A Critical Assessment of the Programmes of Producing ‘Islamic Science’ and ‘Islamisation of Science/Knowledge’

References

• Abaza, Mona. 2002. Debates on Islam and Knowledge in Malaysia and Egypt: Shifting Worlds. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Abu Sulayman, Abdul Hamid. 1994. Islamization: Reforming Contemporary Knowledge. Herndon, VI: International Institute of Islamic Thought.
   Google Scholar
• Agassi, Joseph. 1971. Faraday as a Natural Philosopher. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Agassi, Joseph. 1975. Science in Flux. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Akhtar, Navid. 2012. “The Future Is Halal.” http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b01m0pq2/The_Future_Is_Halal. Accessed 10 April 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Attas, Naquib. 1979. Aims and Objectives of Islamic Education. Jeddah: Hodder and Stoughton.
   Google Scholar
• Ariew, Roger. 2003. “Descartes and the Jesuits: Doubt, Novelty, and the Eucharist.” In Jesuit Science and the Republic of Letters, edited by Mordechai Feingold, 157–194. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bacon, Francis. [1620] 2000. The New Organon, edited by Lisa Jardine and Michael Silverthorne. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bagheri, Khosrow. [2003] 2012. Hoviyat-e ‘Elm-e Dini’ [The Identity of Religious Science]. Tehran: Sāzemān-e Chāp va Enteshārāt.
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Israel, Isaac. 1989. “Philosophy and Methodology of Intelligence: The Logic of Estimate Process.” Intelligence and National Security 4: 660–718. doi: 10.1080/02684528908432023
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, Clinton. 2005. Muslims and Modernity: An Introduction to the Issues and Debates. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Berlin, Isaiah. 1960. “History and Theory: The Concept of Scientific History.” History and Theory 1: 1–31. doi: 10.2307/2504255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betti, Emilio. 1980. “Hermeneutics as the General Methodology of the Geisteswissenschaften.” In Contemporary Hermeneutics: Hermeneutics as Method, Philosophy and Critique, edited by Josef Bleicher, 51–94. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Blaikie, Norman. 2007. Approaches to Social Enquiry: Advancing Knowledge. London: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Bleicher, Josef, ed. 1980. Contemporary Hermeneutics: Hermeneutics as Method, Philosophy and Critique. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bosah, Kosah. 2013. “Jumping a Car with AK-47’s Only in Yemen.” YouTube. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v = AWI8DkQ8Zdg. Accessed 10 October 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Bostan, Hossein, Aboulfazl Gaeini, Mohammad Fath-Ali Khani, and Mahmoud Rajabi. 2005. Gaami beh Souy-e Elm-e Dini: Saakhtaar va Emkaan-e Tajrobe-ye Elm-e Dini [Towards Religious Science: The Structure and Empirical Possibility of Religious Science]. Tehran: Pazhouheshgāh-e Howzeh va Dāneshgāh.
   Google Scholar
• Buchwald, Jed Z., and Robert Fox, eds. 2013. The Oxford Handbook of the History of Physics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, James. 1996. Religion and the Enlightenment from Descartes to Kant. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carnap, Rudolf. 1950. Logical Foundations of Probability. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Castells, Manuel. [1997] 2004. The Power of Identity. The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture. Vol. 2. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Chalmers, David. 1996. The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Collingwood, R. G. 1946. The Idea of History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Copleston, Frederick. [1963] 1994. A History of Philosophy. New York: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Eddington, Arthur S. 1928. The Nature of the Physical World. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Fara, Patricia. 2011. Newton: The Making of Genius. London: Picador.
   Google Scholar
• Force, James E., and Richard H. Popkin, eds. 1999. Newton and Religion: Context, Nature, and Influence. London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Friesen, John Paul. 2004. “The Reading of Newton in the Early Eighteenth Century: Tories and Newtonianism.” Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Leeds. http://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/889/1/uk_bl_ethos_406324.pdf. Accessed 22 October 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Furlow, Christopher. 1996. “The Islamization of Knowledge: Philosophy, Legitimation, and Politics.” Social Epistemology 10: 259–271. doi: 10.1080/02691729608578818
   Google Scholar
• Galison, Peter. 2004. Einstein’s Clocks, Poincaré’s Maps: The Empires of Time. New York: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Gillies, Donald. 1993. Philosophy of Science in the Twentieth Century: Four Central Themes. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Golshani, Mehdi. 2006. Az Elm-e Sekular ta Elm-e Dini [From Secular Science to Religious Science]. Tehran: Pazhouheshgāh-e Oloum-e Ensāni va Motāle’āt-e Farhangi.
   Google Scholar
• Grondin, Jean. 1994. Introduction to Philosophical Hermeneutics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hacking, Ian. 1983. Representing and Intervening: Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hacohen, Malachi Haim. 2002. Karl Popper—The Formative Years, 1902–1945: Politics and Philosophy in Interwar Vienna. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haneef, Muham Aslam. 2005. A Critical Survey of Islamization of Knowledge. Riyadh: Research Centre IIUM.
   Google Scholar
• Hasani, Seyyed Hamidreza, Mehdi Alipour, and Seyyed Mohammad Taqavi. 2006. Elm-e Dini: Didgah-ha va Molahezat [Religious Science: Perspectives and Reflections]. Tehran: Pazhouheshgāh-e Howzeh va Dāneshgāh.
   Google Scholar
• Heidegger, Martin. 1977. The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays. Translated by William Lovitt. New York: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Herschel, John. 1830. Preliminary Discourse on Natural Philosophy. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Hoodhboy, Pervez. 1991. Islam and Science: Religious Orthodoxy and the Battle for Rationality. London: Zed Press.
   Google Scholar
• Husserl, Edmund. [1913] 1982. Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy—First Book: General Introduction to a Pure Phenomenology. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff.
   Google Scholar
• Ihde, Don. 1991. Instrumental Realism: Interface Between Philosophy of Science and Technology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• International Institute of Islamic Thought. [1982] 1988. Islam: Source and Purpose of Knowledge. Herndon, VI: International Institute of Islamic Thought.
   Google Scholar
• International Institute of Islamic Thought. [1982] 1995. Islamization of Knowledge. Herndon, VI: International Institute of Islamic Thought.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, Kevin. 2012. “René Descartes.” Catholic Encyclopaedia. http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/04744b.htm. Accessed 22 October 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, Thomas S. [1962] 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 2nd ed. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lindberg, David. 1976. Theories of Vision from Al-Kindi to Kepler. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Losee, John. 2001. A Historical Introduction to the Philosophy of Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, David. 1994. Critical Rationalism: A Restatement and Defence. LaSalle, IL: Open Court.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, David. 2006. Out of Error: Further Essays on Critical Rationalism. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, William R., and Carl E. Thoresen. 2003. “Spirituality, Religion, and Health: An Emerging Research Field.” American Psychologist 58: 24–35. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.58.1.24
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, Michael. 1989. “The Interpretive Turn in Modern Theory: A Turn for the Worse?” Stanford Law Review 41: 871–957. doi: 10.2307/1228741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nanda, Meera. 2004. Prophets Facing Backward: Postmodern Critiques of Science and Hindu Nationalism in India. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nanda, Meera. 2005. The Wrongs of the Religious Right: Reflections on Secularism, Science and Hindutva. New Delhi: Three Essays Collectives.
   Google Scholar
• Nasr, Seyyed Hossein. 1989. Knowledge and the Sacred. New York: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nasr, Syyed Vali Reza. 1991. “Islamization of Knowledge: A Critical Overview.” Islamic Studies 30: 387–400.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, Richard E. 1969. Hermeneutics: Interpretation Theory in Schleiermacher, Dilthey, Heidegger, and Gadamer. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Palmquist, Stephen. 1992. “Does Kant Reduce Religion to Morality?” Kant-Studien 83: 129–148. doi: 10.1515/kant.1992.83.2.129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Passmore, John. 1967. “Logical Positivism.” In The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Paul Edwards, vol. 5, 52–57. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Paya, Ali. 2007. “The Future of Human Sciences in Iran.” Hawzeh va Daneshgah 12: 24–29.
   Google Scholar
• Paya, Ali. 2011. “The Misguided Conception of Objectivity in Humanities and Social Sciences.” In The Crisis of the Human Sciences: False Objectivity and the Decline of Creativity, edited by Thorsten Botz-Bornstein, 151–184. Kuwait City: Gulf University for Science & Technology Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Paya, Ali. 2012. “How Indigenous Are ‘Indigenous Sciences’? The Case of ‘Islamic Sciences’.” In Asia, Europe, and the Emergence of Modern Science: Knowledge Crossing Boundaries, edited by Arun Bala, 147–166. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Paya, Ali. 2013a. “Religious Technology: Approaches and Challenges.” Journal of Methodology of Social Sciences and Humanities 18: 46–52.
   Google Scholar
• Paya, Ali. 2013b. “Muslims and Modernity: After Two and a Half Centuries What Have We Learnt? A Meta-study of the Main Lessons of an Eventful Encounter.” Islam and Civilisational Studies 4: 548–561. doi: 10.12816/0009779
   Google Scholar
• Paya, Ali. 2015a. “The Transdisciplinary Approach: A Critical Appraisal from an ‘Islamic Perspective’.” American Journal of Islamic Social Sciences 32: 23–48.
   Google Scholar
• Paya, Ali. 2015b. “What and How Can We Learn from the Quran? A Critical Rationalist Perspective.” Islamic Studies 53 (3).
   Google Scholar
• Paya, Ali. 2016. “Faqih as Engineer: A Critical Assessment of the Epistemological Status of Fiqh.” American Journal of Islamic Social Sciences 33: 25–51.
