Digital planning practices: benchmarking planners’ use of information and communication technologies (ICTs)

References

• Adnan, H. R., Hidayanto, A. N., & Kurnia, S. (2021) Citizens’ or government’s will? Exploration of why Indonesia’s local governments adopt technologies for open government, Sustainability, 13(20), pp. 11197. doi:10.3390/su132011197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahvenniemi, H., Huovila, A., Pinto-Seppä, I., & Airaksinen, M. (2017) What are the differences between sustainable and smart cities? Cities, 60, pp. 234–245. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2016.09.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anttiroiko, A.-V., & Caves, R. W. (2014) Urban planning 3.0: Impact of recent developments of the web on urban planning, in: Z., Mahmood (Ed) IT in the Public Sphere: Applications in Administration, Government, Politics, and Planning, pp. 233–257 (Hershey, PA: IGI Global).
   Google Scholar
• Appleton, K., & Lovett, A. (2005) GIS-based visualisation of development proposals: Reactions from planning and related professionals, Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 29(3), pp. 321–339. doi:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2004.05.005.
   Google Scholar
• Austin, P. M., Gurran, N., & Whitehead, C. M. (2014) Planning and affordable housing in Australia, New Zealand and England: Common culture; different mechanisms, Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 29(3), pp. 455–472. doi:10.1007/s10901-013-9356-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batty, M. (1997) The computable city, International Planning Studies, 2(2), pp. 155–173. doi:10.1080/13563479708721676.
   Google Scholar
• Batty, M., & Yang, W. (2022) A Digital Future for Planning: Spatial Planning Reimagined (London). Available at https://digital4planning.com/a-digital-future-for-planning/
   Google Scholar
• Boland, P., Durrant, A., McHenry, J., McKay, S., & Wilson, A. (2022) A ‘planning revolution’or an ‘attack on planning’in England: Digitization, digitalization, and democratization, International Planning Studies, 27(2), pp. 155–172. doi:10.1080/13563475.2021.1979942.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolton, A., & Enzer, M. (2018) The Gemini Principles (Cambridge). Available at https://www.cdbb.cam.ac.uk/system/files/documents/TheGeminiPrinciples.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Brotchie, J., Hall, P., Newton, P., & Nijkamp, P. (2017) The Future of Urban Form: The Impact of New Technology (New York: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Bryman, A. (2012) Social Research Methods, 4th ed. (New York: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Bugs, G., Granell, C., Fonts, O., Huerta, J., & Painho, M. (2010) An assessment of public participation GIS and web 2.0 technologies in urban planning practice in Canela, Brazil, Cities, 27(3), pp. 172–181. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2009.11.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Champlin, C., Te Brömmelstroet, M., & Pelzer, P. (2018) Tables, tablets and flexibility: Evaluating planning support system performance under different conditions of use, Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy, 12(3), pp. 467–491. doi:10.1007/s12061-018-9251-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleland, B., Mulvenna, M., Galbraith, B., Wallace, J., & Martin, S. (2012) Innovation of eParticipation strategies using living labs as intermediaries, Electronic Journal of E-Government, 10(2), pp. 120–132.
   Google Scholar
• Daniel, C., & Pettit, C. (2021) Digital disruption and planning–use of data and digital technology by professional planners, and perceptions of change to planning work, Australian Planner, 57(1), pp. 50–64. doi:10.1080/07293682.2021.1920995.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniel, C., & Pettit, C. (2022) Charting the past and possible futures of planning support systems: Results of a citation network analysis, Environment & Planning B: Urban Analytics & City Science, 49(7), pp. 1875–1892. doi:10.1177/23998083211072866.
   Google Scholar
• Dembski, F., Wössner, U., Letzgus, M., Ruddat, M., & Yamu, C. (2020) Urban digital twins for smart cities and citizens: The case study of Herrenberg, Germany, Sustainability, 12(6), pp. 2307. doi:10.3390/su12062307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans-Cowley, J. S. (2010) Planning in the age of Facebook: The role of social networking in planning processes, GeoJournal, 75(5), pp. 407–420. doi:10.1007/s10708-010-9388-0.
   Google Scholar
• Evans-Cowley, J. S., & Conroy, M. (2006) The growth of e-government in municipal planning, Journal of Urban Technology, 13(1), pp. 81–107. doi:10.1080/10630730600752892.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Firmstone, J., & Coleman, S. (2015) Public engagement in local government: The voice and influence of citizens in online communicative spaces, Information, Communication & Society, 18(6), pp. 680–695. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2014.986180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flacke, J., Shrestha, R., & Aguilar, R. (2020) Strengthening participation using interactive planning support systems: A systematic review, ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 9(1), pp. 49. doi:10.3390/ijgi9010049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galbraith, B., Cleland, B., Martin, S., Wallace, J., Mulvenna, M., & McAdam, R. (2013) Engaging user communities with eParticipation technology: Findings from a European project, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 25(3), pp. 281–294. doi:10.1080/09537325.2013.764986.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallent, N., de Magalhaes, C., & Freire Trigo, S. (2021) Is Zoning the solution to the UK Housing Crisis? Planning Practice & Research, 36(1), pp. 1–19. doi:10.1080/02697459.2020.1829283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geertman, S. (2017) PSS: Beyond the implementation gap, Transportation Research Part A: Policy & Practice, 104, pp. 70–76. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2016.10.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geertman, S., & Stillwell, J. (2012) Planning Support Systems in Practice (Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media).
   Google Scholar
• Geertman, S., & Stillwell, J. (2020) Planning support science: Developments and challenges, Environment & Planning B: Urban Analytics & City Science, 47(8), pp. 1326–1342. doi:10.1177/2399808320936277.
   Google Scholar
• Göçmen, Z. A., & Ventura, S. J. (2010) Barriers to GIS use in planning, Journal of the American Planning Association, 76(2), pp. 172–183. doi:10.1080/01944360903585060.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goode, C., & Rayner, B. (2021) Coronavirus and the digitalisation of planning: Perspectives from practice and academia, in: J. R. Bryson, L. Andres, A. Ersoy & L. Reardon (Eds) Living with Pandemics, pp. 149–158 (London: Edward Elgar Publishing).
   Google Scholar
• Goodspeed, R. (2016) Digital knowledge technologies in planning practice: From black boxes to media for collaborative inquiry, Planning Theory & Practice, 17(4), pp. 577–600. doi:10.1080/14649357.2016.1212996.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, E., & Manosevitch, E. (2011) Augmented deliberation: Merging physical and virtual interaction to engage communities in urban planning, New Media & Society, 13(1), pp. 75–95. doi:10.1177/1461444810365315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurran, N., & Whitehead, C. (2011) Planning and affordable housing in Australia and the UK: A comparative perspective, Housing Studies, 26(7–8), pp. 1193–1214. doi:10.1080/02673037.2011.618982.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanzl, M. (2007) Information technology as a tool for public participation in urban planning: A review of experiments and potentials, Design Studies, 28(3), pp. 289–307. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2007.02.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, N. (2015) The use of surveillance technologies in planning enforcement, Planning Practice & Research, 30(5), pp. 528–547. doi:10.1080/02697459.2015.1076133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horelli, L. (2013) New Approaches to Urban Planning: Insights from Participatory Communities (L. Horelli Ed.) (Helsinki: Aalto University).
   Google Scholar
• Innes, J. E., & Booher, D. E. (2004) Reframing public participation: Strategies for the 21st century, Planning Theory & Practice, 5(4), pp. 419–436. doi:10.1080/1464935042000293170.
   Google Scholar
• Kahila-Tani, M., Kytta, M., & Geertman, S. (2019) Does mapping improve public participation? Exploring the pros and cons of using public participation GIS in urban planning practices, Landscape and Urban Planning, 186, pp. 45–55. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.02.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser, E. J., & Godschalk, D. R. (1995) Twentieth century land use planning: A stalwart family tree, Journal of the American Planning Association, 61(3), pp. 365–385. doi:10.1080/01944369508975648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karvonen, A., Cugurullo, F., & Caprotti, F. (2018) Inside Smart Cities: Place, Politics and Urban Innovation (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Kempa, D., & Lovett, A. A. (2019) Using GIS in landscape planning, in: C. von Haaren, A. Lovett & C. Albert (Eds) Landscape Planning with Ecosystem Services, pp. 77–88 (Dordrecht: Springer).
   Google Scholar
• Kingston, R. (2008) The role of participatory e-planning in the new English local planning system. Paper presented at the Association of Collegiate Planning Schools 47th Annual Conference, Fort Worth, Texas. https://www.ppgis.manchester.ac.uk/downloads/e-Planning_LDFs.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kitchin, R. (2014) The real-time city? Big data and smart urbanism, GeoJournal, 79(1), pp. 1–14. doi:10.1007/s10708-013-9516-8.
   Google Scholar
• Klosterman, R. (1992) Evolving views of computer-aided planning, Journal of Planning Literature, 6(3), pp. 249–260. doi:10.1177/088541229200600303.
   Google Scholar
• Klosterman, R. (1997) Planning support systems: A new perspective on computer-aided planning, Journal of Planning Education & Research, 17(1), pp. 45–54. doi:10.1177/0739456X9701700105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klosterman, R. (2012) E-planning: Retrospect and prospect, International Journal of E-Planning Research (IJEPR), 1(1), pp. 1–4. doi:10.4018/ijepr.2012010101.
   Google Scholar
• Klosterman, R. (2013) Lessons learned about planning: Forecasting, participation, and technology, Journal of the American Planning Association, 79(2), pp. 161–169. doi:10.1080/01944363.2013.882647.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klosterman, R., & Landis, J. D. (1988) Microcomputers in US planning: Past present and future, Environment & Planning B, Planning & Design, 15(3), pp. 355–367. doi:10.1068/b150355.
   Google Scholar
• Kummitha, R. K. R., & Crutzen, N. (2017) How do we understand smart cities? An evolutionary perspective, Cities, 67, pp. 43–52. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2017.04.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, Y., & Geertman, S. (2019) Can social media play a role in urban planning? A literature review, Computational Urban Planning and Management for Smart Cities, 16(1), pp. 69–84.
   Google Scholar
• Manns, S. (2021) The planners’ response to COVID-19, Urban Design International, 26(4), pp. 310–314. doi:10.1057/s41289-021-00156-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milz, D., Pokharel, A., & Gervich, C. D. (2023) Facilitating online participatory planning during the COVID-19 pandemic, Journal of the American Planning Association, pp. 1–14. doi:10.1080/01944363.2023.2185658.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, W. J. (1999) E-Topia:“urban Life, Jim—But Not as We Know It” (Cambridge: MIT press).
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, K., & Webb, B. (2020) Googling the city: In search of the public interest on Toronto’s’ smart’waterfront, Urban Planning, 5(1), pp. 84–95. doi:10.17645/up.v5i1.2520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuman, W. (2011) Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches, 7th ed. (Boston: Allyn & Bacon).
   Google Scholar
• Nochta, T., Wan, L., Schooling, J. M., & Parlikad, A. K. (2021) A socio-technical perspective on urban analytics: The case of city-scale digital twins, Journal of Urban Technology, 28(1–2), pp. 263–287. doi:10.1080/10630732.2020.1798177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pak, B., Chua, A., & Vande Moere, A. (2017) FixMyStreet Brussels: Socio-demographic inequality in crowdsourced civic participation, Journal of Urban Technology, 24(2), pp. 65–87. doi:10.1080/10630732.2016.1270047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papadopoulou, C.-A., & Panagiotopoulou, M. (2015) Tools and technologies for planning the development of smart cities, Journal of Urban Technology, 22(2), pp. 43–62. doi:10.1080/10630732.2015.1018725.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelzer, P. (2017) Usefulness of planning support systems: A conceptual framework and an empirical illustration, Transportation Research Part A: Policy & Practice, 104, pp. 84–95. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2016.06.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettit, C., Bakelmun, A., Lieske, S. N., Glackin, S., Hargroves, K., Thomson, G. Shearer, H., Dia, H. …, Newman, P. (2018) Planning support systems for smart cities, City, Culture & Society, 12, pp. 13–24. doi:10.1016/j.ccs.2017.10.002.
   Google Scholar
• Pettit, C., Klosterman, R. E., Delaney, P., Whitehead, A. L., Kujala, H., Bromage, A., & Nino-Ruiz, M. (2015) The online what if? Planning support system: A land suitability application in Western Australia, Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy, 8(2), pp. 93–112. doi:10.1007/s12061-015-9133-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettit, C., Zarpelon Leao, S., Lock, O., Ng, M., & Reades, J. (2022) Big data: The engine to future cities—A reflective case study in urban transport, Sustainability, 14(3), pp. 1727. doi:10.3390/su14031727.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potts, R. (2020) Is a new ‘planning 3.0’ paradigm emerging? Exploring the relationship between digital technologies and planning theory and practice, Planning Theory & Practice, 21(2), pp. 1–18. doi:10.1080/14649357.2020.1748699.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riggs, W., & Gordon, K. (2017) How is mobile technology changing city planning? Developing a taxonomy for the future, Environment & Planning B: Urban Analytics & City Science, 44(1), pp. 100–119. doi:10.1177/0265813515610337.
   Google Scholar
• Riggs, W., Steins, C., & Shukla, S. (2019) City planning technology benchmarking survey. Available at https://www.planetizen.com/features/102851-city-planning-technology-2019-benchmarking-study
   Google Scholar
• Rudskoy, A., Ilin, I., & Prokhorov, A. (2021) Digital twins in the intelligent transport systems, Transportation Research Procedia, 54, pp. 927–935. doi:10.1016/j.trpro.2021.02.152.
   Google Scholar
• Ruming, K., & Gurran, N. (2014) Australian planning system reform, Australian Planner, 51(2), pp. 102–107. doi:10.1080/07293682.2014.896065.
   Google Scholar
• Russo, P., Lanzilotti, R., Costabile, M. F., & Pettit, C. J. (2018) Adoption and use of software in land use planning practice: A multiple-country study, International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 34(1), pp. 57–72. doi:10.1080/10447318.2017.1327213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scottish Government. (2020) Transforming Places Together: Scotland’s digital strategy for planning. Available at https://www.gov.scot/binaries/content/documents/govscot/publications/strategy-plan/2020/11/transforming-places-together-scotlands-digital-strategy-planning/documents/transforming-places-together-scotlands-digital-strategy-planning/transforming-places-together-scotlands-digital-strategy-planning/govscot%3Adocument/transforming-places-together-scotlands-digital-strategy-planning.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Silva, C. N. (ed.) (2010) The e-planning paradigm–Theory, methods and tools: An overview, in: Handbook of Research on E-Planning: ICTs for Urban Development and Monitoring, pp. 1–14 (Lisbon: IGI Global).
   Google Scholar
• Slotterback, C. S. (2011) Planners’ perspectives on using technology in participatory processes, Environment & Planning B, Planning & Design, 38(3), pp. 468–485. doi:10.1068/b36138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stillwell, J., Geertman, S., & Openshaw, S. (eds.) (1999) Developments in geographical information and planning, in: Geographical Information and Planning, pp. 3–22 (Berlin: Springer).
   Google Scholar
• Talen, E. (2000) Bottom-up GIS: A new tool for individual and group expression in participatory planning, Journal of the American Planning Association, 66(3), pp. 279–294. doi:10.1080/01944360008976107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Te Brömmelstroet, M. (2010) Equip the warrior instead of manning the equipment: Land use and transport planning support in the Netherlands, Journal of Transport and Land Use, 3(1), pp. 25–41. doi:10.5198/jtlu.v3i1.99.
   Google Scholar
• Thakuriah, P. V., Tilahun, N. Y., & Zellner, M. (eds.) (2017) Big data and urban informatics: Innovations and challenges to urban planning and knowledge discovery, in: Seeing Cities Through Big Data, pp. 11–45 (Switzerland: Springer).
   Google Scholar
• Trencher, G., & Karvonen, A. (2019) Stretching “smart”: Advancing health and well-being through the smart city agenda, Local Environment, 24(7), pp. 610–627. doi:10.1080/13549839.2017.1360264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trillo, C., Aburamadan, R., Makore, B. C. N., Udeaja, C., Moustaka, A., Gyau Baffour Awuah, K., Patel, D. …, Mansuri, L.E. (2021, July 24-29) Towards smart planning conservation of heritage cities: Digital technologies and heritage conservation planning. Paper presented at the International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, July 24–29, Washington DC, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Tzachor, A., Sabri, S., Richards, C. E., Rajabifard, A., & Acuto, M. (2022) Potential and limitations of digital twins to achieve the sustainable development goals, Nature Sustainability, 5(10), pp. 822–829. doi:10.1038/s41893-022-00923-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UK Government. (2020) Planning for the future white paper (London). Available at https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/958420/MHCLG-Planning-Consultation.pdf
   Google Scholar
• VanDerhorn, E., & Mahadevan, S. (2021) Digital twin: Generalization, characterization and implementation, Decision Support Systems, 145, pp. 113524. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2021.113524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanolo, A. (2016) Is there anybody out there? The place and role of citizens in tomorrow’s smart cities, Futures, 82, pp. 26–36. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2016.05.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vonk, G., Geertman, S., & Schot, P. (2005) Bottlenecks blocking widespread usage of planning support systems, Environment & Planning A, 37(5), pp. 909–924. doi:10.1068/a3712.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vonk, G., Geertman, S., & Schot, P. (2007) A SWOT analysis of planning support systems, Environment & Planning A: Economy & Space, 39(7), pp. 1699–1714. doi:10.1068/a38262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Schönfeld, K. C., Tan, W., Wiekens, C., & Janssen-Jansen, L. (2020) Unpacking social learning in planning: Who learns what from whom? Urban Research & Practice, 13(4), pp. 411–433. doi:10.1080/17535069.2019.1576216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallin, S., Horelli, L., & Saad-Sulonen, J. (2010) Digital Tools in Participatory Planning (S. Wallin, L. Horelli, & J. Saad-Sulonen Eds.) (Helsinki: Aalto University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Wallin, S., Saad-Sulonen, J., Amati, M., & Horelli, L. (2012) Exploring e-planning practices in different contexts: Similarities and differences between Helsinki and Sydney, International Journal of E-Planning Research (IJEPR), 1(3), pp. 17–39. doi:10.4018/ijepr.2012070102.
   Google Scholar
• Waqar, A., Othman, I., Almujibah, H., Khan, M. B., Alotaibi, S., & Elhassan, A. A. (2023) Factors influencing adoption of digital twin advanced technologies for smart city development: Evidence from Malaysia, Buildings, 13(3), pp. 775. doi:10.3390/buildings13030775.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webber, M. M. (1965) The roles of intelligence systems in urban-systems planning, Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 31(4), pp. 289–296. doi:10.1080/01944366508978182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whited, W. L. (1982) Using Microcomputers in Urban Planning (Chicago, IL: American Plannning Association).
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, W., & McFarland, P. (2012) Investigating the role of electronic planning within planning reform, International Journal of E-Planning Research (IJEPR), 1(2), pp. 65–78. doi:10.4018/ijepr.2012040104.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, W., & Parolin, B. (2012) Review of web-based communications for town planning in local government, Journal of Urban Technology, 19(1), pp. 43–63. doi:10.1080/10630732.2012.626702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, W., & Parolin, B. (2013) Web 2.0 and social media growth in planning practice: A longitudinal study, Planning Practice & Research, 28(5), pp. 544–562. doi:10.1080/02697459.2013.840996.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, A., & Tewdwr-Jones, M. (2022) COVID-19 and the rise of digital planning: Fast and slow adoption of a digital planning system, Town Planning Review, Online, 93(5), pp. 495–518. doi:10.3828/tpr.2022.3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, A., Tewdwr-Jones, M., & Comber, R. (2017) Urban planning, public participation and digital technology: App development as a method of generating citizen involvement in local planning processes, Environment & Planning B: Urban Analytics & City Science, 46(2), pp. 2399808317712515. doi:10.1177/2399808317712515.
   Google Scholar
• Yarberry, S., & Sims, C. (2021) The impact of COVID-19-prompted virtual/remote work environments on employees’ career development: Social learning theory, belongingness, and self-empowerment, Advances in Developing Human Resources, 23(3), pp. 237–252. doi:10.1177/15234223211017850.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeh, A. G.-O. (1988) Microcomputers in urban planning: Applications, constraints, and impacts, Environment & Planning B, Planning & Design, 15(3), pp. 241–254. doi:10.1068/b150241.
   Google Scholar
• Yigitcanlar, T., Kamruzzaman, M., Buys, L., Ioppolo, G., Sabatini-Marques, J., da Costa, E. M., & Yun, J. J. (2018) Understanding ‘smart cities’: Intertwining development drivers with desired outcomes in a multidimensional framework, Cities, 81, pp. 145–160. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2018.04.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar