Is planning a barrier to the development of digital network infrastructure? Insights from rural Wales

References

• Allmendinger, P. (2007) Mobile phone mast development: The rise of Third Party Governance in English planning? Planning Practice & Research, 22(2), pp. 177–196. doi:10.1080/02697450701584352.
   Google Scholar
• Andrew, S., & Lopez, J. (2022) New laws to end mobile coverage “no bar blues”, Press Release, March. (DCMS (Department of Culture, Media and Sport)).
   Google Scholar
• Arcadis. (2017) Planning for Mobile Telecommunications: An Assessment of Permitted Development Rights in Wales, Report for the Welsh Government, December. (Cardiff: Arcadis).
   Google Scholar
• Askew, J., Sheppard, A., Dalton, A., Baker, N., Appleby, T., & Peel, D. (2009) Research Project for a Review of Mobile Phone Operators’ Permitted Development Rights (Cardiff: Welsh Assembly Government).
   Google Scholar
• Ball, M., Allmendinger, P., & Hughes, C. (2009) Housing supply and planning delay in the south of England, Journal of European Real Estate Research, 22(1), pp. 151–169. doi:10.1108/17539260910978463.
   Google Scholar
• Bröer, C., de Graaff, B., Duyvendak, J., & Wester, R. (2016) Engaging citizens: Local interactions, policy discourse and courses of protest against mobile phone cell site deployment, European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology, 3(4), pp. 447–468. doi:10.1080/23254823.2016.1201427.
   Google Scholar
• Bulkeley, H., Watson, M., Hudson, R., & Weaver, P. (2005) Governing municipal waste: Towards a new analytical framework, Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 7(1), pp. 1–23. doi:10.1080/15239080500251700.
   Google Scholar
• Clifford, B., Ferm, J., Livingston, N., & Canelas, P. (2019) Understanding the Impacts of Deregulation in Planning: Turning Offices into Homes? (Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave).
   Google Scholar
• DCMS. (2021) Shared Rural Network (SRN) – transparency commitment publication, Policy Paper, March 11th.
   Google Scholar
• DCMS (Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport). (2019) Rural connected communities overview and application guidance. Available at https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/827375/RCC_Overview_and_Application_Guidance.pdf (accessed 31 March 2022)
   Google Scholar
• Denicol, J., Davies, A., & Krystallis, I. (2020) What are the causes and cures of poor megaproject performance? A systematic literature review and research agenda, Project Management Journal, 51(3), pp. 328–345. doi:10.1177/8756972819896113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devine-Wright, P., Cowell, R., & Devine-Wright, H. (2016) What works for infrastructure siting in local areas: An evidence review DECCreport. Available at http://www.placewise.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/DECC_Infrastructure_PlacewiseLtd.pdf
   Google Scholar
• DLUHC (Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities). (2022) Planning applications in England: October to December 2021. Planning Applications Statistical Release, London, March 29.
   Google Scholar
• Drake, F. (2011) Protesting mobile phone masts: Risk, neoliberalism, and governmentality, Science, Technology & Human Values, 36(4), pp. 522–548. doi:10.1177/0162243910366149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finch, K., Devereux, J., James, J., & Nott, P. (2015) The national broadband network: Challenges and opportunities for telecommunications infrastructure planning, Australian Planner, 52(1), pp. 71–76. doi:10.1080/07293682.2015.1019757.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster, R. B., & Carrel, M. A. (2006) Disguised as a tree: Judicial review of land use decisions on cellular telecommunications facilities under the Telecommunications Act of 1996, The Urban Lawyer, 38(3), pp. 657–668.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W. (2002) Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: A multi-level perspective and case-study, Research Policy, 31, pp. 1257–1274. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., & Marvin, S. (2001) Splintering Urbanism (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, D., & Roche, N. (2020) Examining the policy mix for broadband deployment in Wales: The role of informal coordination in the last mile, Local Economy: The Journal of the Local Economy Policy Unit, 35(1), pp. 48–67. doi:10.1177/0269094219883396.
   Google Scholar
• House of Commons Expenditure Committee (1978) Planning Procedures, 8th Report of the Expenditure Committee, Session , vol. 1, p. 47.
   Google Scholar
• Hutton, G. (2021) Building telecommunications infrastructure, Briefing Paper No. CBP 9156, April 30th. (House of Commons Library).
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, M. (2020) Operators sign £1bn deal for 95% geographic UK coverage by 2026, ISPreview, March 9th.
   Google Scholar
• Larsson, S. (2014) What type of knowledge rules where? Legally regulated participation in large-scale mobile infrastructure planning in Sweden, Environment and Planning C: Government & Policy, 32, pp. 163–183. doi:10.1068/c11305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehr, W., Queder, F., & Haucap, J. (2021) 5G: A new future for mobile network operators, or not?, Telecommunications Policy, 45, pp. 102086. doi:10.1016/j.telpol.2020.102086.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd, M. G., Peel, D., Roberts, P., & Riley, J. (2004) Evaluation of Revised Planning Controls Over Telecommunications Development (Edinburgh: Scottish Executive Social Research).
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, T. (2012) Planning Major Infrastructure (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, T., & Cowell, R. (2016) Infrastructure, planning and the command of time, Environment and Planning C: Government & Policy, 34(8), pp. 1843–1866. doi:10.1177/0263774X16642768.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mobile UK. (2021) Building Mobile Britain: The case for local authority digital champions. Available at https://uploads-ssl.webflow.com/5b7ab54b285dec5c113ee24d/6273e1737caa08e351ba5dfe_Digital-Champions.pdf (accessed 20 August 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Ofcom. (2021) Connected Nations 2021: Wales report. Available at https://www.ofcom.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0025/229723/connected-nations-2021-wales.pdf (accessed 25 February 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Philip, L., Cottrill, C., Farrington, J., Williams, F., & Ashmore, F. (2017) The digital divide: Patterns, policy and scenarios for connecting the “final few” in rural communities across Great Britain, Journal of Rural Studies, 54, pp. 386–398. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.12.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, Z., & Felsenstein, D. (2019) Is planning delay really a constraint in the provision of housing? Some evidence from Israel, Papers in Regional Science, 98(5), pp. 2179–2200. doi:10.1111/pirs.12440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salemink, K., Strijker, D., & Bosworth, G. (2017) Rural development in the digital age: A systematic literature review on unequal ICT availability, adoption and use in rural areas, Journal of Rural Studies, 54, pp. 360–371. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.09.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stilgoe, J. (2007) The (co-)production of public uncertainty: UK scientific advice on mobile phone health risks, Public Understanding of Science, 16, pp. 45–61. doi:10.1177/0963662506059262.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walton, W. (2002) The changing regulation of mobile-phone mast development in a devolved United Kingdom, Environment and Planning B: Planning & Design, 29, pp. 687–705. doi:10.1068/b12849.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welsh Government. (2021) Code of Best Practice on Mobile Phone Development in Wales (Cardiff: Crown Copyright).
   Google Scholar