References
- Callender, C., and J. Cohen. 2006. “There Is No Special Problem About Scientific Representation.” Theoria 55: 7–25.
- Contessa, G. 2007. “Scientific Representation, Interpretation, and Surrogative Reasoning.” Philosophy of Science 74: 48–68. doi: 10.1086/519478
- Contessa, G. 2010. “Scientific Models and Fictional Objects.” Synthese 172: 215–229. doi: 10.1007/s11229-009-9503-2
- Daitz, E. 1956. “The Picture Theory of Meaning.” In Essays in Conceptual Analysis, edited by A. Flew, 53–74. London: Macmillan.
- Duhem, P. 1954. The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory. Translated by P. P. Wiener. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Freeman, W. J. 1991. “The Physiology of Perception.” Scientific American 264 (2): 78–85. doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican0291-78
- Frigg, R. 2010. “Models and Fiction.” Synthese 172: 251–268.
- Goodman, N. 1976. Languages of Art. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.
- Grice, P. 1989. Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Harman, G. 1973. Thought. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Hesse, M. B. 1966. Models and Analogies in Science. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
- Hughes, R. I. G. 1997. “Models and Representation.” Philosophy of Science 64 (Proceedings): S325–S336. doi: 10.1086/392611
- Keller, E. F. 2002. Making Sense of Life: Explaining Biological Development with Models, Metaphors, and Machines. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Kuhn, T. S. 1977. “Objectivity, Value Judgment, and Theory Choice.” In T. S. Kuhn, The Essential Tension: Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change, 320–339. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
- Liu, C. 1997. “Models and Theories I: The Semantic View Revisited.” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 11: 147–164. doi: 10.1080/02698599708573560
- Locke, J. [1690] 1979. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
- Morgan, M. S., and M. Morrison, eds. 1999. Models as Mediators: Perspectives on Natural and Social Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Nozick, R. 2001. Invariance: The Structure of the Objective World. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Rowbottom, D. P. 2009. “Models in Biology and Physics: What's the Difference?” Foundations of Science 14: 281–294. doi: 10.1007/s10699-009-9160-4
- Siegel, S. 2011. The Contents of Visual Experience. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Suárez, M. 2003. “Scientific Representation: Against Similarity and Isomorphism.” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 17: 226–244.
- Suárez, M. 2004. “An Inferential Conception of Scientific Representation.” Philosophy of Science 71: 767–779. doi: 10.1086/421415
- Suárez, M. 2010. “Scientific Representation.” Philosophy Compass 5: 91–101. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-9991.2009.00261.x
- Suppe, F. 1989. The Semantic Conception of Theories and Scientific Realism. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
- Teller, P. 2001. “Twilight of the Perfect Model Model.” Erkenntnis 55: 393–415. doi: 10.1023/A:1013349314515
- Toon, A. 2010. “Models as Make-believe.” In Beyond Mimesis and Convention: Representation in Art and Science, edited by R. Frigg and M. C. Hunter, 71–96. Dordrecht: Springer.
- van Fraassen, B. C. 1980. The Scientific Image. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
- van Fraassen, B. C. 2008. Scientific Representation: Paradoxes of Perspective. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
![Supercharge Your Next Research Paper: Research and write your next paper with Jenni AI.]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/112441/MPU-humanities-jenniai.png"})