Why multi-stakeholder practices don’t work: looking beyond the extent and diversity of actors for co-producing collective action; a case study from an inner area in Italy

References

• Abu-Orf, H. (2005) Collaborative planning in practice: The Nicosia master plan, Planning Practice & Research, 20(1), pp. 41–58. doi:10.1080/02697450500261707
   Google Scholar
• Albrechts, L. (2013) Reframing strategic spatial planning by using a coproduction perspective, Planning Theory, 12(1), pp. 46–63. doi:10.1177/1473095212452722
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrechts, L. (2015a) Breaking out of the box: Ingredients for a more radical planning, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 184, pp. 104–110. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.05.063
   Google Scholar
• Albrechts, L. (2015b) Ingredients for a more radical strategic spatial planning, Environment and Planning B, Planning & Design, 42(3), pp. 510–525. doi:10.1068/b130104p
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appadurai, A. (2012) Why enumeration counts, Environment and Urbanization, 24(2), pp. 639–641. doi:10.1177/0956247812447511
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arzeni, A., & Storti, D. (2017) Le strategie per lo sviluppo rurale nelle Aree interne colpite dal sisma, Agriregionieuropa, 51, pp. 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Barbera, F., Barella, D., & Sinibaldi, E. (2020) Coalizioni e territori: il caso delle politiche per lo sviluppo locale in Piemonte (1994–2006), in: E. Cois & V. Pacetti (Eds) Territori in movimento: esperienza leader e progetti pilota per le aree interne, pp. 59–82 (Torino: Rosenberg & Sellier).
   Google Scholar
• Barca, F. (2008) An agenda for a reformed cohesion policy. EERI Research Paper 06 (Brussels: Economics and Econometrics Research Institute).
   Google Scholar
• Barca, F., McCann, P., & Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2012) The case for regional development intervention: Place-based versus place-neutral approaches, Journal of Regional Science, 52(1), pp. 134–152. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9787.2011.00756.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battaglia, M., Annesi, N., Pierantoni, I., & Sargolini, M. (2019) Future perspectives of sustainable development: An innovative planning approach to inner areas. Experience of an Italian alpine region, Futures, 114, pp. 102468–95. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2019.102468
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bianchetti, C., & Balducci, A. (2013) Competenza e rappresentanza (Roma: Donzelli).
   Google Scholar
• Bobbio, L. (1996) La democrazia non abita a Gordio: studio sui processi decisionali politico-amministrativi, 6th ed. (Milano: Franco Angeli).
   Google Scholar
• Bobbio, L., Pomatto, G., & Ravazzi, S. (2017) Politiche pubbliche. Problemi, soluzioni, incertezze, conflitti (Milano: Mondadori).
   Google Scholar
• Bovaird, T. (2007) Beyond engagement and participation: User and community coproduction of public services, Public Administration Review, 67(5), pp. 846–860. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00773.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bremmers, H. J., Van der Meulen, B. M. J., & Purnhagen, K. (2013) Multi-stakeholder responses to the European Union health claims requirements, Journal on Chain and Network Science, 13(2), pp. 161–172. doi:10.3920/JCNS2013.1006
   Google Scholar
• Breuskin, I. (2012) Social Capital and Governmental Institutions, Living Reviews in Democracy, 3, pp. 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Cahn, E. S. (2000) No More Throw-Away People: The Co-Production Imperative (Washington: Essential Books).
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, S., & Fainstein, S. S. (Eds) (1996) Readings in Planning Theory (Hoboken, New Jersey: Blackwell Publishers).
   Google Scholar
• Carrosio, G., Moro, G., & Zabatino, A. (2018) Cittadinanza attiva e partecipazioneRiabitare l’Italia: le aree interne tra abbandoni e riconquiste, in: A. De Rossi (Ed) (Roma: Donzelli Editore).
   Google Scholar
• Càstan Broto, V., Ortiz, C., Lipietz, B., Osuteye, E., Johnson, C., Kombe, W., Mtwangi-Limbumba T., Macías, J. C., Desmaison B, Hadny A., & Kisembo T. (2022) Co-production outcomes for urban equality: Learning from different trajectories of citizens’ involvement in urban change, Current Research in Environmental Sustainability, 4, pp. 100–179. doi:10.1016/j.crsust.2022.100179
   Google Scholar
• Caudo, G., & De Leo, D. (2018) Urbanistica e azione pubblica (Roma: Donzelli Editore).
