234
Views
14
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ARTICLES

Default Privilege and Bad Lots: Underconsideration and Explanatory Inference

Pages 91-105 | Published online: 24 Feb 2010

References

  • Brandom , R. 1994 . Making it explicit: Reasoning, representing, and discursive commitment , Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press .
  • Brandom , R. 2000 . Articulating reasons: An introduction to inferentialism , Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press .
  • Carrier , M. 1991 . What is wrong with the miracle argument? . Studies in History and Philosophy of Science , 22 : 23 – 36 .
  • Day , T. and Kincaid , H. 1994 . Putting inference to the best explanation in its place . Synthese , 98 : 271 – 295 .
  • Duhem , P. 1954 . The aim and structure of physical theory , 2nd ed. , Edited by: Wiener , P. P. Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press . Original edition, 1914
  • Engel , M. 1992 . Personal and doxastic justification in epistemology . Philosophical Studies , 67 : 133 – 150 .
  • Fogelin , R. 1994 . Pyrrhonian reflections on knowledge and justification , New York : Oxford University Press .
  • Harman , G. 1986 . Change in view: Principles of reasoning , Cambridge, MA : MIT Press .
  • Iranzo , V. 2001 . Bad lots, good explanations . Critica , 33 ( 98 ) : 71 – 96 .
  • Iranzo , V. 2008 . Reliabilism and the abductive defence of scientific realism . Journal for General Philosophy of Science , 39 : 115 – 120 .
  • Kornblith , H. 1983 . Justified belief and epistemically responsible action . Philosophical Review , 92 : 33 – 48 .
  • Kuipers , T. A. F. 2004 . “ Inference to the best theory, rather than inference to the best explanation: Kinds of abduction and induction ” . In Induction and deduction in the sciences , Edited by: Stadler , F. 25 – 51 . Dordrecht : Kluwer .
  • Laudan , L. 1984 . Science and values: The aims of science and their role in scientific debate , Berkeley : University of California Press .
  • Lipton , P. . Is the best good enough? . Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society . Vol. 93 , pp. 89 – 104 .
  • Lipton , P. 2004 . Inference to the best explanation , 2nd ed. , New York : Routledge .
  • Lycan , W. G. 1988 . Judgment and justification , Cambridge : Cambridge University Press .
  • Minnameier , G. 2004 . Peirce‐suit of truth: Why inference to the best explanation and abduction ought not to be confused . Erkenntnis , 60 : 75 – 105 .
  • Psillos , S. 1999 . Scientific realism: How science tracks truth , London : Routledge .
  • Psillos , S. 2002 . “ Simply the best: A case for abduction ” . In Computational logic: From logic programming into the future , Edited by: Kakas , A. C. and Sadri , F. 605 – 25 . Berlin : Springer .
  • Rolin , K. 2006 . The bias paradox in feminist standpoint epistemology . Episteme , 3 ( 1–2 ) : 125 – 136 .
  • Rolin , K. 2008 . Science as collective knowledge . Cognitive Systems Research , 9 ( 1–2 ) : 115 – 124 .
  • Rosenberg , J. F. 1980 . One world and our knowledge of it: The problematic of realism in post‐Kantian perspective , Dordrecht : Reidel .
  • Sellars , W. 1963 . Science, perception and reality , New York : Routledge & Kegan Paul .
  • Sklar , L. 1981 . Do unborn hypotheses have rights? . Pacific Philosophical Quarterly , 62 : 17 – 29 .
  • Stanford , P. K. 2006 . Exceeding our grasp: Science, history, and the problem of unconceived alternatives , Oxford : Oxford University Press .
  • Thagard , P. 1978 . The best explanation: Criteria for theory choice . Journal of Philosophy , 75 : 76 – 92 .
  • Thagard , P. 1992 . Conceptual revolutions , Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press .
  • van Fraassen , B. C. 1980 . The scientific image , Oxford : Clarendon Press .
  • van Fraassen , B. C. 1989 . Laws and symmetry , Oxford : Oxford University Press .
  • Williams , M. 2001 . Problems of knowledge: A critical introduction to epistemology , Oxford : Oxford University Press .
  • Williams , M. 2008 . Responsibility and reliability . Philosophical Papers , 37 ( 1 ) : 1 – 26 .
  • Wray , K. B. 2008 . The argument from underconsideration as grounds for anti‐realism: A defence . International Studies in the Philosophy of Science , 22 : 317 – 326 .

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.