521
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Disparate goals, progressive ideals? Professional biographies of planners in the UK and their ideas of ‘mission’

&
Pages 320-338 | Received 08 Dec 2022, Accepted 13 Nov 2023, Published online: 21 Dec 2023

References

  • Allmendinger, P. (1996) Development control and the legitimacy of planning decisions: A comment, The Town Planning Review, 67(2), pp. 229–233. doi:10.3828/tpr.67.2.x630579742276448.
  • Allmendinger, P., & Tewdwr-Jones, M. (2002) The communicative turn in urban planning: Unravelling paradigmatic, imperialistic and moralistic dimensions, Space and Polity, 6(1), pp. 5–24. doi:10.1080/13562570220137871.
  • Barclay, S., & Marshall, A.-M. (2005) Supporting a cause, developing a movement, and consolidating a practice: Cause lawyers and sexual orientation litigation in Vermont, in: A. Sarat & S. A. Scheingold (Eds) The Worlds Cause Lawyers Make: Structure and Agency in Legal Practice, pp. 171–202 (Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press).
  • Campbell, H., & Marshall, R. (2002) Utilitarianism’s bad breath? A re-evaluation of the public interest justification for planning, Planning Theory, 1(2), pp. 163–187. doi:10.1177/147309520200100205.
  • Campbell, H., Tait, M., & Watkins, C. (2014) Is there space for better planning in a neoliberal world? Implications for planning practice and theory, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 34(1), pp. 45–59. doi:10.1177/0739456X13514614.
  • Chamberlayne, P., Bornat, J., & Wengraf, T. (Eds). (2000) The Turn to Biographical Methods in Social Science (London: Routledge).
  • Clifford, B. (2018) Charting outsourcing in UK public planning. Available at https://drive.google.com/file/d/14NVyj-O4yxVIlwsullq-6wQVmAFnkBTV/view.
  • Clifford, B. (2020) Planning ethics: The need for a ‘do no harm’ principle to help secure the public interest? Available at https://witpi.sites.sheffield.ac.uk/research/planners/planning-ethics.
  • Clifford, B. (2022) British local authority planners, planning reform and everyday practices within the state, Public Policy and Administration, 37(1), pp. 84–104. doi:10.1177/0952076720904995.
  • Clifford, B., Inch, A., Slade, J., Tait, M., Gunn, S., Schoneboom, A., & Vigar, G. (2020). WITPI Planner pen portraits. Available at https://drive.google.com/file/d/1lyaBO8rJUrkYPZ6EO0woRkDO1R-GqoS7/view.
  • Clifford, B., & Tewdwr-Jones, M. (2013) The Collaborating Planner: Practitioners in the Neoliberal Age (Bristol: Policy Press).
  • Denzin, N. K. (2011) Interpretative Guidelines. Chapter 46. in: R. Miller (Ed) Biographical Research Methods: Volume IV, pp. 73–88 (London: Sage).
  • Faulconbridge, J. R., & Muzio, D. (2009) The financialization of large law firms: Situated discourses and practices of reorganization, Journal of Economic Geography, 9(5), pp. 641–661. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbp038.
  • Ferm, J., & Raco, M. (2020) Viability planning, value capture and the geographies of market-led planning reform in England, Planning Theory & Practice, 21(2), pp. 218–235. doi:10.1080/14649357.2020.1754446.
  • Fox-Rogers, L., & Murphy, E. (2016) Self-perceptions of the role of the planner, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 43(1), pp. 74–92. doi:10.1177/0265813515603860.
  • Grange, K. (2013) Shaping acting space: In search of a new political awareness among local authority planners, Planning Theory, 12(3), pp. 225–243. doi:10.1177/1473095212459740.
  • Grange, K. (2017) Planners – A silenced profession? The politicisation of planning and the need for fearless speech, Planning Theory, 16(3), pp. 275–295. doi:10.1177/1473095215626465.
  • Gunn, S., & Vigar, G. (2012) Reform processes and discretionary acting space in English planning practice, 1997–2010, Town Planning Review, 83(5), pp. 533–553. doi:10.3828/tpr.2012.33.
  • Harris, N., & Thomas, H. (2011) Clients, customers and consumers: A framework for exploring the user-experience of the planning service, Planning Theory & Practice, 12(2), pp. 249–268. doi:10.1080/14649357.2011.580157.
  • Harvey, D. (1985) The Urbanisation of Capital (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press).
  • Hendler, S., & Bickenbach, J. E. (1994) The moral mandate of the ‘profession’ of planning. in: H. Thomas (Ed) Values and Planning, pp. 162–177 (London: Routledge).
  • Hillier, J. (2002) Shadows of Power: An Allegory of Prudence in Land-Use Planning (London: Routledge).
  • Hirschman, A. O. (1970) Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
  • Howe, E. (1980) Role choices of urban planners, Journal of the American Planning Association, 46(4), pp. 398–409. doi:10.1080/01944368008977072.
  • Howe, E. (1994) Acting on Ethics in City Planning (New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press).
  • Jackson, J. (2020) What do mid-career Melbourne planners profess? International Planning Studies, 25(4), pp. 393–408. doi:10.1080/13563475.2019.1626702.
  • Kitchen, T. (1997) People, Politics, Policies and Plans: The City Planning Process in Contemporary Britain (Basingstoke, Palgrave: SAGE).
  • Kohli, M. (2011) Biography: Account, text, method. Chapter 45. in: R. Miller (Ed) Biographical Research Methods: Vol. IV, pp. 59–72 (London: Sage).
  • Lauria, M., & Long, M. (2017) Planning experience and planners’ ethics, Journal of the American Planning Association, 83(2), pp. 202–220. doi:10.1080/01944363.2017.1286946.
  • Lewis, D. (2008) Using life histories in social policy research: The case of third sector/public sector boundary crossing, Journal of Social Policy, 37(4), pp. 559–578. doi:10.1017/S0047279408002213.
  • Linovski. (2023) Planners in publicly traded firms, Journal of the American Planning Association, 89(3), pp. 376–388. doi:10.1080/01944363.2022.2093259.
  • Linovski, O. (2019) Shifting agendas: Private consultants and public planning policy, Urban Affairs Review, 55(6), pp. 1666–1701. doi:10.1177/1078087417752475.
  • Loh, C. G., & Arroyo, R. L. (2017) Special ethical considerations for planners in private practice, Journal of the American Planning Association, 83(2), pp. 168–179. doi:10.1080/01944363.2017.1286945.
  • Loh, C. G., & Norton, R. K. (2013) Planning consultants and local planning, Journal of the American Planning Association, 79(2), pp. 138–147. doi:10.1080/01944363.2013.883251.
  • Lowndes, V. (2005) Something old, something new, something borrowed … how institutions change (and stay the same) in local governance, Policy Studies, 26(3–4), pp. 291–309. doi:10.1080/01442870500198361.
  • McClymont, K. (2014) Stuck in the process, facilitating nothing? Justice, capabilities and planning for value-led outcomes, Planning Practice and Research, 29(2), pp. 187–201. doi:10.1080/02697459.2013.872899.
  • Nelson, S., & Neil, R. (2021) Early career planners in a neo-liberal age: Experience of working in the South East of England, Planning Practice & Research, 36(4), pp. 442–455. doi:10.1080/02697459.2020.1867777.
  • Othengrafen, F. (2014) The concept of planning culture: Analysing how planners construct practical judgements in a culturised context, International Journal of E-Planning Research (IJEPR), 3(2), pp. 1–17. doi:10.4018/ijepr.2014040101.
  • Parker, G., Street, E., & Wargent, M. (2018) The rise of the private sector in fragmentary planning in England, Planning Theory & Practice, 19(5), pp. 734–750. doi:10.1080/14649357.2018.1532529.
  • Raco, M. (2018) Private consultants, planning reform and the marketisation of local government finance. in: J. Ferm & J. Tomaney (Eds) Planning Practice: Critical Perspectives from the UK, pp. 123–137 (NYC: Routledge).
  • Reade, E. (1987) British Town and Country Planning (Milton Keynes: Open University Press).
  • Rosenthal, G. (2004) Biographical research, chapter 45. in: C. Seale, G. Gobo, J. Gubrium, & D. Silverman (Eds) Qualitative Research Practice, pp. 48–64 (London: Sage).
  • Rustin, M. (2000) Reflections on the biographical turn in social science. in: P. Chamberlayne (Ed) The Turn to Biographical Methods in Social Science: Comparative Issues and Examples, pp. 33–52 (London: Routledge).
  • Sanyal, B., (Ed). (2005) Comparative Planning Cultures (NYC: Routledge).
  • Schoneboom, A. (2023) What Town Planners Do (Bristol: Policy Press).
  • Slade, D., Gunn, S., & Schoneboom, A. (2019). Serving the public interest? The reorganisation of UK planning services in an era of reluctant outsourcing. Available at https://www.rtpi.org.uk/media/2005/servingthepublicinterest2019.pdf.
  • Steele, W. (2009) Australian urban planners: Hybrid roles and professional dilemmas? Urban Policy and Research, 27(2), pp. 189–203. doi:10.1080/08111140902908873.
  • Sturzaker, J., & Hickman, H. this issue. Profit or public service? PPR
  • Suddaby, R., Cooper, D. J., & Greenwood, R. (2007) Transnational regulation of professional services: Governance dynamics of field level organizational change, Accounting, Organizations & Society, 32(4), pp. 333–362. doi:10.1016/j.aos.2006.08.002.
  • Valler, D., & Phelps, N. A. (2018) Framing the future: On local planning cultures and legacies, Planning Theory & Practice, 19(5), pp. 698–716. doi:10.1080/14649357.2018.1537448.
  • Vigar, G. (2012) Planning and professionalism: Knowledge, judgement and expertise in English planning, Planning Theory, 11(4), pp. 361–378. doi:10.1177/1473095212439993.
  • Wilson, R. (2018) A Guide for the Idealist: Launching and Navigating Your Planning Career (NYC: Routledge).
  • Zanotto, J. M. (2019) Detachment in planning practice, Planning Theory & Practice, 20(1), pp. 37–52. doi:10.1080/14649357.2018.1560491.