References
- Buckwalter, W., and J. Schaffer. 2015. “Knowledge, Stakes, and Mistakes.” Noûs 49: 201–234. doi: 10.1111/nous.12017
- DeRose, K. 2009. The Case for Contextualism. New York: Oxford University Press.
- DeRose, K. 2011. “Contextualism, Contrastivism, and X-Phi Surveys.” Philosophical Studies 156: 81–110. doi: 10.1007/s11098-011-9799-x
- Gerken, M. 2012. “On the Cognitive Bases of Knowledge Ascriptions.” In Knowledge Ascriptions, edited by J. Brown and M. Gerken, 140–170. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Gerken, M. 2013. “Epistemic Focal Bias.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 91: 41–61. doi: 10.1080/00048402.2011.631020
- Hawthorne, J. 2004. Knowledge and Lotteries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Nagel, J. 2010. “Knowledge Ascriptions and the Psychological Consequences of Thinking About Error.” Philosophical Quarterly 60: 286–306. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9213.2009.624.x
- Pinillos, A. 2012. “Knowledge, Experiments, and Practical Interests.” In Knowledge Ascriptions, edited by J. Brown and M. Gerken, 193–220. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Rysiew, P. 2001. “The Context-sensitivity of Knowledge Attributions.” Noûs 35: 477–514. doi: 10.1111/0029-4624.00349
- Sripada, C. S., and J. Stanley. 2012. “Empirical Tests of Interest-relative Invariantism.” Episteme 9: 3–26. doi: 10.1017/epi.2011.2
- Turri, J. 2015. “Skeptical Appeal: The Source-content Bias.” Cognitive Science 39: 307–324. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12153
![Supercharge Your Next Research Paper: Research and write your next paper with Jenni AI.]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/112447/MPU-L1HU.png"})