Ceteris Paribus Laws: A Naturalistic Account

References

• Bailer-Jones, Daniela M. 2002. “Scientists’ Thoughts on Scientific Models.” Perspectives on Science 10: 275–301. doi: 10.1162/106361402321899069
   Google Scholar
• Cartwright, Nancy. 1980a. “Do the Laws of Physics State the Facts?” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 80: 75–84.
   Google Scholar
• Cartwright, Nancy. 1980b. “The Truth Doesn't Explain Much.” American Philosophical Quarterly 17: 159–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cartwright, Nancy. 1983. How the Laws of Physics Lie. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cartwright, Nancy. 2002. “In Favor of Laws that Are Not Ceteris Paribus After All.” Erkenntnis 57: 425–439. doi: 10.1023/A:1021550815652
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cartwright, Nancy. 2007. Hunting Causes and Using Them. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cartwright, Nancy. 2009. “If No Capacities Then No Credible Worlds. But Can Models Reveal Capacities?” Erkenntnis 70: 45–58. doi: 10.1007/s10670-008-9136-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clogg, Clifford C., and Adamantios Haritou. 1997. “The Regression Method of Causal Inference and a Dilemma.” In Causality in Crisis? Statistical Methods and the Search for Causal Knowledge in the Social Sciences, edited by Vaughn R. McKim and Steven Turner, 83–112. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
   Google Scholar
• Creary, Lewis G. 1981. “Causal Explanation and the Reality of Natural Component Forces.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 62: 148–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Datteri, Edoardo, and Federico Laudisa. 2012. “Model Testing, Prediction and Experimental Protocols in Neuroscience: A Case Study.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 43: 602–610. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2012.04.001
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Earman, John, and John T. Roberts. 1999. “Ceteris Paribus, There Is No Problem of Provisos.” Synthese 118: 439–478. doi: 10.1023/A:1005106917477
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earman, John, John T. Roberts, and Sheldon Smith. 2002. “Ceteris Paribus Lost.” Erkenntnis 57: 281–301. doi: 10.1023/A:1021526110200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elgin, Mehmet. 2006. “There May Be Strict Empirical Laws in Biology, After All.” Biology and Philosophy 21: 119–134. doi: 10.1007/s10539-005-3177-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eliot, Christopher H. 2011. “Hempel's Provisos and Ceteris Paribus Clauses.” Journal for General Philosophy of Science 42: 207–218. doi: 10.1007/s10838-011-9161-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fodor, Jerry A. 1991. “You Can Fool Some of the People All of the Time, Everything Else Being Equal; Hedged Laws and Psychological Explanations.” Mind 100: 19–34. doi: 10.1093/mind/C.397.19
   Google Scholar
• Giere, Ronald N. 1988. “Laws, Theories, and Generalizations.” In The Limits of Deductivism, edited by Adolf Grünbaum and Wesley C. Salmon, 37–46. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giere, Ronald N. 1999. Science without Laws. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giere, Ronald N. 2004. “How Models Are Used to Represent Reality.” Philosophy of Science 71: 742–752. doi: 10.1086/425063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gildenhuys, Peter. 2010. “Causal Equations Without Ceteris Paribus Clauses.” Philosophy of Science 77: 608–632. doi: 10.1086/656021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillooly, James F., James H. Brown, Geoffrey B. West, Van M. Savage, and Eric L. Charnov. 2001. “Effects of Size and Temperature on Metabolic Rate.” Science 293: 2248–2251. doi: 10.1126/science.1061967
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glymour, Clark. 2002. “A Semantics and Methodology for Ceteris Paribus Hypotheses.” Erkenntnis 57: 395–405. doi: 10.1023/A:1021538530673
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haavelmo, Trygve. 1944. “The Probability Approach in Econometrics.” Econometrica 12: 1–115. doi: 10.2307/1906935
   Google Scholar
• Hausman, Daniel M. 1989. “Ceteris Paribus Clauses and Causality in Economics.” In PSA 1988: Proceedings of the 1988 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, edited by Arthur Fine and Jarrett Leplin, vol. 2, 308–317. East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association.
   Google Scholar
• Hausman, Daniel M. 1992. The Inexact and Separate Science of Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hempel, Carl G. 1988. “Provisos: A Problem Concerning the Inferential Function of Scientific Theories.” In The Limits of Deductivism, edited by Adolf Grünbaum and Wesley C. Salmon, 19–36. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, Austin Bradford. 1965. “The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation?” Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine 58: 295–300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoo, Ah-Fong, Matthias Henschen, Carol Dezateux, Kate Costeloe, and Janet Stocks. 1998. “Respiratory Function Among Preterm Infants Whose Mothers Smoked During Pregnancy.” American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 158: 700–705. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.158.3.9711057
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hori, Michio. 1993. “Frequency-dependent Natural Selection in the Handedness of Scale-eating Cichlid Fish.” Science 260: 216–219. doi: 10.1126/science.260.5105.216
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kincaid, Harold. 1996. Philosophical Foundations of the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kowalenko, Robert. 2009. “How (Not) to Think about Idealisation and Ceteris Paribus-laws.” Synthese 167: 183–201. doi: 10.1007/s11229-008-9310-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kowalenko, Robert. 2011. “The Epistemology of Hedged Laws.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 42: 445–452. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2011.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakatos, Imre. 1970. “Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes.” In Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, edited by Imre Lakatos and Alan Musgrave, 91–197. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lange, Marc. 1993. “Natural Laws and the Problem of Provisos.” Erkenntnis 38: 233–248. doi: 10.1007/BF01128982
   Google Scholar
• Lange, Marc. 2000. Natural Laws in Scientific Practice. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lange, Marc. 2002. “Who's Afraid of Ceteris-Paribus Laws? Or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Them.” Erkenntnis 57: 407–423. doi: 10.1023/A:1021546731582
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Chuang. 2004. “Laws and Models in a Theory of Idealization.” Synthese 138: 363–385. doi: 10.1023/B:SYNT.0000016425.36070.37
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lødrup Carlsen, K. C., J. J. Jaakkoka, P. Nafstad, and K. H. Carlsen. 1997. “In Utero Exposure to Cigarette Smoking Influences Lung Function at Birth.” European Respiratory Journal 10: 1774–1779. doi: 10.1183/09031936.97.10081774
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKim, Vaughn R., and Stephen P. Turner, eds. 1997. Causality in Crisis? Statistical Methods and the Search for Causal Knowledge in the Social Sciences. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morreau, Michael. 1999. “Other Things Being Equal.” Philosophical Studies 96: 163–182. doi: 10.1023/A:1004333008564
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mott, Peter. 1992. “Fodor and Ceteris Paribus Laws.” Mind 101: 335–346. doi: 10.1093/mind/101.402.335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mumford, Stephen. 1998. “Laws of Nature Outlawed.” Dialectica 52: 83–101. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-8361.1998.tb00043.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mumford, Stephen. 2005. “Laws and Lawlessness.” Synthese 144: 397–413. doi: 10.1007/s11229-005-5873-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pietroski, Paul, and Georges Rey. 1995. “When Other Things Aren't Equal: Saving Ceteris Paribus Laws from Vacuity.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 46: 81–110. doi: 10.1093/bjps/46.1.81
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiffer, Stephen. 1991. “Ceteris Paribus Laws.” Mind 100: 1–17. doi: 10.1093/mind/C.397.1
   Google Scholar
• Schurz, Gerhard. 2001a. “Pietroski and Rey on Ceteris Paribus Laws.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 52: 359–370. doi: 10.1093/bjps/52.2.359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schurz, Gerhard. 2001b. “What Is ‘Normal’? An Evolution-theoretic Foundation for Normic Laws and Their Relation to Statistical Normality.” Philosophy of Science 68: 476–497. doi: 10.1086/392938
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schurz, Gerhard. 2002. “Ceteris Paribus Laws: Classification and Deconstruction.” Erkenntnis 57: 351–372. doi: 10.1023/A:1021582327947
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scriven, Michael. 1961. “The Key Property of Physical Laws—Inaccuracy.” In Current Issues in the Philosophy of Science, edited by Herbert Feigl and Grover Maxwell, 91–101. New York: Holt, Reinhart and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Sheldon. 2002. “Violated Laws, Ceteris Paribus Clauses, and Capacities.” Synthese 130: 235–264. doi: 10.1023/A:1014422011637
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spurrett, David. 2001. “Cartwright on Laws and Composition.” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 15: 253–268. doi: 10.1080/02698590120080190
   Google Scholar
• Stick, S. M., P. R. Burton, L. Gurrin, P. D. Sly, and P. N. LeSouëf. 1996. “Effects of Maternal Smoking during Pregnancy and a Family History of Asthma on Respiratory Function in Newborn Infants.” Lancet 348: 1060–1064. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)04446-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• USDHHS. 2004. The Health Consequences of Smoking: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
   Google Scholar
• van Fraassen, Bas C. 1989. Laws and Symmetry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1929. “Some Remarks on Logical Form.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 9 (Suppl.): 162–171.
   Google Scholar
• Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1977. Remarks on Colour. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Woodward, James. 1997. “Explanation, Invariance, and Intervention.” Philosophy of Science 64 (Proceedings): S26–S41. doi: 10.1086/392584
   Google Scholar
• Woodward, James. 2000. “Explanation and Invariance in the Special Sciences.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51: 197–254. doi: 10.1093/bjps/51.2.197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodward, James. 2003. Making Things Happen: A Theory of Causal Explanation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wooldridge, Jeffrey M. 2009. Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach. 4th ed. Mason, OH: South-Western Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar