1,102
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Editorial

Spatial governance and planning policy transfer in the Global South. The role of international agency and the recirculation of policies

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Adams, N., Cotella, G., & Nunes, R. (2011a) Spatial planning in Europe. The interplay between knowledge and policy in an enlarged EU, in: N. Adams, G. Cotella, & R. Nunes (Eds) Territorial Development, Cohesion and Spatial Planning: Building on EU Enlargement, pp. 1–25 (London & New York: Routledge).
  • Adams, N., Cotella, G., & Nunes, R. (Eds) (2011b). Territorial knowledge channels in a multi-jurisdictional policy environment. A theoretical framework, in: Adams, N., Cotella, G., & Nunes, R. (Eds) Territorial Development, Cohesion and Spatial Planning: Building on EU Enlargement, pp. 26–55 (London & New York: Routledge).
  • Ardila, D. S. (2020) Global policies for moving cities: The role of think tanks in the proliferation of bus rapid transit systems in Latin America and worldwide, Policy and Society, 39(1), pp. 70–90. doi:10.1080/14494035.2019.1699636.
  • Athey, S. (2017) Beyond prediction: Using big data for policy problems, Science, 355(6324), pp. 483–485. doi:10.1126/science.aal4321.
  • Bennett, C. J. (1991) What is policy convergence and what causes it?, British Journal of Political Science, 21(2), pp. 215–233. doi:10.1017/S0007123400006116.
  • Berisha, E., Cotella, G., Janin Rivolin, U., & Solly, A. (2021) Spatial governance and planning systems and the public control of spatial development: A European Typology, European Planning Studies, 29(1), pp. 181–200. doi:10.1080/09654313.2020.1726295.
  • Berisha, E., Cotella, G., Janin Rivolin, U., & Solly, A. (2023) Spatial governance and planning systems vis-à-vis land consumption in Europe, European Planning Studies, pp. 1–16. doi:10.1080/09654313.2023.2207605.
  • Blanc, F. (2023) Unpacking the ecuadorian spatial planning law: Policy mobilities in Latin America between Transnational agency and path-dependent logics, Planning Practice & Research, 39(1), pp. XX–XX. doi:10.1080/02697459.2022.2034283.
  • Blanc, F., Cabrera, J. E., Cotella, G., García, A., & Sandoval, J. C. (2022a) Does planning keep its promises? Latin American spatial governance and planning as an ex-post regularisation activity, Planning Practice & Research, 37(6), pp. 699–720. doi:10.1080/02697459.2022.2042921.
  • Blanc, F., Cabrera, J. E., Cotella, G., Vecchio, G., Santelices, N., Casanova, R., & Reinheimer, B., Blanca, M., Reinheimer, B. (2022b) Latin American spatial governance and planning systems and the rising judicialisation of planning: Evidence from Argentina, Chile, and Uruguay, DisP-The Planning Review, 58(4), pp. 22–39. doi:10.1080/02513625.2022.2200654.
  • Blanc, F., & Cotella, G. (2023a) Global urban development frameworks landing in Latin America: Insights from Ecuador and Bolivia, Development Policy Review, 41(1), pp. e12632. doi:10.1111/dpr.12632.
  • Blanc, F., & Cotella, G. (2023b) The role of time in the localisation of Global urban policy. A Comparative analysis of Ecuador and Bolivia, Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 25(4), pp. 1–15. doi:10.1080/13876988.2023.2173582.
  • Carrion, A., Ariza-Montobbio, P., & Calero, D. (2023) Territorializing the climate policy agenda in intermediate cities of the andean region, Planning Practice & Research, 39(1), pp. XX–XX. doi:10.1080/02697459.2022.2026036.
  • Cerf, M. E. (2019) Sustainable development goal integration, interdependence, and implementation: The environment–economic–health nexus and universal health coverage, Global Challenges, 3(9), pp. 1900021. doi:10.1002/gch2.201900021.
  • Colomb, C. (2007) Unpacking new labour’s ‘Urban Renaissance’ agenda: Towards a socially sustainable reurbanization of British cities? Planning, Practice & Research, 22(1), pp. 1–24. doi:10.1080/02697450701455249.
  • Cotella, G., & Dąbrowski, M. K. (2021) EU Cohesion policy as a driver of europeanisation: A comparative analysis, in: D. Rauhut, F. Sielker, & A. Humer (Eds) EU Cohesion Policy and Spatial Governance Territorial, Social and Economic Challenges, pp. 48–65 (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar).
  • Cotella, G., & Janin Rivolin, U. (2011) Europeanization of spatial planning through discourse and practice in Italy, disP–The Planning Review, 3(186), pp. 42–53. doi:10.1080/02513625.2011.10557143.
  • Cotella, G., Rivolin, U. J., & Santangelo, M. (2015) Transferring ‘good’ territorial governance across Europe, in: P. Schmitt & L. Van Well (Eds) Territorial Governance Across Europe: Pathways, Practices and Prospects, pp. 238–253. doi:10.4324/9781315716220.
  • Dąbrowski, M., Musiałkowska, I., & Polverari, L. (2018) Introduction: Drawing lessons from international policy-transfer initiatives in regional and urban development and spatial planning, Regional Studies, 52(9), pp. 1165–1168. doi:10.1080/00343404.2018.1462490.
  • Dąbrowski, M., Varjú, V., & Amenta, L. (2019) Transferring circular economy solutions across differentiated territories: Understanding and overcoming the barriers for knowledge transfer, Urban Planning, 4(3), pp. 52–62. doi:10.17645/up.v4i3.2162.
  • Dąbrowski, M., Varju, V., & Czapiewski, K. (2020) D7.1 Theoretical Model of Knowledge Transfer (Delft: REPAiR). Available at https://h2020repair.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Deliverable-7.1-Theoretical-model-of-knowledge-transfer.pdf
  • Dolowitz, D. P., & Marsh, D. (1996) Who learns what from whom: A review of the policy transfer literature, Political Studies, 44(2), pp. 343–357. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00334.x.
  • Dolowitz, D. P., & Marsh, D. (2000) Learning from abroad: The role of policy transfer in contemporary policy-making, Governance, 13(1), pp. 5–23. doi:10.1111/0952-1895.00121.
  • Dolowitz, D. P., & Marsh, D. (2012) The future of policy transfer research, Political Studies Review, 10(3), pp. 339–345. doi:10.1111/j.1478-9302.2012.00274.x.
  • Dunlop, C. A. (2009) Policy transfer as learning: Capturing variation in what decision-makers learn from epistemic communities, Policy Studies, 30(3), pp. 289–311. doi:10.1080/01442870902863869.
  • Evans, M. (2009) Policy transfer in critical perspective, Policy Studies, 30(3), pp. 243–268. doi:10.1080/01442870902863828.
  • Evans, M. (Ed.) (2017) Policy Transfer in Global Perspective (Taylor & Francis). doi:10.4324/9781315246574.
  • Galland, D., & Elinbaum, P. (2018) A “Field” under construction: The state of planning in Latin America and the Southern turn in planning: Introduction to the special issue on Latin America, DisP-The Planning Review, 54(1), pp. 18–24. doi:10.1080/02513625.2018.1454665.
  • Healey, P., & Upton, R. (Eds.) (2010) Crossing Borders: International Exchange and Planning Practices (London & New York: Routledge).
  • Jajamovich, G., & Delgadillo, V. (2020) La circulación de conocimientos, saberes y políticas urbanas en América Latina. Introducción, Iberoamericana, 10(74), pp. 7–11. doi:10.18441/ibam.20.2020.74.7-11.
  • Janin Rivolin, U. (2012) Planning systems as institutional technologies: A proposed conceptualization and the implications for comparison, Planning Practice and Research, 27(1), pp. 63–85. doi:10.1080/02697459.2012.661181.
  • Janin Rivolin, U., & Faludi, A. (2005) The hidden face of European spatial planning: Innovations in governance, European Planning Studies, 13(2), pp. 195–215. doi:10.1080/0965431042000321785.
  • Knill, C. (2005) Introduction: Cross-national policy convergence: Concepts, approaches and explanatory factors, Journal of European Public Policy, 12(5), pp. 764–774. doi:10.1080/13501760500161332.
  • Marsh, D., & Sharman, J. C. (2009) Policy diffusion and policy transfer, Policy Studies, 30(3), pp. 269–288. doi:10.1080/01442870902863851.
  • Maximo, R., & Royer, L. (2023) Multilevel urban policy mobilities through the city statute: The spreading of Brazilian urban federal law, Planning Practice & Research, 39(1), pp. XX–XX. doi:10.1080/02697459.2022.2126678.
  • McCann, E. (2011) Urban policy mobilities and global circuits of knowledge: Toward a research agenda, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 101(1), pp. 107–130. doi:10.1080/00045608.2010.520219.
  • McCann, E., & Ward, K. (Eds.) (2011) Mobile Urbanism: Cities and Policymaking in the Global Age, Vol. 17 (Minneapolis, MN: U of Minnesota Press).
  • McCann, E., & Ward, K. (2012) Policy assemblages, mobilities and mutations: Toward a multidisciplinary conversation, Political Studies Review, 10(3), pp. 325–332. doi:10.1111/j.1478-9302.2012.00276.x.
  • Montero, S. (2020) Leveraging Bogotá: Sustainable development, global philanthropy and the rise of urban solutionism, Urban Studies, 57(11), pp. 2263–2281. doi:10.1177/0042098018798555.
  • Montero, S., & Baiocchi, G. (2022) A posteriori comparisons, repeated instances and urban policy mobilities: What ‘Best practices’ leave behind, Urban Studies, 59(8), pp. 1536–1555. doi:10.1177/00420980211041460.
  • Moodley, S. (in press) The role of municipal knowledge management vehicles in facilitating international knowledge sharing and policy mobility: the durban story, Planning Practice & Research, 39(1), pp. XX–XX. doi:10.1080/02697459.2021.1964781.
  • Morais de Sá e Silva, M., & Porto de Oliveira, O. (2023) Incorporating time into policy transfer Studies: A Comparative analysis of the transnational policy process of conditional cash transfers and participatory budgeting, Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 25(4), pp. 418–438. doi:10.1080/13876988.2023.2193961.
  • Morphet, J., & Clifford, B. (2014) Policy convergence, divergence and communities: The case of spatial planning in post-devolution Britain and Ireland, Planning Practice & Research, 29(5), pp. 508–524. doi:10.1080/02697459.2014.976998.
  • Mukhopadhyay, C., Belingardi, C., Papparaldo, G., Hendawy, M., & Chettiparambil Rajan, A. (2021) Special issue: planning practices and theories from the global south, in: Conversations in Planning Theory and Practice Booklet Projects, pp. 7–13 (Dortmund, Germany: Association of European School of Planning – Young Academic Network).
  • Peck, J., & Theodore, N. (2010) Mobilizing policy: Models, methods, and mutations, Geoforum, 41(2), pp. 169–174. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2010.01.002.
  • Peck, J., & Theodore, N. (2015) Fast Policy: Experimental Statecraft at the Thresholds of Neoliberalism (Minneapolis, MN: U of Minnesota Press).
  • Porto de Oliveira, O., Osorio Gonnet, C., Montero, S., & Leite Kerches da Silva, K. (2019) Latin America and Policy Diffusion: From Import to Export (Routledge Studies in Latin American Politics, Routledge). doi:10.4324/9780429446139.
  • Porto de Oliveira, O., & Romano, G. (Eds.) (2023) Brazil and China in Knowledge and Policy Transfer (London: Palgrave Macmillan Cham).
  • Rapoport, E., & Hult, A. (2017) The travelling business of sustainable urbanism: International consultants as norm-setters, Environment & Planning A: Economy & Space, 49(8), pp. 1779–1796. doi:10.1177/0308518X16686069.
  • Romano, G., & Porto de Oliveira, O. (2023) Brazil and China going global: Emerging issues and questions to explore knowledge and policy transfers, Critical Policy Studies, pp. 1–19. Published online 9 Mar 2023. doi:10.1080/19460171.2023.2180400.
  • Rose, R. (1991) What is lesson-drawing?, Journal of Public Policy, 11(1), pp. 3–30. doi:10.1017/S0143814X00004918.
  • Rose, R. (1993) Lesson-Drawing in Public Policy: A Guide to Learning Across Time and Space (New Jersey: Chatham House).
  • Rose, R. (2004) Learning from Comparative Public Policy: A Practical Guide (London & New York: Routledge).
  • Rossbach, A., & Montandon, D. (2017) An Overview of National Urban Laws in Latin America and the Caribbean: Case Studies from Brazil, Colombia and Ecuador (Cities Alliance).
  • Sharman, J. C. (2010) Dysfunctional policy transfer in national tax blacklists, Governance, 23(4), pp. 623–639. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0491.2010.01501.x.
  • Sintomer, Y., Herzberg, C., & Röcke, A. (2008) From Porto Alegre to Europe: Potentials and limitations of participatory budgeting, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 32(1), pp. 164–178. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2427.2008.00777.x.
  • Sintomer, Y., Herzberg, C., Röcke, A., & Allegretti, G. (2012) Transnational models of citizen participation: The case of participatory budgeting, Journal of Deliberative Democracy, 8(2). doi:10.16997/jdd.141.
  • Stead, D. (2012) Best practices and policy transfer in spatial planning, Planning Practice and Research, 27(1), pp. 103–116. doi:10.1080/02697459.2011.644084.
  • Stead, D., & Cotella, G. (2011) Differential Europe: Domestic actors and their role in shaping spatial planning systems, DisP-The Planning Review, 47(186), pp. 13–21. doi:10.1080/02513625.2011.10557140.
  • Stone, D. (2012) Transfer and translation of policy, Policy Studies, 33(6), pp. 483–499. doi:10.1080/01442872.2012.695933.
  • Stone, D. (2017) Understanding the transfer of policy failure: Bricolage, experimentalism and translation, Policy & Politics, 45(1), pp. 55–70. doi:10.1332/030557316X14748914098041.
  • Stone, D., Porto de Oliveira, O., & Pal, L. A. (2020) Transnational policy transfer: The circulation of ideas, power and development models, Policy and Society, 39(1), pp. 1–18. doi:10.1080/14494035.2019.1619325.
  • Temenos, C., & McCann, E. (2013) Geographies of policy mobilities, Geography Compass, 7(5), pp. 344–357. doi:10.1111/gec3.12063.
  • Unceta, P. M., Hausleitner, B., & Dąbrowski, M. (2020) Socio-spatial segregation and the spatial structure of ‘Ordinary’ activities in the Global South, Urban Planning, 5(3), pp. 303–318. doi:10.17645/up.v5i3.3047.
  • Vecchio, G. (2023) Transferring transport policy problems: the instrumental role of social concerns in policy transfer, Planning Practice & Research, 39(1), pp. XX–XX. doi:10.1080/02697459.2022.2061105.
  • Watson, V. (2014) The case for a southern perspective in planning theory, International Journal of E-Planning Research (IJEPR), 3(1), pp. 23–37. doi:10.4018/ijepr.2014010103.
  • Whitney, R. A., & López-García, D. (2023) Fast-track institutionalization: The opening of urban planning best practice agencies in Mexico city, Environment & Planning C: Politics & Space, 41(3), pp. 600–616. doi:10.1177/23996544221142166.
  • Williamson, P. (2021) De-globalisation and decoupling: Post-COVID-19 myths versus realities, Management and Organization Review, 17(1), pp. 29–34. doi:10.1017/mor.2020.80.
  • Wood, A. (2014) Learning through policy tourism: Circulating bus rapid transit from South America to South Africa, Environment and Planning A, 46(11), pp. 2654–2669. doi:10.1068/a140016p.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.