   Google Scholar
• Paya, Ali. Forthcoming-a. “A Popperian (Critical Rationalist) Approach to Religion.” In Karl Popper and the Problem of Change, edited by Halil Rahman Acar. Ankara: Research Institute for Philosophical Foundations of Disciplines.
   Google Scholar
• Paya, Ali. Forthcoming-b. “Religious Intellectualism, Critical Rationalism, and Kant’s Project.”
   Google Scholar
• Paya, Ali. Forthcoming-c. “How to Promote ‘Modern Critical Thinking’ in the Context of Islamic Studies in Virtual Environment?” In E-learning and Islamic Studies, edited by Mohammad Rezaee. London: ICAS Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Paya, Ali, and John Esposito. 2012. Iraq, Democracy, and the Future of Islam. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Perkins, James Handasyd. 1840. Christian Civilization: An Address Delivered Before the Athenian Society of the University of Ohio. Cincinnati, OH: A. Pugh.
   Google Scholar
• Popper, Karl R. [1944] 2013. The Poverty of Historicism. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Popper, Karl R. [1945] 2013. The Open Society and Its Enemies. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Popper, Karl R. [1959] 2014. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Popper, Karl R. [1963] 2005. Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Popper, Karl R. [1972] 1979. Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Popper, Karl R. 1988. The Open Universe: An Argument for Indeterminism. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Popper, Karl R. 1994. The Myth of the Framework: In Defence of Science and Rationality. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Quine, Willard V. O. 1973. The Roots of Reference. LaSalle, IL: Open Court.
   Google Scholar
• Reckwitz, Andreas. 2002. “Toward a Theory of Social Practices: A Development in Culturalist Theorizing.” European Journal of Social Theory 5: 243–263. doi: 10.1177/13684310222225432
   Google Scholar
• Riyahi, Hossein, Farnoush Safavi-far, and Maziar Attari. 2004. “‘Elm-e Dini: Emkan va Chegounegi’ [Religious Science: Its Possibility and Nature].” Qabasat 76–77: 119–141.
   Google Scholar
• Saliba, George. 2007. Islamic Science and the Making of the European Renaissance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sardar, Ziauddin. 1989. Explorations in Islamic Science. London: Mansell.
   Google Scholar
• Sardar, Ziauddin. 2004. Desperately Seeking Paradise: Journey of a Sceptical Muslim. London: Granta.
   Google Scholar
• Schaffer, Simon. 2004. “Light Fantastic, Episode 1: Let There Be Light.” Documentary Series, BBC Four, December.
   Google Scholar
• Searle, John R. 1995. The Social Construction of Reality. London: Allen Lane.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, Simon. 1997. Fermat’s Last Theorem. London: Fourth Estate.
   Google Scholar
• Sinha, D. 1963. “Phenomenology and Positivism.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 23: 562–577. doi: 10.2307/2104519
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snively, Gloria, and John Corsiglia. 2001. “Discovering Indigenous Science: Implications for Science Education.” Science Education 85: 6–34. doi: 10.1002/1098-237X(200101)85:1<6::AID-SCE3>3.0.CO;2-R
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stebbing, L. Susan. 1937. Philosophy and the Physicists. London: Methuen.
   Google Scholar
• Stenberg, Leif. 1996. The Islamization of Science: Four Muslim Positions Developing an Islamic Modernity. New York: Coronet Books.
   Google Scholar
• Suppe, Frederick. 1977. The Structure of Scientific Theories. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swingewood, Alan. 1984. A Short History of Sociological Thought. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Trigg, Roger. 1980. Reality at Risk: A Defence of Realism in Philosophy and Science. Brighton: Harvester.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, Jonathan H. 1985. “In Defense of Positivism.” Sociological Theory 3: 24–30. doi: 10.2307/202222
   Google Scholar
• Vision, Gerald. 1989. Modern Anti-realism and Manufactured Truth. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vision, Gerald. 2004. Veritas: The Correspondence Theory and Its Critics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Watkins, J. W. N. 1958. “Confirmable and Influential Metaphysics.” Mind 67: 344–365. doi: 10.1093/mind/LXVII.267.344
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weaver, Andrew J., Kenneth I. Pargament, Kevin J. Flannelly, and Julia E. Oppenheimer. 2006. “Trends in the Scientific Study of Religion, Spirituality, and Health: 1965–2000.” Journal of Religion and Health 45: 208–214. doi: 10.1007/s10943-006-9011-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb, George E. 1994. The Evolution Controversy in America. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.
   Google Scholar
• Wittgenstein, Ludwig. [1953] 2009. Philosophical Investigations. London: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Zobel, Gibby. 2013. “Alfredo Moser: Bottle Light Inventor Proud to be Poor.” BBC World Service. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-23536914. Accessed 10 October 2014.
   Google Scholar