180
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Intentional Models as Essential Scientific Tools

Pages 199-217 | Published online: 12 Nov 2013

References

  • Adams, F. 2003. “The Informational Turn in Philosophy.” Minds and Machines 13: 471–501 doi: 10.1023/A:1026244616112
  • Ajzen, I. 1985. “From Intention to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior.” In Action-control: From Cognition to Behaviour, edited by J. Kuhi, and J. Beckmann, 11–39. Heidelberg: Springer
  • Ajzen, I. 1988. Attitudes, Personality and Behavior. Milton Keynes: Open University Press
  • Ajzen, I. 1991. “The Theory of Planned Behavior.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50: 179–211 doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
  • Andersen, R., and H. Cui 2009. “Intention, Action Planning, and Decision Making in Parietal-frontal Circuits.” Neuron 63: 568–583 doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2009.08.028
  • Batterman, R. 2000. “Multiple Realizability and Universality.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51: 115–145 doi: 10.1093/bjps/51.1.115
  • Batterman, R. 2002. “Asymptotics and the Role of Minimal Models.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 53: 21–38 doi: 10.1093/bjps/53.1.21
  • Batterman, R. 2011. “Emergence, Singularities, and Symmetry Breaking.” Foundations of Physics 41: 1031–1050 doi: 10.1007/s10701-010-9493-4
  • Bechtel, W. 2005. “The Challenge of Characterizing Operations in the Mechanisms Underlying Behavior.” Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 84: 313–325 doi: 10.1901/jeab.2005.103-04
  • Bechtel, W. 2007. “Reducing Psychology while Maintaining Its Autonomy via Mechanistic Explanations.” In The Matter of the Mind: Philosophical Essays on Psychology, Neuroscience and Reduction, edited by M. Schouten, and H. Looren de Jong, 172–198. Oxford: Blackwell
  • Bechtel, W. 2008. Mental Mechanisms: Philosophical Perspectives on Cognitive Neuroscience. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum
  • Bechtel, W., and A. Abrahamsen 2007. “Mental Mechanisms, Autonomous Systems, and Moral Agency.” In Proceedings of the 29th Annual Cognitive Science Society, edited by D. S. McNamara, and J. G. Trafton, 95–100. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society
  • Bogen, J. 2005. “Regularities and Causality: Generalizations and Causal Explanations.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Science 36: 397–420 doi: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2005.03.009
  • Bunge, M. 2003. Emergence and Convergence: Qualitative Novelty and the Unity of Knowledge. Toronto: University of Toronto Press
  • Busemeyer, J. R., and J. T. Townsend 1993. “Decision Field Theory: A Dynamic-cognitive Approach to Decision Making in an Uncertain Environment.” Psychological Review 100: 432–459 doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.100.3.432
  • Chemero, A., and M. Silberstein 2008. “After the Philosophy of Mind: Replacing Scholasticism with Science.” Philosophy of Science 75: 1–27 doi: 10.1086/587820
  • Churchland, P. M. 1981. “Eliminative Materialism and the Propositional Attitudes.” Journal of Philosophy 78: 67–90 doi: 10.2307/2025900
  • Craver, C. 2006. “When Mechanistic Models Explain.” Synthese 153: 355–376 doi: 10.1007/s11229-006-9097-x
  • Craver, C. 2007. Explaining the Brain: Mechanisms and the Mosaic Unity of Neuroscience. Oxford: Clarendon Press
  • Darden, L. 2006. Reasoning in Biological Discoveries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  • Dennett, D. 1971. “Intentional Systems.” Journal of Philosophy 68: 87–106 doi: 10.2307/2025382
  • Dennett, D. 1987. The Intentional Stance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
  • Dretske, F. 1981. Knowledge and the Flow of Information. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
  • Eliasmith, C. 2010. “How We Ought to Describe Computation in the Brain.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 41: 313–320 doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2010.07.001
  • Eliasmith, C., T. C. Stewart, X. Choo, T. Bekolay, T. DeWolf, Y. Tang, and D. Rasmussen 2012. “A Large-scale Model of the Functioning Brain.” Science 338: 1202–1205 doi: 10.1126/science.1225266
  • Field, H. 1978. “Mental Representation.” Erkenntnis 13: 9–61 doi: 10.1007/BF00160888
  • Floridi, L. 2005. “Is Semantic Information Meaningful Data?.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 70: 351–370 doi: 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2005.tb00531.x
  • Fodor, J. 1975. The Language of Thought. New York: Crowell Press
  • Fodor, J. 1987. Psychosemantics: The Problem of Meaning in the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
  • Fodor, J. 2008. LOT 2: The Language of Thought Revisited. Oxford: Clarendon Press
  • Frigg, R., and S. Hartmann 2009. “Models in Science.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by E. N. Zalta, http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2009/entries/models-science. Consulted 3 October 2011
  • Glennan, S. 2005. “Modeling Mechanisms.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 36: 375–388 doi: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2005.03.011
  • Godfrey-Smith, P. 2000. “Information, Arbitrariness, and Selection: Comments on Maynard Smith.” Philosophy of Science 67: 202–207 doi: 10.1086/392770
  • Godfrey-Smith, P. 2004. “On Folk Psychology and Mental Representation.” In Representation in Mind: New Approaches to Mental Representation, edited by H. Clapin, P. Staines, and P. Slezak, 147–162. Amsterdam: Elsevier
  • Godfrey-Smith, P. 2005. “Folk Psychology as a Model.” Philosophers’ Imprint 5: 1–16
  • Harris, S., S. Sheth, and M. Cohen 2008. “Functional Neuroimaging of Belief, Disbelief, and Uncertainty.” Annals of Neurology 63: 141–147 doi: 10.1002/ana.21301
  • Huebner, B. 2011. “Minimal Minds.” In The Oxford Handbook of Animal Ethics, edited by T. L. Beauchamp, and R. G. Frey, 441–468. Oxford: Oxford University Press
  • Ji, S. 1997. “Isomorphism Between Cell and Human Languages: Molecular Biology, Bioinformatic and Linguistic Implications.” BioSystems 44: 17–39 doi: 10.1016/S0303-2647(97)00039-7
  • Ji, S. 1999. “The Linguistics of DNA: Words, Sentences, Grammar, Phonetics, and Semantics.” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 870: 411–417 doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb08916.x
  • Kaplan, D., and W. Bechtel 2011. “Dynamical Models: An Alternative or Complement to Mechanistic Explanations?.” Topics in Cognitive Science 3: 438–444 doi: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2011.01147.x
  • Lettvin, J., H. Maturana, W. McCulloch, and W. Pitts 1959. “What the Frog's Eye Tells the Frog's Brain.” Proceedings of the Institute of Radio Engineers 47: 1940–1951
  • Longino, H. 2006. “Theoretical Pluralism and the Scientific Study of Behavior.” In Scientific Pluralism, edited by S. Kellert, H. Longino, and C. K. Waters, 102–132. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press
  • Machamer, P., L. Darden, and C. Craver 2000. “Thinking About Mechanisms.” Philosophy of Science 67: 1–25 doi: 10.1086/392759
  • Maibom, H. 2003. “The Mindreader and the Scientist.” Mind and Language 18: 296–315 doi: 10.1111/1468-0017.00229
  • Maibom, H. 2009. “In Defence of Model Theory Theory.” Journal of Consciousness Studies 16: 360–378
  • Marr, D. 1982. Vision: A Computation Investigation into the Human Representational System and Processing of Visual Information. San Francisco, CA: Freeman
  • Maynard Smith, J. 2000. “The Concept of Information in Biology.” Philosophy of Science 67: 177–194 doi: 10.1086/392768
  • Parisien, C., and P. Thagard 2008. “Robosemantics: How Stanley the Volkswagen Represents the World.” Minds and Machines 18: 169–178 doi: 10.1007/s11023-008-9098-2
  • Sarkar, S. 1996. “Biological Information: A Skeptical Look at Some Central Dogmas of Molecular Biology.” In The Philosophy and History of Molecular Biology: New Perspectives, edited by S. Sarkar, 187–231. Dordrecht: Kluwer
  • Sarkar, S. 2000. “Information in Genetics and Developmental Biology: Comments on Maynard Smith.” Philosophy of Science 67: 208–213 doi: 10.1086/392771
  • Sarkar, S. 2004. “Genes Encode Information for Phenotypic Traits.” In Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Science, edited by C. Hitchcock, 259–274. Malden, MA: Blackwell
  • Searle, J. R. 1980. “Minds, Brains and Programs.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3: 417–457 doi: 10.1017/S0140525X00005756
  • Searle, J. R. 1992. The Rediscovery of the Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
  • Sehon, S. 1997. “Natural-kind Terms and the Status of Folk Psychology.” American Philosophical Quarterly 34: 333–344
  • Sereno, M. I. 1991. “Four Analogies Between Biological and Cultural/Linguistic Evolution.” Journal of Theoretical Biology 151: 467–507 doi: 10.1016/S0022-5193(05)80366-2
  • Sterelny, K. 2000. “The ‘Genetic Program’ Program: A Commentary on Maynard Smith on Information in Biology.” Philosophy of Science 67: 195–201 doi: 10.1086/392769
  • Sterelny, K., and P. Griffiths 1999. Sex and Death: An Introduction to Philosophy of Biology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
  • Sterelny, K., K. C. Smith, and M. Dickison 1996. “The Extended Replicator.” Biology and Philosophy 11: 377–403 doi: 10.1007/BF00128788
  • Stich, S. 1983. From Folk Psychology to Cognitive Science: The Case Against Belief. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
  • Stocker, A. A., and E. P. Simoncelli 2006. “Noise Characteristics and Prior Expectations in Human Visual Speed Perception.” Nature Neuroscience 9: 578–585 doi: 10.1038/nn1669
  • Thagard, P. 2006. Hot Thought: Mechanisms and Applications of Emotional Cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
  • Thagard, P. 2009. “Why Cognitive Science Needs Philosophy and Vice Versa.” Topics in Cognitive Science 1: 237–254 doi: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01016.x
  • Thagard, P. 2012. The Cognitive Science of Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
  • Thelen, E., and B. Smith 1994. A Dynamic Systems Approach to the Development of Cognition and Action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
  • Van Gelder, T., and R. Port 1995. “It's About Time: An Overview of the Dynamical Approach to Cognition.” Mind as Motion: Explorations in the Dynamics of Cognition, edited by R. Port, and T. Van Gelder, 1–43. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
  • Weber, M. 2005. “Genes, Causation and Intentionality.” History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 27: 407–420
  • Wilson, M. 2006. Wandering Significance: An Essay on Conceptual Behavior. New York: Oxford University Press
  • Wimsatt, W. C. 2007. Re-engineering Philosophy for Limited Beings. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.