   Google Scholar
• Conca, K. (2019) Prospects for a multi-stakeholder dialogue on climate engineering, Environmental Politics, 28(3), pp. 417–440. doi:10.1080/09644016.2018.1522065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department for Economic Development and Cohesion - Ministry of Economic Development (2014), Partnership agreement 2014-2020 and guidelines for constructing an ‘area-project strategy’. Available at https://opencoesione.gov.it/media/uploads/4_ap_italia-sezione-3-e-4_gennaio-2020.pdf (accessed 4 July 2022).
   Google Scholar
• De Rossi, A., & Barbera, F. (Eds) (2018) Riabitare l’Italia: le aree interne tra abbandoni e riconquiste (Rome: Donzelli Editore).
   Google Scholar
• Dissart, J. C. (2012) Building capabilities and territorial resources in mountain tourist areas. Case study in Oisans, Journal of Alpine Research Revue de Géographie Alpine, 100(2). doi:10.4000/rga.1809
   Google Scholar
• Dubois, J. L., Lompo, K., Giraud, G., & Renouard, C. (2008) The relational capability: Theory and empirical evidence in Nigeria, in: Proceedings conference Equality, Inclusion and Human development, Human Development and Capability Association, IIHD, August, New Delhi.
   Google Scholar
• Evangelista, V. (2019) Planning and participation in the National Strategy for Inner Areas: Basso Sangro-Trigno, Geotema, 56(9), pp. 63–71.
   Google Scholar
• Forester, J. (1993) Critical Theory, Public Policy, and Planning Practice (New York: SUNY Press).
   Google Scholar
• Frediani, A. A. (2010) Sen’s capability approach as a framework to the practice of development, Development in Practice, 20(2), pp. 173–187. doi:10.1080/09614520903564181
   Google Scholar
• Fregolent, L. (2006) La pianificazione d’area tra direttive europee ed esperienze. La pianificazione d’area tra direttive europee ed esperienze, Archivio di studi urbani e regionali, n. 85-86, pp. 1000–1018.
   Google Scholar
• Friedmann, J. (2008) The uses of planning theory: A bibliographic essay, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 28(2), pp. 247–257. doi:10.1177/0739456X08325220
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fumasoli, T., Stensaker, B., & Vukasovic, M. (2018) Tackling the multi-actor and multi-level complexity of European governance of knowledge: Transnational actors in focus, European Educational Research Journal, 17(3), pp. 325–334. doi:10.1177/1474904117742763
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fung, A., & Wright, E. O. (2003) Deepening Democracy: Institutional Innovations in Empowered Participatory Governance, 4th ed. (London: Verso).
   Google Scholar
• Gabellini, P. (2018) Le mutazioni dell’urbanistica. Principi, tecniche, competenze (Roma: Carocci).
   Google Scholar
• Godfrey-Wood, R., & Mamani-Vargas, G. (2017) The coercive side of collective capabilities: Evidence from the Bolivian Altiplano, Journal of Human Development & Capabilities, 18(1), pp. 75–88. doi:10.1080/19452829.2016.1199169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Häring, A. M., Vairo, D., Dabbert, S., & Zanoli, R. (2009) Organic farming policy development in the EU: What can multi-stakeholder processes contribute?, Food Policy, 34(3), pp. 265–272. doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2009.03.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, N. (2002) Collaborative planning, in: P. Allmendinger & M. Tewdwr-Jones (Eds) Planning Futures: New Directions for Planning Theory, pp. 21–43 (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (1997). Traditions of planning thought. In: Collaborative Planning. Palgrave, London, pp. 7–30. doi:10.1007/978-1-349-25538-2_1
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (1998) Collaborative planning in a stakeholder society, The Town Planning Review, 69(1), pp. 1–21. doi:10.3828/tpr.69.1.h651u2327m86326p
   Google Scholar
• Hillier, J. (2003) Agonizing over consensus: Why Habermasian ideals cannot be ‘real’?, Planning Theory, 2(1), pp. 37–59. doi:10.1177/1473095203002001005
   Google Scholar
• Innes, J. E., & Booher, D. E. (2003) The impact of collaborative planning on governance capacity. in: Annual Conference of the Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning, Baltimore, November 21–24.
   Google Scholar
• Innes, J. E., & Booher, D. E. (2010) Planning with Complexity: An Introduction to Collaborative Rationality for Public Policy (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Joshi, A., & Moore, M. (2004) Institutionalized co-production: Unorthodox public service delivery in challenging environments, The Journal of Development Studies, 40(4), pp. 31–49. doi:10.1080/00220380410001673184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koopmans, M. E., Rogge, E., Mettepenningen, E., Knickel, K., & Šūmane, S. (2018) The role of multi-actor governance in aligning farm modernization and sustainable rural development, Journal of Rural Studies, 59, pp. 252–262. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.03.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawn, M. (2011) Standardizing the European education policy space, European Educational Research Journal, 10(2), pp. 259–272. doi:10.2304/eerj.2011.10.2.259
   Google Scholar
• Lockwood, M., Worboysand, G. L., & Kothari, A. (2006) Managing Protected Areas: A Global Guide (London: The Cromwell Press Group).
   Google Scholar
• Lucatelli, S., & Storti, D. (2019) La strategia nazionale aree interne e lo sviluppo rurale: scelte operate e criticità incontrate in vista del post 2020, Agriregioneuropa, 56(15), pp. 10–14.
   Google Scholar
• McGranahan, D. A. (1999) Natural amenities drive rural population change, US Department of Agriculture, 781, pp. 1–27.
   Google Scholar
• Mitlin, D. (2008) With and beyond the state—co-production as a route to political influence, power and transformation for grassroots organizations, Environment and Urbanization, 20(2), pp. 339–360. doi:10.1177/0956247808096117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moulaert, F. (2011) When solidarity boosts strategic planning, in: S. Oosterlynck, J. Van den Broeck, L. Albrechts, F. Moulaert & A. Verhetsel (Eds) Strategic Spatial Projects: Catalysts for Change, pp. 79–84 (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M. C. (2001) Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach, 3rd ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M. C. (2006) Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press).
   Google Scholar
• Opschoor, J. B. (2004) Knowledge sharing in support of human development, in: M. Spoor (Ed) Globalization, Poverty and Conflict, pp. 307–322 (Dordrecht: Springer).
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, S. P., Radnor, Z., & Nasi, G. (2013) A new theory for public service management? Toward a (public) service-dominant approach, The American Review of Public Administration, 43(2), pp. 135–158. doi:10.1177/0275074012466935
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (1996) Crossing the great divide: Coproduction, synergy, and development, World Development, 24(6), pp. 1073–1087. doi:10.1016/0305-750X(96)00023-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel, S., Baptist, C., & d’Cruz, C. (2012) Knowledge is power–informal communities assert their right to the city through SDI and community-led enumerations, Environment and Urbanization, 24(1), pp. 13–26. doi:10.1177/0956247812438366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robins, S. L. (2008) From Revolution to Rights in South Africa: Social Movements, NGOs & Popular Politics After Apartheid (Suffolk: Boydell & Brewer Ltd).
   Google Scholar
• Savini, F., & Bertolini, L. (2019) Urban experimentation as a politics of niches, Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 51(4), pp. 831–848. doi:10.1177/0308518X19826085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen, A. (1999) Commodities and Capabilities (Oxford: OUP Catalogue).
   Google Scholar
• Siame, G., & Watson, V. (2022) Co-production and the issue of urban up-scaling and governance change in the global south: The case of Uganda, Planning Theory, 21(3), pp. 269–290. doi:10.1177/14730952221076601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strategy document of Alta Tuscia-Antica città di Castro (2020) Available at: https://www.agenziacoesione.gov.it/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Lazio-Alta-Tuscia-strategia.pdf (accessed 4 July 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Susskind, L., & Cruikshank, J. L. (1987) Breaking the Impasse: Consensual Approaches to Resolving Public Disputes (New York: Basic Books).
   Google Scholar
• Watson, V. (2014) Co-production and collaboration in planning-The difference, Planning Theory & Practice, 15(1), pp. 62–76. doi:10.1080/14649357.2013.866266
   Google Scholar
• Willyard, C., Scudellari, M., & Nordling, L. (2018) How three research groups are tearing down the ivory tower, Nature, 562(7725), pp. 24–29. doi:10.1038/d41586-018-06858-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf, J., Nogueira, F., & Borges, M. (2021) A collaborative methodology for local strategic planning: Insights from four plans in Portugal, Planning Practice & Research, 36(1), pp. 91–107. doi:10.1080/02697459.2020.1755138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar