References
- Bowler, P. J. 2008. “What Darwin Disturbed: The Biology that Might Have Been.” Isis 99: 560–567. doi: 10.1086/591714
- Chang, H. 2009. “We Have Never Been Whiggish about Phlogiston.” Centaurus 51: 239–264. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0498.2009.00150.x
- Chang, H. 2010a. “The Hidden History of Phlogiston: How Philosophical Failure Can Generate Historiographical Refinement.” Hyle 16: 47–79.
- Chang, H. 2010b. “A Case for Pluralism in Science.” Paper delivered at a meeting of the British Society for the Philosophy of Science, London, 1 March.
- Clarke, S., and A. Walsh. 2009. “Scientific Imperialism and the Proper Relations Between the Sciences.” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 23: 195–207. doi: 10.1080/02698590903007170
- Cooper, D. E. 2002. The Measure of Things: Humanism, Humility and Mystery. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
- Dupré, J. 1993. The Disorder of Things: Metaphysical Foundations of the Disunity of Science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Dupré, J. 1996. “Against Scientific Imperialism.” In PSA 1994: Proceedings of the 1994 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, edited by M. Forbes, D. Hull, and R. M. Burian, vol. 2, 374–381. East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association.
- Dupré, J. 2001. Human Nature and the Limits of Science. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
- Dupré, J. 2002. “The Lure of the Simplistic.” Philosophy of Science 69 (Proceedings): S284–S293. doi: 10.1086/341852
- Feyerabend, P. K. 1993. Against Method. 3rd ed. London: Verso.
- French, S. 2008. “Genuine Possibilities in the Scientific Past and How to Spot Them.” Isis 99: 568–575. doi: 10.1086/591715
- Hacking, I. 2000. “How Inevitable Are the Results of Successful Science?” Philosophy of Science 67 (Proceedings): S58–S71. doi: 10.1086/392809
- Henry, J. 2008. “Ideology, Inevitability, and the Scientific Revolution.” Isis 99: 552–559. doi: 10.1086/591713
- Kellert, S. H., H. E. Longino, and C. K. Waters, eds. 2006. Scientific Pluralism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
- Kitcher, P. 1999. “Unification as a Regulative Ideal.” Perspectives on Science 7: 337–348. doi: 10.1162/posc.1999.7.3.337
- Lakatos, I. 1978. The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes, edited by J. Worrall and G. Currie. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Pickering, A. 1995. The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency, and Science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
- Preston, J. 1996. Feyerabend: Philosophy, Science, and Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
- Radick, G. 2005. “Other Histories, Other Biologies.” In Philosophy, Biology and Life, edited by A. O'Hear, 21–47. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Radick, G. 2008. “Why What If?” Isis 99: 547–551. doi: 10.1086/591712
- Rescher, N. 2009. Unknowability: An Inquiry into the Limits of Knowledge. New York: Lexington Books.
- Schiebinger, L., and C. Swan, eds. 2007. Colonial Botany: Science, Commerce, and Politics in the Early Modern World. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
- Soler, L. 2008. “Are the Results of Our Science Contingent or Inevitable?” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 39: 221–229. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2008.03.014
- Stanford, P. K. 2006. Exceeding Our Grasp: Science, History, and the Problem of Unconceived Alternatives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Trizio, E. 2008. “How Many Sciences for One World? Contingency and the Success of Science.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 39: 253–258. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2008.03.017
- Wittgenstein, L. 1988. Culture and Value, edited by G. H. von Wright and H. Nynam, translated by P. Winch. Oxford: Blackwell.
![Supercharge Your Next Research Paper: Research and write your next paper with Jenni AI.]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/112447/MPU-L1HU.png"})