Using Multiple Means of Determination

References

• Achinstein, Peter 2001. The Book of Evidence, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bechtel, William 2000. From Imaging to Believing: Epistemic Issues in Generating Biological Data. In Biology and Epistemology, edited by Richard Creath, & Jane Maienschein, 138–166. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bechtel, William 2002. Aligning Multiple Research Techniques in Cognitive Neuroscience: Why Is It Important?. Philosophy of Science, 69(Proceedings), S48–S58. doi: 10.1086/341767
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogen, James, & Woodward, James 1988. Saving the Phenomena. Philosophical Review, 97, 303–352. doi: 10.2307/2185445
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burian, Richard M. 1997. Exploratory Experimentation and the Role of Histochemical Techniques in the Work of Jean Brachet, 1938–1952. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 19, 27–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burian, Richard M. 2001. The Dilemma of Case Studies Resolved: The Virtues of Using Case Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science. Perspectives on Science, 9, 383–404. doi: 10.1162/106361401760375794
   Google Scholar
• Calcott, Brett 2011. Wimsatt and the Robustness Family: Review of Wimsatt's Re-engineering Philosophy for Limited Beings. Biology and Philosophy, 26, 281–293. doi: 10.1007/s10539-010-9202-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. 1959. Convergent and Discriminant Validation by the Multitrait-multimethod Matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 65, 81–105. doi: 10.1037/h0046016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cartwright, Nancy 1991. Replicability, Reproducibility and Robustness: Comments on Harry Collins. History of Political Economy, 23, 143–155. doi: 10.1215/00182702-23-1-143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chalmers, Alan 2011. Drawing Philosophical Lessons from Perrin's Experiments on Brownian Motion: A Response to van Fraassen. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 62, 711–732. doi: 10.1093/bjps/axq039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Culp, Sylvia 1994. Defending Robustness: The Bacterial Mesosome as a Test Case. In PSA 1994: Proceedings of the 1994 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, edited by David Hull, Micky Forbes, & Richard M. Burian, vol. 1, 46–57. East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association.
   Google Scholar
• Culp, Sylvia 1995. Objectivity in Experimental Inquiry: Breaking Data–Technique Circles. Philosophy of Science, 62, 430–450. doi: 10.1086/289877
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitelson, Branden 2001. A Bayesian Account of Independent Evidence with Applications. Philosophy of Science, 68(Proceedings), S123–S140. doi: 10.1086/392903
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklin, Allan 2010. Experiment in Physics. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N. Zalta, http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2010/entries/physics-experiment. Accessed 13 May 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Franklin, Allan, & Howson, Colin 1984. Why Do Scientists Prefer to Vary Their Experiments?. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 15, 51–62. doi: 10.1016/0039-3681(84)90029-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giere, Ronald 1973. History and Philosophy of Science: Intimate Relationship or Marriage of Convenience?. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 24, 282–297. doi: 10.1093/bjps/24.3.282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hacking, Ian 1983. Representing and Intervening: Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hanson, Norwood Russell 1962. The Irrelevance of History of Science to Philosophy of Science. Journal of Philosophy, 59, 574–586. doi: 10.2307/2023279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudson, Robert G. 1999. Mesosomes: A Study in the Nature of Experimental Reasoning. Philosophy of Science, 66, 289–309. doi: 10.1086/392689
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudson, Robert G. 2009. The Methodological Strategy of Robustness in the Context of Experimental WIMP Research. Foundations of Physics, 39, 174–193. doi: 10.1007/s10701-009-9271-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosso, Peter 1988. Dimensions of Observability. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 39, 449–467. doi: 10.1093/bjps/39.4.449
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nickles, Thomas 1995. Philosophy of Science and History of Science. Osiris, 10, 139–163. doi: 10.1086/368747
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odenbaugh, Jay, & Alexandrova, Anna 2011. Buyer Beware: Robustness Analyses in Economics and Biology. Biology and Philosophy, 26, 757–771. doi: 10.1007/s10539-011-9278-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orzack, Steven H., & Sober, Elliott 1993. A Critical Assessment of Levin's The Strategy of Model Building in Population Biology (1966). Quarterly Review of Biology, 68, 533–546. doi: 10.1086/418301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perrin, Jean 1916. Atoms, New York: D. van Nostrand.
   Google Scholar
• Pinnick, Cassandra, & Gale, George 2000. Philosophy of Science and History of Science: A Troubling Interaction. Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 31, 109–125. doi: 10.1023/A:1008353021407
   Google Scholar
• Pitt, Joseph C. 2001. The Dilemma of Case Studies: Toward a Heraclitian Philosophy of Science. Perspectives on Science, 9, 373–382. doi: 10.1162/106361401760375785
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, Nicolas 1993. Facts, Artifacts, and Mesosomes: Practicing Epistemology with the Electron Microscope. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 24, 227–265. doi: 10.1016/0039-3681(93)90047-N
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, Nicholas 2001. Evolving Scientific Epistemologies and the Artifacts of Empirical Philosophy of Science: A Reply Concerning Mesosomes. Biology and Philosophy, 16, 627–652. doi: 10.1023/A:1012038815107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards, Robert J. 1993. Arguments in a Sartorial Mode, or the Asymmetries of History and Philosophy of Science. In PSA 1992: Proceedings of the 1992 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, edited by David Hull, Micky Forbes, & Kathleen Okruhlik, vol. 2, 482–489. East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association.
   Google Scholar
• Salmon, Wesley C. 1984. Scientific Explanation and the Causal Structure of the World, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sober, Elliott 1989. Independent Evidence About a Common Cause. Philosophy of Science, 56, 275–287. doi: 10.1086/289487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soler, Léna 2012. Introduction: The Solidity of Scientific Achievements: Structure of the Problem, Difficulties, Philosophical Implications. In Characterizing the Robustness of Science: After the Practice Turn in Philosophy of Science, edited by Léna Soler, Emiliano Trizio, Thomas Nickles, & William C. Wimsatt, 1–60. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Soler, Léna, Trizio, Emiliano, Nickles, Thomas, & Wimsatt, William C., eds 2012. Characterizing the Robustness of Science: After the Practice Turn in Philosophy of Science, Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Staley, Kent W. 2004. Robust Evidence and Secure Evidence Claims. Philosophy of Science, 71, 467–488. doi: 10.1086/423748
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staley, Kent W. 2010. Using Inferential Robustness to Establish the Security of an Evidence Claim. PhilSci-Archive, , . http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/8809
   Google Scholar
• Stegenga, Jacob 2009. Robustness, Discordance, and Relevance. Philosophy of Science, 76, 650–661.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trizio, Emiliano 2012. Achieving Robustness to Confirm Controversial Hypotheses: A Case Study in Cell Biology. In Characterizing the Robustness of Science: After the Practice Turn in Philosophy of Science, edited by Léna Soler, Emiliano Trizio, Thomas Nickles,, & William C. Wimsatt, 105–120. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• van Fraassen, Bas C. 2009. The Perils of Perrin, in the Hands of Philosophers. Philosophical Studies, 143, 5–25. doi: 10.1007/s11098-008-9319-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, Marcel 2005. Philosophy of Experimental Biology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weisberg, Michael 2006. Robustness Analysis. Philosophy of Science, 73, 730–742. doi: 10.1086/518628
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wimsatt, William C. 1981. Robustness, Reliability, and Overdetermination. In Scientific Inquiry and the Social Sciences, edited by Marilynn B. Brewer, & Barry E. Collins, 124–163. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Wimsatt, William C. 2007. Re-engineering Philosophy for Limited Beings, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Woodward, James 2006. Some Varieties of Robustness. Journal of Economic Methodology, 13, 219–240. doi: 10.1080/13501780600733376
   Google Scholar