Is There a Cultural Barrier Between Historical Epistemology and Analytic Philosophy of Science?

References

• Andersen, Hanne, Dennis Dieks, Wenceslao J. Gonzalez, Thomas Uebel, and Gregory Wheeler, eds. 2013. New Challenges to Philosophy of Science. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bachelard, Gaston. [1928] 1987. Essai sur la connaissance approchée. Paris: Vrin.
   Google Scholar
• Bachelard, Gaston. 1929. La valeur inductive de la relativité. Paris: Vrin.
   Google Scholar
• Bachelard, Gaston. [1934] 1984. The New Scientific Spirit. Translated by Arthur Goldhammer. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braunstein, Jean-François. 2012. “Historical Epistemology, Old and New.” In Epistemology and History from Bachelard and Canguilhem to Today's History of Science. Berlin: Max-Planck-Institut für Wissenschaftsgeschichte. https://www.mpiwg-berlin.mpg.de/Preprints/P434.PDF.
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, Anastasios. 1987. “Pierre Duhem. De l'histoire des sciences à l’épistémologie historique.” PhD thesis, Université de Paris–Sorbonne.
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, Anastasios. 1990. Duhem. Science, réalité et apparence. Paris: Vrin.
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, Anastasios. 2003. Les origines françaises de la philosophie des sciences. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, Anastasios. 2006. “Quelle épistémologie historique? Kuhn, Feyerabend, Hacking et l’école bachelardienne.” Revue de métaphysique et de morale 49: 113–125. doi: 10.3917/rmm.061.0113
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, Anastasios. 2014. “Epistemology Historicized: The French Tradition.” In New Directions in the Philosophy of Science, edited by Maria Carla Galavotti, Dennis Dieks, Wenceslao J. Gonzalez, Stephan Hartmann, Thomas Uebel, and Marcel Weber, 727–736. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Canguilhem, Georges. [1943] 1989. The Normal and the Pathological. Translated by Carolyn R. Fawcett. New York: Zone Books.
   Google Scholar
• Canguilhem, Georges. [1958] 1968. “La philosophie biologique d'Auguste Comte et son influence en France au XIXe siècle.” In Georges Canguilhem, Études d'histoire et de philosophie des sciences, 61–74. Paris: Vrin.
   Google Scholar
• Canguilhem, Georges. [1963] 1968. “L'histoire des sciences dans l’œuvre épistémologique de Gaston Bachelard.” In Georges Canguilhem, Études d'histoire et de philosophie des sciences, 173–186. Paris: Vrin.
   Google Scholar
• Cavaillès, Jean. [1960] 1997. Sur la logique et la théorie de la science. Paris: Vrin.
   Google Scholar
• Dagognet, François. 1964. La raison et les remèdes. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
   Google Scholar
• Dagognet, François. 2009. “Pharmacology As a Philosophical Object.” In French Studies in the Philosophy of Science: Contemporary Research in France, edited by Anastasios Brenner and Jean Gayon, 189–200. Vienna: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Daston, Lorraine, and Elisabeth Lunbeck, eds. 2011. Histories of Scientific Observation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duhem, Pierre. 1905. “Paul Tannery.” Revue de philosophie 6: 216–230.
   Google Scholar
• Duhem, Pierre. 1906. La théorie physique, son objet et sa structure. Paris: Vrin.
   Google Scholar
• Feyerabend, Paul K. 1999. Conquest of Abundance: A Tale of Abstraction versus the Richness of Being. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, Philipp. 1910. “Abel Rey, Die Theorie der Physik bei den modernen Physikern.” Monatshefte für Mathematik und Physik 21: A43–A45. doi: 10.1007/BF01693296
   Google Scholar
• Frank, Philipp. 1949. Modern Science and Its Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gingras, Yves. 2010. “Naming Without Necessity: On the Genealogy and Uses of the Label ‘Historical Epistemology’.” Revue de synthèse 131: 439–454. doi: 10.1007/s11873-010-0124-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hacking, Ian. 2002. Historical Ontology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, Thomas S. 2000. “A Discussion with Thomas S. Kuhn.” In The Road Since Structure: Philosophical Essays, 1970–1993, with an Autobiographical Interview, edited by James Conant and John Haugeland, 255–323. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lecourt, Dominique. 1969. L’épistémologie historique de Gaston Bachelard. Paris: Vrin.
   Google Scholar
• Lecourt, Dominique. 1999. “Épistémologie.” In Dictionnaire d'histoire et philosophie des sciences, edited by Dominique Lecourt, 365–368. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
   Google Scholar
• Lecourt, Dominique. 2008. Georges Canguilhem. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
   Google Scholar
• Mormann, Thomas. 2013. “Topology as an Issue for History of Philosophy of Science.” In New Challenges to Philosophy of Science, edited by Hanne Andersen, Dennis Dieks, Wenceslao J. Gonzalez, Thomas Uebel, and Gregory Wheeler, 423–434. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Parrochia, Daniel. 2009. “French Philosophy of Technology.” In French Studies in the Philosophy of Science: Contemporary Research in France, edited by Anastasios Brenner and Jean Gayon, 51–70. Vienna: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, Hilary. 1981. Reason, Truth and History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rey, Abel. 1904. “Ce que devient la logique.” Revue philosophique de la France et de l’étranger 57: 612–625.
   Google Scholar
• Rey, Abel. 1907. La théorie de la physique chez les physiciens contemporains. Paris: Alcan.
   Google Scholar
• Rey, Abel. 1908a. La philosophie moderne. Paris: Flammarion.
   Google Scholar
• Rey, Abel. 1908b. Die Theorie der Physik bei den modernen Physikern. Leipzig: Klinkhardt.
   Google Scholar
• Rheinberger, Hans-Jörg. 2010. On Historicizing Epistemology. Translated by David Fernbach. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wolters, Gereon. 2014. “Is There a European Philosophy of Science? A Wake-up Call.” In Philosophy of Science in Europe—European Philosophy of Science and the Viennese Heritage, edited by Friedrich Stadler and Maria Carla Galavotti, 277–293. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar