Refining the Inferential Model of Scientific Understanding

References

• Anderson, J. R. 1983. The Architecture of Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. R. 1993. Rules of the Mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
   Google Scholar
• Bull, L., and T. Kovacs 2005. Foundations of Learning Classifier Systems. Heidelberg: Springer
   Google Scholar
• Churchland, P. M. 1989. A Neurocomputational Perspective: The Nature of Mind and the Structure of Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
   Google Scholar
• Conee, E., and R. Feldman. 2012. “Replies.” In Evidentialism and Its Discontents, edited by T. Dougherty, 283–323. Oxford: Oxford University Press
   Google Scholar
• Cushing, J. T. 1991. “Quantum Theory and Explanatory Discourse: Endgame for Understanding?.” Philosophy of Science 58: 337–358 doi: 10.1086/289621
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dennett, D. 1971. “Intentional Systems.” Journal of Philosophy 68: 87–106 doi: 10.2307/2025382
   Google Scholar
• Elgin, C. 2007. “Understanding and the Facts.” Philosophical Studies 132: 33–42 doi: 10.1007/s11098-006-9054-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman, A. 2012. “Toward a Synthesis of Reliabilism and Evidentialism? Or: Evidentialism's Troubles, Reliabilism's Rescue Package.” In Evidentialism and Its Discontents, edited by T. Dougherty, 254–280. Oxford: Oxford University Press
   Google Scholar
• Grimm, S. 2006. “Is Understanding a Species of Knowledge?.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 57: 515–535 doi: 10.1093/bjps/axl015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimm, S. 2009. “Reliability and the Sense of Understanding.” In Scientific Understanding: Philosophical Perspectives, edited by H. W. de Regt, S. Leonelli, and K. Eigner, 83–99. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press
   Google Scholar
• Grimm, S. 2010. “The Goal of Understanding.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 41: 337–344 doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2010.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, D., and T. Horgan 2011. The Epistemological Spectrum: At the Interface of Cognitive Science and Conceptual Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press
   Google Scholar
• Holland, J., K. Holyoak, R. Nisbett, and P. Thagard 1986. Induction: Processes of Inference, Learning and Discovery. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
   Google Scholar
• Holyoak, K., and R. Morrison 2005. The Cambridge Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning, edited by K. Holyoak, and R. MorrisonCambridge: Cambridge University Press
   Google Scholar
• Kvanvig, J. 2003. The Value of Knowledge and the Pursuit of Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
   Google Scholar
• Newell, A. 1990. Unified Theories of Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
   Google Scholar
• Newman, M. 2012. “An Inferential Model of Scientific Understanding.” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 26: 1–26 doi: 10.1080/02698595.2012.653118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otero, J., J. A. Léon, and A. C. Graesser 2002. The Psychology of Science Text Comprehension. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
   Google Scholar
• Regt, H. W. de. 2004. “Discussion Note: Making Sense of Understanding.” Philosophy of Science 71: 98–109 doi: 10.1086/381415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regt, H. W. de. 2009. “Understanding and Scientific Explanation.” In Scientific Understanding: Philosophical Perspectives, edited by H. W. de Regt, S. Leonelli, and K. Eigner, 21–42. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press
   Google Scholar
• Regt, H. W. de, ed. 2013. “Special Section: Understanding Without Explanation.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 44: 505–538
   Google Scholar
• Regt, H. W. de, S. Leonelli, and K. Eigner 2009. Scientific Understanding: Philosophical Perspectives, edited by H. W. de Regt, S. Leonelli, and K. EignerPittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press
   Google Scholar
• Tapiero, I. 2007. Situation Models and Levels of Coherence: Toward a Definition of Comprehension. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
   Google Scholar
• Thagard, P. 2010. “How Brains Makes Mental Models.” In Model-based Reasoning in Science and Technology, edited by L. Magnani, W. Carnielli, and C. Pizzi, 447–462. Berlin: Springer
   Google Scholar
• Thagard, P. 2012. “Cognitive Architectures.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Cognitive Science, edited by K. Frankish, and W. Ramsay, 50–71. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
   Google Scholar
• Thagard, P., and A. Litt 2008. “Models of Scientific Explanation.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Computational Psychology, edited by R. Sun, 549–564. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
   Google Scholar
• Trout, J. D. 2002. “Scientific Explanation and the Sense of Understanding.” Philosophy of Science 69: 213–233 doi: 10.1086/341050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trout, J. D. 2005. “Paying the Price for a Theory of Explanation.” Philosophy of Science 72: 198–208 doi: 10.1086/426849
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urbanowicz, R. J., and J. H. Moore 2009. “Learning Classifier Systems: A Complete Introduction, Review, and Roadmap.” Journal of Artificial Evolution and Applications., http://www.hindawi.com/archive/2009/736398
   Google Scholar
• Way, E. C. 1991. Knowledge, Representation and Metaphor. Dordrecht: Kluwer
   Google Scholar
• Wyatt, J. 2002. “Reinforcement Learning: A Brief Overview.” In Perspectives on Adaptivity and Learning, edited by I. O. Stamatescu, 243–264. Berlin: Springer
   Google Scholar
• Zagzebski, L. 2001. “Recovering Understanding.” In Knowledge, Truth, and Duty: Essays on Epistemic Justification, Responsibility, and Virtue, edited by M. Steup, 235–252. New York: Oxford University Press
   Google Scholar