Profit or public service? Tensions and alignment in private planning practice

References

• Baum, H. S. (1997) Social science, social work, and surgery: Teaching what students need to practice planning, Journal of the American Planning Association, 63(2), pp. 179–188. doi:10.1080/01944369708975913.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, H., & Marshall, R. (1998) Acting on principle: Dilemmas in planning practice, Planning Practice & Research, 13(2), pp. 117–128. doi:10.1080/02697459816139.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, H., & Marshall, R. (2002) Values and professional identities in planning practice, In: P. Allmendinger & M. Tewdwr-Jones (Eds) Planning Futures: New Directions for Planning Theory, pp. 93–109. (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Cherry, G. (1996) Town Planning in Britain Since 1900: The Rise and Fall of the Planning Ideal, (Oxford: Blackwell).
   Google Scholar
• Cullingworth, B., & Nadin, V. (2006) Town and Country Planning in the UK, 14th ed. (London and New York: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Davidoff, P. (1965) Advocacy and pluralism in planning, Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 34(4), pp. 331–338. doi:10.1080/01944366508978187.
   Google Scholar
• Erwin, P. M. (2011) Corporate codes of conduct: The effects of code content and quality on ethical performance, Journal of Business Ethics, 99(4), pp. 535–548. doi:10.1007/s10551-010-0667-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox-Rogers, L., & Murphy, E. (2016) Self-perceptions of the role of the planner, Environment and Planning: B, Planning & Design, 43(1), pp. 74–92. doi:10.1177/0265813515603860.
   Google Scholar
• Grange, K. (2013) Shaping acting space: In search of a new political awareness among local authority planners, Planning Theory, 12(3), pp. 225–243. doi:10.1177/1473095212459740.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grange, K. (2017) Planners–a silenced profession? The politicisation of planning and the need for fearless speech, Planning Theory, 16(3), pp. 275–295. doi:10.1177/1473095215626465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grijzen, J. (2010). Outsourcing planning: What do consultants do in a regional spatial planning in the Netherlands. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gunn, S., & Hillier, J. (2012) Processes of innovation: Reformation of the English strategic planning system, Planning Theory & Practice, 13(3), pp. 359–381. doi:10.1080/14649357.2012.706630.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. (1989) From managerialism to entrepreneurialism: The transformation in urban governance in late capitalism, Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 71(1), pp. 3–17. doi:10.1080/04353684.1989.11879583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haughton, G., & Hincks, S. (2013) Austerity planning, Town and Country Planning, 82(1), pp. 23–28.
   Google Scholar
• Hickman, H., & Sturzaker, J. (2022) Ethical principles in an increasingly diverse planning profession: The potential impact of different types of planners, The Town Planning Review, 93(3), pp. 241–249. doi:10.3828/tpr.2021.43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inch, A., Wargent, M., & Tait, M. (2022) Serving the public interest? Towards a history of private sector planning expertise in England, Planning Perspectives. [Preprint]. doi:10.1080/02665433.2022.2063165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, B. J. (2010) Planning practice & research city planners and public service motivation city planners and public service motivation, City Planners and Public Service Motivation, Planning Practice & Research, 25(5), pp. 563–586. doi:10.1080/02697459.2010.522854.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, B. J. (2012) Public service motivation and the technical, political, and facilitator roles of city planners, International Journal of Public Administration, 35(1), pp. 30–45. doi:10.1080/01900692.2011.635454.
   Google Scholar
• Kitchen, T. (1997) People, Politics, Policies and Plans, (London: PCP).
   Google Scholar
• Kunzmann (2016) Crisis and urban planning? A commentary, European Planning Studies, 24(7), pp. 1313–1318, doi: 10.1080/09654313.2016.1168787.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauria, M., & Long, M. F. (2017) Planning experience and planners’ ethics, Journal of the American Planning Association, 83(2), pp. 202–220. doi:10.1080/01944363.2017.1286946.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauria, M., & Long, M. F. (2019) Ethical dilemmas in professional planning practice in the United States, Journal of the American Planning Association, 85(4), pp. 393–404. doi:10.1080/01944363.2019.1627238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linovski, O. (2019) Shifting agendas: Private consultants and public planning policy, Urban Affairs Review, 55(6), pp. 1666–1701. doi:10.1177/1078087417752475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linovski, O. (2021). Conflicting Interests: Professional Planning Practice in Publicly Traded Firms. In: Hurl, C., Vogelpohl, A. (Eds) Professional Service Firms and Politics in a Global Era, pp. 295–319. (London: Palgrave Macmillan).
   Google Scholar
• Loh, C. G., & Arroyo, R. L. (2017) Special ethical considerations for planners in private practice, Journal of the American Planning Association, 83(2), pp. 168–179. doi:10.1080/01944363.2017.1286945.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loh, C. G., & Norton, R. L. (2013) Planning consultants and local planning, Journal of the American Planning Association, 79(2), pp. 138–147. doi:10.1080/01944363.2013.883251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lord, A., & Tewdwr-Jones, M. (2014) Is planning ‘Under attack’? Chronicling the deregulation of urban and environmental planning in England, European Planning Studies, 22(2), pp. 345–361. doi:10.1080/09654313.2012.741574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maidment, C. (2016) N the public interest? Planning in the Peak District National Park, Planning Theory, 15(4), pp. 366–385. doi:10.1177/1473095216662093.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murtagh, N., Odeleye, N., & Maidment, C. (2019) Do town planners in England feel a professional responsibility for a climate-resilient built environment?, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 297(1), pp. 012036. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/297/1/012036.
   Google Scholar
• Oranje, M., Venter, S., & Ferreira, A. (2018) Good intentions, deep frustrations, and upward mobility: Just another young planner’s day in South Africa, In: T. Tasan-Kok & M. Oranje (Eds) From Student to Urban Planner: Young Practitioners’ Reflections on Contemporary Ethical Challenges, pp. 74–85. (Abingdon: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Parker, G., Street, E., & Wargent, M. (2019) Advocates, advisors and scrutineers: The technocracies of private sector planning in England, In: M. Raco & F. Savini (Eds) Planning and Knowledge: How New Forms of Technocracy are Shaping Contemporary Cities, pp. 157–168. (Bristol: Policy Press).
   Google Scholar
• Perry, J. L. (1996) Measuring public service motivation: An assessment of construct reliability and validity, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 6(1), pp. 5–22. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024303.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, S. J. (2006) The Ethics Of Urban Planning: Remembering The Old AICP Code (1978-2005) | Planetizen Features, Planetizen. Available at https://www.planetizen.com/node/20046 (accessed 2 August 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Planning and compulsory purchase Act 2004, c. 38. Available at https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2004/5/section/38?view=plain (accessed 17 November 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Planning Institute Australia (2020) Membership Statistics [Personal Communication], (Canberra: Planning Institute Australia).
   Google Scholar
• Raco, M., & Savini, F. (2019) Planning and Knowledge: How New Forms of Technocracy are Shaping Contemporary Cities, (Bristol: Policy Press).
   Google Scholar
• Read, D. C., & Leland, S. M. (2011) Does sector matter? An analysis of planners’ attitudes regarding politics and competing interests in the planning process, The American Review of Public Administration, 41(6), pp. 639–653. doi:10.1177/0275074010390031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rocco, R. (2018) Planning for rights: Bewildered young planners in Brazil, In: T. Tasan-Kok & M. Oranje (Eds) From Student to Urban Planner: Young Practitioners’ Reflections on Contemporary Ethical Challenges, pp. 168–180. (Abingdon: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• RTPI (2016) Code of Professional Conduct, (London: Royal Town Planning Institute).
   Google Scholar
• RTPI (2017) Ethics and Professional Standards: Advice for RTPI Members, (London: Royal Town Planning Institute).
   Google Scholar
• RTPI (2019) The UK Planning Profession in 2019: Statistics on the Size and Make-Up of the Planning Profession in the UK, (London: Royal Town Planning Institute).
   Google Scholar
• Schoneboom, A., Slade, J., Tait, M., & Vigar, G. (2022) What Town Planners Do – Exploring Planning Practices and the Public Interest Through Workplace Ethnographies, (Bristol: Policy Press).
   Google Scholar
• Schweitzer, L. A. (2017) Introduction: Planning ethics in the 21st century, Journal of the American Planning Association, 83(2), pp. 159–160. doi:10.1080/01944363.2017.1290496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slade, D., Gunn, S., & Schoneboom, A. (2019) Serving the Public Interest? The Reorganisation of UK Planning Services in an Era of Reluctant Outsourcing, (London: Royal Town Planning Institute).
   Google Scholar
• Steele, W. (2009) Australian urban planners: Hybrid roles and professional dilemmas?, Urban Policy and Research, 27(2), pp. 189–203. doi:10.1080/08111140902908873.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sturzaker, J., & Lord, A. (2018) Fear: An underexplored motivation for planners’ behaviour?, Planning Practice & Research, 33(4), pp. 359–371. doi:10.1080/02697459.2017.1378982.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sykes, O. (2018) Things can only get better’? Transitioning from planning student to planner in the England of the 1990s and 2000s, In: T. Tasan-Kok & M. Oranje (Eds) From Student to Urban Planner: Young Practitioners’ Reflections on Contemporary Ethical Challenges, pp. 137–150. (Abingdon: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Tait, M. (2016) Planning and the public interest: Still a relevant concept for planners?, Planning Theory, 15(4), pp. 335–343. doi:10.1177/1473095216660780.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tait, M., Inch, A., Slade, J., Gunn, Z., Vigar, G., Schoneboom, A., & Clifford, B. (2020) Working in the Public Interest? What must planners do differently? Available at https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10113579/1/WITPI_WhatMustPlannersDo.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Tasan-Kok, T., & Oranje, M. (2018) Editors’ reflections and conclusions, In: T. Tasan-Kok & M. Oranje (Eds) From Student to Urban Planner: Young Practitioners’ Reflections on Contemporary Ethical Challenges, pp. 296–309. (Abingdon: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Taşan-Kok, T., & Penpecioğlu, M. (2018) Confronted and disappointed? Struggle of Turkish planners against authoritarian state-regulated urban development, In: T. Tasan-Kok & M. Oranje (Eds) From Student to Urban Planner: Young Practitioners’ Reflections on Contemporary Ethical Challenges, pp. 107–123. (Abingdon: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Tewdwr-Jones, M. (1999) Discretion, flexibility, and certainty in British planning: Emerging ideological conflicts and inherent political tensions, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 18, pp. 244–256. doi:10.1177/0739456X9901800306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomaney, J. & Ferm, J. (2018) Introduction: contexts and frameworks for contemporary planning practice, In: J. Ferm & J. Tomaney (Eds) Planning Practice: Critical Perspectives from the UK, pp. 1–19. (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Vigar, G. (2012) Planning and professionalism: Knowledge, judgement and expertise in English planning, Planning Theory, 11(4), pp. 361–378. doi:10.1177/1473095212439993.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar