How Inclusive Is European Philosophy of Science?

References

• Böhme, G., and W. Schäfer. 1983. “Towards a Social Science of Nature.” In Finalization in Science: The Social Orientation of Scientific Progress, edited by W. Schäfer, 251–272. Dordrecht: Reidel.
   Google Scholar
• Briggle, A., and C. Mitcham. 2012. Science and Ethics: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, M. B. 2009. Science in Democracy: Expertise, Institutions, and Representation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cartieri, F., and A. Potochnik. 2014. “Toward Philosophy of Science's Social Engagement.” Erkenntnis 79: 901–916. doi: 10.1007/s10670-013-9535-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Day, M. 2008. The Philosophy of History: An Introduction. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Dehue, T. 2008. De depressie-epidemie. Over de plicht het lot in eigen hand te nemen. Amsterdam: Augustus.
   Google Scholar
• Delanty, G., and P. Strydom, eds. 2003. Philosophies of Social Science: The Classic and Contemporary Readings. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Derksen, M. 2001. “Discipline, Subjectivity and Personality: An Analysis of the Manuals of Four Psychological Tests.” History of the Human Sciences 14: 25–47. doi: 10.1177/095269510101400102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, H. 2009. Science, Policy, and the Value-free Ideal. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Forman, P. 2007. “The Primacy of Science in Modernity, of Technology in Postmodernity, and of Ideology in the History of Technology.” History and Technology 23: 1–152. doi: 10.1080/07341510601092191
   Google Scholar
• Galison, P. 2008. “Ten Problems in History and Philosophy of Science.” Isis 99: 111–124. doi: 10.1086/587536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzalez, W. J. 2015. “From the Characterization of ‘European Philosophy of Science’ to the Case of Philosophy of the Social Sciences.” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 29: 167–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heilbron, J. 2011. But What about the European Union of Scholars? Wassenaar: Netherlands Institute for Advanced Study. http://www.nias.knaw.nl/Publications/Uhlenbeck%20Lecture/29_Johan%20Heilbron. Accessed 25 November 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Hesse, M. B. 1980. Revolutions and Reconstructions in the Philosophy of Science. Brighton: Harvester Press.
   Google Scholar
• Horlings, E., T. Gurney, J. Deuten, and L. van Drooge. 2013. Patentaanvragen door kennisinstellingen. Den Haag: Rathenau Instituut.
   Google Scholar
• Iggers, G. G. 1997. Historiography in the Twentieth Century: From Scientific Objectivity to the Postmodern Challenge. Hanover, NH: Wesleyan University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Janich, P. 1998. “Was macht experimentelle Resultate empiriehaltig? Die methodisch-kulturalistische Theorie des Experiments.” In Experimental Essays—Versuche zum Experiment, edited by F. Steinle and M. Heidelberger, 93–112. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
   Google Scholar
• Kinzel, K. 2015. “Narrative and Evidence: How Can Case Studies from the History of Science Support Claims in the Philosophy of Science?” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 49: 48–57. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2014.12.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitcher, P. 2011. Science in a Democratic Society. Amherst, MA: Prometheus.
   Google Scholar
• Kohn, W., and L. J. Sham. 1965. “Self-Consistent Equations Including Exchange and Correlation Effects.” Physical Review 140: A1133–A1138. doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.140.A1133
   Google Scholar
• Koningsveld, H. 1976. Het verschijnsel wetenschap. Een inleiding tot de wetenschapsfilosofie. Meppel: Boom.
   Google Scholar
• Kourany, J. A. 2010. Philosophy of Science after Feminism. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kragh, H. 1987. An Introduction to the Historiography of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kroes, P. 2014. “Modern Science and Technology: Two Sides of a Coin.” In Building Bridges: Connecting Science, Technology and Philosophy, edited by H. W. de Regt and C. Kwa, 167–173. Amsterdam: VU University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. S. 1970a. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 2nd ed. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. S. 1970b. “Logic of Discovery or Psychology of Research?” In Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, edited by I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave, 1–23. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kunneman, H. [1986] 1990. Der Wahrheitstrichter. Habermas und die Postmoderne. Frankfurt: Campus.
   Google Scholar
• Kuukkanen, J.-M. 2013. “Kuhn's Legacy: Theoretical and Philosophical Study of History.” Topoi 32: 91–99. doi: 10.1007/s11245-012-9141-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laudan, L. 1984. Science and Values: The Aims of Science and Their Role in Scientific Debate. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laudan, R., L. Laudan, and A. Donovan. 1988. “Testing Theories of Scientific Change.” In Scrutinizing Science: Empirical Studies of Scientific Change, edited by A. Donovan, L. Laudan, and R. Laudan, 3–44. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Lenhard, J. 2014. “Disciplines, Models, and Computers: The Path to Computational Quantum Chemistry.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 48: 89–96. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2014.05.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leuschner, A. 2012. “(Un)politische Wissenschaftsphilosophie im 20. Jahrhundert.” Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 60: 285–295. doi: 10.1524/dzph.2012.0020
   Google Scholar
• Longino, H. E. 1990. Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Longino, H. E. 1995. “Gender, Politics, and the Theoretical Virtues.” Synthese 104: 383–397. doi: 10.1007/BF01064506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenz, C. 1990. De constructie van het verleden. Meppel: Boom.
   Google Scholar
• Lorenz, C. 1994. “Historical Knowledge and Historical Reality: A Plea for ‘Internal Realism’.” History and Theory 33: 297–327. doi: 10.2307/2505476
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahner, M. 2007. “Demarcating Science from Non-science.” In General Philosophy of Science: Focal Issues, edited by T. A. F. Kuipers, 515–575. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Mauskopf, S., and W. Schmaltz, eds. 2012. Integrating History and Philosophy of Science: Problems and Prospects. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• McAllister, J. W. 2008. “Editorial: Contours of a European Philosophy of Science.” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 22: 1–3. doi: 10.1080/02698590802280852
   Google Scholar
• Meijers, A., ed. 2009. Philosophy of Technology and Engineering Sciences. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Mladenović, B. 2007. “‘Muckraking in History’: The Role of History of Science in Kuhn's Philosophy.” Perspectives on Science 15: 261–294. doi: 10.1162/posc.2007.15.3.261
   Google Scholar
• Mody, C. C. M. 2011. “Climbing the Hill: Seeing (and Not Seeing) Epochal Breaks from Multiple Vantage Points.” In Science Transformed? Debating Claims of an Epochal Break, edited by A. Nordmann, H. Radder, and G. Schiemann, 54–65. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nickles, T. 1986. “Remarks on the Use of History as Evidence.” Synthese 69: 253–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordmann, A., H. Radder, and G. Schiemann, eds. 2011. Science Transformed? Debating Claims of an Epochal Break. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• PFHS. 2009. “ Philosophical Foundations of the Historiography of Science.” Universiteit Leiden. http://www.hum.leiden.edu/philosophy/research/philosophical-foundations. Accessed 25 November 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Quine, W. V. O. 1990. Pursuit of Truth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Radder, H. [1984] 2012. The Material Realization of Science: From Habermas to Experimentation and Referential Realism. 2nd ed. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Radder, H. 1996. In and About the World: Philosophical Studies of Science and Technology. Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Radder, H. 1997. “Philosophy and History of Science: Beyond the Kuhnian Paradigm.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 28: 633–655. doi: 10.1016/S0039-3681(97)00015-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radder, H. 1998. “The Politics of STS.” Social Studies of Science 28: 325–331. doi: 10.1177/030631298028002005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radder, H. 2006. The World Observed/The World Conceived. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Radder, H. 2009a. “Introduction to Part I.” In Philosophy of Technology and Engineering Sciences, edited by A. Meijers, 23–25. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Radder, H. 2009b. “Science, Technology and the Science–Technology Relationship.” In Philosophy of Technology and Engineering Sciences, edited by A. Meijers, 65–91. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Radder, H. 2009c. “Why Technologies Are Inherently Normative.” In Philosophy of Technology and Engineering Sciences, edited by A. Meijers, 887–921. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Radder, H., ed. 2010a. The Commodification of Academic Research: Science and the Modern University. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Radder, H. 2010b. “Mertonian Values, Scientific Norms, and the Commodification of Academic Research.” In The Commodification of Academic Research: Science and the Modern University, edited by H. Radder, 231–258. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Radder, H. 2013. “Exploring Philosophical Issues in the Patenting of Scientific and Technological Inventions.” Philosophy and Technology 26: 283–300. doi: 10.1007/s13347-013-0109-8
   Google Scholar
• Raphael, L. 2003. Geschichtswissenschaft im Zeitalter der Extreme: Theorien, Methoden, Tendenzen von 1900 bis zur Gegenwart. München: Beck.
   Google Scholar
• Resnik, D. B. 2010. “Financial Interests and the Norms of Academic Science.” In The Commodification of Academic Research: Science and the Modern University, edited by H. Radder, 65–89. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rouse, J. 1987. Knowledge and Power: Toward a Political Philosophy of Science. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sarkar, S., and J. Pfeifer, eds. 2006. The Philosophy of Science: An Encyclopedia. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schickore, J. 2011. “More Thoughts on HPS: Another 20 Years Later.” Perspectives on Science 19: 453–481. doi: 10.1162/POSC_a_00049
   Google Scholar
• Sterckx, S. 2010. “Knowledge Transfer from Academia to Industry through Patenting and Licensing: Rhetoric and Reality.” In The Commodification of Academic Research: Science and the Modern University, edited by H. Radder, 44–64. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wolters, G. 2015. “Globalized Parochialism: Consequences of English as Lingua Franca in Philosophy of Science.” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 29: 189–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyatt, S., A. Harris, S. Adams, and S. E. Kelly. 2013. “Illness Online: Self-reported Data and Questions of Trust in Medical and Social Research.” Theory, Culture and Society 30: 131–150. doi: 10.1177/0263276413485900
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyatt, S., A. Scharnhorst, A. Beaulieu, and P. Wouters. 2013. “Introduction to Virtual Knowledge.” In Virtual Knowledge: Experimenting in the Humanities and the Social Sciences, edited by P. Wouters, A. Beaulieu, A. Scharnhorst, and S. Wyatt, 1–23. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yoshida, Y. 2012. “Re-politicising Philosophy of Science: A Continuing Challenge for Social Epistemology.” Social Epistemology 26: 365–378. doi: 10.1080/02691728.2012.727190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar