Pragmatism, Bohr, and the Copenhagen Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics

References

• Ayer, A. J. 1952. Language, Truth and Logic. New York: Dover.
   Google Scholar
• Ayer, A. J., ed. 1959. Logical Positivism. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beller, M. 1999. Quantum Dialogue: The Making of a Revolution. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bohr, N. 1925. “Atomic Theory and Mechanics.” In Philosophical Writings of Niels Bohr, edited by J. Faye and H. J. Folse, vol. 1, 25–51. Woodbridge, CT: Ox Bow Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bohr, N. 1929. “Introductory Survey.” In Philosophical Writings of Niels Bohr, edited by J. Faye and H. J. Folse, vol. 1, 1–24. Woodbridge, CT: Ox Bow Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bohr, N. 1934. “Atomic Theory and the Description of Nature.” In Philosophical Writings of Niels Bohr, edited by J. Faye and H. J. Folse, vol. 1, 92–101. Woodbridge, CT: Ox Bow Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bohr, N. 1935. “Can Quantum-mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?” Physical Review 48: 696–702. doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.48.696
   Google Scholar
• Bohr, N. 1937. “Causality and Complementarity.” In Philosophical Writings of Niels Bohr, edited by J. Faye and H. J. Folse, vol. 4, 83–91. Woodbridge, CT: Ox Bow Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bohr, N. 1948. “On the Notions of Causality and Complementarity.” In Philosophical Writings of Niels Bohr, edited by J. Faye and H. J. Folse, vol. 4, 141–148. Woodbridge, CT: Ox Bow Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bohr, N. 1949. “Discussion with Einstein on Epistemological Problems in Atomic Physics.” In Philosophical Writings of Niels Bohr, edited by J. Faye and H. J. Folse, vol. 2, 32–66. Woodbridge, CT: Ox Bow Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bohr, N. 1963. Essays 1958–1962 on Atomic Physics and Human Knowledge. New York: Interscience.
   Google Scholar
• Bohr, N. 1972–2008. Collected Works. 13 vols. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Carnap, R. 1937. Logical Syntax of Language. Translated by A. Smeaton. London: Kegan, Paul, Trench, Teubner & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Carnap, R. 1963. “Intellectual Autobiography.” In The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap, edited by P. A. Schilpp, 3–84. LaSalle: Open Court.
   Google Scholar
• Faye, J. 1991. Niels Bohr: His Heritage and Legacy. An Anti-realist View of Quantum Mechanics. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Faye, J. 2008. “Copenhagen Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by E. N. Zalta. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/qm-copenhagen. Accessed 15 February 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Hookway, C. 2008. “Pragmatism.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by E. N. Zalta. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/pragmatism. Accessed 15 February 2013.
   Google Scholar
• James, W. [1907] 1975. Pragmatism: A New Name for Some Old Ways of Thinking. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lindley, D. 1996. Where Does the Weirdness Go? Why Quantum Mechanics Is Strange, But Not As Strange As You Think. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Murdoch, D. 1987. Niels Bohr’s Philosophy of Physics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peirce, C. S. [1878] 1992. “How to Make Our Ideas Clear.” In The Essential Peirce, edited by N. Houser and C. Kloesel, vol. 1, 124–141. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peirce, C. S. 1931–1935. Collected Papers, edited by C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss, and A. W. Burks. 8 vols. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Petersen, A. 1963. “The Philosophy of Niels Bohr.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 19 (7): 8–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Post, H. R. 1971. “Correspondence, Invariance and Heuristics: In Praise of Conservative Induction.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 2: 213–255. doi: 10.1016/0039-3681(71)90042-2
   Google Scholar
• Radder, H. 1991. “Heuristics and the Generalized Correspondence Principle.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 42: 195–226. doi: 10.1093/bjps/42.2.195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar