From the Characterization of ‘European Philosophy of Science’ to the Case of Philosophy of the Social Sciences

References

• Andersen, H., D. Dieks, W. J. Gonzalez, T. Uebel, and G. Wheeler, eds. 2013. New Challenges to Philosophy of Science. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Anscombe, G. E. M. 1957. Intention. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Apel, K. O. [1979] 1984. Understanding and Explanation: A Transcendental–Pragmatic Perspective. Translated by G. Warnke. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Apel, K. O. 1985. “La ‘distinción’ diltheyana entre explicación y comprensión y la posibilidad de ‘mediación’ entre ambas.” Teorema 15: 95–114.
   Google Scholar
• Blaug, M. 1980. The Methodology of Economics: Or How Economists Explain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blaug, M. 1994. “Why I Am Not a Constructivist: Confessions of an Unrepentant Popperian.” In New Directions in Economic Methodology, edited by R. E. Backhouse, 109–136. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dieks, D., W. J. Gonzalez, S. Hartmann, M. Stöltzner, and M. Weber, eds. 2012. Probabilities, Laws, and Structures. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Dieks, D., W. J. Gonzalez, S. Hartmann, T. Uebel, and M. Weber, eds. 2011. Explanation, Prediction, and Confirmation. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Dilthey, W. [1883] 1962. Einleitung in die Geisteswissenschaften. In W. Dilthey, Gesammelte Schriften, vol. 1. 5th ed. Stuttgart: Teubner-Vaudenhoeck und Ruprecht.
   Google Scholar
• Dray, W. 1957. Laws and Explanation in History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dray, W. 1964. Philosophy of History. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Droysen, J. G. [1858] 1958. “Grundriss der Historik.” In J. G. Droysen, Historik. Vorlesungen über Enzyklopädie und Methodologie der Geschichte. 3rd ed. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
   Google Scholar
• Dummett, M. [1963] 1978. “Realism”. In M. Dummett, Truth and Other Enigmas, 145–165. London: Duckworth.
   Google Scholar
• Dummett, M. 1982. “Realism.” Synthese 52: 55–112. doi: 10.1007/BF00485255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fetzer, J., ed. 2000. Science, Explanation, and Rationality: The Philosophy of Carl G. Hempel. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frigg, R., and I. Votsis. 2011. “Everything You Always Wanted to Know About Structural Realism but Were Afraid to Ask.” European Journal for Philosophy of Science 1: 227–276. doi: 10.1007/s13194-011-0025-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gadamer, H. G. [1960] 1986. Wahrheit und Methode. 5th ed. Tubingen: J. C. B. Mohr.
   Google Scholar
• Gadamer, H. G. 1976. Vernunft im Zeitalter der Wissenschaft. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Gadamer, H. G. 1989. Das Erbe Europas. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Galavotti, M. C., D. Dieks, W. J. Gonzalez, S. Hartmann, T. Uebel, and M. Weber, eds. 2014. New Directions in the Philosophy of Science. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Galavotti, M. C., E. Nemeth, and F. Stadler, eds. 2014. European Philosophy of Science: Philosophy of Science in Europe and the Viennese Heritage. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Gayon, J. 2009. “Philosophy of Biology: An Historico-critical Characterization.” In French Studies in the Philosophy of Science: Contemporary Research in France, edited by A. Brenner and J. Gayon, 201–212. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. 1987. Social Theory and Modern Sociology. Oxford: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. 1993. New Rules of Sociological Method, 2nd ed. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalez, W. J. 1984. “La interpretación historicista de las Ciencias Sociales.” Anales de Filosofía 2: 109–137.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalez, W. J. 1990. “Semántica anti-realista: Intuicionismo matemático y concepto de verdad.” Theoria 12/13: 149–170.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalez, W. J. 1991. “Intuitionistic Mathematics and Wittgenstein.” History and Philosophy of Logic 12: 167–183. doi: 10.1080/01445349108837183
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalez, W. J. 1995. “Reichenbach's Concept of Prediction.” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 9: 37–58. doi: 10.1080/02698599508573505
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalez, W. J. 1996. “Caracterización del objeto de la Ciencia de la Historia y bases de su configuración metodológica.” In Acción e Historia. El objeto de la Historia y la Teoría de la Acción, edited by W. J. Gonzalez, 25–111. A Coruña: Publicaciones Universidad de A Coruña.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalez, W. J. 2003. “From Erklären–Verstehen to Prediction–Understanding: The Methodological Framework in Economics.” In Realism in Action: Essays in the Philosophy of Social Sciences, edited by M. Sintonen, P. Ylikoski, and K. Miller, 33–50. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalez, W. J. 2005. “The Philosophical Approach to Science, Technology and Society.” In Science, Technology and Society: A Philosophical Perspective, edited by W. J. Gonzalez, 3–49. A Coruña: Netbiblo.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalez, W. J. 2008. “Rationality and Prediction in the Sciences of the Artificial: Economics as a Design Science.” In Reasoning, Rationality, and Probability, edited by M. C. Galavotti, R. Scazzieri, and P. Suppes, 165–186. Stanford, CA: CSLI.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalez, W. J. 2010a. “Trends and Problems in Philosophy of Social and Cultural Sciences: A European Perspective.” In The Present Situation in the Philosophy of Science, edited by F. Stadler, D. Dieks, W. J. Gonzalez, S. Hartmann, T. Uebel, and M. Weber, 221–242. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalez, W. J. 2010b. “Explanation, Prediction, and Confirmation in the Social Sciences: Realm and Limits.” Journal for General Philosophy of Science 41: 389–394. doi: 10.1007/s10838-010-9128-7
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalez, W. J. 2011a. “Complexity in Economics and Prediction: The Role of Parsimonious Factors.” In Explanation, Prediction, and Confirmation, edited by D. Dieks, W. J. Gonzalez, S. Hartmann, T. Uebel, and M. Weber, 319–330. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalez, W. J. 2011b. “Conceptual Changes and Scientific Diversity: The Role of Historicity.” In Conceptual Revolutions: From Cognitive Science to Medicine, edited by W. J. Gonzalez, 39–62. A Coruña: Netbiblo.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalez, W. J. 2012. “Methodological Universalism in Science and Its Limits: Imperialism versus Complexity.” In Thinking about Provincialism in Thinking, edited by K. Brzechczyn and K. Paprzycka, 155–175. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalez, W. J. 2013a. “From the Sciences that Philosophy Has ‘Neglected’ to the New Challenges.” In New Challenges to Philosophy of Science, edited by D. Dieks, W. J. Gonzalez, T. Uebel, M. Weber, and G. Wheeler, 1–6. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalez, W. J. 2013b. “The Sciences of Design as Sciences of Complexity: The Dynamic Trait.” In New Challenges to Philosophy of Science, edited by H. Andersen, D. Dieks, W. J. Gonzalez, T. Uebel, and G. Wheeler, 299–311. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalez, W. J. 2013c. “The Roles of Scientific Creativity and Technological Innovation in the Context of Complexity of Science.” In Creativity, Innovation, and Complexity in Science, edited by W. J. Gonzalez, 11–40. A Coruña: Netbiblo.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalez, W. J. 2013d. “Value Ladenness and the Value-free Ideal in Scientific Research.” In Handbook of the Philosophical Foundations of Business Ethics, edited by C. Lütge, 1503–1521. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalez, W. J., ed. 2014. Bas van Fraassen's Approach to Representation and Models in Science. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalez, W. J. 2015. Philosophico-methodological Analysis of Prediction and Its Role in Economics. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hempel, C. G. [1942] 1965. “The Function of General Laws in History.” Reprinted in C. G. Hempel, Aspects of Scientific Explanation and Other Essays in the Philosophy of Science, 231–243. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hempel, C. G., and P. Oppenheim. [1948] 1965. “Studies in the Logic of Explanation.” Reprinted in C. G. Hempel, Aspects of Scientific Explanation and Other Essays in the Philosophy of Science, 245–295. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. S. 2000. The Road Since Structure: Philosophical Essays, 1970–1993, with an Autobiographical Interview, edited by J. Conant and J. Haugeland. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuipers, T. A. F. 2013. “Philosophy of Design Research.” In New Challenges to Philosophy of Science, edited by H. Andersen, D. Dieks, W. J. Gonzalez, T. Uebel, and G. Wheeler, 457–446. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lenk, H. 2011. “Methodological Higher-level Interdisciplinarity by Scheme-interpretationism: Against Methodological Separatism of the Natural, Social, and Human Sciences.” In Explanation, Prediction, and Confirmation, edited by D. Dieks, W. J. Gonzalez, S. Hartmann, T. Uebel, and M. Weber, 253–267. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lyre, H. 2010. “Humean Perspectives on Structural Realism.” In The Present Situation in the Philosophy of Science, edited by F. Stadler, D. Dieks, W. J. Gonzalez, S. Hartmann, T. Uebel, and M. Weber, 381–397. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Marchi, N. de, and M. Blaug, eds. 1991. Appraising Economic Theories. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Martínez, J. M. 1994. La Filosofía de las Ciencias Humanas y Sociales de H. G. Gadamer. Barcelona: PPU.
   Google Scholar
• McCloskey, D. N. 1985. The Rhetoric of Economics. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCloskey, D. N. 1994. Knowledge and Persuasion in Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Niiniluoto, I. 1993. “The Aim and Structure of Applied Research.” Erkenntnis 38: 1–21. doi: 10.1007/BF01129020
   Google Scholar
• Niiniluoto, I. 1995. “Approximation in Applied Science.” In Idealization VII: Structuralism, Idealization and Approximation, edited by M. Kuokkanen, 127–139. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
   Google Scholar
• Niiniluoto, I. 2013. “On the Philosophy of Applied Social Sciences.” In New Challenges to Philosophy of Science, edited by H. Andersen, D. Dieks, W. J. Gonzalez, T. Uebel, and G. Wheeler, 265–274. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ortega y Gasset, J. 1946–1983. Obras completas, edited by P. Garagorri. 12 vols. Madrid: Revista de Occidente/Alianza Editorial.
   Google Scholar
• Özel, H. 2003. “Closing Open Systems: Two Examples for the ‘Double Hermeneutic’ in Economics.” METU Studies in Development 30: 223–248.
   Google Scholar
• Popper, K. R. 1957. The Poverty of Historicism. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Popper, K. R. 1966. The Open Society and Its Enemies. 5th ed. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Popper, K. R. [1969] 1994. “The Moral Responsibility of the Scientist.” Reprinted in K. R. Popper, The Myth of the Framework: In Defence of Science and Rationality, 121–129. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Raley, H. C. 1971. José Ortega y Gasset: Philosopher of European Unity. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reichenbach, H. 1936. “Logistic Empiricism in Germany and the Present State of Its Problems.” Journal of Philosophy 33: 141–160. doi: 10.2307/2015405
   Google Scholar
• Reichenbach, H. 1938. Experience and Prediction. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rescher, N. 1992–1994. A System of Pragmatic Idealism. 3 vols. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rescher, N. 2012. Pragmatism: The Restoration of Its Scientific Roots. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, A. 1992. Economics—Mathematical Politics or Science of Diminishing Returns? Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rouse, J. 1987. Knowledge and Power: Toward a Political Philosophy of Science. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Salmon, W. C. 1990. Four Decades of Scientific Explanation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schurz, G., ed. 1988. Erklären und Verstehen in der Wissenschaft. Munich: Oldenbourg.
   Google Scholar
• Shrader-Frechette, K. 2005. “Objectivity and Professional Duties Regarding Science and Technology.” In Science, Technology and Society: A Philosophical Perspective, edited by W. J. Gonzalez, 51–79. Netbiblo: A Coruña.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. 1998. “Economics as a Historical Science.” Theoria 13: 241–260.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, C. P. [1959] 2012. The Two Cultures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spohn, W. 2011. “Normativity Is the Key to the Difference Between the Human and the Natural Sciences.” In Explanation, Prediction, and Confirmation, edited by D. Dieks, W. J. Gonzalez, S. Hartmann, T. Uebel, and M. Weber, 241–251. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Stadler, F. 2014. “History and Philosophy of Science: Between Description and Construction.” In New Directions in the Philosophy of Science, edited by M. C. Galavotti, D. Dieks, W. J. Gonzalez, S. Hartmann, T. Uebel, and M. Weber, 747–767. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Stadler, F., D. Dieks, W. J. Gonzalez, S. Hartmann, T. Uebel, and M. Weber, eds. 2010. The Present Situation in the Philosophy of Science. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Steering Committee. 2006. The Philosophy of Science in a European Perspective. Proposal submitted to the European Science Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Suppe, F. 1977. “The Search for Philosophic Understanding of Scientific Theories.” In The Structure of Scientific Theories, edited by F. Suppe, 1–241. 2nd ed. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. 1964. The Explanation of Behaviour. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. 1980. “Understanding in Human Science.” Review of Metaphysics 34: 25–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. 1981. “Understanding and Explanation in the Geisteswissenschaften.” In Wittgenstein: To Follow a Rule, edited by S. H. Holtzman and C. M. Leich, 191–210. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. 1985a. Philosophy and the Human Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. 1985b. Human Agency and Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Toulmin, S. E. 1953. The Philosophy of Science: An Introduction. London: Hutchinson.
   Google Scholar
• van Fraassen, B. C. 1988. “Die Pragmatik des Erklärens.” In Erklären und Verstehen in der Wissenschaft, edited by G. Schurz, 31–56. Munich: Oldenbourg.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M. [1904] 1968. “‘Objectivity’ in Social Science and Social Policy.” In M. Weber, The Methodology of the Social Sciences, edited by E. A. Shils and H. A. Finch, 50–112. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M. [1917] 1968. “The Meaning of ‘Ethical Neutrality’ in Sociology and Economics.” In M. Weber, The Methodology of the Social Sciences, edited by E. A. Shils and H. A. Finch, 1–47. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Winch, P. 1958. The Idea of Social Science and Its Relation to Philosophy. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Wittgenstein, L. 1953. Philosophical Investigations. Translated by G. E. M. Anscombe. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Worrall, J. 1989. “Structural Realism: The Best of Both Worlds?” Dialectica 43: 99–124. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-8361.1989.tb00933.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worrall, J. 2006. “Why Randomize? Evidence and Ethics in Clinical Trials.” In Contemporary Perspectives in Philosophy and Methodology of Science, edited by W. J. Gonzalez and J. Alcolea, 65–82. A Coruña: Netbiblo.
   Google Scholar
• Worrall, J. 2007. “Why There's No Cause to Randomize.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 58: 451–488. doi: 10.1093/bjps/axm024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worrall, J. 2011. “The No Miracles Intuition and the No Miracles Argument.” In Explanation, Prediction, and Confirmation, edited by D. Dieks, W. J. Gonzalez, S. Hartmann, T. Uebel, and M. Weber, 11–21. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, G. H. von. 1971. Explanation and Understanding. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yeo, R. 1993. Defining Science: William Whewell, Natural Knowledge and Public Debate in Early Victorian Britain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar