Natural Selection Does Care about Truth

References

• Beilby, J. K., ed. 2002. Naturalism Defeated? Essays on Plantinga's Evolutionary Argument against Naturalism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blancke, S., J. De Smedt, H. De Cruz, M. Boudry, and J. Braeckman. 2012. “The Implications of the Cognitive Sciences for the Relation Between Religion and Science Education: The Case of Evolutionary Theory.” Science and Education 21: 1167–1184. doi: 10.1007/s11191-011-9402-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boudry, M. 2013. “Alvin Plantinga: Where the Conflict Really Lies. Science, Religion and Naturalism.” Science and Education 22: 1219–1227. doi: 10.1007/s11191-012-9516-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd, R., P. J. Richerson, and J. Henrich. 2011. “The Cultural Niche: Why Social Learning Is Essential for Human Adaptation.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108: 10918–10925. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1100290108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Childers, G. 2011. “What's Wrong with the Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism?” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 69: 193–204. doi: 10.1007/s11153-010-9272-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clendinnen, F. J. 1989. “Evolutionary Explanation and the Justification of Belief.” In Issues in Evolutionary Epistemology, edited by K. Hahlweg and C. A. Hooker, 458–474. Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clifford, W. K. [1877] 1999. The Ethics of Belief and Other Essays, edited by T. Madigan. Amherst, MA: Prometheus Books.
   Google Scholar
• De Cruz, H. 2008. “An Extended Mind Perspective on Natural Number Representation.” Philosophical Psychology 21: 475–490. doi: 10.1080/09515080802285289
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Cruz, H., M. Boudry, J. De Smedt, and S. Blancke. 2011. “Evolutionary Approaches to Epistemic Justification.” Dialectica 65: 517–535. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-8361.2011.01283.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fales, E. 1996. “Plantinga's Case Against Naturalistic Epistemology.” Philosophy of Science 63: 432–451. doi: 10.1086/289920
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fales, E. 2002. “Darwin's Doubt, Calvin's Calvary.” In Naturalism Defeated? Essays on Plantinga’s Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism, edited by J. K. Beilby, 43–58. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer, G. 2008. Rationality for Mortals: How People Cope with Uncertainty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haselton, M. G., and D. M. Buss. 2000. “Error Management Theory: A New Perspective on Biases in Cross-sex Mind Reading.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 78: 81–91. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.78.1.81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. 2011. Thinking, Fast and Slow. London: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Kelemen, D., and E. Rosset. 2009. “The Human Function Compunction: Teleological Explanation in Adults.” Cognition 111: 138–143. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.01.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law, S. 2012. “Naturalism, Evolution and True Belief.” Analysis 72: 41–48. doi: 10.1093/analys/anr130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, M. 1997. “Plantinga on Functions and the Theory of Evolution.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 75: 83–98. doi: 10.1080/00048409712347691
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCauley, R. N. 2011. Why Religion Is Natural and Science Is Not. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McKay, R. T., and D. C. Dennett. 2009. “The Evolution of Misbelief.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32: 493–561. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X09990975
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plantinga, A. 1993. Warrant and Proper Function. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Plantinga, A. 2000. Warranted Christian Belief. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Plantinga, A. 2002. “Reply to Beilby's Cohorts.” In Naturalism Defeated? Essays on Plantinga’s Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism, edited by J. K. Beilby, 204–275. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Plantinga, A. 2011a. “Content and Natural Selection.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 83: 435–458. doi: 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2010.00444.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plantinga, A. 2011b. Where the Conflict Really Lies: Science, Religion, and Naturalism. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Plantinga, A., and M. Tooley. 2008. Knowledge of God. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Reiss, M. J. 2009. “The Relationship Between Evolutionary Biology and Religion.” Evolution 63: 1934–1941. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00714.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterelny, K. 2010. “Minds: Extended or Scaffolded?” Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 9: 465–481. doi: 10.1007/s11097-010-9174-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stich, S. P. 1990. The Fragmentation of Reason: Preface to a Pragmatic Theory of Cognitive Evaluation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tomasello, M. 2001. “Cultural Transmission: A View from Chimpanzees and Human Infants.” Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology 32: 135–146. doi: 10.1177/0022022101032002002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vlerick, M. 2012. “How Can Human Beings Transgress Their Biologically Based Views?” South African Journal of Philosophy 31: 707–735.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkins, J. S., and P. E. Griffiths. 2012. “Evolutionary Debunking Arguments in Three Domains.” In A New Science of Religion, edited by G. Dawes and J. Maclaurin, 133–146. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar