planning culture and the value of planning gain? Evidence from England, The Town Planning Review, 90(4), pp. 453–471. doi:10.3828/tpr.2019.29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enoch, M., Potter, S., Ison, S., & Humphreys, I. (2004) Role of hypothecation in financing transit, lessons from the United Kingdom, Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1864(1), pp. 31–37. doi: 10.3141/1864-05.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira, A. (2013) Emotions in planning practice: A critical review and a suggestion for future developments based on mindfulness, The Town Planning Review, 84(6), pp. 703–719. doi:10.3828/tpr.2013.37.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, T., Smith, M., & Sykes, O. (2013) Can less sometimes be more? – Integrating land use and transport planning on Merseyside (1965–2008), Urban, Planning and Transport Research, 1(1), pp. 1–27. doi:10.1080/21650020.2013.866876.
   Google Scholar
• Gallent, N. (2008) Strategic-local tensions and the spatial planning approach in England, Planning Theory & Practice, 9(3), pp. 307–323. doi:10.1080/14649350802277795.
   Google Scholar
• GLA (Greater London Authority) 2016 Crossrail Funding Supplementary Planning Guidance (London: GLA)).
   Google Scholar
• Glaister, S., Burnham, J., Stevens, H., & Travers, T. (2006) Transport Policy in Britain, 2nd ed. (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan)).
   Google Scholar
• Gozalvo Zamorano, M. J., & Muñoz Gielen, D. (2017) Non-negotiable developer obligations in the Spanish land readjustment: An effective passive governance approach that ‘de facto’ taxes development value?, Planning Practice & Research, 32(3), pp. 274–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Headicar, P. (2009) Transport Policy and Planning in Great Britain. (Abingdon: Routledge)).
   Google Scholar
• Hillier, J. (2011) Strategic navigation across multiple planes. Towards a Deleuzean-inspired methodology for strategic spatial planning, The Town Planning Review, 82(5), pp. 503–527. doi:10.3828/tpr.2011.30.
   Google Scholar
• Holt, V., & Baker, M. (2014) All hands to the pump? Collaborative capability in local infrastructure planning in the North West of England, The Town Planning Review, 85(6), pp. 753–772. doi:10.3828/tpr.2014.45.
   Google Scholar
• Lane, R., & Wells, J. (2006) Using planning agreements to fund transport infrastructure, Municipal Engineer, 159: pp. 77–83. doi: 10.1680/muen.2006.159.2.77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindblom, C. E. (1959) The science of ‘muddling through’, Public Administration Review, 19(2), pp. 79–88. doi:10.2307/973677.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lord, A. (2012) The Planning Game; an Information Economics Approach to Understanding Urban and Environmental Management. (Abingdon: Routledge)).
   Google Scholar
• Lord, A., Burgess, G., Gu, Y., & Dunning, R. (2019) Virtuous or vicious circles? Exploring the behavioural connections between developer contributions and path dependence: Evidence from England, Geoforum, 106: pp. 244–252. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.07.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lord, A., Cheang, C.-W., & Dunning, R. (2022) Understanding the geography of affordable housing provided through land value capture: Evidence from England, Urban Studies, 59(6), pp. 1219–1237. doi:10.1177/0042098021998893.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lord, A. D., Dunning, R., Buck, M., Cantillon, S., Burgess, G., Crook, T., Watkins, C., & Whitehead, C. (2020) The Incidence, Value and Delivery of Planning Obligations and Community Infrastructure Levy in England in 2018/19. (London: Ministry for Housing Communities and Local Government)).
   Google Scholar
• Moore, V. (2002) A Practical Approach to Planning Law, 8th ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Morphet, J., Tewdwr-Jones, M., Gallent, N., Hall, B., Spry, M., & Howard, R. (2007) Shaping and Delivering Tomorrow’s Places: Effective Practice in Spatial Planning. (London: Royal Town Planning Institute)).
   Google Scholar
• Noblit, G. W., & Hare, R. D. (1988) Meta-Ethnography; Synthesizing Qualitative Studies. (Newbury Park: Sage)).
   Google Scholar
• Nutley, S., Walter, I., & Davies, H. T. O. (2003) From knowing to doing; a framework for understanding the evidence-into-practice agenda, Evaluation, 9(2), pp. 125–148. doi:10.1177/1356389003009002002.
   Google Scholar
• ODPM (Office of the Deputy Prime Minister) 2005 Circular 05/2005 Planning Obligations (London: ODPM).
   Google Scholar
• OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) 2022 Financing Transportation Infrastructure Through Land Value Capture; concepts, Tools and Case Studies (Paris: OECD)).
   Google Scholar
• Pressman, J. L., & Wildavsky, A. B. (1973) Implementation: How Great Expectations in Washington are Dashed in Oakland. (Berkeley: University of California Press)).
   Google Scholar
• Raynsford, N. (2018) Planning 2020, Raynsford Review of Planning in England. (London: Town & Country Planning Association)).
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. M. (2003) Diffusion of Innovations, 5th ed. (New York: Free Press)).
   Google Scholar
• Rycroft-Malone, J., Harvey, G., Seers, K., Kitson, A., McCormack, B., & Titchen, A. (2004) An exploration of the factors that influence the implementation of evidence into practice, Journal of Clinical Nursing, 13(8), pp. 913–924. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2004.01007.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rydin, Y., Beauregard, R., Cremaschi, M., & Lieto, L. (2021) Introduction, In: Y. Rydin, R. Beauregard, M. Cremaschi, & L. Lieto (Eds) Regulation and Planning; Practices, Institutions, Agency, pp. 1–11 (London: Routledge)).
   Google Scholar
• Rye, T., Green, C., Young, E., & Ison, S. (2011) Using the land-use planning process to secure travel plans: An assessment of progress in England to date, Journal of Transport Geography, 19(2), pp. 235–243. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2010.05.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samsura, D. A. A., van der Krabben, E., van Deeman, A. M. A., & van der Heijden, R. E. C. M. (2015) Negotiation processes in land and property development: An experimental study, Journal of Property Research, 32(2), pp. 173–191. doi:10.1080/09599916.2015.1009846.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, M. (2014) Integrating policies, plans and programmes in local government: An exploration from a spatial planning perspective, Local Government Studies, 40(3), pp. 473–493. doi:10.1080/03003930.2013.823407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, M. (2018) Revisiting implementation theory; an interdisciplinary comparison between urban planning and healthcare implementation research, Environment & Planning C: Politics and Space, 36(5), pp. 877–896.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, M. (2021) Delivering the goods: Executing sustainable transport policy through urban planning in Merseyside (2001–2010), Planning Perspectives, 36(3), pp. 515–534. doi:10.1080/02665433.2020.1813620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, M., Sykes, O., & Fischer, T. (2014) Derailed: Understanding the implementation failures of Merseytram, The Town Planning Review, 85(2), pp. 237–260. doi:10.3828/tpr.2014.15.
   Google Scholar
• Snowden, D. J., & Boone, M. E. (2007). A leaders framework for decision making, Harvard Business Review, November, pp. 69–76.
   Google Scholar
• Solesbury, W. (2002) The ascendancy of evidence, Planning Theory and Practice, 3(1), pp. 90–96. doi:10.1080/14649350220117834.
   Google Scholar
• Sturzaker, J., & Lord, A. (2018) Fear: An underexplored motivation for planners’ behaviour?, Planning Practice and Research, 33(4), pp. 359–371. doi:10.1080/02697459.2017.1378982.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vigar, G. (2002) The Politics of Mobility. (London: SPON)).
   Google Scholar
• Vigar, G. (2012) Planning and professionalism: Knowledge, judgement and expertise in English planning, Planning Theory and Practice, 11(4), pp. 361–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyatt, P. (2017) Experiences of running negotiable and non-negotiable developer contributions side-by-side, Planning Practice and Research, 32(2), pp. 152–170. doi:10.1080/02697459.2016.1222148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar