Planning’s value, planners’ values: defining and redefining for contemporary practice

References

• AICP. (2016) AICP Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct (Chicago: American Institute of Certified Planners).
   Google Scholar
• Albrechts, L. (2018) A quest for a critical debate and new ideas, in: T. Tasan-Kok & M. Oranje (Eds) From Student to Urban Planner: Young Practitioners’ Reflections on Contemporary Ethical Challenges, pp. 287–293 (Abingdon: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Alterman, R. (2017) From a minor to a major profession: Can planning and planning theory meet the challenges of globalisation? Transactions of the Association of European Schools of Planning, pp. 1–17. doi:10.24306/TrAESOP.2017.01.001.
   Google Scholar
• Anand, G. (2024) Practicing within and beyond planning: Narratives of practitioners from South Africa, Planning Practice & Research, pp. 1–16. doi:10.1080/02697459.2023.2244310.
   Google Scholar
• Andres, L., Denoon-Stevens, S., & Jones, P. (2024) Planners, blended (in)formality and a public interest of fragments, Planning Practice & Research, pp. 1–16. doi:10.1080/02697459.2023.2247249.
   Google Scholar
• Arnold, S., & Stirling, A. (2019) Councils in Crisis: Local Government Austerity 2009/10–2024/25 (London: New Economics Foundation).
   Google Scholar
• Arnstein, S. R. (1969) A ladder of citizen participation, Journal of the American Planning Association, 35(4), pp. 216–224. doi:10.1080/01944366908977225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, C. R., & Neu, D. (2005) What is the meaning of “the public interest”? Examining the ideology of the American public accounting profession, Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal, 18(5), pp. 690–703. doi:10.1108/09513570510620510.
   Google Scholar
• Bakunowitsch J., Othengrafen, F., & Bongers-Römer, S. (2024) Using practice theory to conceptualise balancing and values in urban planning, Planning Practice & Research, 39(2), pp. 1–X.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, I. (2022) Why UK housing plans shouldn’t mix politics with planning, Leaders Romans Group, January 6. Available at https://www.lrg.co.uk/media-centre/why-uk-housing-plans-shouldnt-mix-politics-with-planning/ (accessed 21 August 2023).
   Google Scholar
• Bates, L. K. (2021) Tired, but hopeful, Planning Theory & Practice, 22(5), pp. 663–667. doi:10.1080/14649357.2021.2003102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best, N. (2023) Spatial Planning for Climate Resilience & Net Zero - Barriers & Opportunities for Delivering Net Zero and Climate Resilience Through the Local Planning System - a Report for the Climate Change Committee (Bristol & London: Centre for Sustainable Energy & Town & Country Planning Association).
   Google Scholar
• Bicquelet-Lock, A. (2024) The future of the planning profession revisited, Planning Practice & Research, 39(2), pp. 1–X.
   Google Scholar
• Booth, P. (2020) The Wrong Answers to the Wrong Questions - Countering the Misconceptions Driving the Government’s Planning Reform Agenda (London: The Town & Country Planning Association). Available at https://www.tcpa.org.uk/the-wrong-answers-to-the-wrong-questions.
   Google Scholar
• Brownill, S., & Inch, A. (2019) Framing people and planning: 50 years of debate, Built Environment, 45(1), pp. 7–25. doi:10.2148/BENV.45.1.7.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, H., & Marshall, R. (2000) Moral obligations, planning, and the public interest: A commentary on current British practice, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 27(2), pp. 297–312. doi:10.1068/b2509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakravarty, S., & Prakash, P. (2024) Sympathy for the bogeyman planner: A call for a nuanced discourse on planning ethics in India, Planning Practice & Research, pp. 1–20. doi:10.1080/02697459.2023.2259269.
   Google Scholar
• Cherry, G. (1996) Town Planning in Britain Since 1900: The Rise and Fall of the Planning Ideal (Oxford: Blackwell).
   Google Scholar
• Clifford, B. (2018) Extending Permitted Development Rights in England: The Implications for Public Authorities and Communities (London: Royal Institute of Chartered Surveyors).
   Google Scholar
• Clifford, B., & Vigar, G. (2024) Disparate goals, progressive ideals? Professional biographies of planners in the UK and their ideas of “mission”, Planning Practice & Research, pp. 1–19. doi:10.1080/02697459.2023.2289274.
   Google Scholar
• Close, A. (2024) The experience of others – reflections on professional practice, values and motivations from alternative career journeys, Planning Practice & Research, pp. 1–8. doi:10.1080/02697459.2023.2197770.
   Google Scholar
• Davidoff, P. (1965) Advocacy and pluralism in planning, Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 34(4), pp. 331–338. doi:10.1080/01944366508978187.
   Google Scholar
• Fainstein, S. S., Forester, J., Lee, K. L., Na’puti, T., Agyeman, J., Stewart, N. J., Novy, J., Dedekorkut Howes, A., Burton, P., Norgaard, S., Smith, N. R., Zukin, S., Lubinsky, A., & Keith, M., et al. (2023) Resistance and response in planning, Planning Theory & Practice, 24(2), pp. 245–283. doi:10.1080/14649357.2023.2190681.
   Google Scholar
• Forester, J. (1989) Planning in the Face of Power (Berkeley: University of California Press).
   Google Scholar
• Grange, K. (2017) Planners–A silenced profession? The politicisation of planning and the need for fearless speech, Planning Theory, 16(3), pp. 275–295. doi:10.1177/1473095215626465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, J. L. (2022) When politicians call for “better” planning, it’s time to worry, Planning Theory & Practice, 23(4), pp. 491–495. doi:10.1080/14649357.2022.2121582.
   Google Scholar
• Harper, S. (2016) The Lawyer Bubble: A Profession in Crisis (London: Hachette UK).
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (2006) Collaborative Planning, Planning-Environment-Cities, Edited by H. Riding and A. Thornley. Hampshire (New York: Palgrave Macmillan).
   Google Scholar
• Heil, M., Turner, L., & Wilson, D. (2023) People of color: Confronting white supremacy in planning, in: D. Pojani (Ed) Alternative Planning History and Theory, pp. 125–144 (Abingdon: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Hickman, H., & Boddy, M. (2020) “If independence goes, the planning system goes”: New political governance and the English planning inspectorate, Town Planning Review, 91(1), pp. 21–45. doi:10.3828/tpr.2020.2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickman, H., McClymont, K., & Sheppard, A. (2021). Planners of the future: Expectations, motivations, and experiences: A snapshot from 2019–2020. Royal Town Planning Institute. Available at https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/7228622.
   Google Scholar
• Hickman, H., & Sturzaker, J. (2022) Ethical principles in an increasingly diverse planning profession: The potential impact of different types of planners, Town Planning Review, 93(3), pp. 241–249. doi:10.3828/TPR.2021.43.
   Google Scholar
• Hopkins, K. (2021) Time to take the politics out of planning with independent body, the planner. Available at https://www.theplanner.co.uk/2021/12/09/time-take-politics-out-planning-independent-body (accessed 21 August 2023).
   Google Scholar
• Howard, E. (1898) To-Morrow: A Peaceful Path to Real Reform (London: Swann Sonnenschein).
   Google Scholar
• Howard, E. (2003) To-Morrow: A Peaceful Path to Real Reform. Original Edition with Commentary (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Inch, A., Wargent, M., & Tait, M. (2022) Serving the public interest? Towards a history of private sector planning expertise in England, Planning Perspectives [Preprint], 38(2), pp. 231–251. doi:10.1080/02665433.2022.2063165.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J. (1961) The Death and Life of Great American Cities (Harmondsworth: Penguin).
   Google Scholar
• Jewell, H. (2022) Gen Z workers should be proud of being “snowflakes” rather than martyrs, The Guardian, January 27. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/jan/27/gen-z-workers-snowflakes-bad-treatment-bad-pay (accessed: 23 August 2023).
   Google Scholar
• Koning, J., & van Dijk, T. (2021) Rehabilitating Utopias: The importance of imagination to confronting our spatial challenges, Planning Practice & Research, 39(1), pp. 136–155. doi:10.1080/02697459.2021.1954750.
   Google Scholar
• Lauria, M., & Long, M. F. (2019) Ethical dilemmas in professional planning practice in the United States, Journal of the American Planning Association, 85(4), pp. 393–404. doi:10.1080/01944363.2019.1627238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linovski, O. (2019) Shareholder as client: Firms, markets, and the new business of planning, Journal of Urban Affairs, 41(7), pp. 1017–1035. doi:10.1080/07352166.2018.1562303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linovski, O. (2021) Conflicting interests: Professional planning practice in publicly traded firms, Professional Service Firms and Politics in a Global Era, pp. 295–319. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-72128-2_15.
