Why Metaphysical Abstinence Should Prevail in the Debate on Reductionism

References

• Balzer , W. , Moulines , C. U. and Sneed , J. D. 1987 . An architectonic for science: The structuralist program , Dordrecht : Reidel .
   Google Scholar
• Bickle , J. 1998 . Psychoneural reduction , Cambridge , MA : MIT Press .
   Google Scholar
• Bickle , J. 2003 . Philosophy and neuroscience: A ruthlessly reductive account , Dordrecht : Kluwer .
   Google Scholar
• Cartwright , N. 1999 . The dappled world , Cambridge : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Cartwright , N. 2001 . “ Against the completability of science ” . In The proper ambition of science , Edited by: Stone , M. W. F. and Wolff , J. London : Routledge .
   Google Scholar
• Davies , D. 1996 . Explanatory disunities and the unity of science . International Studies in the Philosophy of Science , 10 : 5 – 21 .
   Google Scholar
• Dupré , J. 1993 . The disorder of things , Cambridge , MA : Harvard University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Dupré , J. 1996 . “ Metaphysical disorder and scientific disunity ” . In The disunity of science: Boundaries, contexts and power , Edited by: Galison , P. and Stump , D. J. Stanford , CA : Stanford Univeristy Press .
   Google Scholar
• Dupré , J. 2002 . The lure of the simplistic . Philosophy of Science , 69 : S284 – 93 .
   Google Scholar
• Fodor , J. 1974 . Special sciences . Synthese , 28 : 77 – 115 .
   Google Scholar
• Fodor , J. 1997 . Special sciences: Still autonomous after all these years (a reply to Jaegwon Kim’s ‘Mutiple realization and the metaphysics of reduction’) . Philosophical Perspectives , 11 : 149 – 63 .
   Google Scholar
• Gale , G. 1984 . Science and the philosophers . Nature , 312 : 491 – 95 .
   Google Scholar
• Garfinkel , A. 1981 . Forms of explanation , New Haven , CT : Yale University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Hacking , I. 1999 . The social construction of what? , Cambridge , MA : Harvard University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Hooker , C. A. 1981 . Towards a general theory of reduction I, II, III . Dialogue , 20 : 38 – 59 . 201 – 36 . 496 – 529 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim , J. 1992 . Multiple realization and the metaphysics of reduction . Philosophy and Phenomenological Research , 52 : 1 – 26 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim , J. 1993 . Supervenience and mind , Cambridge : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Kim , J. 1998 . Mind in a physical world , Cambridge , MA : MIT Press .
   Google Scholar
• Kincaid , H. 1990 . Molecular biology and the unity of science . Philosophy of Science , 57 : 575 – 93 .
   Google Scholar
• Kitcher , P. 1984 . 1953 and all that: A tale of two sciences . Philosophical Review , 93 : 335 – 73 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitcher , P. 1999 . The hegemony of molecular biology . Biology and Philosophy , 14 : 195 – 210 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitcher , P. 2001 . Science, truth, and democracy , Oxford : Oxford University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Kripke , S. 1972 . “ Naming and necessity ” . In Semantics of natural language , Edited by: Davidson , D. and Harman , G. Dordrecht : Reidel .
   Google Scholar
• Lipton , P. 2002 . The reach of the law . Philosophical Books , 43 : 254 – 60 .
   Google Scholar
• McLaughlin , B. P. 1992 . “ The rise and fall of British emergentism ” . In Emergence or reduction , Edited by: Berckerman , A. , Kim , J. and Flohr , H. New York : De Gruyter .
   Google Scholar
• Morrison , M. 2000 . Unifying scientific theories , Cambridge : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Nagel , E. [1961] 1979 . The structure of science: Problems in the logic of scientific explanation , Indianapolis , IN : Hackett .
   Google Scholar
• Nickles , T. 1987 . “ From natural philosophy to metaphilosophy of science ” . In Kelvin’s Baltimore lectures and modern theoretical physics , Edited by: Kargon , R. and Achinstein , P. Cambridge , MA : MIT Press .
   Google Scholar
• Oppenheim , P. and Putnam , H. 1958 . “ The unity of science as a working hypothesis ” . In Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science , Edited by: Feigl , H. , Scriven , M. and Maxwell , G. vol. 2 , 3 – 36 . Minneapolis : University of Minnesota Press .
   Google Scholar
• Putnam , H. 1975 . Mind, language, and reality. Philosophical papers , vol. 2 , Cambridge : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Robinson , J. D. 1992 . Discussion: Aims and achievements of the reductionist approach in biochemistry/molecular biology/cell biology: A response to Kincaid . Philosophy of Science , 59 : 465 – 70 .
   Google Scholar
• Ruphy , S. 2003 . Is the world really ‘dappled’? A response to Cartwright’s charge against ‘cross‐wise reduction’ . Philosophy of Science , 70 : 57 – 67 .
   Google Scholar
• Sklar , L. 1985 . Philosophy and spacetime physics , Berkeley : University of California Press .
   Google Scholar
• Sober , E. 1999 . The multiple realizability argument against reductionism . Philosophy of Science , 66 : 542 – 64 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steel , D. 2004 . Can a reductionist be a pluralist? . Biology and Philosophy , 19 : 55 – 73 .
   Google Scholar
• Witmer , D. G. 2003 . Dupré’s anti‐essentialist objection to reductionism . Philosophical Quaterly , 53 : 181 – 200 .
   Google Scholar