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald, K., Sanyal, B., Silver, M., Ng, M. K., Head, P., Williams, K., Watson, V., & Campbell, H., et al. (2014) Challenging theory: Changing practice: Critical perspectives on the past and potential of professional planning, Planning Theory & Practice, 15(1), pp. 95–122. doi:10.1080/14649357.2014.886801.
   Google Scholar
• Martins, M. L. R., Versari Ferreira, J. C., & Gonçalves, A. L. S. (2024) What’s urban planning in the Brazilian 21st century? Planning Practice & Research, pp. 1–16. doi:10.1080/02697459.2023.2258293.
   Google Scholar
• Mieg, H., & Oevermann, H. (2021) Architects in Europe: Models of professionalisation and potential implications for the planning profession, DisP-The Planning Review, 57(1), pp. 6–17. doi:10.1080/02513625.2021.1945817.
   Google Scholar
• Murtagh, N., Odeleye, N., & Maidment, C. (2019) Do town planners in England feel a professional responsibility for a climate-resilient built environment? IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 297(1), pp. 12036. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/297/1/012036.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, G., & Owusu, F. (2023) Colonized peoples: The struggle to reframe (neo)colonial planning in anglophone Sub-Saharan Africa, in: D. Pojani (Ed) Alternative Planning History and Theory, pp. 200–217 (Abingdon: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Navitas, P., Irsyad, F. R. N., & Larasati, A. F. (2024) Planning practice in Indonesia during COVID-19: Insights from students, Planning Practice & Research, pp. 1–18. doi:10.1080/02697459.2023.2287808.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, S., & Neil, R. (2021) Early career planners in a neo-liberal age: Experience of working in the South East of England, Planning Practice & Research, 36(4), pp. 442–455. doi:10.1080/02697459.2020.1867777.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, G., Wargent, M., Linovski, O., Schoneboom, A., Gunn, S., Slade, D., Odeleye, N.-D., Maidment, C., Shepherd, E., Doak, J., Elliot, T., Nicholls, V., Street, E., Dobson, M., Platts, S., & Tasan-Kok, T. (2020) The future of the planning profession, Planning Theory & Practice, 21(3), pp. 453–480. doi:10.1080/14649357.2020.1776014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peña, S. (2024) Planning practice and the planning profession in Mexico, Planning Practice & Research, pp. 1–20. doi:10.1080/02697459.2023.2287289.
   Google Scholar
• Planning Institute Australia. (2023) Code of professional conduct. Available at https://www.planning.org.au/documents/item/6014
   Google Scholar
• Pojani, D. (2023) Alternative Planning History and Theory (Abingdon: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Porter, L. (2017). Indigenous people and the miserable failure of Australian planning. Planning Practice & Research, 32(5), pp. 556–570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, L., & Barry, J. (2016). Planning for Coexistence? Recognizing Indigenous Rights Through Land-Use Planning in Canada and Australia (Abingdon, UK: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Putri, P. W. (2020) Insurgent planner: Transgressing the technocratic state of postcolonial Jakarta, Urban Studies, 57(9), pp. 1845–1865. doi:10.1177/0042098019853499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puustinen, S., Mäntysalo, R., Hytönen, J., & Jarenko, K. (2017) The “deliberative bureaucrat”: Deliberative democracy and institutional trust in the jurisdiction of the Finnish planner, Planning Theory & Practice, 18(1), pp. 71–88. doi:10.1080/14649357.2016.1245437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quick, K. S., & Feldman, M. S. (2011) Distinguishing participation and inclusion, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 31(3), pp. 272–290. doi:10.1177/0739456X11410979.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raco, M. (2018) Private consultants, planning reform and the marketisation of local government finance, in: Ferm, J. & Tomaney, J. (Eds) Planning Practice: Critical Perspectives from the UK, pp. 123–137 (Abingdon: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Riddell, C. (2024) Voices from the sharp end: How are the values of today’s planners shaping contemporary practice? Planning Practice & Research, pp. 1–7. doi:10.1080/02697459.2023.2196498.
   Google Scholar
• Rockliff, J. (2023) Taking the politics out of planning, Premier of Tasmania. Available at https://www.premier.tas.gov.au/site_resources_2015/additional_releases/taking-the-politics-out-of-planning (accessed: 21 August 2023).
   Google Scholar
• RTPI. (2019) The UK Planning Profession in 2019: Statistics on the Size and Make-Up of the Planning Profession in the UK (London: Royal Town Planning Institute).
   Google Scholar
• RTPI. (2023) Code of Professional Conduct - Effective from 1 February 2023 (London: Royal Town Planning Institute).
   Google Scholar
• Sabah, C. M., & Gülümser, A. A. (2024) The roles and ethical perspectives of urban planners in Turkey, Planning Practice & Research, pp. 1–29. doi:10.1080/02697459.2023.2230019.
   Google Scholar
• Sanchez, T. W. (2020) Review: A guide for the idealist: Launching and navigating your planning career by Willson, Richard, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 40(3), pp. 354–356. doi:10.1177/0739456X18807754.
   Google Scholar
• Savini, F., & Raco, M. (2019) The rise of a new urban technocracy, in: M. Raco & F. Savini (Eds) Planning and Knowledge, pp. 3–18 (Bristol: Policy Press).
   Google Scholar
• Schoneboom, A. (2023) What Town Planners Do - Exploring Planning Practices and the Public Interest Through Workplace Ethnographies (Bristol: Policy Press).
   Google Scholar
• Skeffington, A. M. (1969) People and Planning: Report of the Committee on Public Participation in Planning (London: HMSO).
   Google Scholar
• Slade, D., Gunn, S., & Schoneboom, A. (2019) Serving the Public Interest? The Reorganisation of UK Planning Services in an Era of Reluctant Outsourcing (London: Royal Town Planning Institute).
   Google Scholar
• Steele, W. (2009) Australian urban planners: Hybrid roles and professional dilemmas?, Urban Policy and Research, 27(2), pp. 189–203. doi:10.1080/08111140902908873.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sturzaker, J., & Hickman, H. (2024) Profit or public service? Tensions and alignment in private planning practice, Planning Practice & Research, pp. 1–16. doi:10.1080/02697459.2023.2182027.
   Google Scholar
• Sturzaker, J., & Nurse, A. (2020) Rescaling Urban Governance – Planning, Localism and Institutional Change (Bristol: Policy Press).
   Google Scholar
• Sykes, O., & Sturzaker, J., eds. (2023) Planning in a Failing State - Reforming Spatial Governance in England (Bristol: Policy Press).
   Google Scholar
• Tait, M. (2016) Planning and the public interest: Still a relevant concept for planners? Planning Theory, 15(4), pp. 335–343. doi:10.1177/1473095216660780.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tasan-Kok, T., Bertolini, L., Oliveira e Costa, S., Lothan, H., Carvalho, H., Desmet, M., De Blust, S., Devos, T., Kimyon, D., Zoete, J. A., & Ahmad, P., et al. (2016) “Float like a butterfly, sting like a bee”: Giving voice to planning practitioners, Planning Theory & Practice, 17(4), pp. 621–651. doi:10.1080/14649357.2016.1225711.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tasan-Kok, T., & Oranje, M. (2018a) Editors’ reflections and conclusions, in: T. Tasan-Kok & M. Oranje (Eds) From Student to Urban Planner: Young Practitioners’ Reflections on Contemporary Ethical Challenges, pp. 296–309 (Abingdon: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Tasan-Kok, T., & Oranje, M. (2018b) Why it is important to give voice to young practitioners, in: T. Tasan-Kok & M. Oranje (Eds) From Student to Urban Planner: Young Practitioners’ Reflections on Contemporary Ethical Challenges, pp. 1–9 (Abingdon: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Taşan-Kok, T., & Penpecioğlu, M. (2018) Confronted and disappointed? Struggle of Turkish planners against authoritarian state-regulated urban developmen, in: T. Tasan-Kok & M. Oranje (Eds) From Student to Urban Planner: Young Practitioners’ Reflections on Contemporary Ethical Challenges, pp. 107–123 (Abingdon: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Twinn, C. (2013) Professionalism, sustainability and the public interest: What next?, Building Research & Information, 41(1), pp. 123–128. doi:10.1080/09613218.2013.743306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wachs, M. (2016) The past, present, and future of professional ethics in planning, in: S. Fainstein & J. DeFilippis (Eds) Readings in Planning Theory, pp. 464–479 (Chichester: John Wiley & Sons).
   Google Scholar
• Watson, V. (2016) Seeing from the south: Refocusing urban planning on the Globe’s central urban issues, in: S. Fainstein & J. DeFilippis (Eds) Readings in Planning Theory, pp. 540–560 (Chichester: James Wiley & Sons).
   Google Scholar